Next Article in Journal
Investigating the Correlation of Tectonic and Morphometric Characteristics with the Hydrological Response in a Greek River Catchment Using Earth Observation and Geospatial Analysis Techniques
Next Article in Special Issue
The Study of Uranium Accumulation in Marine Bottom Sediments: Effect of Redox Conditions at the Time of Sedimentation
Previous Article in Journal
Heated Topics in Thermochronology and Paths towards Resolution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Natural Radioactivity of Laterite and Volcanic Rock Sample for Radioactive Mineral Exploration in Mamuju, Indonesia

1
Centre for Nuclear Minerals Technology, National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia (BATAN), Jakarta 12440, Indonesia
2
Polytechnic Institute of Nuclear Technology (STTN), Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
3
Centre for Technology of Radiation Safety and Metrology, National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia (BATAN), Jakarta 12440, Indonesia
4
Department of Radiation Science, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8560, Japan
5
Institute of Radiation Emergency Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8560, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors have made an equivalent contribution to the first author.
Geosciences 2020, 10(9), 376; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10090376
Submission received: 7 August 2020 / Revised: 14 September 2020 / Accepted: 17 September 2020 / Published: 19 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radioisotopes Studies in the Geosciences)

Abstract

:
Mamuju is a region of Indonesia with relatively high exposure to natural radiation. Since 2012, Mamuju has been a uranium and thorium exploration area. Several mapping studies of the region have been carried out to depict NORM (naturally occurring radioactive material) areas and areas with uranium anomalies. This paper is the first study to use radioactivity measurements of laterite and volcanic rocks to determine the characteristics of radionuclides and other mineral measurements, which are essential for categorising Mamuju rocks and exploring the region as a potential mining area. The radioactivity of the samples was measured using a high-purity germanium (HPGe) detector. Furthermore, we used X-ray fluorescence (XRF) to determine the rock mineral composition. Mamuju is anomalous due to its high content of 238U and 232Th concentrations of 539–128,699 Bq·kg−1 (average: 22,882 Bq·kg−1) and 471–288,639 Bq·kg−1 (average: 33,549 Bq·kg−1), respectively. The major elements are dominant, including Fe2O3, SiO2, Al2O3, and Na2O, with several other major elements such as MnO, TiO2, and CaO.

1. Introduction

The government of Indonesia plans to build a nuclear power plant (NPP). The amount of nuclear fuel necessary for the plant’s operation will require a supply of uranium ore. To maintain the continuity of the NPP’s operation, it is essential to maintain the balance of the demand and supply of uranium. Therefore, before the NPP is built, it is necessary to analyse the availability of uranium to develop an adequate and sustainable uranium supply strategy.
Mamuju is a region of Indonesia with relatively high exposure to natural radiation. According to the results of research conducted by the Centre for Safety and Metrology Technology of Radiation—BATAN, the ambient dose equivalent rate in the Mamuju area reached 2800 nSv·h−1 with an average value of 631 ± 23 nSv·h−1. This value is quite high compared to the average natural radiation dose rate in Indonesia, which is approximately 50 nSv·h−1 [1,2]. Furthermore, a mapping research was conducted by the Centre for Nuclear Minerals Technology—BATAN to depict the NORM region and areas with uranium (U) anomalies in Mamuju [3]. Significant thorium (Th) levels were found in several areas in Tapalang, and high uranium (U) levels were observed at several sites.
U and Th contents in volcanic rocks in the Tapalang area are controlled by the distribution of rock types and their constituent soils. The main minerals that contain U and Th are davidite and thorianite, while gummite and autunite are secondary minerals [4]. Mamuju contains the Adang volcano rock complex, which is the product of the volcanism process of a volcano complex with an eruption centre and several lava domes [5]. The formation of volcanic rock complexes is related to the presence of radioactive minerals in basaltic–andesitic rocks. The accumulation of U and Th also occurs in volcanic rocks that have undergone weathering and enrichment processes [6].
Natural enrichment of radioactive minerals occurs due to volcanic activity in Mamuju area. Remote sensing analysis shows that the Mamuju area, including Tapalang, is a centre of volcanic activity, revealing a number of circular features throughout the region [7]. Areas that have high Th levels generally have a high level of rock alteration with a varied Th/U ratio.
U deposits can be formed under various geological conditions, including high-grade metamorphic, plutonic, metasomatic, hydrothermal, and basin diagenesis, and in volcanic, sedimentary, and superficial environments [8]. According to these geological processes, U ore deposits are divided into dozens of groups on the basis of different criteria. In intrusive-type U deposits, the mineralisation is associated with high-temperature magmatic systems such as alaskite, pegmatite, and granite [9]. The main U mineral in this group is typically magmatic uraninite (or uranothorite in some cases) [10]. The ore grades of this type of U deposits are usually low (0.01–0.1%). Mamuju and the surrounding geological area are composed of the Latimojong formation, Talaya volcanic rocks, Adang volcanic rocks, intrusion rocks, the Mamuju formation, the Tapalang member of Mamuju formation, and alluvium deposits (Figure 1) [4].
U has several naturally occurring isotopes, including 238U, 235U, and 234U. The determination of the 238U/235U activity ratio (AR) has been used as an indication of the presence of depleted uranium (DU) in the environment [11,12,13,14]; naturally occurring U has a constant 238U/235U AR of 21.7 [15], while DU has a ratio above 76.9 [11]. DU is characterised as technologically enhanced naturally occurring. Natural U contains 0.7% of the 235U isotope. The remaining 99.3% is mostly the 238U isotope, which does not contribute directly to the fission process. Most reactors are light-water reactors (of two types, pressurised water reactor and boiling water reactor ) and require U to be enriched from 0.7% to 3–5% 235U in their fuel.
The objective of this paper is to describe the radioactivity characteristics of laterite and volcanic rock samples from Mamuju, which are essential to the categorisation of Mamuju rocks in the radioactive mineral exploration area. This is the first study of the radioactivity characteristics of laterite and volcanic rock samples from Mamuju. Other researchers explained the geological order of the region [3], mapping radionuclides on the basis of satellite imagery results [7] and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) measurements [3,4,5]

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Mamuju is located on the western edge of the island Sulawesi. The topography of the Mamuju area includes the area from the coast to the mountain. The city of Mamuju lies in the province of West Sulawesi. Sulawesi Island has a complex geological setting with the complex of tectonic setting caused by the three interaction plates (Pacific, Eurasian continental, and Australian continental plates). Sulawesi island is generally divided into nonvolcanic arch and volcanic arch [16].
A total of 30 fresh rock samples were obtained from several subdistricts of Mamuju area: Takandeang, Rante Dunia, Kasambang, Botteng, Ahu, Hulu Mamuju, Hulu Ampalas, and Salumati (Figure 2). The purpose of taking fresh rock is to avoid weathering factors so that the fresh rock obtained is in accordance with the actual rock conditions. Fresh rock samples came from locations with high exposure; then, outcrop observations were made using a magnifying glass and ultraviolet flashlight. After the presence of mineral deposits in the outcrop was identified, further sampling was carried out at that location, accompanied by recording the coordinates of the location, the depth of rock or soil, and the rock and soil types.

2.2. Identification of Elements

We used XRF (Xepos, Ametek, Berwyn, PA, USA) to determine the elements in laterite and volcanic rock samples. The samples were air-dried at 25–35 °C for three days and then dried in an oven at 105 °C for more than 24 h to remove the moisture content until a constant weight was reached. Then, the samples were crushed and mashed to a size of 200 mesh and heated with 105 °C for 2 h to remove organic compounds. A total of 5 g of each sample was weighed, and 1 g of lithium tetraborate (Li2B4O7; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was added as a binding agent. The mixture was stirred well and compressed into pellet form with a hydraulic press. Once the samples were shaped, the pellets were analysed using XRF. Before testing the samples, we performed XRF calibration using a blank, OREAS-124 (Mantra Resousces Nyota Prospect, Lindi, Tanzania), OREAS-465 (Tanzania- Mantra Resousces Nyota Prospect), CGL-124 (Central Geological Laboratory, Ulan Bator, Mongolia, RG-Th (IAEA), and GSR-5 (China).

2.3. Radioactivity Measurement

We measured the activity concentrations of the samples using an HPGe detector (GEM, ORTEC, USA). To prepare such a standard, a known quantity of a multi-nuclide standard source supplied by the Japan Radioisotope Association was placed in a cylindrical container of 48 mm × 55 mm (U-8 container). Approximately 100 g of each sample was weighed and sealed in U-8 container. The air-tightness of this vial aims to create equilibrium between the parent and the progeny, of which one of the decays of U and Th is 222Rn and 220Rn, which are gaseous. Furthermore, the samples are left for more than 30 days to allow decay products to reach secular equilibrium before further gamma spectrometer measurements. It was necessary to calibrate the counting system with a standard source with the same geometry as those of the samples. We measured 238U, 235U, 232Th, and 40K using a HPGe detector with a relative efficiency of 40%, a resolution of 1.81 keV at 1.33 MeV, and ultra-low background shielding using old lead content. The detector was enclosed in a 10 cm thick compact lead shield. The counts of the samples were obtained by analysing the spectra obtained from the Multi-Channel Analyzer (MCA) on a PC with associated Gamma Studio software (Seiko, EG&G, Tokyo, Japan). The counting time was about 1800–70,000 s, depending on when the total count of each radionuclide reached 10,000 to obtain adequate certainty. The full energy absorbed peaks of 351 for 214Pb and 609 keV for 214Bi were identified for calculations of 238U or 226Ra concentration. 235U radioactivity was determined using the gamma energy lines of 143 keV and 163 keV. However, the most intensive gamma line, 185 keV, was excluded to avoid interference with the 186 keV gamma energy from 226Ra [17]. The full energy absorbed peaks of 238 keV for 212Pb, 581 keV for 208Tl, and 911 keV for 228Ac were used for 232Th, and a single peak of 1460 keV was used for 40K. The minimum detectable concentrations (MDCs) of 238U, 232Th, 235U, and 40K for this measurement were 5.2 × 10−3, 5.2 × 10−3, 3.4 × 10−3, and 1.5 × 10−3 Bq·kg−1, respectively. We used Equations (1) and (2) to calculate activity concentrations from these measurements.
A = n E   Y   W f c ,
L D = L C + K σ D ,
where n is net count per second, E is the counting efficiency, Y is the energy yield, W is the sample weight (kg), and fc is the correction factor (including summing in, summing out, decay factor, recovery factor, attenuation factor, branching ratio, and growth factor). LD is the detection limit, LC is the critical level below which no signal can be detected, σ D is the standard deviation, and K is the error probability [18,19].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

We used Origin Pro 2020b (student version) to evaluate significant relationships between the distribution coefficients of radionuclides and major elements and their oxide contents. We conducted a Pearson correlation analysis and calculated the values of Pearson correlation coefficients with a two-tailed significance test (p-value at 0.05 and 0.01). Equation (3) expresses the Pearson correlation coefficients [20].
r = i = 1 n ( x i x ¯ ) ( y i y ¯ ) i = 1 n ( x i x ¯ ) 2   i = 1 n ( y i y ¯ ) 2
where n is the sample size, xi and yi are the individual sample points indexed, and x ¯ ,   y ¯ are the sample means.

3. Results

According to the regional geological data, the volcanic rocks found in the study area belong to the Talaya volcano group and the Adang volcano group. In general, sedimentary rocks in Mamuju occur in laterite, strata, and structures, while the constituent rocks of the volcanic complex in Mamuju Region are varied; thus, it is necessary to use very fresh rock samples. The base rock is generally dominated by types of tephrite, tephriponolite, phonotephrite, and phonolite (Table 1).
Volcanic rocks from the Adang complex are composed of trachyte, tephra-phonolite, phono-tephrite, and phonolite rock with ultrapotassic affinity formed in the active continental margin (ACM) crust within the SW continental crust of Sulawesi [4,6]. The XRF analysis showed that the rocks in Mamuju are dominated by the elements Fe2O3, SiO2, Al2O3, and Na2O, with several other major elements such as MnO, TiO2, and CaO (Table 2).
The rocks also contained rare Earth elements (REEs), as shown in Table 3. The identified REEs include Rb2O, YPO4, ZrO2, BaO, La2O3, Ce2O3, Nd2O3, and Sm2O3. The most dominant of these REEs were YPO4, ZrO2, La2O3, and Ce2O3 with highest concentrations of 1235 µg·g−1, 2892 µg·g−1, and 23,570 µg·g−1, respectively.
The radioactivity measurement was carried out in rocks using an HPGe detector (Table 4). The results show that the Mamuju rocks are unique because they have very high concentrations of 238U and 232Th radionuclides. There are two categories (uranium prone and thorium prone) of rocks that have higher 232Th concentrations, such as samples from Hulu Mamuju, Takandeang, and Rante Dunia, with a maximum 232Th activity concentration of 288,639 Bq·kg−1. The rocks with the highest 238U activity concentrations, such as Botteng, Hulu Ampalas, Salumati, and Ahu, were found in the Botteng region with a maximum activity concentration of 128,699 Bq·kg−1. The highest level of 40K was measured in the Hulu Mamuju area and was approximately 23,088 Bq·kg−1.

4. Discussion

The diverse rock types in a volcanic complex indicate the existence of various factors that influence the formation of these rocks, including the source of magma, crystallisation rate, magma differentiation system, time, temperature, and pressure of magma formation, the amount of influential volatiles, and the tectonic arrangement of volcanic arcs. The results of elemental content measurements in the Mamuju sample using XRF can be seen in Table 2. It is known that rocks in Mamuju are dominated by elements of Fe2O3, SiO2, Al2O3, and Na2O, with several other major elements such as MnO, TiO2, and CaO. Mamuju rocks also contain rare Earth elements or rare Earth metals (Table 3). The basaltic rocks that form the Adang volcanic rock complex are ultrapotassic rocks. Ultrapotassic rocks contain high levels of K2O when associated with shoshonitic and calc-alkaline series. According to the results of correlation analysis between 238U, 232Th and the major elements in these rocks, there were several relationships of Fe2O3, SiO2, Al2O3, and Na2O with U and Th in Mamuju (Figure 3). The correlation accumulation of U and Th levels also occurs in volcanic rocks that have undergone weathering and enrichment processes. This is in accordance with previous studies showing that the Mamuju area contains the radioactive materials thorianite (12% Pb), davidite (15% Fe), gummite (>70% Th), and autunite [4,5,7].
Among the REEs, there is a positive correlation between YPO4 and ZrO2 and between La2O3 and Ce2O3 (Figure 4). This is because YPO4 (91Y) is the parent radionuclide and emits beta particles into ZrO2 (91Zr) as in the decay scheme. Similarly, La2O3 (140La) decays to Ce2O3 (140Ce). With such conditions, Mamuju rocks contain higher levels of zircon and cerium.
The results of HPGe analysis show that Mamuju rocks have a very high concentration of 238U and 232Th radionuclides. On the basis of the concept of secular equilibrium, concentrations of 238U and 226Ra are considered the same concentration between the parent and the progeny. We created a comparison chart of 238U activity concentrations using an HPGe detector and for total U using XRF analysis (Figure 5). This method was also used to compare 232Th and total Th. Correlation analysis was conducted using Pearson correlation. The p-value was less than 0.05 (two-tailed) and, thus, it was categorised as having a significant correlation. The correlation coefficient values of the U and Th variables were 0.93 and 0.92, respectively, which shows that both methods have a strong positive correlation. This graph shows that there is a uniformity between the 238U results of HPGe analysed from the energy peak 214Pb and 214Bi and the concentration of total U measured by XRF and between the 232Th results of HPGe analysed from the energy peak 212Pb, 208Tl, and 228Ac and the concentration of total Th measured by XRF.
According to the HPGe measurement result, Mamuju is an anomalous area because it has high contents of 238U, 232Th, and 40K with activity concentrations of 539–128,699 Bq·kg−1 (average: 22,882 ± 1602 Bq·kg−1), 471–288,639 Bq·kg−1 (average: 33,549 ± 2348 Bq kg−1), 69–23,088 Bq·kg−1 (average: 1909 ± 134 Bq·kg−1), respectively. According to the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) data, these values exceed the global elemental average concentrations of soil samples; the average concentration of 238U is around 37 ± 4 Bq·kg−1, that of 232Th is around 33 ± 3 Bq·kg−1, and that of 40K is around 400 ± 24 Bq·kg−1 (Figure 6) [21]. This shows that Mamuju has potential as an exploration area for radioactive minerals if we compare these values with other studies [22,23,24].
According to the measurement results, rock samples from Mamuju have a 238U/235U AR of 20.1–26.6, with an average of 22.9. This value indicates that the Mamuju area is still in natural condition without the effect of fallout from other sources (Figure 7) [11,15].

5. Conclusions

Mamuju is an anomalous area due to its high content of U and Th concentrations. From this study, it can be concluded that Mamuju rocks have 238U concentration characteristics of 539–128,699 Bq·kg−1 and 232Th concentration characteristics of 471–288,639 Bq·kg−1. The U occurring in the region is categorised as natural with an average AR 238U/235U of 22.9. The major elements include Fe2O3, SiO2, Al2O3, and Na2O, with several other major elements such as MnO, TiO2, and CaO and REE elements such as ZrO2 and Ce2O3. Therefore, Mamuju has potential as an exploration area for radioactive minerals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.D.N., M.H., and S.T.; methodology, E.D.N. and N.A.; validation, I.R. and E.D.N.; formal analysis, E.D.N. and I.R.; investigation, H.S., I.R., and E.D.N.; resources, E.D.N., I.R., H.S., and S.T.; data curation, E.D.N. and I.R.; writing—original draft preparation, E.D.N. and I.R.; writing—review and editing, E.D.N., I.R., H.S., S.P., M.H., N.A., and S.T.; visualization, E.D.N.; supervision, H.S., S.P., M.H., N.A., and S.T.; funding acquisition, H.S. and S.T. All authors read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by the Indonesian government (DIPA 2014-2019).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alatas, Z.; Lusiyanti, Y.; Sofiati, P.; Dwi, R.; Viria, S. Cytogenetic response of population in high natural radiation areas in Mamuju regency, West Sulawesi. J. Sains Indones. Nucl. Tech. 2012, 13, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  2. Eka, D.N.; Hosoda, M.; Kusdiana; Winarni, I.D.; Prihantoro, A.; Suzuki, T.; Tamakuma, Y.; Akata, N.; Tokonami, S. Dose assessment of radium-226 in drinking water from Mamuju, a high background radiation area of Indonesia. Radiat. Environ. Med. 2020, 9, 79–83. [Google Scholar]
  3. Heri, S.; Sukadana, I.G.; Sumaryanto, A. Radiometric mapping for naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) assessment in Mamuju, West Sulawesi. IAJ 2014, 40, 33–39. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sukadana, I.G.; Indrastomo, F.; Syaeful, H. Geology and radionuclide ratio mapping for radioactive mineral exploration in Mamuju, West Sulawesi. In Proceedings of the Seminar Nasional Teknologi Energi Nuklir, Bali, Indonesia, 15–16 October 2015; Volume 1, pp. 140–147. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sukadana, I.G.; Heri, S. Identification of mineralization type and specific radioactive minerals. J. East China Univ. Technol. 2016, 39, 36–45. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ratman, N.; Atmawinata, S. Geology Map of Mamuju-Sulawesi, 1st ed.; Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Geologi: Bandung, Indonesia, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  7. Indrastomo, F.D.I.; Gde, S.; Saepuloh, A.; Harsolumakso, A.H.; Datu, K. Volcanostratigraphy interpretation of mamuju area based on landsat-8 imagery analysis. Eksplorium 2016, 36, 71–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cuney, M.; Emetz, A.; Mercadier, J.; Mykchaylov, V.; Shunko, V.; Yuslenko, A. Uranium deposits associated with na-metasomatism from central Ukraine: A review of some of the major deposits and genetic constraints. Ore Geol. Rev. 2012, 44, 82–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Min, M.; Chen, J.; Wang, J.; Wei, G.; Fayek, M. Mineral paragenesis and textures associated with sandstonehosted roll-front uranium deposits, Nw China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2005, 26, 51–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cuney, M. The extreme diversity of uranium deposits. Miner. Depos. 2009, 44, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Salman, A.; Ahmed, Z.; Allam, K.; El-Sharkawy, S. A comparative study for 235U radioactivity concentration calculation methods in phosphate samples. Radiat. Prot. Environ. 2019, 42, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, C. Determination of uranium isotopic ratio (235U/238U) using extractive electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J. Anal. At. Spec. 2011, 26, 2045–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ivanovich, M.; Harmon, R.S. Uranium Series Disequilibrium: Applications to Earth, Marine, and Environmental Sciences; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mishra, S.; Kasar, S.; Takamasa, A.; Veerasamy, N.; Sahoo, S.K. Measurement of uranium distribution coefficient and 235U/238U ratio in soils affected by Fukushima dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident. J. Environ. Radioact. 2019, 198, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Karangelos, D.; Anagnostakis, M.; Hinis, E.; Simopoulos, S.; Zunic, Z. Determination of depleted uranium in environmental samples by gamma-spectroscopic techniques. J. Environ. Radioact. 2004, 76, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hartono, U.S. Geology Sulawesi, 1st ed.; LIPI Press: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  17. Saleh, I.H.; Abdel-Hakim, A.A. Determination of depleted uranium using a high-resolution gamma-ray spectrometer and its applications in soil and sediments. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2016, 10, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. El-Gamal, A.; Saleh, I.H. Radiological and mineralogical investigation of accretion and erosion coastal sediments in Nile Delta region, Egypt. J. Oceanogr. Mar. Sci. 2012, 3, 41–55. [Google Scholar]
  19. Reguigui, N. Gamma Ray Spectrometry. Practical Information. 2006. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nafaa_Reguigui/publication/259533588_Gamma_Ray_Spectrometry/links/0046352c6cf29942b0000000.pdf (accessed on 18 September 2020).
  20. McKean, J.W.; Sheather, S.J. Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology, 3rd ed.; 2003; Available online: https://www.kriso.ee/encyclopedia-physical-science-technology-3rd-edition-db-9780122274107.html (accessed on 18 September 2020).
  21. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. UNSCEAR 2008 Report, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Volume I: Annex B Exposures of the Public and Workers from Various Sources of Radiation; UNSCEAR: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gaafar, I.; El-Shershaby, A.; Zeidan, I.; El-Ahll, L.S. Natural radioactivity and radiation hazard assessment of phosphate mining, Quseir-Safaga area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. NRIAG J. Astron. Geophys. 2016, 5, 160–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Vakanjac, B.; Rutherford, N.; Vakanjac, V.R.; Đumić, T.; Djordjević-Milošević, S. Distribution of Uranium and Rare Elements in Radioactive Phosphate-Bearing Anomalies in Southeast Mongolia. Minerals 2020, 10, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Abdulqader, S.M.; Vakanjac, B.; Kovacevic, J.; Naunovic, Z.; Zdjelarevic, N. Natural radioactivity of intrusive-metamorphic and sedimentary rocks of the Balkan Mountain range (Serbia, Stara Planina). Minerals 2018, 8, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The geological map of the Mamuju area.
Figure 1. The geological map of the Mamuju area.
Geosciences 10 00376 g001
Figure 2. Study area: (a) Sulawesi Island and Mamuju area; (b) Mamuju subdistrict and sampling point.
Figure 2. Study area: (a) Sulawesi Island and Mamuju area; (b) Mamuju subdistrict and sampling point.
Geosciences 10 00376 g002
Figure 3. Correlation analysis between 232U and 232Th and major elements.
Figure 3. Correlation analysis between 232U and 232Th and major elements.
Geosciences 10 00376 g003
Figure 4. Correlation between ZrO2 and YPO4 concentrations and between Ce2O3 and La2O3 concentrations.
Figure 4. Correlation between ZrO2 and YPO4 concentrations and between Ce2O3 and La2O3 concentrations.
Geosciences 10 00376 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of 238U and 232Th concentration between gamma spectrometry and XRF measurement.
Figure 5. Comparison of 238U and 232Th concentration between gamma spectrometry and XRF measurement.
Geosciences 10 00376 g005
Figure 6. 238U and 232Th concentration in Mamuju. *a is the worldwide average for 238U; *b is the worldwide average for 232Th.
Figure 6. 238U and 232Th concentration in Mamuju. *a is the worldwide average for 238U; *b is the worldwide average for 232Th.
Geosciences 10 00376 g006
Figure 7. 238U/235U activity ratio. WA is the natural world average of 238U/235U activity ratio.
Figure 7. 238U/235U activity ratio. WA is the natural world average of 238U/235U activity ratio.
Geosciences 10 00376 g007
Table 1. Details of rock sample.
Table 1. Details of rock sample.
Sample No.Samples CodeSedimentation TypeRock TypeRocks NameGPS (UTM)Location
ZoneEast (m)North (m)
1A1StructureLava phonoliteLava phonolite50 S721,567.009,696,880.00Hulu Mamuju
2A2StructureLava phonoliteLava phonolite50 S721,530.009,696,892.00Hulu Mamuju
3A3StructureLava phonoliteLava phonolite50 S721,774.009,696,416.00Hulu Mamuju
4A4StructureLava phonoliteLava phonolite50 S721,575.009,696,825.00Hulu Mamuju
5A5StructureLava phonoliteLava phonolite50 S721,827.009,696,745.00Hulu Mamuju
6B1StrataPhonolitoidPhonolitoid50 S707,790.009,692,800.00Botteng
7B2StrataPhonolitoidPhonolite50 S707,412.029,694,718.92Botteng
8C1StructureAutobreksiPhonolite50 S705,746.009,688,196.00Takandeang
9C2StructureAutobreksiPhonolite50 S705,746.009,688,196.00Takandeang
10C3StructureAutobreksiPhonolite50 S705,746.009,688,196.00Takandeang
11C4LateritePhonolitoidPhonolitoid50 S709,486.009,689,203.00Rante Dunia
12C5LateritePhonolitoidPhonolitoid50 S709,486.009,689,203.00Rante Dunia
13C6LateritePhonolitoidPhonolitoid50 S709,486.009,689,203.00Rante Dunia
14C7LateritePhonolitoidPhonolitoid50 S709,486.009,689,203.00Rante Dunia
15C8StructureAutobreksiPhonolite50 S705,746.009,688,196.00Takandeang
16D1LateriteIgneousPhonolitee50 S703,255.009,689,161.00Ahu
17C9LateriteIgneousPhonolite50 S704,674.009,689,566.00Takandeang
18E1StrataSedimentBreksi50 S711,782.009,680,503.00Kasambang
19E2StrataIgneousPhonolitoid50 S702,282.009,680,381.00kasambang
20E3StrataIgneousPhonolitoid50 S712,050.009,680,507.00kasambang
21D2StructureIgneousPhonolitoid50 S703,401.289,686,395.53Ahu
22D3StrataIgneousPhonolitoid50 S703,734.509,685,494.98Ahu
23F1StrataIgneousPhonolitoid50 S722,408.009,702,740.00Hulu Ampalas
24F2StrataIgneousPhonolitoid50 S722,336.009,702,587.00Hulu Ampalas
25F3StrataIgneousPhonolitoid50 S722,343.009,702,489.00Hulu Ampalas
26F4StrataIgneousPhonolitoid50 S722,356.009,702,673.00Hulu Ampalas
27F5StrataIgneousPhonolitoid50 S722,493.009,703,606.00Hulu Ampalas
28F6StrataIgneousPhonolitoid50 S722,295.009,702,362.00Hulu Ampalas
29F7StrataIgneousPhonolitoid50 S722,396.009,704,904.00Hulu Ampalas
30G1StrataIgneousPhonolitoid50 S705,443.009,689,232.00Salumati
Table 2. Major elements.
Table 2. Major elements.
SampleNa2OMgOAl2O3SiO2P2O5K2OCaOTiO2Fe2O3
%%%%%%%%%
17.5 ± 0.20.3 ± 0.12.8 ± 0.111.6 ± 0.41.6 ± 0.12.8 ± 0.22.9 ± 0.23.2 ± 0.113.6 ± 0.6
26.5 ± 0.20.4 ± 0.116.4 ± 0.544.9 ± 1.41.1 ± 0.113.5 ± 0.50.5 ± 0.11.6 ± 0.210.1 ± 0.6
32.2 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.12.9 ± 0.110.9 ± 0.31.0 ± 0.13.3 ± 0.22.4 ± 0.20.6 ± 0.16.3 ± 0.4
42.0 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.12.9 ± 0.110.8 ± 0.30.8 ± 0.13.4 ± 0.22.8 ± 0.21.4 ± 0.114.3 ± 0.8
52.4 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.14.2 ± 0.114.2 ± 0.40.9 ± 0.15.1 ± 0.40.2 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.14.4 ± 0.3
64.3 ± 0.11.1 ± 0.17.2 ± 0.227.0 ± 0.81.1 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.14.5 ± 0.32.1 ± 0.111.7 ± 0.6
73.5 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.18.7 ± 0.210.9 ± 0.30.9 ± 0.10.7 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.13.6 ± 0.325.0 ± 1.8
83.8 ± 0.13.6 ± 0.114.8 ± 0.561.1 ± 1.80.2 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.12.1 ± 0.22.0 ± 0.210.9 ± 0.6
93.2 ± 0.14.5 ± 0.212.8 ± 0.550.7 ± 1.60.2 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.11.6 ± 0.21.6 ± 0.29.8 ± 0.6
103.6 ± 0.14.3 ± 0.214.4 ± 0.556.6 ± 1.70.2 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.12.0 ± 0.21.9 ± 0.29.9 ± 0.6
110.6 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.123.6 ± 0.739.5 ± 1.20.2 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.12.9 ± 0.219.5 ± 1.1
120.4 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.122.4 ± 0.738.1 ± 1.20.2 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.12.8 ± 0.218.7 ± 1.0
131.2 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.129.6 ± 0.847.9 ± 1.40.3 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.12.7 ± 0.217.1 ± 1.0
140.8 ± 0.10.7 ± 0.129.4 ± 0.846.7 ± 1.40.2 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.12.8 ± 0.219.0 ± 1.0
153.1 ± 0.15.5 ± 0.215.2 ± 0.558.6 ± 1.70.2 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.11.9 ± 0.22.0 ± 0.211.9 ± 0.6
165.9 ± 0.21.3 ± 0.115.4 ± 0.551.3 ± 1.61.0 ± 0.110.0 ± 0.55.4 ± 0.41.0 ± 0.18.8 ± 0.6
177.6 ± 0.22.4 ± 0.111.8 ± 0.448.8 ± 1.61.7 ± 0.13.0 ± 0.25.5 ± 0.41.9 ± 0.217.5 ± 1.0
183.4 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.16.4 ± 0.228.1 ± 1.00.7 ± 0.15.2 ± 0.32.4 ± 0.21.6 ± 0.113.6 ± 0.9
196.9 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.111.9 ± 0.452.3 ± 1.61.0 ± 0.15.5 ± 0.33.5 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.115.8 ± 1.0
206.8 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.111.3 ± 0.447.9 ± 1.51.3 ± 0.17.0 ± 0.44.3 ± 0.31.7 ± 0.117.6 ± 1.0
214.2 ± 0.14.2 ± 0.112.4 ± 0.553.4 ± 1.70.5 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.13.3 ± 0.21.8 ± 0.19.6 ± 0.6
222.0 ± 0.12.8 ± 0.19.2 ± 0.338.4 ± 1.30.5 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.12.4 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.110.7 ± 0.6
230.3 ± 0.11.8 ± 0.114.9 ± 0.562.8 ± 1.81.5 ± 0.210.5 ± 0.11.3 ± 0.21.9 ± 0.15.5 ± 0.4
240.3 ± 0.12.6 ± 0.113.1 ± 0.452.7 ± 1.61.6 ± 0.28.8 ± 0.41.4 ± 0.12.3 ± 0.27.3 ± 0.5
250.3 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.110.9 ± 0.344.3 ± 1.40.6 ± 0.18.8 ± 0.40.3 ± 0.11.1 ± 0.14.7 ± 0.3
260.3 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.19.6 ± 0.349.0 ± 1.51.1 ± 0.17.5 ± 0.40.6 ± 0.11.2 ± 0.119.8 ± 1.1
270.3 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.110.5 ± 0.374.7 ± 1.81.2 ± 0.16.7 ± 0.40.5 ± 0.11.2 ± 0.15.2 ± 0.4
280.6 ± 0.13.5 ± 0.115.1 ± 0.658.0 ± 1.60.9 ± 0.110.1 ± 0.50.9 ± 0.11.4 ± 0.19.5 ± 0.6
292.7 ± 0.12.7 ± 0.115.1 ± 0.655.1 ± 1.61.3 ± 0.16.4 ± 0.44.2 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.111.1 ± 0.6
305.4 ± 0.23.4 ± 0.116.3 ± 0.655.1 ± 1.60.4 ± 0.11.3 ± 0.11.9 ± 0.21.6 ± 0.111.5 ± 0.6
Table 3. Rare Earth elements in rock samples.
Table 3. Rare Earth elements in rock samples.
SamplesRb2OYPO4ZrO2La2O3Ce2O3Nd2O3Sm2O3
µg·g−1µg·g−1µg·g−1µg·g−1µg·g−1µg·g−1µg·g−1
1175 ± 111094 ± 1032232 ± 2135025 ± 50111,010 ± 10902921 ± 290347 ± 32
2504 ± 271235 ± 1192892 ± 276630 ± 612284 ± 225524 ± 5134 ± 3
3301 ± 15725 ± 691261 ± 1259959 ± 98923,570 ± 22575734 ± 571647 ± 59
4340 ± 17795 ± 751535 ± 1497232 ± 71917,410 ± 17234466 ± 445486 ± 47
5337 ± 17925 ± 901580 ± 1557878 ± 77817,450 ± 17234445 ± 432555 ± 52
6307 ± 15827 ± 801825 ± 181391 ± 37728 ± 71*BLD73 ± 6
722 ± 280 ± 7126 ± 12701 ± 691433 ± 142206 ± 19102 ± 9
874 ± 589 ± 7246 ± 23438 ± 42792 ± 78137 ± 1281 ± 7
948 ± 3*BLD126 ± 12352 ± 33639 ± 62122 ± 1159 ± 4
1065 ± 5*BLD136 ± 13442 ± 42773 ± 76167 ± 1579 ± 6
11381 ± 17*BLD120 ± 113174 ± 3151610 ± 1601172 ± 115310 ± 29
12397 ± 18636 ± 601076 ± 1043238 ± 3211260 ± 1251171 ± 115293 ± 27
13342 ± 1689 ± 8525 ± 513036 ± 3011206 ± 1201069 ± 101293 ± 27
14415 ± 1921 ± 2345 ± 323153 ± 3141179 ± 1161083 ± 103290 ± 27
1554 ± 390 ± 8668 ± 63393 ± 38694 ± 68156 ± 1475 ± 6
162563 ± 235*BLD126 ± 12808 ± 791497 ± 146277 ± 2532 ± 3
17199 ± 15208 ± 19120 ± 11453 ± 44782 ± 7684 ± 864 ± 6
18953 ± 92169 ± 1556 ± 5349 ± 331059 ± 10444 ± 380 ± 8
191611 ± 14967 ± 6365 ± 34521 ± 51859 ± 8374 ± 655 ± 5
20674 ± 6181 ± 8366 ± 34659 ± 641069 ± 10554 ± 584 ± 8
21191 ± 17245 ± 21128 ± 12396 ± 37759 ± 74185 ± 1779 ± 7
22779 ± 71226 ± 21560 ± 55690 ± 691414 ± 138328 ± 3146 ± 4
23462 ± 45820 ± 81750 ± 73326 ± 31671 ± 66175 ± 1671 ± 6
24651 ± 61413 ± 40756 ± 74343 ± 33737 ± 72199 ± 1885 ± 8
25448 ± 42725 ± 711261 ± 125159 ± 15313 ± 3060 ± 541 ± 4
26303 ± 29621 ± 601001 ± 98206 ± 19436 ± 4279 ± 780 ± 8
27244 ± 21802 ± 791123 ± 111182 ± 17372 ± 35116 ± 1034 ± 3
28501 ± 49645 ± 59803 ± 80322 ± 31637 ± 61150 ± 1462 ± 6
29822 ± 80751 ± 721433 ± 141215 ± 20396 ± 3863 ± 552 ± 5
30969 ± 93421 ± 40862 ± 85361 ± 35541 ± 5227 ± 2*BLD
*BLD = below limit of detection.
Table 4. Radionuclide elements in rock samples.
Table 4. Radionuclide elements in rock samples.
SamplesGamma SpectrometryXRF
238U232Th40K235UTotal UTotal Th
Bq·kg−1Bq·kg−1Bq·kg−1Bq·kg−1µg·g−1µg·g−1
179,333 ± 634736,756 ± 29403078 ± 2463598 ± 2555363 ± 5907633 ± 840
2110,767 ± 8861288,639 ± 23,09123,088 ± 18474564 ± 4125209 ± 57352,730 ± 5300
315,667 ± 1253211,271 ± 16,902100 ± 8660 ± 601444 ± 15930,900 ± 3100
420,494 ± 1640178,440 ± 14,275100 ± 7867 ± 811197 ± 13229,210 ± 2903
550,113 ± 4000261,266 ± 20,9012182 ± 1752165 ± 2012084 ± 22933,660 ± 3650
6128,699 ± 10,2961435 ± 11577 ± 65663 ± 5265450 ± 550513 ± 51
72210 ± 1771703 ± 136669 ± 54100 ± 8505 ± 56663 ± 66
8565 ± 451374 ± 110419 ± 3425 ± 1593 ± 58644 ± 63
92230 ± 1781919 ± 154495 ± 40111 ± 8216 ± 21506 ± 49
10864 ± 69984 ± 791280 ± 10239 ± 2194 ± 18611 ± 60
111009 ± 812736 ± 219633 ± 5146 ± 3153 ± 15861 ± 85
12990 ± 792619 ± 209645 ± 5247 ± 3146 ± 14864 ± 86
13855 ± 682751 ± 220639 ± 5138 ± 3108 ± 10658 ± 63
14815 ± 652594 ± 208636 ± 5235 ± 2113 ± 11713 ± 70
15426 ± 34959 ± 7769 ± 616 ± 1212 ± 20611 ± 60
16864 ± 69576 ± 462290 ± 18343 ± 3117 ± 11349 ± 32
17373 ± 30537 ± 43674 ± 5418 ± 164 ± 6246 ± 23
18539 ± 431005 ± 801540 ± 12324 ± 273 ± 7694 ± 67
19864 ± 69984 ± 791280 ± 10235 ± 2107 ± 10314 ± 31
20768 ± 611212 ± 951490 ± 11935 ± 2105 ± 101032 ± 99
2114,738 ± 1179826 ± 66159 ± 13621 ± 521446 ± 140434 ± 41
225553 ± 4441052 ± 84318 ± 25241 ± 191001 ± 99394 ± 37
2310,659 ± 853553 ± 442594 ± 208421 ± 38801 ± 80195 ± 18
2422,538 ± 1804623 ± 502320 ± 186992 ± 712012 ± 199229 ± 20
2537,553 ± 3004521 ± 423098 ± 2481625 ± 1412465 ± 23143 ± 13
2619,293 ± 1543430 ± 341658 ± 133821 ± 691209 ± 120116 ± 10
2792,009 ± 7361471 ± 381668 ± 1333956 ± 3555306 ± 529134 ± 12
289109 ± 729585 ± 472296 ± 184373 ± 31925 ± 91249 ± 23
2927,420 ± 2194954 ± 761491 ± 1191115 ± 992496 ± 242228 ± 20
3029,154 ± 2332680 ± 54280 ± 221341 ± 1212597 ± 251405 ± 40
Ave.22,882 ± 160233,549 ± 23481909 ± 134988 ± 781457 ± 1175531 ± 443
WA37 ± 433 ± 3400 ± 24---
XRF = X-ray fluorescence; Ave. = average; WA = worldwide average in the soil [21].

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rosianna, I.; Nugraha, E.D.; Syaeful, H.; Putra, S.; Hosoda, M.; Akata, N.; Tokonami, S. Natural Radioactivity of Laterite and Volcanic Rock Sample for Radioactive Mineral Exploration in Mamuju, Indonesia. Geosciences 2020, 10, 376. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10090376

AMA Style

Rosianna I, Nugraha ED, Syaeful H, Putra S, Hosoda M, Akata N, Tokonami S. Natural Radioactivity of Laterite and Volcanic Rock Sample for Radioactive Mineral Exploration in Mamuju, Indonesia. Geosciences. 2020; 10(9):376. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10090376

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rosianna, Ilsa, Eka Djatnika Nugraha, Heri Syaeful, Sugili Putra, Masahiro Hosoda, Naofumi Akata, and Shinji Tokonami. 2020. "Natural Radioactivity of Laterite and Volcanic Rock Sample for Radioactive Mineral Exploration in Mamuju, Indonesia" Geosciences 10, no. 9: 376. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10090376

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop