Next Article in Journal
Scaling the Potential of Compact City Development: The Case of Lahore, Pakistan
Next Article in Special Issue
Environmental and Stress Analysis of Wild Plant Habitat in River Nile Region of Dakahlia Governorate on Basis of Geospatial Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling the Influence of Online Social Media Information on Post-Disaster Mobility Decisions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Fourteen Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes by Observing Gas Exchange Parameters, Relative Water and Chlorophyll Content, and Yield Attributes under Drought Stress
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/su13095255
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Removal Mechanisms of Slag against Potentially Toxic Elements in Soil and Plants for Sustainable Agriculture Development: A Critical Review

by
Sajid Mehmood
1,†,
Xiukang Wang
2,*,
Waqas Ahmed
3,4,†,
Muhammad Imtiaz
5,
Allah Ditta
6,
Muhammad Rizwan
7,
Sana Irshad
8,
Saqib Bashir
9,
Qudsia Saeed
10,
Adnan Mustafa
11 and
Weidong Li
1,*
1
College of Ecology and Environment, Hainan University, Haikou 570100, China
2
College of Life Sciences, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China
3
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Radionuclides Pollution Control and Resources, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
4
School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
5
Soil and Environmental Biotechnology Division, National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
6
Department of Environmental Sciences, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University Sheringal, Dir (U), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 18000, Pakistan
7
Institute of Soil Science, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46600, Pakistan
8
School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430070, China
9
Department of Soil and Environmental Science, Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan 32200, Pakistan
10
College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling 712100, China
11
National Engineering Laboratory for Improving Quality of Arable Land, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Sustainability 2021, 13(9), 5255; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095255
Submission received: 21 March 2021 / Revised: 30 April 2021 / Accepted: 5 May 2021 / Published: 8 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Biotic and Abiotic Stress Tolerance: Physiological and Molecular Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Production)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Potentially toxic element (PTE) pollution is a major abiotic stress, which reduces plant growth and affects food quality by entering the food chain, and ultimately poses hazards to human health. Currently, the use of slag in PTE-contaminated soils has been reported to reduce PTEs and toxicity in plants. This review highlights the role of slag used as a fertilizer for better crop production and sustainable agricultural development. The application of slag increased the growth, yield, and quality of crops under PTE toxicity. The mechanisms followed by slag are the immobilization of PTEs in the soil, enhancement of soil pH, changes in the redox state of PTEs, and positive changes in soil physicochemical and biological properties under PTE toxicity. Nevertheless, these processes are influenced by the plant species, growth conditions, imposition length of stress, and type of slag used. The current review provides an insight into improving plant tolerance to PTE toxicity by slag-based fertilizer application and highlights the theoretical basis for applying slag in PTE-contaminated environments worldwide.

1. Introduction

With the rapid increase in the world population, similarly to other industries, steel industries are also more concerned about the safe and eco-friendly recycling of their by-products. In the past, steel industries were designed to produce iron and steel of a specific quality and quantity [1]. With the rapid growth of industrialization in recent decades, the increased volume of byproducts (slag) produced from iron/steel production has drawn attention to the need for its more effective recycling. [1]. Slags are widely used worldwide as a substitute for limestone and offer a cost-effective advantage to farmers. The main aim for researchers and environmentalists is to stop the entry of metals and metalloids into the food chain for better human health [2,3], and in this respect, the use of slags in various fields can help cope with this problem [2]. Potentially toxic element (PTE) contamination of soil refers to the excessive deposition of PTEs due to human activities [3,4,5,6]. In soil medium, the highest concentrations of PTE plant toxicity are represented by cadmium [7], lead [7], zinc [8], copper [9], nickel [10], vanadium [11], and arsenic [12], etc.
In the current scenario, the need for food is increased, and the use of fertilizers has been increased by humans, resulting in the deterioration of the environment [13,14,15]. Highly mobile PTEs can easily enrich the food chain and are highly hazardous to the environment. The remediation of soil becomes very difficult once it becomes polluted with PTEs. Soil cleanup is more complicated than air and water cleanup, according to previous reports [16], because PTEs in the soil form complexes and bonds with clay particles, and it becomes more challenging to break those bonds [17]. However, soil contamination in developed countries is considered a severe issue and more attention is paid to its remediation and public health. A wide range of compounds (TiO2, Fe3O3, FeO, Fe3O4, BaO, MgO, CaO, Al2O3, MnO and SiO2) and minerals are found on/in the layers of slags produced in various industrial operations [18,19]. In 2014, it was observed that each ton of steel produced by the steel industry generates 500 kg of steel slag [20]. China utilizes only 25% of steel slag out of 100 million tons produced, the production of steel slag accounting for 24% of the total solid waste produced in China [21,22]. Steel slag contains a variety of trace elements on its surface, which makes it an excellent fertilizer for better plant growth. Bearing in mind the importance of these benefits, Japan and Europe use steel slag as a soil amendment agent. Slag is used as a fertilizer and ground shifting agent in Japan and Europe because trace metal elements, such as Cr and V, are not readily released in slag. [23,24]. Slag fertilizers include slag–silicate fertilizers, slag–phosphate fertilizers, and unique iron matter fertilizers [4]. The presence of Ca2+ on the surface of steel slag produces stable PTE ions, with the aim to eliminate PTE ions from the contaminated medium.
Moreover, Wen et al. [25] concluded that applying steel slag to PTE acidic mining soils effectively raises the soil’s pH, increases soil microbial abundance, and immobilizes PTE ions, providing a desirable plant survival climate. Recently, a variety of studies have reported that there is a great commitment from slag-based fertilizer modification in agriculture to increase crop productivity [26,27], minimize soil acidification [28], and alleviate greenhouse gas (GHG). Slag fertilization’s beneficial results focus primarily on the shifts in microbial environments and microbial behaviors. In particular, soil microorganisms play a key role in almost all ecological processes at a system level and provide ecosystem services necessary for preserving soil quality and productivity [29]. Das et al. [1] reported that slag utilization in the PTE-contaminated soil improves crop production by affecting soil pH and greenhouse gas emissions. The fundamental processes of slag–microbial interactions and the importance of soil biota to ecosystem functionality are gradually deceptive. This review discussed the role of slag on PTEs used as a substitute for fertilizers for better crop growth in PTE-polluted soils.

2. Slags as Low-Cost Adsorbents: Applications and Performance

The adsorption and reactivity processes of the slag surfaces with adsorbates are determined by the chemical composition; morphological phases; physical properties; and other properties, such as the number of adsorption sites and form of surface functional groups. For example, the dissolution of free lime in slag regulates the pH of the solution and the hydrolysis of the dissolved cations [30,31]. Furthermore, the processes of bonding with adsorbates in slags are dictated by the hydrolysis products of different chemical phases [32]. The type of slag and its particle size distribution impact potentially toxic elements’ (PTEs) adsorption efficiency. A porous slag system with a micropore size distribution produces a broad internal surface region, resulting in strong adsorption potential and adsorption performance [32,33,34,35]. The adsorption potential of slags is also affected by experimental conditions, such as agitation rate, temperature, and solid/liquid phase ratio, and solution conditions, such as solution pH, adsorbate types and concentration, ionic pressure, and competing adsorbates [33]. This segment offers a comprehensive overview of existing information regarding the adsorption of PTEs and other adsorbates by slags.

3. Slag as an Amendment

3.1. Effects on Potentially Toxic Elements in Plants

Plant growth and yield are high priorities for sustainable agricultural progress [36]. In recent decades, plant growth and human health are at high risk due to the contamination of soils with potentially toxic elements (PTEs). The toxicity caused by PTEs to the plants in PTE-polluted environments can be predicted by bioavailability [37]. Fractions of PTEs in the soil play a vital role in the uptake of PTEs by plants. The most stable form of PTE is the residual fraction, which forms crystals with soil minerals and becomes unavailable to plants [38]. While the acid-soluble fraction of PTEs induces toxicity due to its easy uptake by plants, with the addition of amendments, such as slag, it can be immobilized. Liu et al. [39] reported that the acid-soluble fraction of As could be immobilized with the addition of different kinds of slags.
Furthermore, Wang et al. [40] reported that the maturity of soil also promotes the sorption of PTEs with the increase in soil redox potential. With the addition of slag to the Cd-polluted site at two separate crop growth levels, the bioavailability of Cd was reduced. [35], while reducible and oxidizable fractions of PTEs in the soil are unstable and can be changed with the change in soil conditions [41,42]. The addition of slags to Cd- and As-contaminated soil increased the oxidizable fractions and decreased the reducible fractions of both the metals by increasing soil pH [43]; this may refer to the adsorption of PTEs with Fe/Mn oxides in soil (Figure 1). It was noted by Liu et al. [35] that the addition of slag to a rice crop in contaminated soil decreased its concentration by 40% in roots and 38% in shoots. The use of slag as a fertilizer increases phosphorus [44], calcium, and magnesium [45] availability to the plants. Calcium and magnesium form inorganic ionic pairs with minerals present on the slag surface used as a fertilizer [46,47,48]. It was concluded by Fan et al. [49] that the use of slag as a fertilizer has the ability to decrease Cr, Cu, Pb, and Zn in acidic soils and indicated that slag could be used in PTE pollution control for plants and the environment. Fan et al. [49] further concluded that slag fertilization is risk-free for surrounding soils and plants. However, the use of slag as a fertilizer at the field level necessitates more empirical results to be obtained and the more in-depth prediction of the role of this fertilizer against other chemical fertilizers used for the remediation of PTEs from PTE-polluted sites.

3.2. Effects on Crop Yield

In China, food safety has gained great public concern with the frequently published reports on environmental contamination effects on crop quality [50,51]. According to the Chinese ministry of health, the rice samples from various markets across the country exceed the permissible limit of Cd in rice [52,53]. According to Du et al. [54], approximately 60% of the rice samples collected from Hunan province were found to be unfit according to the permissible Cd limit. The use of slag fertilization is gaining a large amount interest and demand around the globe. Silicate-based slags are commonly used in rice cropping systems [55], as Si is considered essential for plants [1]. The intensive rice cultivation in many countries, such as China, to meet food demand is depleting Si from the soil, which causes a reduction in the yield of crops and affects soil health [56]. This makes applying silicate fertilizers to rice crops necessary to achieve better yields [1]. Many studies have reported an increase in rice yield using silicate-based slag as a fertilizer in lowlands fields. However, the increase in the yields of grains is directly proportional to the types of slag, their application percentage, the type of soil, and agronomic management [1]. The potential effect of slag on crop yield is presented in Table 1.
According to Ali et al. [58], the application of silicate-based fertilizers in submerged paddies could increase 47.3% of the crop yield. However, Luyckx et al. [62] further reported that Si from the applied silicate fertilizers in the soil preferentially deposits in the epidermal cell wall of the plant to increase its strength, help to sustain various other stresses, and increase plant biomass. Similarly, lime-based slag fertilizers are used in acidic soil to change the acidic nature of soils which benefits plants in terms of mineral availability and provides protection to plants against pathogens. Phosphate-based slag fertilization improves initial plant growth and yield by increasing the level of phosphorous in the soil. Moreover, slag is loaded with Ca on its surface, which provides strength to plant roots and improves the K uptake, which is essential for the growth of plants [53]. Calcium silicate-based slag decreases the pH of the soil and has also been found to increase the bioavailbilty of P, Si, and Ca present in soil [63]. The slag produced from the blast furnace was used in rice plants and was found to increase growth, biomass, and yield by improving the soil fertility status [64]. A mixture of converter slag and fungicide does not reduce the density of Plasmodiophora brassicae in soil but rather eliminates clubroot fungus [65]. The use of Linz–Donawitz (LD) slag in acidic pastured soils raises soil pH; increases Ca and Mg soil exchangeability; decreases equivalents Al, Mn, Cu, and Zn in soils; and results in significant crop yield and nutrient optimal concentrations in plants [66]. Brazilian sugarcane fields with both calcite and basic slags have a positive residual impact on soil acidity adjustment, increased base saturation, and the sugarcane yield of ratoon [67]. The increase in crop yield with the fertilization of slag in soil is largely regulated by the microbial decomposition of organic matter and nutrient mobilization [1]. Das et al. [1] further reported that the fertilization of slag not only increases soil nutrients, but also enriches soil microorganisms that have a beneficial role in nutrient mobilization. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the role of soil microbes that influence different plant physiologies under slag amendments for better agricultural productivity under slag application. The potential effect of slag on plant growth is presented in Figure 2.

3.3. Effects on Potentially Toxic Elements in Soils

The PTEs in agricultural soils are constantly increasing with fertilizers and pest control agents, coal combustion of materials rich in PTEs, irrigation of soil with sewage water, and mining [68]. Among these, the irrigation of soils with sewage water proved to be the most destructive in terms of PTE concentration increment. The potential toxicity of elements in the soil is mainly caused by sewage irrigation [68]. According to 55 surveyed sites in China by the First National Survey of Soil Pollution (FNSSP) in 2005–2013, about 39 were irrigated by sewage water [69]. Titanium (Ti) contamination in arable soils of Guangdong province resulted from long-term wastewater irrigation [70]. The toxicity of metals/metalloids can be reduced by changing soil properties with slag amendment through adsorption, precipitation, cation/anion exchange, and by changing soil pH. This method helps reduce bioavailable PTEs, such as As, Cu, Pb, Cd, and Zn [18]. Masud et al. [71] also reported that the inclusion of slag in the soil could improve its properties, such as pH, electrical conductivity (EC), cation exchange capacity (CEC), exchangeable Ca, Mg, and metal availability to the plant, and as a result, proved helpful in increasing the crop yield. There are several examples: Fe oxyhydroxide sorption and the formation of amorphous Fe (III) arsenates can stabilize Fe; Cr can be stabilized by reducing the more mobile toxic Cr (VI) (III); Cu carbonate and oxyhydroxide precipitation, ion exchange, and the formation of the ternary cation-anion complex on the surface of Fe and Al oxyhydroxides can all stabilize Cu; and phosphorus changes to Pb and Zn may also stabilize Cr (III) [52]. Soil amendment with slag as a fertilizer significantly alters soil solution composition by either precipitation or sorption reactions. Ning et al. [28] concluded that slag fertilization to metal-polluted soil stabilizes the chemical and mineralogical properties of PTEs.
Additionally, slag fertilization in soil increases Si supply which plays a crucial role against the alleviation of As uptake by crops [51]. The application of passivators (Thomas basic slag (TBS), hydrous manganese oxide (HMO), and iron ores) to Cd-, Pb-, and Zn-contaminated soil showed a smaller improvement of plant biomass but significantly decreases the toxicity levels of these PTEs in plants [58]. These agents minimize the consumption of Cd by plants efficiently. HMO and iron ores help to minimize shoot Pb or Zn levels in ryegrass, while TBS decreases shoot Pb concentration. The Ca and C content in TBS improves crop yields and the physicochemical properties of the soil by increasing the precipitation and sorption of PTEs [1].

3.4. Effects on Soil Properties Subjected to Immobilization of Potentially Toxic Elements

Soil contamination by PTEs has become a global concern and needs urgent solving for better crop production. A wide range of approaches has been employed for the improvement of soil quality and crop yield. According to Gao et al. [72], the wastewater generated from the burning of fossils, sewage, application of pesticides, etc., is the main source of the river, groundwater, and soil pollution. The application of slag as an amendment in co-contaminated soil changes the forms of PTE and properties of soils significantly. According to Qin et al. [60], these changes are attributed to an increase in soil pH due to the loading of slag surface NaOH, CaCO3, Ca, and Mg oxides. It was also confirmed by Liu et al. [35] that slag application in the soils causes an increase in soil pH. Slags with higher components of Ca and Mg oxides (carbide slags) are the best choice for their application in acidic contaminated soils as they increase soil pH and change forms of various PTEs. Additionally, a slag with a higher amount of Ca, Mg, and Si on its surface precipitate PTEs present in the PTE-polluted soils [73,74,75]. Acidic soil promotes the adsorption of As anions, while high-pH soils caused desorption in As anions by decreasing positive charges [76,77]. Tang [78] concluded that the bioavailability of As could be significantly affected by increasing soil pH. A two-year field study found that the application of slag from the steel industry as an amendment causes significant changes in soil physicochemical properties, such as enhancement in soil pH, soil organic carbon contents, stabilize soil carbon, and soil salinity, and alters the communities of bacteria present in the soil [35]. Hence, waste materials, such as slag, can be used as an amendment to the polluted agricultural soils to improve soil fertility, crop growth, and fruiting. However, the mechanism of slag interaction with microbes in soil and their effect on carbon cycling is still limited and needs to be addressed.

3.5. Effects on Soil Organic Carbon Contents

Soil organic matter plays an important role in the remediation of PTEs from polluted environments, provides essential nutrients to plants, and improves plant growth and fruiting. The long-term application of slag to the soil increases soil organic carbon contents due to lower carbon mineralization rates [79]. Additionally, slag contains ferric oxide on its surface, which could also increase soil carbon storage [80,81]. Downward movement of the slag causes a higher increment in soil organic contents in the deeper horizon as compared to topsoil [82,83]. Slag fertilization may decrease the labile C availability for microorganisms as slag shows very poor performance in organic minerals [84,85]. Wang et al. [79] found a negative correlation between soil pH and soil microbial biomass carbon. Soil pH is considered crucial for microbial growth [86]. However, different bacteria respond differently to soil pH changes [87]. According to Wang et al. [79], certain acidophilic microorganisms’ activity was suppressed with increased soil pH due to slag application.

4. Mechanism of Slag Interaction with Potentially Toxic Elements in Soil

Bearing in mind the application benefits of slag-based fertilizers for better crop production in potentially toxic element (PTE)-contaminated soils, it is important to know the different mechanisms slag follows to bind toxic ions at the soil and plant levels (Figure 3). Many studies have mentioned the mechanisms of detoxification of PTEs in plants by slag. However, a better understanding of the mechanism of PTE detoxification in plants from contaminated soils is vital for the practical application of slag. At the soil level, the application of slag may cause the immobilization of PTE, changes in the soil pH, and changes in PTE fractions, and causes an improvement in the soil physicochemical and biological properties of soils. While at the plant level, the application of slag-based fertilizers causes an increase in the antioxidant defense system and causes a reduction in the translocation of PTEs to plant shoots.
However, the mechanisms for PTE ion remediation by slag are similar to many other applied amendments in previous studies, such as lime [88], biochar [89,90,91,92], zeolite [93], chitosan [94], the indigenous strain Bacillus XZM [95], hydrogen sulfide [96], and sepiolite [97]. The basic PTE ion immobilization on the slag surface was attributed to the presence of silicate, ferrites, and calcium oxides on the surface [98]. Silicate ferrite present on the slag surface releases SiO44− and Fe2O3, and OH− interacts with PTE ions to make them immobile [98]. The presence of hydrogen oxides on the surface of slag has the ability to diffuse into the slag surface [98] due to small masses [99] and then can immobilize PTEs on the slag surface [100]. Moreover, PTEs exchange with the silicate and ferrite present on the slag surface and can be immobilized within the slag matrix [101]. The PTE ions present in the soil solution gradually enter the slag due to the absorption gradient.
Additionally, various metals form complexes with soil organic matter and become immobilized due to increased organic matter after slag addition to the soils. The increase in soil pH might result in the instability of PTE ion concentration in soil solutions. The unstable PTEs in the soil solutions exchange with Ca2+ in order to be immobilized within the silicate and ferrite fractions [100], while some PTE ions make bonds in soil organic matters. Moreover, various cations and anions are present on the slag surface, which increases the ionic strength and may affect PTE species. However, there are still unresolved areas for further studies to analyze the effects of ionic strength on the immobilization mechanism of PTEs under the slag-based fertilization of acidic polluting soils.

5. Concerns about the Fertilization of Slag for Sustainable Agriculture

The use of slag fertilizers to improve crop production and soil fertility in contaminated media is a beneficial product for sustainable agriculture [1]. These effects might be related to the change in soil microorganisms and nutrients with slag in the contaminated soil. However, the fertilization of potentially toxic element (PTE)-contaminated soils with slags is considered at risk of PTE accumulation and liming [3]. The accumulation of PTEs in the soil may cause deleterious effects on human health; however, according to Gwon et al. [28], the slags contain traces of PTEs, but their concentration might not cause environmental hazards. According to previous studies, the short-term application of slag as a fertilizer proved beneficial for plants in contaminated soils [29]. However, the long-term application of slag significantly increased the levels of Cr and V in the soil-cultivated layer.
In contrast, Hiltunen [102] investigated the long-term effect of slag in Germany and concluded that the slag amendment did not enhance the levels of Cr in soil and uptake by plants. Therefore, there is a great need to perform research on the long-term application of slag to analyze its effect on agriculture under different contaminated soils and agronomic management practices. The excessive fertilization of contaminated soils with slag may increase alkalinity in the soil, which results in a reduction in the uptake of essential macro- and micronutrients by plants and causes a reduction in crop yield [103]. The application of slag as a fertilizer may reduce plant growth because N, P, and K on the slag surface are very low. Therefore, slag and chemical fertilizers with high N, P, and K levels should be considered for better crop production [1,104,105].

6. Conclusions and Future Directions

Potentially toxic elements (PTEs) significantly decrease crop yields and cause a huge loss to the productivity of agriculture, with a severe threat to humans and animals by entering the food chain via these crops. In recent decades, it has been reviewed that the application of slag fertilizers could be helpful in the significant removal of PTE ions from plants and soils. The application of slag to PTE-polluted soils decreased PTE uptake by plants and significantly improved plant growth and yield. The mechanisms of PTE removal by slag include: (a) the immobilization of PTEs by sorption and increase in soil pH; (b) changing the fraction of PTEs in the soil; (c) changing soil physicochemical and biological properties; (d) the alteration of plant antioxidant enzymes. However, these mechanisms can be different for different plants, genotypes of plants, plant growth conditions, imposition time of stress, and types of slag fertilizers used. Therefore, slag as a fertilizer can be used as a soil remediator for better crop growth. The purpose of this review was to highlight the importance of slag as a fertilizer to be used against PTE-contaminated sites for sustainable agricultural development and for the reduction in PTEs in plants to stop their entrance into the food chain. However, more work is required on the mechanism of slag interaction with PTEs in plants. Freshly obtained slag has been applied recently in many studies; however, the application of slag in the soil might undergo many biochemical interactions, and its effect on the soil with age might vary. There is still a need to analyze the effect of aged slag on PTE bioavailability to better understand this phenomenon. Some of the studies mentioned above pointed out the adsorption of PTEs on the slag surface and also retained nutrients. This showed that certain slag applications as fertilizers in PTE-contaminated soil might cause a reduction in plant growth and production due to the lower availability of nutrients. The effect of slag fertilization on PTE-contaminated soils concerning nutrient availability for plants must be evaluated in the future. The abovementioned research explained that the fertilization of PTE-contaminated soils with slag showed a modification in plant growth, but there is still a research gap on whether the aged slag could have the same effect as fresh slag.
Furthermore, the effect of aged slag fertilization on the adsorption and immobilization of PTEs in soil and the bioavailability of PTEs in contaminated soil is also unclear. Finally, it is recommended to conduct lab trials of aged slag fertilization before its long-term application for sustainable agriculture. In conclusion, field trials of aged slag are required to establish a strong role of slag in the remediation of PTEs from contaminated environments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M. and W.L.; methodology, W.A. and S.M.; validation, X.W., M.I., M.R. and Q.S.; formal analysis, S.M. and S.I.; investigation, W.L., S.M. and A.M.; data curation, A.D. and S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, W.A. and S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC-31860728) economically supported this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Das, S.; Kim, G.W.; Hwang, H.Y.; Verma, P.P.; Kim, P.J. Cropping With Slag to Address Soil, Environment, and Food Security. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kimio, I. Steelmaking Slag for Fertilizer Usage. Nippon. STEEL SUMITOMO Met. Tech. Rep. 2015, 109, 130–136. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brevik, E.C.; Burgess, L.C. Soils and Human Health. In Soils and Human Health; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; pp. 1–403. ISBN 9781439844557. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chowdhury, S.; Mazumder, M.J.; Al-Attas, O.; Husain, T. Heavy metals in drinking water: Occurrences, implications, and future needs in developing countries. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 569–570, 476–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dixit, R.; Wasiullah; Malaviya, D.; Pandiyan, K.; Singh, U.B.; Sahu, A.; Shukla, R.; Singh, B.P.; Rai, J.P.; Sharma, P.K.; et al. Bioremediation of heavy metals from soil and aquatic environment: An overview of principles and criteria of fundamental processes. Sustainability 2015, 7, 2189–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Rascio, N.; Navari-Izzo, F. Heavy metal hyperaccumulating plants: How and why do they do it? And what makes them so interesting? Plant Sci. 2011, 180, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mehmood, S.; Rizwan, M.; Bashir, S.; Ditta, A.; Aziz, O.; Yong, L.Z.; Dai, Z.; Akmal, M.; Ahmed, W.; Adeel, M.; et al. Comparative Effects of Biochar, Slag and Ferrous–Mn Ore on Lead and Cadmium Immobilization in Soil. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2017, 100, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hafeez, B.; Khanif, Y.M.; Saleem, M. Role of Zinc in Plant Nutrition—A Review. Am. J. Exp. Agric. 2013, 3, 374–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bashir, S.; Zhu, J.; Fu, Q.; Hu, H. Comparing the adsorption mechanism of Cd by rice straw pristine and KOH-modified biochar. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 11875–11883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tariq, W.; Saifullah, M.; Anjum, T.; Javed, M.; Tayyab, N.; Shoukat, I. Removal of Heavy Metals from Chemical Industrial Wastewater Using Agro Based Bio-Sorbents. Acta Chem. Malays. 2018, 2, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Imtiaz, M.; Ashraf, M.; Rizwan, M.S.; Nawaz, M.A.; Mehmood, S.; Yousaf, B.; Yuan, Y.; Ditta, A.; Mumtaz, M.A.; Ali, M.; et al. Vanadium toxicity in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grown in red soil: Effects on cell death, ROS and antioxidative systems. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 158, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hettick, B.E.; Cañas-Carrell, J.E.; French, A.D.; Klein, D.M. Arsenic: A Review of the Element’s Toxicity, Plant Interactions, and Potential Methods of Remediation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 7097–7107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Isherwood, K.F. Mineral Fertilizer Use; IFA: Paris, France, 2000; ISBN 2950629938. [Google Scholar]
  14. Smith, L.; Siciliano, G. A comprehensive review of constraints to improved management of fertilizers in China and mitigation of diffuse water pollution from agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2015, 209, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Weithmann, N.; Möller, J.N.; Löder, M.G.J.; Piehl, S.; Laforsch, C.; Freitag, R. Organic fertilizer as a vehicle for the entry of microplastic into the environment. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaap8060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mosa, K.A.; Saadoun, I.; Kumar, K.; Helmy, M.; Dhankher, O.P. Potential Biotechnological Strategies for the Cleanup of Heavy Metals and Metalloids. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zhao, X.; Liu, W.; Cai, Z.; Han, B.; Qian, T.; Zhao, D. An overview of preparation and applications of stabilized zero-valent iron nanoparticles for soil and groundwater remediation. Water Res. 2016, 100, 245–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Lim, J.; Chew, L.; Choong, T.S.; Tezara, C.; Yazdi, M. Overview of Steel Slag Application and Utilization. MATEC Web Conf. 2016, 74, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, C.; Shih, K.; Sun, C.; Wang, F. Oxidative degradation of propachlor by ferrous and copper ion activated persulfate. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 416, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hocheng, H.; Su, C.; Jadhav, U.U. Bioleaching of metals from steel slag by Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans culture supernatant. Chemosphere 2014, 117, 652–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Pang, B.; Zhou, Z.; Xu, H. Utilization of carbonated and granulated steel slag aggregate in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 84, 454–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yüksel, I. A review of steel slag usage in construction industry for sustainable development. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2016, 19, 369–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fujisawa, N.; Fukushima, M.; Yamamoto, M.; Iwai, H.; Komai, T.; Kawabe, Y.; Liu, D. Structural alterations of humic acid fractions in a steel slag-compost fertilizer during fertilization. Analysis by pyrolysis/methylation-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2012, 95, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gómez-Nubla, L.; Aramendia, J.; De Vallejuelo, S.F.-O.; Carrero, J.A.; Madariaga, J.M. Focused ultrasound energy over steel slags as a fast tool to assess their environmental risk before and after their reuse in agriculture and civil constructions. Microchem. J. 2017, 132, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wen, T.; Yang, L.; Dang, C.; Miki, T.; Bai, H.; Nagasaka, T. Effect of basic oxygen furnace slag on succession of the bacterial community and immobilization of various metal ions in acidic contaminated mine soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 388, 121784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gwon, H.S.; Khan, M.I.; Alam, M.A.; Das, S.; Kim, P.J. Environmental risk assessment of steel-making slags and the potential use of LD slag in mitigating methane emissions and the grain arsenic level in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 353, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. White, B.; Tubana, B.S.; Babu, T.; Mascagni, H.; Agostinho, F.; Datnoff, L.E.; Harrison, S. Effect of Silicate Slag Application on Wheat Grown Under Two Nitrogen Rates. Plants 2017, 6, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ning, D.; Liang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xiao, J.; Duan, A. Impacts of Steel-Slag-Based Silicate Fertilizer on Soil Acidity and Silicon Availability and Metals-Immobilization in a Paddy Soil. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Das, S.; Jeong, S.T.; Das, S.; Kim, P.J. Composted Cattle Manure Increases Microbial Activity and Soil Fertility More Than Composted Swine Manure in a Submerged Rice Paddy. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Piatak, N.M.; Seal, R.R., II; Hoppe, D.A.; Green, C.J.; Buszka, P.M. Geochemical Characterization of Iron and Steel Slag and Its Potential to Remove Phosphate and Neutralize Acid. Minerals 2019, 9, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bodurtha, P.; Brassard, P. Neutralization of Acid by Steel-Making Slags. Environ. Technol. 2000, 21, 1271–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dimitrova, S. Metal sorption on blast-furnace slag. Water Res. 1996, 30, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ahmaruzzaman, M. Industrial wastes as low-cost potential adsorbents for the treatment of wastewater laden with heavy metals. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 166, 36–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dimitrova, S.; Mehandgiev, D. Lead removal from aqueous solutions by granulated blast-furnace slag. Water Res. 1998, 32, 3289–3292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shafaghat, J.; Ghaemi, A. Comparison of Pb(II) Adsorption by Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace and Phosphorus Slags; Exploitation of RSM. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A Sci. 2021, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rai, P.K.; Lee, S.S.; Zhang, M.; Tsang, Y.F.; Kim, K.H. Heavy metals in food crops: Health risks, fate, mechanisms, and management. Environ. Int. 2019, 125, 365–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wu, C.; Dun, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, M.; Wu, G. Foliar application of selenium and zinc to alleviate wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cadmium toxicity and uptake from cadmium-contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 190, 110091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, D.; Gao, B.; Gao, L.; Zhou, H.; Zhao, X.; Yin, S. Characteristics of cadmium remobilization in tributary sediments in Three Gorges Reservoir using chemical sequential extraction and DGT technology. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 218, 1094–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Liu, G.; Meng, J.; Huang, Y.; Dai, Z.; Tang, C.; Xu, J. Effects of carbide slag, lodestone and biochar on the immobilization, plant uptake and translocation of As and Cd in a contaminated paddy soil. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 266, 115194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, X.; Peng, B.; Tan, C.; Ma, L.; Rathinasabapathi, B. Recent advances in arsenic bioavailability, transport, and speciation in rice. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 5742–5750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bakircioglu, D.; Kurtulus, Y.B.; Ibar, H. Investigation of trace elements in agricultural soils by BCR sequential extraction method and its transfer to wheat plants. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 175, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Matong, J.M.; Nyaba, L.; Nomngongo, P.N. Fractionation of trace elements in agricultural soils using ultrasound assisted sequential extraction prior to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometric determination. Chemosphere 2016, 154, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Qi, Y.; Huang, B.; Darilek, J.L. Effect of Drying on Heavy Metal Fraction Distribution in Rice Paddy Soil. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e97327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Yang, J.; Wang, S.; Lu, Z.; Lou, S. Converter slag–coal cinder columns for the removal of phosphorous and other pollutants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 168, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Castro, G.; Crusciol, C. Effects of superficial liming and silicate application on soil fertility and crop yield under rotation. Geoderma 2013, 195–196, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Gonzalo, M.J.; Lucena, J.J.; Hernández-Apaolaza, L. Effect of silicon addition on soybean (Glycine max) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants grown under iron deficiency. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 70, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Richmond, K.E.; Sussman, M. Got silicon? The non-essential beneficial plant nutrient. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 268–272. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wu, J.-W.; Shi, Y.; Zhu, Y.-X.; Wang, Y.-C.; Gong, H.-J. Mechanisms of Enhanced Heavy Metal Tolerance in Plants by Silicon: A Review. Pedosphere 2013, 23, 815–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fan, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; Cheng, F. Evaluating heavy metal accumulation and potential risks in soil-plant systems applied with magnesium slag-based fertilizer. Chemosphere 2018, 197, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chandio, A.A.; Jiang, Y.; Rehman, A.; Rauf, A. Short and long-run impacts of climate change on agriculture: An empirical evidence from China. Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strat. Manag. 2020, 12, 201–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gale, H.F.; Hu, D. Food Safety Pressures Push Integration in China’s Agricultural Sector. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2012, 94, 483–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, P.; Chen, H.; Kopittke, P.M.; Zhao, F.-J. Cadmium contamination in agricultural soils of China and the impact on food safety. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 249, 1038–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yang, X.; Xia, L.; Li, J.; Dai, M.; Yang, G.; Song, S. Adsorption of As(III) on porous hematite synthesized from goethite concentrate. Chemosphere 2017, 169, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Du, Y.; Hu, X.-F.; Wu, X.-H.; Shu, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Yan, X.-J. Affects of mining activities on Cd pollution to the paddy soils and rice grain in Hunan province, Central South China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185, 9843–9856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Meharg, C.; Meharg, A.A. Silicon, the silver bullet for mitigating biotic and abiotic stress, and improving grain quality, in rice? Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 120, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Annunziata, T.; Coll, V. Possible Uses of Steelmaking Slag in Agriculture: An Overview. In Material Recycling—Trends and Perspectives; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  57. Ali, M.A.; Oh, J.H.; Kim, P.J. Evaluation of silicate iron slag amendment on reducing methane emission from flood water rice farming. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 128, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ali, M.A.; Lee, C.H.; Lee, Y.B.; Kim, P.J. Silicate fertilization in no-tillage rice farming for mitigation of methane emission and increasing rice productivity. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2009, 132, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lee, C.H.; Kim, S.Y.; Villamil, M.B.; Pramanik, P.; Hong, C.O.; Kim, P.J. Different response of silicate fertilizer having electron acceptors on methane emission in rice paddy soil under green manuring. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2012, 48, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, W.; Lai, D.Y.F.; Abid, A.A.; Neogi, S.; Xu, X.; Wang, C. Effects of Steel Slag and Biochar Incorporation on Active Soil Organic Carbon Pools in a Subtropical Paddy Field. Agronomy 2018, 8, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Wang, W.; Lai, D.; Wang, C.; Pan, T.; Zeng, C. Effects of rice straw incorporation on active soil organic carbon pools in a subtropical paddy field. Soil Tillage Res. 2015, 152, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Luyckx, M.; Hausman, J.-F.; Lutts, S.; Guerriero, G. Silicon and Plants: Current Knowledge and Technological Perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Crusciol, C.A.; Artigiani, A.C.; Arf, O.; Filho, A.C.C.; Soratto, R.P.; Nascente, A.S.; Alvarez, R.C. Soil fertility, plant nutrition, and grain yield of upland rice affected by surface application of lime, silicate, and phosphogypsum in a tropical no-till system. Catena 2016, 137, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Ning, D.; Liang, Y.; Song, A.; Duan, A.; Liu, Z. In situ stabilization of heavy metals in multiple-metal contaminated paddy soil using different steel slag-based silicon fertilizer. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 23638–23647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hwang, S.F.; Strelkov, S.E.; Gossen, B.D.; Turnbull, G.D.; Ahmed, H.U.; Manolii, V.P. Soil treatments and amendments for amelioration of clubroot of canola. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2011, 91, 999–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Moraes, J.; Tashima, M.; Akasaki, J.; Melges, J.; Monzó, J.; Borrachero, M.; Soriano, L.; Payá, J. Effect of sugar cane straw ash (SCSA) as solid precursor and the alkaline activator composition on alkali-activated binders based on blast furnace slag (BFS). Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 144, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Yip, C.K.; Lukey, G.C.; Provis, J.L.; Van Deventer, J.S. Effect of calcium silicate sources on geopolymerisation. Cem. Concr. Res. 2008, 38, 554–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Qin, G.; Niu, Z.; Yu, J.; Li, Z.; Ma, J.; Xiang, P. Soil heavy metal pollution and food safety in China: Effects, sources and removing technology. Chemosphere 2021, 267, 129205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, X.-N.; Guo, Q.-P.; Shen, X.-X.; Yu, S.-W.; Qiu, G.-Y. Water quality, agriculture and food safety in China: Current situation, trends, interdependencies, and management. J. Integr. Agric. 2015, 14, 2365–2379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jiang, J.; Xu, R.-K. Application of crop straw derived biochars to Cu(II) contaminated Ultisol: Evaluating role of alkali and organic functional groups in Cu(II) immobilization. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 133, 537–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Masud, M.; Li, J.-Y.; Xu, R.-K. Use of Alkaline Slag and Crop Residue Biochars to Promote Base Saturation and Reduce Acidity of an Acidic Ultisol. Pedosphere 2014, 24, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gao, R.; Fu, Q.; Hu, H.; Wang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, J. Highly-effective removal of Pb by co-pyrolysis biochar derived from rape straw and orthophosphate. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 371, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. He, H.; Tam, N.F.; Yao, A.; Qiu, R.; Li, W.C.; Ye, Z. Growth and Cd uptake by rice (Oryza sativa) in acidic and Cd-contaminated paddy soils amended with steel slag. Chemosphere 2017, 189, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Liu, H.; Yang, F.; Zheng, Y.; Kang, J.; Qu, J.; Chen, J.P. Improvement of metal adsorption onto chitosan/Sargassum sp. composite sorbent by an innovative ion-imprint technology. Water Res. 2011, 45, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yu, H.-Y.; Ding, X.; Li, F.; Wang, X.; Zhang, S.; Yi, J.; Liu, C.; Xu, X.; Wang, Q. The availabilities of arsenic and cadmium in rice paddy fields from a mining area: The role of soil extractable and plant silicon. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 215, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Maguffin, S.C.; Abu-Ali, L.; Tappero, R.V.; Pena, J.; Rohila, J.S.; McClung, A.M.; Reid, M.C. Influence of manganese abundances on iron and arsenic solubility in rice paddy soils. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2020, 276, 50–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yamaguchi, N.; Nakamura, T.; Dong, D.; Takahashi, Y.; Amachi, S.; Makino, T. Arsenic release from flooded paddy soils is influenced by speciation, Eh, pH, and iron dissolution. Chemosphere 2011, 83, 925–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tang, X.-Y.; Zhu, Y.-G.; Shan, X.-Q.; McLaren, R.; Duan, J. The ageing effect on the bioaccessibility and fractionation of arsenic in soils from China. Chemosphere 2007, 66, 1183–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Wang, M.; Lan, X.; Xu, X.; Fang, Y.; Singh, B.P.; Sardans, J.; Romero, E.; Peñuelas, J.; Wang, W. Steel slag and biochar amendments decreased CO2 emissions by altering soil chemical properties and bacterial community structure over two-year in a subtropical paddy field. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 740, 140403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ali, S.; Farooq, M.A.; Yasmeen, T.; Hussain, S.; Arif, M.S.; Abbas, F.; Bharwana, S.A.; Zhang, G. The influence of silicon on barley growth, photosynthesis and ultra-structure under chromium stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 89, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, W.Q.; Li, P.F.; Zeng, C.S.; Tong, C. Evaluation of Silicate Iron Slag as a Potential Methane Mitigating Method. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 468–471, 1626–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Major, J.; Lehmann, J.; Rondon, M.; Goodale, C. Fate of soil-applied black carbon: Downward migration, leaching and soil respiration. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2010, 16, 1366–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Singh, B.P.; Fang, Y.; Boersma, M.; Collins, D.; Van Zwieten, L.; Macdonald, L.M. In Situ Persistence and Migration of Biochar Carbon and Its Impact on Native Carbon Emission in Contrasting Soils under Managed Temperate Pastures. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Okuda, T.; Lin, F.; Nakai, S.; Nishijima, W.; Katayama, Y.; Okada, M. Effect of changes in the physicochemical properties of sand-alternatives on bacterial community structure in coastal sediments. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 88, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Song, X.; Li, L.; Zheng, J.; Pan, G.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, J.; Hussain, Q.; Han, X.; Yu, X. Sequestration of maize crop straw C in different soils: Role of oxyhydrates in chemical binding and stabilization as recalcitrance. Chemosphere 2012, 87, 649–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Marstorp, H.; Guan, X.; Gong, P. Relationship between dsDNA, chloroform labile C and ergosterol in soils of different organic matter contents and pH. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2000, 32, 879–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Chen, J.; Liu, X.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, B.; Lu, H.; Chi, Z.; Pan, G.; Li, L.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, X.; et al. Biochar soil amendment increased bacterial but decreased fungal gene abundance with shifts in community structure in a slightly acid rice paddy from Southwest China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2013, 71, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Singh, J.; Kalamdhad, A.S. Effect of carbide sludge (lime) on bioavailability and leachability of heavy metals during rotary drum composting of water hyacinth. Chem. Speciat. Bioavailab. 2014, 26, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Tang, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; Ren, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Luo, L.; Yang, Y.; Huang, H.; Chen, A. Physicochemical features, metal availability and enzyme activity in heavy metal-polluted soil remediated by biochar and compost. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 701, 134751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cheng, S.; Chen, T.; Xu, W.; Huang, J.; Jiang, S.; Yan, B. Application Research of Biochar for the Remediation of Soil Heavy Metals Contamination: A Review. Molecules 2020, 25, 3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Medyńska-Juraszek, A.; Ćwieląg-Piasecka, I. Effect of Biochar Application on Heavy Metal Mobility in Soils Impacted by Copper Smelting Processes. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2020, 29, 1749–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Tu, C.; Wei, J.; Guan, F.; Liu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Luo, Y. Biochar and bacteria inoculated biochar enhanced Cd and Cu immobilization and enzymatic activity in a polluted soil. Environ. Int. 2020, 137, 105576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Bashir, S.; Salam, A.; Rehman, M.; Khan, S.; Gulshan, A.B.; Iqbal, J.; Shaaban, M.; Mehmood, S.; Zahra, A.; Hu, H. Effective Role of Biochar, Zeolite and Steel Slag on Leaching Behavior of Cd and Its Fractionations in Soil Column Study. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2019, 102, 567–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Yuvaraja, G.; Pang, Y.; Chen, D.-Y.; Kong, L.-J.; Mehmood, S.; Subbaiah, M.V.; Rao, D.S.; Pavuluri, C.M.; Wen, J.-C.; Reddy, G.M. Modification of chitosan macromolecule and its mechanism for the removal of Pb(II) ions from aqueous environment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 136, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Irshad, S.; Xie, Z.; Wang, J.; Nawaz, A.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Mehmood, S. Faheem Indigenous strain Bacillus XZM assisted phytoremediation and detoxification of arsenic in Vallisneria denseserrulata. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 381, 120903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Rizwan, M.; Mostofa, M.G.; Ahmad, M.Z.; Zhou, Y.; Adeel, M.; Mehmood, S.; Javed, R.; Imtiaz, M.; Aziz, O.; Ikram, M.; et al. Hydrogen sulfide enhances rice tolerance to nickel through the prevention of chloroplast damage and the improvement of nitrogen metabolism under excessive nickel. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 138, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Bashir, S.; Ali, U.; Shaaban, M.; Gulshan, A.B.; Iqbal, J.; Khan, S.; Husain, A.; Ahmed, N.; Mehmood, S.; Kamran, M.; et al. Role of sepiolite for cadmium (Cd) polluted soil restoration and spinach growth in wastewater irrigated agricultural soil. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 258, 110020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yang, L.; Wei, T.; Li, S.; Lv, Y.; Miki, T.; Yang, L.; Nagasaka, T. Immobilization persistence of Cu, Cr, Pb, Zn ions by the addition of steel slag in acidic contaminated mine soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 412, 125176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lü, R.; Xi, Q.; Li, T.; Li, R.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Fan, C.; Feng, J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Z.; et al. Adsorption equilibrium, kinetics, and dynamic separation of Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions from phosphoric acid–nitric acid aqueous solution by strong acid cation resin. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2019, 27, 2930–2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yang, L.; Wen, T.; Wang, L.; Miki, T.; Bai, H.; Lu, X.; Yu, H.; Nagasaka, T. The stability of the compounds formed in the process of removal Pb(II), Cu(II) and Cd(II) by steelmaking slag in an acidic aqueous solution. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 231, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chen, G.; Yang, L.; Chen, J.; Miki, T.; Li, S.; Bai, H.; Nagasaka, T. Competitive mechanism and influencing factors for the simultaneous removal of Cr(III) and Zn(II) in acidic aqueous solutions using steel slag: Batch and column experiments. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 230, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hiltunen, R.; Hiltunen, A. Environmental aspects of the utilization of steel industry slags. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of VII International Conference on Molten Slags, Fluxes and Salts, Cap Town, South Africa, 25–28 January 2004. [Google Scholar]
  103. Chand, S.; Paul, B.; Kumar, M. An Overview of Use of Linz-Donawitz (LD) Steel Slag in Agriculture. Curr. World Environ. 2015, 10, 975–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Wang, X.; Wang, G.; Guo, T.; Xing, Y.; Mo, F.; Wang, H.; Fan, J.; Zhang, F. Effects of plastic mulch and nitrogen fertilizer on the soil microbial community, enzymatic activity and yield performance in a dryland maize cropping system. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2021, 72, 400–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wang, X.; Fan, J.; Xing, Y.; Xu, G.; Wang, H.; Deng, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Li, P.; Li, Z. The effects of mulch and nitrogen fertilizer on the soil environment of crop plants. Adv. Agron. 2019, 153, 121–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sustainability 13 05255 g001 550
Figure 1. Beneficial effects of slag-based fertilizers in soil and plant.
Figure 1. Beneficial effects of slag-based fertilizers in soil and plant.
Sustainability 13 05255 g001
Sustainability 13 05255 g002 550
Figure 2. The potential effect of slag on plant growth.
Figure 2. The potential effect of slag on plant growth.
Sustainability 13 05255 g002
Sustainability 13 05255 g003 550
Figure 3. Proposed mechanism of slag-based fertilizers in the soil.
Figure 3. Proposed mechanism of slag-based fertilizers in the soil.
Sustainability 13 05255 g003
Table
Table 1. Potential effects of slag-based fertilizers on crop yield.
Table 1. Potential effects of slag-based fertilizers on crop yield.
Types of Slag UsedYieldApplication RateDuration of TrialReferences
ControlSlag
g/haµg/haYears
Silicate iron slag6000714040002[57]
Silicate fertilizer (granular)6450945040001[58]
carbide slag7.53 × 1068.61 × 1063 × 1061[39]
Silicate fertilizer (granular)3900450023001[59]
Silicate fertilizer (granular)5200560023001[59]
Silicate fertilizer (granular)5300590023001[59]
Silicate fertilizer (granular)5160560023001[59]
Steel slag6730683080001[60]
Silicate fertilizer (granular)12,58012,60020002[61]
Steel slag4630467080001[60]
Silicate fertilizer (granular)12,58012,84040002[61]
Silicate fertilizer (granular)12,58012,85080002[61]
Steel slag4910506080001[60]
Steel slag6970720080001[60]
LD slag5.7 g pot−16.3 g pot−120001[26]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mehmood, S.; Wang, X.; Ahmed, W.; Imtiaz, M.; Ditta, A.; Rizwan, M.; Irshad, S.; Bashir, S.; Saeed, Q.; Mustafa, A.; et al. Removal Mechanisms of Slag against Potentially Toxic Elements in Soil and Plants for Sustainable Agriculture Development: A Critical Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5255. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095255

AMA Style

Mehmood S, Wang X, Ahmed W, Imtiaz M, Ditta A, Rizwan M, Irshad S, Bashir S, Saeed Q, Mustafa A, et al. Removal Mechanisms of Slag against Potentially Toxic Elements in Soil and Plants for Sustainable Agriculture Development: A Critical Review. Sustainability. 2021; 13(9):5255. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095255

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mehmood, Sajid, Xiukang Wang, Waqas Ahmed, Muhammad Imtiaz, Allah Ditta, Muhammad Rizwan, Sana Irshad, Saqib Bashir, Qudsia Saeed, Adnan Mustafa, and et al. 2021. "Removal Mechanisms of Slag against Potentially Toxic Elements in Soil and Plants for Sustainable Agriculture Development: A Critical Review" Sustainability 13, no. 9: 5255. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095255

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop