Next Article in Journal
Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO) Layers from Silicate/Phosphate Baths on Ti-6Al-4V for Biomedical Components: Influence of Deposition Conditions and Surface Finishing on Dry Sliding Behaviour
Next Article in Special Issue
ZnO (Ag-N) Nanorods Films Optimized for Photocatalytic Water Purification
Previous Article in Journal
Bioactive Coating on Titanium Dental Implants for Improved Anticorrosion Protection: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optical and Superhydrophilic Characteristics of TiO2 Coating with Subwavelength Surface Structure Consisting of Spherical Nanoparticle Aggregates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in TiO2 Films Prepared by Sol-Gel Methods for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants and Antibacterial Activities

1
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Institute for Medical Science, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Chonbuk 54907, Korea
2
Department of Chemistry, Inha University, 100 Inharo, Incheon 22212, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2019, 9(10), 613; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9100613
Submission received: 26 July 2019 / Revised: 24 September 2019 / Accepted: 24 September 2019 / Published: 25 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photocatalytic Thin Films)

Abstract

:
Photocatalysis has recently emerged as an advanced, green, and eco-friendly process for the treatment of wastewater and air, and antimicrobial disinfection applications. In this context, TiO2 nanostructures have been shown to be the prominent photocatalyst candidates due to their low cost, non-toxicity, and ease of fabrication. This review highlights the investigation and development of TiO2 photocatalyst film by sol-gel method with special emphasis on the photodecolorization of synthetic dyes and antibacterial activities. Furthermore, various synthesis methods for the preparation of TiO2 films and their advantages, as well as limitations, are summarized. Finally, recent advances in TiO2 films by sol-gel method for dye degradation and antibacterial activities, challenges, and future perspective are discussed.

1. Semiconductor Photocatalysis

Energy, environment, and health are serious challenges that the modern world faces today. Besides several benefits to mankind, industrialization has resulted in adverse impacts on ecosystems. Among the most critical contemporary global issues, environmental pollution has gained extensive interest. One of the main pollution sources comes from wastewater containing dyes discharged from textile, foodstuff, and leather industries [1,2]. Water pollution is caused by both synthetic and biological contaminants and can, among other things, be damaging for aquatic environments. The prevention of toxic chemical and biological contamination through environmentally green techniques is an important issue.
In recent decades, semiconductor photocatalysis has been intensively studied for water and air treatment [3,4]. The semiconductors possess a band gap that separates the valence band (VB) and conduction band (CB). When the photocatalyst is illuminated by light with an appropriate wavelength with energy equal to or greater than its band gap, the electrons are excited from the VB to the CB, thereby producing an electron (e-) in the CB and leaving a positive hole (h+) in the VB. If the as-produced electron and hole migrate to the surface of the semiconductor photocatalyst without recombination, they facilitate redox reactions with the compounds adsorbed on the catalyst. The positive hole at the valence band oxidizes pollutants either directly or through a reaction with water to produce powerful hydroxyl radicals (OH). Similarly, the electrons at the conduction band reduce the oxygen atoms adsorbed on the photocatalyst. During the photocatalytic process, superoxide radicals (O2-) and other reactive groups are produced, resulting from reactions with moisture oxygen (O2). These oxidation and reduction reactions are the fundamental mechanism of photocatalysis [5,6,7].

2. TiO2 Photocatalyst

TiO2 powders have, since ancient times, been commonly used as a paint additive to obtain white pigments [8]. Since the discovery of the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 [9], it has been known as one of the most efficient photocatalytic materials. TiO2 is known for its various properties such as high photoactivity, good stability, low cost, and low toxicity [10,11]. In the last few decades, TiO2-based nanostructures have been widely studied in academic research and used in a variety of applications such as photovoltaics, sensors, removal of organic pollutants and pathogens, and energy storage [1,10,12,13,14,15,16].
TiO2 nanomaterials have a bandgap of 3.0–3.2 eV and can be excited by UV light. Due to this reason, the use of TiO2 is limited as less than 5% of the solar spectrum falls within the UV range [17,18,19]. TiO2 exists in three crystalline structures: (i) rutile, (ii) anatase, and (iii) brookite [20]. Anatase and rutile are preferred for photocatalysis, whereas brookite is considered as the least stable phase and is generally not used in photocatalysis [21,22]. The bandgaps of bulk anatase and rutile are 3.2 and 3.0 eV, which correspond to the wavelengths of 388 and 414 nm, respectively [23]. As compared to rutile, the anatase phase is considered as photocatalytically more active due to its ability to adsorb water and hydroxyl groups [24]. Studies have shown that the synergistic effect between anatase and rutile is helpful in enhancing the photocatalytic activity of the TiO2 structures [21].
In TiO2-based photocatalysis, when a photon (with energy equal to or greater than the bandgap of TiO2) illuminates the TiO2 particles or film, the electrons are activated from the valance band to the conduction band and produce electron–hole pairs. The formed charge carriers migrate towards the surface and react with the adsorbed chemicals, thereby degrading organic pollutants. The process of formation of the advanced oxidant and the degradation of the pollutant is given in Figure 1.

Limitations of TiO2 as a Photocatalyst

Although TiO2 is the most studied photocatalyst for the degradation of organic pollutants, there are lots of limitations to overcome for its widespread application (Figure 2). The main drawback of TiO2 is its poor ability to absorb solar irradiation [6,25]. Its wide bandgap (3.2 eV) limits the use of visible light as the light source. Fast recombination of photogenerated charge carriers is also a limitation of TiO2 in photocatalysis, which decreases the quantum efficiency of the overall reaction. Since photocatalytic degradation occurs on the surface of photocatalysts, adsorption is prerequisite for good performance [26]. However, the adsorption capacity of TiO2 is relatively low, which results in slow photocatalytic degradation rates [27]. Reducing the size of the TiO2 particles in nanoscale can enhance the surface area; however, aggregation may appear as a problem that hampers the light incidence on the active center, thereby reducing the catalytic activity [14]. In addition, separation, recovery, and reuse of the nanostructured TiO2 may be a key obstacle in its practical application [14,28]. Another limitation of TiO2 is the poor thermal stability of its most effective anatase phase. Anatase is a highly active polymorph and is normally less stable and transforms to rutile phase at a higher temperature (above ~700 °C) [13,27].

3. TiO2 Films

TiO2-based photocatalytic thin films and nanostructures are now being used extensively for a variety of applications such as environmental remediation, self-cleaning windows, water splitting, hydrogen release, and antibacterial material due to their interesting chemical, electrical, and optical properties [19,29,30,31,32,33]. The thin films can be applied to various substrates and are used instead of bulk materials that result in substantial cost savings. Engineering thin films at nanoscale enables distinct mechanical, chemical, and physical surface functionalities including higher surface area and enhanced photocatalytic performance [34]. TiO2 thin films can contain anatase, rutile, or a combination of both of these phases. Mostly, photocatalytic thin TiO2 films have been used for the decomposition of organic contaminants and antibacterial applications [34].

3.1. Preparation of TiO2 Film

TiO2 thin films have been synthesized by several sophisticated techniques such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [35,36], hydrothermal synthesis [37,38], metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) [39,40], sputtering [41,42], liquid phase deposition (LPD) [43,44], electrophoretic deposition [45], physical vapor deposition (PVD) [46], pulsed laser deposition [47,48], sol-gel [5,49,50], electrochemical deposition [51], atomic layer deposition (ALD) [52], etc. Most of the synthesis processes require a high temperature and pressure. The method of synthesis and processing conditions play an important role in the properties of the materials. Since the microstructure and physical properties of TiO2 affect its photocatalytic activity, the choice of a proper method is important in order to achieve good results. Table 1 summarizes some of the common techniques along with their advantages and limitations.

3.2. Preparation of TiO2 Film by Sol-gel Method

Among the various methods, the sol-gel method is one of the most used methods to prepare thin film or a powder catalyst for various applications such as catalysis, sensors, membranes, electrochemical devices, etc. [5,34]. The sol-gel method has become the most common and simple approach to prepare TiO2 films due to its effectiveness, homogeneity, and reliability [34]. In this process, TiO2 colloidal suspension is formed from the involvement of hydrolysis and polycondensation reactions of the precursor (metal alkoxides or inorganic metal salts), and the film with the desired thickness can be deposited onto the substrate either by dip coating or spin coating techniques [59]. By controlling the sol-to-gel transition and thereby the sol viscosity, a variety of shapes with desired porosity and texture can be obtained [60]. Most importantly, the sol-gel coating can be carried out at room temperature without special expensive instruments [34]. The sol-gel route combined with deep or spin coating has been widely applied to coat metallic film in different substrates. In this section, we discuss the sol-gel-assisted synthesis of TiO2 or doped-TiO2 films and their photocatalytic performance in the degradation of organic pollutants and antibacterial activities. Figure 3 shows a process flow chart for the preparation of TiO2 film by sol-gel method.

3.3. TiO2 Film for Organic Dye Removal Application

Among the most critical contemporary global issues, environmental pollution related to water pollution has gained extensive interest. One of the main pollution sources comes from wastewater containing dyes discharged from textile, foodstuff, and leather industries. TiO2 films have been shown to be promising materials for removing organic dyes from water. In recent years, pure or modified TiO2 films have been developed for organic dye removal applications [5,34,61,62]. Table 2 presents some examples of TiO2-based film for organic dye removal applications.

3.3.1. Undoped TiO2 Films

Guillard el al. [63] employed several sol-gel methods for depositing TiO2 films on various substrates such as silicon wafers, soda lime glass, and Pyrex glass and studied their effectiveness in water treatment. The photocatalytic efficiency of synthesized films was tested by degrading malic acid. It was found that several factors such as TiO2 loadings, the thickness, the number of coatings, and the calcination temperature influenced the photocatalytic activity of the film. The optimal calcination temperature was 400 °C.
Chen et al. [64] synthesized a series of mesoporous ultrafine anatase nanocrystallite TiO2 films onto a borosilicate glass substrate via the sol-gel preparation route. The synthesis process involved the use of nonionic surfactant Tween 20 as a template through a self-assembly pathway. After calcination at 500 °C, crystalline structure, thickness, morphology, optical properties, and porous structures were investigated. The photocatalytic property was investigated by creatinine degradation test. The study revealed that the high calcination temperature was beneficial to get good crystallinity and adhesion between the film and substrate. The obtained results showed that the photocatalytic activity could be remarkably improved by increasing the Tween 20 loading in the sol.
The anatase phase of TiO2 is normally found in the sol-gel synthesis, although brookite is often observed. Pure brookite without anatase or rutile is difficult to prepare [22]. Recently, Komaraiah et al. [65] employed a sol-gel spinning technique in order to deposit TiO2 thin film onto a glass substrate. After annealing at different temperatures, the authors studied the photocatalytic degradation of a methylene blue aqueous solution under visible light irradiation. It was confirmed from the XRD that the thin film was of a single phase orthorhombic brookite structure. SEM analysis showed highly uniform, crack-free, and spherical nanoparticles with around a 68 nm diameter. The as-synthesized film showed 92% methylene blue (MB) degradation efficiency within 240 min under visible light irradiation.
Dulian et al. [60] studied the influence of coating thickness on the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 films. In their study, the authors prepared transparent anatase TiO2 film by sol-gel method in alcoholic solution. The thin films were deposited on the borosilicate glass substrate and a multiple dip coating technique was employed to prepare different layers of coating for up to 12 dip-coating cycles. It was observed that with an increasing number of coatings, the roughness and optical band gaps were decreased. Furthermore, the photocatalytic degradation of MB was strongly related to the thickness of the layer, the number of the layer, and its morphology. The thicker oxide layers showed faster MB degradation properties.
In recent years, various supporting media such as glass, ITO, textile, etc. have been applied for TiO2 coating. Among different substrates, textile has attracted increasing interest due to the durability and good affinity of inorganic nanostructures with fabrics [66]. In this regards, Costa and coworkers have developed TiO2-supported textile media with self-cleaning properties [67]. Their study revealed that the photocatalytic efficiency is correlated to the surface hydrophilicity, which promotes the formation of a higher amount of OH radicals.

3.3.2. Modified TiO2 Films

One important approach to overcome the quick recombination of photogenerated charge carriers is the doping technique. The doping strategy can suppress the electron–hole pair recombination rate and shift the activity of TiO2 from UV to the visible light region, thereby enhancing the photocatalytic efficiency in visible light [68]. In past decades, several approaches have been adopted for TiO2 modification, for example, metal-doped TiO2 (such as Pt, Pd, Ag, Sr, Au, Ce, V, Fe) [34,69], non-metal doped TiO2 (such as N, S, C, B, F) [34,69], composite of TiO2 with a lower semiconductor bandgap energy than that of TiO2 [18,69].

Metal-Doped TiO2 Films

Sonawane et al. [70] prepared Fe-doped TiO2 thin films on a variety of substrates (glass, silica rings, glass-helix) using a Ti-peroxy sol-gel dip coating method. Fe and polyethylene glycol (PEG) were incorporated in titanium peroxide sol, and after drying and calcination at 500 °C, the PEG was removed and crystalline Fe-doped TiO2 film was obtained. The photocatalytic activity of the Fe–TiO2 film was studied by methyl orange degradation under sunlight. As compared to undoped TiO2 film, the degradation capacity was enhanced by 2–2.5 times in the Fe-doped TiO2 film.
Gultekin et al. [71] prepared gold nanoparticle-doped TiO2 film by sol-gel method and studied the effect of Au doping on the optical, structural, and morphological properties. From their study, the authors conclude that Au doping can modify the optical, structural, and morphological properties of TiO2 film.
Yu et al. [72] investigated the photocatalytic activity of sol-gel-derived Pb-doped TiO2 film by degrading dimethyl-2,2-dichlorovinyl phosphate (DDVP) under sunlight irradiation. The Pb dopant reduced the bandgap of the photocatalyst and extended the wavelength response towards the visible region, thereby improving the photocatalytic activity under solar light.
Rapsomanikis et al. [73] synthesized cerium (Ce)-modified TiO2 film via the sol-gel route at 500 °C on glass substrate with a varying content of Ce. The presence of Ce caused a decrease in the size of TiO2 NPs, and the films were formed without cracks. The authors examined the photocatalytic behavior of the Ce-modified TiO2 films for the decoloration of Basic Blue 41 in water under both UV and visible light. It was found that the cerium-modified TiO2 films effectively extend the spectral response to the visible region, exhibiting enhanced photocatalytic decoloration of BB-41 in water under visible light.
Guillén-Santiago’s group [74] prepared Ag-doped TiO2 thin films by sol-gel method and compared their photocatalytic properties with undoped TiO2 film. The author also studied the effect of ageing time of the starting solution, as well as the number of coatings, on the photocatalytic degradation of MB. It was found that the film thickness and ageing time of the solution play an important role in the degradation of MB. An optimal photocatalytic activity (35% under UV irradiation) was achieved in 5-immersion Ag-doped TiO2 thin films that were deposited from 7- and 14-day-old solutions. Solís-Casados and coworkers [75] synthesized Bi-doped TiO2 film with different Bi contents by sol-gel method. The material was characterized with various techniques. It was found that the addition of bismuth promotes the formation of bismuth titanate. Malachite green was selected as a representative pollutant, and the degradation test was carried out under simulated solar light. The TiO2 film with bismuth showed better photocatalytic activity as compared to pure TiO2 film.
MB is one of the most commonly used substances for dyeing cotton, wood, paper, and silk [26,76]. It has been widely used in medicine for several therapeutic and diagnostic purpose. Due to its complex aromatic structure, hydrophilic nature, and stability against light, temperature, and chemicals, it is difficult to degrade MB completely through the conventional water treatment process. For decades, semiconductor photocatalysis has been considered as an advanced technique for the complete degradation of MB. MB is one of the most commonly used dyes to study the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 films. Generally, brookite is considered as a less effective phase of TiO2 as compared to rutile and anatase. Komaraiah et al. [65] employed the sol-gel spinning technique in order to deposit TiO2 thin film onto a glass substrate. After annealing at different temperatures, the photocatalytic degradation of MB in aqueous solution was carried out under visible light irradiation. It was confirmed from the XRD that the thin film was of a single-phase orthorhombic brookite structure. SEM analysis showed highly uniform, crack-free, and spherical nanoparticles around 68 nm in diameter. The as-synthesized film showed 92% MB degradation efficiency within 240 min under visible light irradiation.

Non-Metal Doped TiO2 Film

Although metal doping has been widely applied for enhancing the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 film, the metal dopants tend to suffer from thermal instability, which causes an increase in photoinduced carrier recombination centers, thereby decreasing the lifetime of the electron–hole pairs. In this regard, non-metal doping seems to be a more promising technique for enhancing the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 film in the visible light region due to the presence of impurity states that are near the valence band edge. Several non-metal (such as C, F, S, N)-doped TiO2 films have been prepared.
Lin et al. [77] prepared C-doped mesoporous TiO2 film by combined sol-gel and hydrothermal processes, using glucose as a carbon source and structure-directing agent. Their study indicated that the oxygen sites in the TiO2 lattice were substituted by carbon-atom-forming O–Ti–C bonds, and the film was composed of mainly anatase TiO2. The C-doped TiO2 film exhibited a significant red shift to the visible region, showing visible light active photocatalytic properties. The photocatalytic activity of C-doped TiO2 film for the degradation of X-3B was higher than that of undoped TiO2 film under both UV and the visible region.
Rajendra et al. [59] employed a sol-gel dip coating method to prepare immobilized activated carbon-doped TiO2 film by sol-gel method using titanium tetraisopropoxide. It was observed that the type and concentration of the doping agents and the operating temperature influenced the properties of TiO2 film. Hassan et al. have reported that the presence of carbon influences the crystallinity of TiO2, which controls the photocatalytic sites and activity [78].
Han et al. [31] prepared visible-light-activated S-doped TiO2 film by sol-gel method based on a self-assembly technique for a water treatment application. In this work, borosilicate glass was used as a substrate and the films were calcined to remove the organic content. The results showed that the calcination temperature influenced the physiochemical properties of the film. S-doped TiO2 film with a smooth surface and minimum roughness was obtained at 350 °C calcination and was the most effective for the degradation of hypatotoxin microcystin-LR (MC-LR), compared to other films obtained at 400 and 500 °C.
Nitrogen is known for enhancing the photoresponding range of TiO2 into the visible region [79]. Among all the non-metal dopants, nitrogen has been applied most for visible-light-active photocatalytic TiO2 systems. Introducing nitrogen into the TiO2 lattice is effective and straightforward due to the atomic size, low ionization potential, and high stability of nitrogen. Nitrogen atoms either occupy interstitial sites (possibly with N–O bonding) or substitutional sites (replacement of O with N atoms) in TiO2. Mekprasart et al. [80] prepared nitrogen-doped TiO2 films on glass substrate by spin coating technique and studied the effect of nitrogen doping on the optical and photocatalytic properties. They found that after doping with nitrogen, the absorption spectrum of the TiO2 film shifted to the visible region, clearly suggesting photocatalytic activity under visible light. Compared to undoped TiO2, the N-doped TiO2 film showed better photocatalytic performance for the degradation of Rhodamine B under solar light irradiation.

Binary Composite

Preparation of a binary or ternary semiconductor system is another approach to modify the TiO2 film photocatalyst and can improve the charge separation system and enhance the photocatalytic activity. In this regards, Pérez-González et al. [81] synthesized TiO2–ZnO composite thin films by sol-gel method and studied their optical, structural, and morphological properties. The photocatalytic efficiency was evaluated by degradation of MB. The result indicated better photocatalytic properties than single metal oxide films. Photocatalytic properties were further enhanced with the addition of Ag NPs on the film [82].
Weerachai Sangchay [83] deposited SnO2-doped TiO2 film on a glass substrate and calcined it at 700 °C for 2 h. The photocatalytic decolorization of the aqueous MB solution revealed enhanced performance as compared to the pristine TiO2 film. Furthermore, the TiO2 film doped with 1 mol% of SnO2 showed the highest photocatalytic properties.
Hernández-Torres and coworkers [84] prepared CdS/TiO2 composite films on glass substrate by chemical bath deposition and the sol-gel /dip coating method. They examined the influence of CdS deposition on the morphology and optical and photocatalytic properties of TiO2 films and found that the CdS deposition time influences the absorbance of the composite, with the absorption edges being shifted to the visible region. The photocatalytic study was carried out by degrading methyl blue under visible light, and the composite showed enhanced photocatalytic properties as compared to CdS-free TiO2 film. Stoyanov et al. [85] studied the photocatalytic performance of mixed TiO2/V2O5 films and found that the composite film showed better photocatalytic decomposition of methylene blue in water as compared to TiO2 films.
Composites of TiO2 with silicon dioxide (SiO2) have been prepared for enhancing the performance of TiO2 photocatalysts [86,87]. SiO2 is employed as an additive to TiO2 due to its interesting properties such as chemical inertness, thermal stability, and low refractive index [88]. In this regard, Pakdel and Daoud [87] employed a sol-gel method to prepare titania and silica sols. The TiO2/SiO2 composite was loaded in the cotton fabrics. The authors evaluated the self-cleaning properties of the composite sample by studying the decomposition rate of MB under UV irradiation and observed that the sample coated with TiO2/SiO2 showed an enhanced photocatalytic performance [87].
Several factors influence the photocatalytic behavior of TiO2 films, such as the initial concentration of dye, catalyst amount, pH, presence of inorganic anions, temperature, light source, light intensity, and configuration of the photocatalytic reactor [26,98]. In recent years, pilot plant studies for different reactor configurations have been carried out and compared to select the optimal configuration for scale-up [99,100].

3.4. TiO2 Film for Antibacterial Application

TiO2 is considered a promising antibacterial agent due to its good antibacterial behavior and biocompatibility [1,101]. In addition, TiO2 nanostructures have been found to be effective for the inactivation of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [102]. Table 3 represents the antibacterial performances of various TiO2 films prepared by sol-gel method. TiO2 kills the microorganisms upon illumination of light mainly due to its photocatalytic properties [103]. Currently, there are three different mechanisms suggested for the antibacterial action of TiO2-based materials [103]: i) reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, ii) cell wall damage and lipid peroxidation of the cell membrane, iii) cytoplasmic flow due to cell membrane damage. Several studies have indicated that ROS formation is the main mechanism responsible for the antibacterial activities of TiO2-based materials [104,105,106,107]. The bactericidal activity of ROS is attributed to its high reactivity and oxidizing properties. ROS are generated continuously by aerobic cells during metabolism and include the superoxide anion (UO2−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), the hydroxyl anion (OH−), and hydroxyl radical (UOH). The generated species are capable of destroying cell membrane constituents directly, damage the integrity of the membrane, and even cross the bacterial membrane. The destruction of cellular components such as lipids, DNA, and proteins leads to loss of function and ultimately to the death of cells [14,103,108,109]. A schematic diagram showing the antibacterial mechanism of TiO2 is given in Figure 4.
In order to investigate antibacterial performance against Eschericia coli (E. coli) under visible light, Arellano et al. [110] prepared Fe-doped TiO2 film deposited on a sodium glass substrate. The precursor was treated at 400 and 800 °C to give the anatase and rutile phase of TiO2, respectively. The antibacterial study showed that the Fe–TiO2 film containing 5% of Fe and treated at 800 °C eliminated E. coli completely after 60 min. This is attributed to the higher contact area for the adherence of bacteria and smaller energy band gap.
Kiwi et al. [111] present a design, characterization, and antibacterial evaluation of TiO2 and TiO2-doped films (polyethylene–TiO2, TiO2–In2O3, and TiO2–polyester) against E. coli. The authors suggest bacterial cell wall damage to be the main bactericidal action of the films.
Pleskova and coworkers [102] prepared TiO2 films on glass substrate using tetrabutyl oxytitan as a TiO2 precursor. The bactericidal activity of TiO2 films was studied against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria under UV irradiation at a wavelength of 380 nm. After 12 min of exposure to UV light, a 29, 45, and 47% decrease in viability was recorded for Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis), and E. coli. Furthermore, the authors reported that the sterilization activity was only observed in a single use; however, photoinduced bactericidal activity can be restored by annealing the TiO2 at a temperature higher than 400 °C.
Sunada and researchers [106] prepared TiO2 films on silica coated soda-lime glass plates using titanium isopropoxide as a precursor and studied their photokilling acidity against E. coli cells. The authors found that the photocatalytic reaction affected cell survival by causing damage from the outside of the cell. They concluded that the TiO2 film photocatalyst decomposes the lipopolysaccharide of E. coli’s cell wall. The AFM photographs of E. coli cell on TiO2 films after different time of UV illumination is given in Figure 5. The AFM image showed that the outer membrane decomposed first, and upon further UV illumination, the bacterial cell completely decomposed.
Pleskova et al. [112] used TiO2 films as a self-sterilization surface, which killed several bacteria by reactive oxygen species upon irradiation with UV light. The authors presented a new way to enhance the antibacterial action of TiO2 films by the forming of nanopores on the surface of the film. They studied the bactericidal activities of TiO2 films against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and observed that the modified surface possesses significantly higher antibacterial activity as compared to the conventional TiO2 surface film, due to the increased surface area as well as possible changes in the microstructure of TiO2 induced by laser exposure. The morphological changes in the bacteria after the incubation was examined by atomic force microscopy and indicated cell wall damage caused by the exposure to UV and/or ROS.
In the literature, most antibacterial investigations have been carried out against E.coli. bacteria, which is a member of the coliform group. However, there have been few studies of the photocatalytic destruction of other bacteria. Recently, Pleskova et al. [112] studied the antibacterial properties of TiO2 film against various bacteria such as E. coli, S. aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidid (S. epidermidis), Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium), Klebsiella oxytoca (K. oxytoca), Kelbsiella penumoniae (K. pneumoniae), Proteus vulgaris (P. vulgaris), and Microcossus spp. Their study suggested that the vast majority of the strains used were sensitive to the bactericidal property of TiO2 film under UV irradiation. However, the degree of antibacterial efficacy was bacteria-dependent. As can be seen in Figure 6, P. aeruginosa 9691 and S. epidermidis 1061 showed the most sensitivity when treated with TiO2 film under UV irradiation. On the other hand, P. vulgaris 1212 and K. pneumonia 527 showed the least sensitivity.

4. Conclusions, Challenges and Future Perspectives

TiO2-based photocatalytic systems, including films, have shown promising results for the removal of organic pollutants and the destruction of pathogens in water. TiO2 films are mainly prepared by chemical, physical, and sputter-based approaches, among which sol-gel coating is the most simple, low-cost, and suitable method for laboratory studies. Despite several advantages of TiO2, such as low cost, non-toxicity, and ease of fabrication, a poor ability to absorb solar irradiation is the main drawback to widening its application in photocatalysis. In recent years, pristine TiO2 films as well as modified (or doped) TiO2 films have been developed by sol-gel technique for photocatalytic dye degradation and antibacterial applications. Although there is great progress in designing and synthesizing TiO2 films with enhanced photocatalytic efficiency, challenges remain in developing a cheap, low-toxicity, and reproducible synthetic approach. Control over the thickness of the coating, pore size, surface area, uniform morphology, and crystallinity also need to be addressed for better results. Another challenge associated with the use of TiO2 film for photocatalytic dye removal and antibacterial applications is stability and durability. It is expected that continued research in this field will lead to a better understanding and uncover the way to overcome existing limitations.

Funding

This work was supported by the Traditional Culture Convergence Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2018M3C1B5052283). This research was also supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2019R1A2C1004467).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pant, B.; Pant, H.R.; Barakat, N.A.M.; Park, M.; Jeon, K.; Choi, Y.; Kim, H.-Y. Carbon nanofibers decorated with binary semiconductor (TiO2/ZnO) nanocomposites for the effective removal of organic pollutants and the enhancement of antibacterial activities. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 7029–7035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hassan, M.S.; Amna, T.; Al-Deyab, S.S.; Kim, H.-C.; Khil, M.-S. Monodispersed 3D MnWO4–TiO2 composite nanoflowers photocatalysts for environmental remediation. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2015, 15, 753–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pant, B.; Park, M.; Kim, H.-Y.; Park, S.-J. Ag-ZnO photocatalyst anchored on carbon nanofibers: Synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic activities. Synth. Met. 2016, 220, 533–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Opoku, F.; Govender, K.K.; van Sittert, C.G.C.E.; Govender, P.P. Recent Progress in the Development of Semiconductor-Based Photocatalyst Materials for Applications in Photocatalytic Water Splitting and Degradation of Pollutants. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2017, 1, 1700006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Akpan, U.G.; Hameed, B.H. The advancements in sol–gel method of doped-TiO2 photocatalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2010, 375, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pant, B.; Park, M.; Park, S.-J.; Kim, H.-Y. One-pot synthesis of CdS sensitized TiO2 decorated reduced graphene oxide nanosheets for the hydrolysis of ammonia-borane and the effective removal of organic pollutant from water. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 15247–15252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tung, W.S.; Daoud, W.A. Self-cleaning fibers via nanotechnology: A virtual reality. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 7858–7869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hashimoto, K.I.; Irie, H.; Fujishima, A. TiO2 Photocatalysis: A Historical Overview and Future Prospects. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 44, 8269–8285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pant, B.; Barakat, N.A.M.; Pant, H.R.; Park, M.; Saud, P.S.; Kim, J.-W.; Kim, H.-Y. Synthesis and photocatalytic activities of CdS/TiO2 nanoparticles supported on carbon nanofibers for high efficient adsorption and simultaneous decomposition of organic dyes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 434, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pant, B.; Park, M.; Park, S.-J. Hydrothermal synthesis of Ag2CO3-TiO2 loaded reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites with highly efficient photocatalytic activity. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2019, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hsu, K.-C.; Fang, T.-H.; Hsiao, Y.-J.; Wu, P.-C. Response and characteristics of TiO2/perovskite heterojunctions for CO gas sensors. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 794, 576–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pant, B.; Park, M.; Park, S.-J. TiO2 NPs Assembled into a Carbon Nanofiber Composite Electrode by a One-Step Electrospinning Process for Supercapacitor Applications. Polymers 2019, 11, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pant, B.; Saud, P.S.; Park, M.; Park, S.-J.; Kim, H.-Y. General one-pot strategy to prepare Ag–TiO2 decorated reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for chemical and biological disinfectant. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 671, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nakata, K.; Fujishima, A. TiO2 photocatalysis: Design and applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2012, 13, 169–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bai, Y.; Mora-Seró, I.; De Angelis, F.; Bisquert, J.; Wang, P. Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials for Photovoltaic Applications. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 10095–10130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pant, B.; Park, M.; Park, S.-J. MoS2/CdS/TiO2 ternary composite incorporated into carbon nanofibers for the removal of organic pollutants from water. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2019, 102, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Daghrir, R.; Drogui, P.; Robert, D. Modified TiO2 For Environmental Photocatalytic Applications: A Review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 3581–3599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pant, B.; Pant, H.R.; Park, M.; Liu, Y.; Choi, J.-W.; Barakat, N.A.M.; Kim, H.-Y. Electrospun CdS–TiO2 doped carbon nanofibers for visible-light-induced photocatalytic hydrolysis of ammonia borane. Catal. Commun. 2014, 50, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Allen, N.S.; Mahdjoub, N.; Vishnyakov, V.; Kelly, P.J.; Kriek, R.J. The effect of crystalline phase (anatase, brookite and rutile) and size on the photocatalytic activity of calcined polymorphic titanium dioxide (TiO2). Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2018, 150, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, J.; Xu, Q.; Feng, Z.; Li, M.; Li, C. Importance of the Relationship between Surface Phases and Photocatalytic Activity of TiO2. Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 1790–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Di Paola, A.; Bellardita, M.; Palmisano, L. Brookite, the Least Known TiO2 Photocatalyst. Catalysts 2013, 3, 36–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dette, C.; Pérez-Osorio, M.A.; Kley, C.S.; Punke, P.; Patrick, C.E.; Jacobson, P.; Giustino, F.; Jung, S.J.; Kern, K. TiO2 Anatase with a Bandgap in the Visible Region. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6533–6538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, H.; Huang, X.; Li, W.; Gao, J.; Xue, H.; Li, R.K.Y.; Mai, Y.-W. TiO2 nanoparticle decorated carbon nanofibers for removal of organic dyes. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 549, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dong, H.; Zeng, G.; Tang, L.; Fan, C.; Zhang, C.; He, X.; He, Y. An overview on limitations of TiO2-based particles for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants and the corresponding countermeasures. Water Res. 2015, 79, 128–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pant, B.; Ojha, G.P.; Kim, H.-Y.; Park, M.; Park, S.-J. Fly-ash-incorporated electrospun zinc oxide nanofibers: Potential material for environmental remediation. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 245, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Etacheri, V.; Di Valentin, C.; Schneider, J.; Bahnemann, D.; Pillai, S.C. Visible-light activation of TiO2 photocatalysts: Advances in theory and experiments. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2015, 25, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pant, B.; Pant, H.R.; Barakat, N.A.M.; Park, M.; Han, T.-H.; Lim, B.H.; Kim, H.-Y. Incorporation of cadmium sulfide nanoparticles on the cadmium titanate nanofibers for enhanced organic dye degradation and hydrogen release. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 1553–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Javid, A.; Kumar, M.; Ashraf, M.; Lee, J.H.; Han, J.G. Photocatalytic antibacterial study of N-doped TiO2 thin films synthesized by ICP assisted plasma sputtering method. Phys. E: Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostructures 2019, 106, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Varnagiris, S.; Medvids, A.; Lelis, M.; Milcius, D.; Antuzevics, A. Black carbon-doped TiO2 films: Synthesis, characterization and photocatalysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2019, 382, 111941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Han, C.; Pelaez, M.; Likodimos, V.; Kontos, A.G.; Falaras, P.; O’Shea, K.; Dionysiou, D.D. Innovative visible light-activated sulfur doped TiO2 films for water treatment. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2011, 107, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Scuderi, V.; Buccheri, M.A.; Impellizzeri, G.; Di Mauro, A.; Rappazzo, G.; Bergum, K.; Svensson, B.G.; Privitera, V. Photocatalytic and antibacterial properties of titanium dioxide flat film. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2016, 42, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Oliveira, L.F.; Marques, J.; Coutinho, P.J.G.; Parpot, P.; Tavares, C.J. Photocatalytic thin films coupled with polymeric microcapsules for the controlled-release of volatile agents upon solar activation. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2013, 439, 012018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Varshney, G.; Kanel, S.R.; Kempisty, D.M.; Varshney, V.; Agrawal, A.; Sahle-Demessie, E.; Varma, R.S.; Nadagouda, M.N. Nanoscale TiO2 films and their application in remediation of organic pollutants. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 306, 43–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Maruyama, T.; Arai, S. Titanium dioxide thin films prepared by chemical vapor deposition. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1992, 26, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yeung, K.S.; Lam, Y.W. A simple chemical vapour deposition method for depositing thin TiO2 films. Thin Solid Film. 1983, 109, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Miao, H.; Hu, X.; Fan, J.; Li, C.; Sun, Q.; Hao, Y.; Zhang, G.; Bai, J.; Hou, X. Hydrothermal synthesis of TiO2 nanostructure films and their photoelectrochemical properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 358, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kitano, M.; Mitsui, R.; Eddy, D.R.; El-Bahy, Z.M.A.; Matsuoka, M.; Ueshima, M.; Anpo, M. Synthesis of Nanowire TiO2 Thin Films by Hydrothermal Treatment and their Photoelectrochemical Properties. Catal. Lett. 2007, 119, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, E.H.; Lim, M.H.; Lah, M.S.; Koo, S.M. Synthesis and characterization of heteroleptic titanium MOCVD precursors for TiO2 thin films. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 2415–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Saripudin, A.; Arifin, P. Growth mechanism of Co:TiO2 thin film deposited by metal organic chemical vapor deposition technique. Iop Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 128, 012046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Heo, C.H.; Lee, S.-B.; Boo, J.-H. Deposition of TiO2 thin films using RF magnetron sputtering method and study of their surface characteristics. Thin Solid Film. 2005, 475, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Eufinger, K.; Poelman, D.; Poelman, H.; De Gryse, R.; Marin, G.B. Photocatalytic activity of dc magnetron sputter deposited amorphous TiO2 thin films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2007, 254, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mallak, M.; Bockmeyer, M.; Löbmann, P. Liquid phase deposition of TiO2 on glass: Systematic comparison to films prepared by sol–gel processing. Thin Solid Film. 2007, 515, 8072–8077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Begum, N.S.; Farveez Ahmed, H.M. Synthesis of nanocrystalline TiO2 thin films by liquid phase deposition technique and its application for photocatalytic degradation studies. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2008, 31, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, Y.; Wan, J.; Ke, Y. A novel approach of preparing TiO2 films at low temperature and its application in photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177, 750–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Asenova, I.; Manova, D.; Mändl, S. Incorporation of nitrogen into TiO2 thin films during PVD processes. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2014, 559, 012008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Garapon, C.; Champeaux, C.; Mugnier, J.; Panczer, G.; Marchet, P.; Catherinot, A.; Jacquier, B. Preparation of TiO2 thin films by pulsed laser deposition for waveguiding applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1996, 96, 836–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Murugesan, S.; Kuppusami, P.; Parvathavarthini, N.; Mohandas, E. Pulsed laser deposition of anatase and rutile TiO2 thin films. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2007, 201, 7713–7719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sobczyk-Guzenda, A.; Pietrzyk, B.; Szymanowski, H.; Gazicki-Lipman, M.; Jakubowski, W. Photocatalytic activity of thin TiO2 films deposited using sol–gel and plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition methods. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 2787–2794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, J.; Zhang, J.; Xian, Y.; Ying, X.; Liu, M.; Jin, L. Preparation and application of TiO2 photocatalytic sensor for chemical oxygen demand determination in water research. Water Res. 2005, 39, 1340–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Karuppuchamy, S.; Suzuki, N.; Ito, S.; Endo, T. A novel one-step electrochemical method to obtain crystalline titanium dioxide films at low temperature. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2009, 9, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pore, V.; Kivelä, T.; Ritala, M.; Leskelä, M. Atomic layer deposition of photocatalytic TiO2 thin films from TiF4 and H2O. Dalton Trans. 2008, 6467–6474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yemmireddy, V.K.; Hung, Y.-C. Using Photocatalyst Metal Oxides as Antimicrobial Surface Coatings to Ensure Food Safety—Opportunities and Challenges. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 617–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jameel, D.A. Thin film deposition process. Int. J. Mod. Phys. Appl. 2015, 1, 193–199. [Google Scholar]
  55. Patil, M.K.; Shaikh, S.; Ganesh, I. Recent Advances on TiO2 Thin Film Based Photocatalytic Applications (A Review). Curr. Nanosci. 2015, 11, 271–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mardare, D.; Iacomi, F.; Cornei, N.; Girtan, M.; Luca, D. Undoped and Cr-doped TiO2 thin films obtained by spray pyrolysis. Thin Solid Film. 2010, 518, 4586–4589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Deák, Á.; Janovák, L.; Csapó, E.; Ungor, D.; Pálinkó, I.; Puskás, S.; Ördög, T.; Ricza, T.; Dékány, I. Layered double oxide (LDO) particle containing photoreactive hybrid layers with tunable superhydrophobic and photocatalytic properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 389, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Merai, L.; Deak, A.; Sebok, D.; Csapo, E.; Kolumban, T.S.; Hopp, B.; Dekany, I.; Janovak, L. Photoreactive composite coating with composition dependent wetting properties. Express Polym. Lett. 2018, 12, 1061–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rajendran, K.; Senthil Kumar, V.; Anitha Rani, K. Synthesis and characterization of immobilized activated carbon doped TiO2 thin films. Optik 2014, 125, 1993–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dulian, P.; Nachit, W.; Jaglarz, J.; Zięba, P.; Kanak, J.; Żukowski, W. Photocatalytic methylene blue degradation on multilayer transparent TiO2 coatings. Opt. Mater. 2019, 90, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, F.; Ge, W.; Shen, T.; Ye, B.; Fu, Z.; Lu, Y. The effect of bulk/surface defects ratio change on the photocatalysis of TiO2 nanosheet film. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 410, 513–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Khaki, M.R.D.; Shafeeyan, M.S.; Raman, A.A.A.; Daud, W.M.A.W. Application of doped photocatalysts for organic pollutant degradation—A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 198, 78–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Guillard, C.; Beaugiraud, B.; Dutriez, C.; Herrmann, J.-M.; Jaffrezic, H.; Jaffrezic-Renault, N.; Lacroix, M. Physicochemical properties and photocatalytic activities of TiO2-films prepared by sol–gel methods. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2002, 39, 331–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, Y.; Stathatos, E.; Dionysiou, D.D. Microstructure characterization and photocatalytic activity of mesoporous TiO2 films with ultrafine anatase nanocrystallites. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2008, 202, 1944–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Komaraiah, D.; Madhukar, P.; Vijayakumar, Y.; Ramana Reddy, M.V.; Sayanna, R. Photocatalytic degradation study of methylene blue by brookite TiO2 thin film under visible light irradiation. Mater. Today Proc. 2016, 3, 3770–3778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bozzi, A.; Yuranova, T.; Guasaquillo, I.; Laub, D.; Kiwi, J. Self-cleaning of modified cotton textiles by TiO2 at low temperatures under daylight irradiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2005, 174, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ortelli, S.; Costa, A.L.; Dondi, M. TiO2 Nanosols Applied Directly on Textiles Using Different Purification Treatments. Materials 2015, 8, 7988–7996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Huang, F.; Yan, A.; Zhao, H. Influences of Doping on Photocatalytic Properties of TiO2 Photocatalyst. In Semiconductor Photocatalysis—Materials, Mechanisms and Applications; Cao, W., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2016; pp. 31–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Radhiyah, A.A.; Iis, S. Recent Progress on Development of TiO2 Thin Film Photocatalysts for Pollutant Removal. Recent Pat. Mater. Sci. 2009, 2, 88–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sonawane, R.S.; Kale, B.B.; Dongare, M.K. Preparation and photo-catalytic activity of Fe TiO2 thin films prepared by sol-gel dip coating. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2004, 85, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gültekin, A.; Karanfil, G.; Özel, F.; Kuş, M.; Say, R.; Sönmezoğlu, S. Synthesis and characterisations of Au-nanoparticle-doped TiO2 and CdO thin films. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2014, 75, 775–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yu, J.; Yu, J.C.; Cheng, B.; Zhao, X. Photocatalytic Activity and Characterization of the Sol-Gel Derived Pb-Doped TiO2 Thin Films. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2002, 24, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rapsomanikis, A.; Apostolopoulou, A.; Stathatos, E.; Lianos, P. Cerium-modified TiO2 nanocrystalline films for visible light photocatalytic activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2014, 280, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Guillén-Santiago, A.; Mayén, S.A.; Torres-Delgado, G.; Castanedo-Pérez, R.; Maldonado, A.; Olvera, M.d.l.L. Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue using undoped and Ag-doped TiO2 thin films deposited by a sol–gel process: Effect of the ageing time of the starting solution and the film thickness. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2010, 174, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Solís-Casados, D.A.; Escobar-Alarcón, L.; Alvarado-Pérez, V.; Haro-Poniatowski, E. Photocatalytic Activity under Simulated Sunlight of Bi-Modified TiO2 Thin Films Obtained by Sol Gel. Int. J. Photoenergy 2018, 2018, 8715987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rafatullah, M.; Sulaiman, O.; Hashim, R.; Ahmad, A. Adsorption of methylene blue on low-cost adsorbents: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Lin, X.; Rong, F.; Ji, X.; Fu, D. Carbon-doped mesoporous TiO2 film and its photocatalytic activity. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2011, 142, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hassan, M.E.; Cong, L.; Liu, G.; Zhu, D.; Cai, J. Synthesis and characterization of C-doped TiO2 thin films for visible-light-induced photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 294, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Asahi, R.; Morikawa, T.; Ohwaki, T.; Aoki, K.; Taga, Y. Visible-Light Photocatalysis in Nitrogen-Doped Titanium Oxides. Science 2001, 293, 269–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Mekprasart, W.; Khumtong, T.; Rattanarak, J.; Techitdheera, W.; Pecharapa, W. Effect of Nitrogen Doping on Optical and Photocatalytic Properties of TiO2 Thin Film Prepared by Spin Coating Process. Energy Procedia 2013, 34, 746–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Pérez-González, M.; Tomás, S.A.; Morales-Luna, M.; Arvizu, M.A.; Tellez-Cruz, M.M. Optical, structural, and morphological properties of photocatalytic TiO2–ZnO thin films synthesized by the sol–gel process. Thin Solid Film. 2015, 594, 304–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pérez-González, M.; Tomás, S.A.; Santoyo-Salazar, J.; Gallardo-Hernández, S.; Tellez-Cruz, M.M.; Solorza-Feria, O. Sol-gel synthesis of Ag-loaded TiO2-ZnO thin films with enhanced photocatalytic activity. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 779, 908–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sangchay, W. The Self-cleaning and Photocatalytic Properties of TiO2 Doped with SnO2 Thin Films Preparation by Sol-gel Method. Energy Procedia 2016, 89, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Hernández-Torres, M.E.; Ojeda-Carrera, M.T.; Sánchez-Cantú, M.; Silva-González, N.R.; Gracia-Jiménez, J.M. CdS/TiO2 composite films for methylene blue photodecomposition under visible light irradiation and non-photocorrosion of cadmium sulfide. Chem. Pap. 2014, 68, 1257–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Stoyanov, S.; Mladenova, D.; Dushkin, C. Photocatalytic properties of mixed TiO2/V2O5 films in water purification at varying ph. React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 2006, 88, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Yuranova, T.; Mosteo, R.; Bandara, J.; Laub, D.; Kiwi, J. Self-cleaning cotton textiles surfaces modified by photoactive SiO2/TiO2 coating. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2006, 244, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Pakdel, E.; Daoud, W.A. Self-cleaning cotton functionalized with TiO2/SiO2: Focus on the role of silica. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 401, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Sun, X.; Li, C.; Ruan, L.; Peng, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, J.; Li, Y. Ce-doped SiO2@TiO2 nanocomposite as an effective visible light photocatalyst. J. Alloy. Compd. 2014, 585, 800–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Arabatzis, I.M.; Antonaraki, S.; Stergiopoulos, T.; Hiskia, A.; Papaconstantinou, E.; Bernard, M.C.; Falaras, P. Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity of nanocrystalline thin film TiO2 catalysts towards 3,5-dichlorophenol degradation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2002, 149, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Gelover, S.; Mondragón, P.; Jiménez, A. Titanium dioxide sol-gel deposited over glass and its application as a photocatalyst for water decontamination. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2004, 165, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yogi, C.; Kojima, K.; Wada, N.; Tokumoto, H.; Takai, T.; Mizoguchi, T.; Tamiaki, H. Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue by TiO2 film and Au particles-TiO2 composite film. Thin Solid Film. 2008, 516, 5881–5884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Peng, Y.-H.; Huang, G.-F.; Huang, W.-Q. Visible-light absorption and photocatalytic activity of Cr-doped TiO2 nanocrystal films. Adv. Powder Technol. 2012, 23, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kaleji, B.K.; Sarraf-Mamoory, R.; Fujishima, A. Influence of Nb dopant on the structural and optical properties of nanocrystalline TiO2 thin films. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 132, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Gutiérrez, D.J.R.; Mathews, N.R.; Martínez, S.S. Photocatalytic activity enhancement of TiO2 thin films with silver doping under visible light. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2013, 262, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mohamed, R.M.; Aazam, E. Synthesis and characterization of P-doped TiO2 thin-films for photocatalytic degradation of butyl benzyl phthalate under visible-light irradiation. Chin. J. Catal. 2013, 34, 1267–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Qin, L.Z.; Liang, H.; Liao, B.; Liu, A.D.; Wu, X.Y.; Sun, J. Photocatalytic performance of Fe-, Ni-, or Cu-ion implanted TiO2 films under UV light, visible light and sunlight irradiation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2013, 307, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hou, X.-G.; Huang, M.-D.; Wu, X.-L.; Liu, A.-D. Preparation and studies of photocatalytic silver-loaded TiO2 films by hybrid sol–gel method. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 146, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gnanaprakasam, A.; Sivakumar, V.M.; Thirumarimurugan, M. Influencing Parameters in the Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Effluent via Nanometal Oxide Catalyst: A Review. Indian J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 2015, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Raghu, S.; Basha, C.A. Electrochemical treatment of Procion Black 5B using cylindrical flow reactor—A pilot plant study. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 139, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Abdel-Maksoud, Y.; Imam, E.; Ramadan, A. TiO2 Solar Photocatalytic Reactor Systems: Selection of Reactor Design for Scale-up and Commercialization—Analytical Review. Catalysts 2016, 6, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Joost, U.; Juganson, K.; Visnapuu, M.; Mortimer, M.; Kahru, A.; Nõmmiste, E.; Joost, U.; Kisand, V.; Ivask, A. Photocatalytic antibacterial activity of nano-TiO2 (anatase)-based thin films: Effects on Escherichia coli cells and fatty acids. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2015, 142, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Pleskova, S.N.; Golubeva, I.S.; Verevkin, Y.K.; Pershin, E.A.; Burenina, V.N.; Korolichin, V.V. Photoinduced bactericidal activity of TiO2 films. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2011, 47, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Hou, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, C.; Zhang, S.; Liu, H.; Li, S.; Wang, X. Toxicity and mechanisms of action of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in living organisms. J. Environ. Sci. 2019, 75, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Dasari, T.P.; Pathakoti, K.; Hwang, H.-M. Determination of the mechanism of photoinduced toxicity of selected metal oxide nanoparticles (ZnO, CuO, Co3O4 and TiO2) to E. coli bacteria. J. Environ. Sci. 2013, 25, 882–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kubacka, A.; Diez, M.S.; Rojo, D.; Bargiela, R.; Ciordia, S.; Zapico, I.; Albar, J.P.; Barbas, C.; Martins dos Santos, V.A.P.; Fernández-García, M.; et al. Understanding the antimicrobial mechanism of TiO2-based nanocomposite films in a pathogenic bacterium. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Sunada, K.; Watanabe, T.; Hashimoto, K. Studies on photokilling of bacteria on TiO2 thin film. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2003, 156, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Van Acker, H.; Coenye, T. The Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Antibiotic-Mediated Killing of Bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2017, 25, 456–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Pant, B.; Pant, H.R.; Pandeya, D.R.; Panthi, G.; Nam, K.T.; Hong, S.T.; Kim, C.S.; Kim, H.Y. Characterization and antibacterial properties of Ag NPs loaded nylon-6 nanocomposite prepared by one-step electrospinning process. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2012, 395, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Pant, B.; Pokharel, P.; Tiwari, A.P.; Saud, P.S.; Park, M.; Ghouri, Z.K.; Choi, S.; Park, S.-J.; Kim, H.-Y. Characterization and antibacterial properties of aminophenol grafted and Ag NPs decorated graphene nanocomposites. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 5656–5662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Arellano, U.; Asomoza, M.; Ramírez, F. Antimicrobial activity of Fe–TiO2 thin film photocatalysts. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2011, 222, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kiwi, J.; Rtimi, S.; Sanjines, R.; Pulgarin, C. TiO2 and TiO2-Doped Films Able to Kill Bacteria by Contact: New Evidence for the Dynamics of Bacterial Inactivation in the Dark and under Light Irradiation. Int. J. Photoenergy 2014, 2014, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Pleskova, S.N.; Golubeva, I.S.; Verevkin, Y.K. Bactericidal activity of titanium dioxide ultraviolet-induced films. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 59, 807–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Yoriya, S.; Chumphu, A.; Pookmanee, P.; Laithong, W.; Thepa, S.; Songprakorp, R. Multi-Layered TiO2 Films towards Enhancement of Escherichia coli Inactivation. Materials 2016, 9, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Erdural, B.; Bolukbasi, U.; Karakas, G. Photocatalytic antibacterial activity of TiO2–SiO2 thin films: The effect of composition on cell adhesion and antibacterial activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2014, 283, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Sangchay, W.; Sikong, L.; Kooptarnond, K. The Photocatalytic and Antibacterial Activity of Cu-Doped TiO2 Thin Films. Walailak J. Sci. Technol. 2013, 10, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Hou, X.; Ma, H.; Liu, F.; Deng, J.; Ai, Y.; Zhao, X.; Mao, D.; Li, D.; Liao, B. Synthesis of Ag ion-implanted TiO2 thin films for antibacterial application and photocatalytic performance. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 299, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Ubonchonlakate, K.; Sikong, L.; Saito, F. Photocatalytic disinfection of P.aeruginosa bacterial Ag-doped TiO2 film. Procedia Eng. 2012, 32, 656–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kim, D.S.; Kwak, S.-Y. Photocatalytic Inactivation of E. coli with a Mesoporous TiO2 Coated Film Using the Film Adhesion Method. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 148–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Akhavan, O.; Ghaderi, E. Photocatalytic Reduction of Graphene Oxide Nanosheets on TiO2 Thin Film for Photoinactivation of Bacteria in Solar Light Irradiation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 20214–20220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram showing the TiO2 photocatalysis. Adapted with permission from [7]; Copyright 2011 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram showing the TiO2 photocatalysis. Adapted with permission from [7]; Copyright 2011 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Coatings 09 00613 g001
Figure 2. A schematic diagram showing the limitations of TiO2 photocatalysts.
Figure 2. A schematic diagram showing the limitations of TiO2 photocatalysts.
Coatings 09 00613 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagram showing the process flow chart for the preparation of TiO2-based film by sol-gel method. Adapted with permission from [5]; Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram showing the process flow chart for the preparation of TiO2-based film by sol-gel method. Adapted with permission from [5]; Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V.
Coatings 09 00613 g003
Figure 4. Schematic diagram showing the toxicity of TiO2 NPs to microorganisms [103]. Reprinted with permission from [103]; Copyright 2018 The Research Centre for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Figure 4. Schematic diagram showing the toxicity of TiO2 NPs to microorganisms [103]. Reprinted with permission from [103]; Copyright 2018 The Research Centre for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Coatings 09 00613 g004
Figure 5. AFM images of E. coli cells on the TiO2 film: (a) no illumination; (b) illumination for 1 day; (c) illumination for 6 days. Light intensity was 1.0 mW/cm2. Adapted with permission from [106]; Copyright 2003 Elsevier Science B.V.
Figure 5. AFM images of E. coli cells on the TiO2 film: (a) no illumination; (b) illumination for 1 day; (c) illumination for 6 days. Light intensity was 1.0 mW/cm2. Adapted with permission from [106]; Copyright 2003 Elsevier Science B.V.
Coatings 09 00613 g005
Figure 6. Colony forming units (CFUs) of various bacteria strains after incubation under UV for 15 min on the surface of sterile glass (control) and TiO2. Reprinted with the permission from [113]; Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V.
Figure 6. Colony forming units (CFUs) of various bacteria strains after incubation under UV for 15 min on the surface of sterile glass (control) and TiO2. Reprinted with the permission from [113]; Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V.
Coatings 09 00613 g006
Table 1. Common techniques for TiO2 coating and their advantages as well as limitations.
Table 1. Common techniques for TiO2 coating and their advantages as well as limitations.
MethodDescriptionAdvantagesLimitationsRef.
Sputter depositionAn ionizing plasma sputters the target in a vacuum chamber and the ionized atoms are deposited on the substrate.—High quality and uniform deposition
—Good adhesion
—Risk of substrate damage due to ionic bombardment
—Grain size of the sputtered films is typically smaller
[34,53,54]
Chemical vapor depositionA thin film of metal oxide is formed on a heated substrate from a gaseous phase in a closed chamber at a relatively higher temperature.—Produce uniform, films at low or high rates
—Flexible with regards to the shape of the substrate
—Compatibility with good adhesion
—Simultaneously coat multiple components
—Control structure of crystal and generate uniform films with pure materials and high density
—High cost
—High reaction temperature
—Low deposition rates
—Cannot control the stoichiometry of films using more than one material
[53,54,55]
Physical Vapor DepositionIt involves the transfer of material on an atomic level onto a solid substrate. This is a physical process such as high temperature vacuum evaporation followed by condensation rather than a chemical reaction among precursors.—Suitable for any type of inorganic materials
—Safer than other methods
—High cost[54,55]
Sol-gel synthesisThis is a wet chemical method that involves hydrolysis and condensation of metallo-organic alkoxide precursors for gel formation followed by dip/spin/spray coating or screen printing.—Simple, homogeneity, low cost, reliability, reproducibility, controllability
—Films are easily anchored on the substrate bearing complicated shapes and a large surface area.
—Suitable for deposition on various substrates
—Easy method
—Long period of deposition
—High temperature
—Not possible to attach a thick layer of nanoparticles on the substrate
[34,53,55]
Spray pyrolysisA solution containing a precursor is sprayed by a nanoporous nebulizer onto the hot substrate in the furnace.—Cost-effective and can be easily performed
—Substrates with complex geometries can be coated.
—Uniform and high-quality coatings
—Low processing temperature
—Multilayer fabrication capability
—Coatings are not uniform in thickness.[34,56]
Electrophoretic depositionFormation of coating on the charged surface takes place by the movement of charge particles in suspension under an appropriate electric field—Simple and cheap
—Uniform coating
—Size and shape of nanoparticles can be controlled
—High-quality coatings
—Volatile, toxic
—Flammability
—Costly
—High electric field strengths are required.
[53]
HydrothermalIncludes either a single or heterogeneous phase reactions in aqueous solution at elevated temperatures and pressures to crystallize materials directly from solution—Simple to operate
—Ability to grow large, high-quality crystals, maintaining a good control of their chemical composition
—Expensive autoclaves are required
—Impossibility of observing the crystal as it grows
[34,55]
Doctor-bladeA slurry is placed on a substrate, and the unidirectional shear force is applied by a blade over the substrate. —Simple and economic
—Easy to control film thickness and homogeneity
—Suitable for mass production of electro-ceramic thick films
—Slow evaporation
—Tendency to aggregate or crystallize at high solution/paste concentration
[34]
Plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (CVD)This method utilizes a plasma to deeply fragment organic precursor molecules, which subsequently deposit onto solid substrates within the reaction chamber, such as nanoparticles.—Requires much lower temperatures
—Good for deposition on multilayer films
—Good adhesion and uniformity
—High deposition rate
—Good mechanical properties
—Controllable coating thickness
—Chemical and particle contamination
—High cost
—Toxic byproducts
[54]
Spray coatingThe solvent is evaporated during the spraying process.—Simple
—Low-cost
—Scalable film forming technique
—The thickness is not uniform.[57,58]
Table 2. Photocatalytic dye degradation performance of various TiO2 films prepared by sol-gel method.
Table 2. Photocatalytic dye degradation performance of various TiO2 films prepared by sol-gel method.
CatalystTiO2 PrecursorSubstrateLight SourcePollutantInitial Concentration of the PollutantDegradation PerformanceRef.
TiO2 nanocrystalline thin filmtitanium (IV) butoxide and Degussa P25 TiO2glassUV3,5-dichlorophenol (3,5-DCP)5 ppm1600 min[89]
TiO2 filmtitanium tetraisopropoxide and Degussa P25soda lime glass, pyrex glass UV2-hydroxybutanedioic acid50 ppm200 min[63]
Fe-doped TiO2 filmtitanium tetraisopropoxidesoda lime glass, silica rings, glass helixsunlightmethyl orange100 ppm95% in 3 h[70]
TiO2 filmtitanium isopropoxideglasssolar light4- chlorophenol and carbaryl20 mg/L4-chlorophenol: 75% degradation in 3 h, and carbaryl: 65% for degradation in 3 h[90]
Mesoporous TiO2 filmtitanium isopropoxideTween 20 as templateUVcreatinine19.5 mg/L-[64]
Au-doped TiO2 filmtitanium isopropoxidequartz glassUVmethylene blue1.63 × 10− 5 M180 min[91]
S-doped TiO2 filmtitanium isopropoxideborosilicate glassvisible lighthepatotoxin microcystin-LR (MC-LR)500 μg L−1∼50% degradation was observed in 5 h[31]
Cr-doped TiO2 filmbutyl titanateglass or siliconvisible lightmethyl orange90% within 5 h[92]
Nb-doped TiO2 film titanium (IV) butoxideglazed porcelainUVmethylene blue5 ppm76.2% within 120 min[93]
Ag-doped TiO2 film, titanium butoxide ITO platesvisible lightmethanol and basic orange II (BOII)60 × 10−3 mol L−1 80% of total organic carbon in 5 h[94]
P-doped TiO2 film titanium tetrabutyl titanateglass platesvisible lightbutyl benzyl phthalate (BBP)20 mg/L98% in 240 min[95]
Fe, Ni, and Cu –ion implanted TiO2 film, tetrabutylorthotitanateglassUV, visible, sunlightmethyl orange [96]
Ag/TiO2 filmstetrabutylorthotitanateglassUV, visible lightmethyl orange5 × 10−5 mol/LUV365 (73%) and visible light (3.8 times) enhanced.[97]
Bi-modified
TiO2 film
titanium isopropoxideborosilicate glasssimulated sunlightmalachite green10 μmol/L67%
180 min
[75]
TiO2 thin filmstitanium tetraisopropoxideglassvisible lightmethylene blue1 × 10−6 M92%
4 h
[65]
Pb-doped TiO2 filmtitanium (IV) butoxidesoda-lime glasssunlightdimethyl-2,2-dichlorovinyl phosphate10−4 M~30%
6 h
[72]
Ce-modified TiO2 filmtitanium tetraisopropoxideglassUV and visible lightbasic blue 412.5 × 10−5 M~85% in 180 min[73]
Table 3. Antibacterial performance of various TiO2 films prepared by the sol-gel method.
Table 3. Antibacterial performance of various TiO2 films prepared by the sol-gel method.
CatalystSubstrateBacteriaConcentration of BacteriaIncubation TimeLight SourceInhibition %Ref.
Fe–TiO2 thin filmsodium glass E. coli-1 hVisible light100[110]
Multi-Layered TiO2 filmglass platesE. coli2.59 × 107 CFU/ml8 hSunlight91.9[113]
nano-TiO2 (anatase)-based thin filmsSiliconE. coli108 CFU/mL20 minUV100[101]
SiO2–TiO2 filmglass slidesE. coli106–108 per ml1 hArtificial solar radiation50[114]
Cu-doped TiO2 filmglassE. coli103 CFU/ml4 h UV100[115]
TiO2 filmglass plateS. aureus, S. epidermidis, E. coli200 CFU15 minUV50[102]
TiO2 thin filmsilica- coated soda- lime glassE. coli2 × 105 CFU/ml90 minUV100[106]
Ag ion-implanted TiO2 thin films E. coli4.46 × 108 CFU/mL24 hfluorescent lamp and in the dark100[116]
Ag-doped TiO2 filmglass fiberP. aeruginosa1 × 103 CFU/ml10 minUV100[117]
Mesoporous TiO2 filmglassE. coli106 cells mL−160 minUV99.99[118]
GO nanosheets on TO2 filmglassE. coli106 CFU/mL24 hSolar light[119]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pant, B.; Park, M.; Park, S.-J. Recent Advances in TiO2 Films Prepared by Sol-Gel Methods for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants and Antibacterial Activities. Coatings 2019, 9, 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9100613

AMA Style

Pant B, Park M, Park S-J. Recent Advances in TiO2 Films Prepared by Sol-Gel Methods for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants and Antibacterial Activities. Coatings. 2019; 9(10):613. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9100613

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pant, Bishweshwar, Mira Park, and Soo-Jin Park. 2019. "Recent Advances in TiO2 Films Prepared by Sol-Gel Methods for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants and Antibacterial Activities" Coatings 9, no. 10: 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9100613

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop