Next Article in Journal
Thermomechanical Analysis of a Helical-Wedge Rolling Process for Producing Balls
Next Article in Special Issue
Germanium and Indium Recovery from Zinc Metallurgy by-Products—Dross Leaching in Sulphuric and Oxalic Acids
Previous Article in Journal
The Edge Crack, Texture Evolution, and Mechanical Properties of Mg-1Al-1Sn-Mn Alloy Sheets Prepared Using On-Line Heating Rolling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Recycling the GaN Waste from LED Industry by Pressurized Leaching Method

1
Department of Resources Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
2
Institute of Environmental Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2018, 8(10), 861; https://doi.org/10.3390/met8100861
Submission received: 3 October 2018 / Revised: 17 October 2018 / Accepted: 17 October 2018 / Published: 22 October 2018

Abstract

:
In recent years, with the increasing research and development of the light-emitting diode (LED) industry, which contains gallium nitride (GaN), it is expected that there will be a large amount of related wastes in the future. Gallium has an extremely high economic value, therefore, it is necessary to establish a recycling system for the GaN waste. However, GaN is a direct-gap semiconductor and with its high energy gap, high hardness, and high melting point, these make it difficult to recycle. Therefore, this study will analyze the physical characteristics of LED wastes containing GaN and carry out various leaching methods to leach the valuable metals from the waste optimally. Different acids are used to find out the best reagent for gallium leaching. Different experimental parameters are discussed, such as the effect of the different acid agents, concentration, pressure, liquid-solid mass ratio, temperature and time, which influence the leaching efficiency of gallium. Finally, acid leaching under high pressure is preferred to leach the GaN waste, and hydrochloric acid is used as the leaching solution because of its better leaching efficiency of gallium. Optimally, the leaching efficiency of gallium can reach 98%.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Gallium and indium are essential ingredients for semiconductors and light-emitting diode (LED) LED chips, cell phones, photovoltaic generation panels, optical communication devices and computers [1]. Both of these metals are vital for the electronics industry because of their unique physical and chemical properties, and are classified as significant from an industrial application perspective and critical from a supply chain scarcity prospective [2,3].
Gallium is a soft, silvery metal which is used primarily in electronic circuits, semiconductors, and light-emitting diodes (LEDs). It is also useful in high-temperature thermometers, barometers, pharmaceuticals, and nuclear medicine tests [4]. Gallium technologies also have large power-handling capabilities and are used for cable television transmission, commercial wireless infrastructure, power electronics, and satellites. Gallium is also used for such familiar applications as screen backlighting for computer notebooks, flat-screen televisions, and desktop computer monitors [5]. In 2016, the global production of low-grade (99.99% pure) and high-purity (99.9999% and 99.99999% pure) Ga production was estimated to be 375 and 180 tons, respectively. Approximately 93% of low-grade Ga is refined in China. The principal producers of the high-purity metal were China, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States [6]. About 70 percent of the gallium was used in integrated circuits (both analog and digital). Optoelectronic devices represented the remaining 30 percent of gallium consumption [5]. For current technological trends, gallium is irreplaceable by other materials/metals, and triggers global competitions to ensure steady supply [7]. According to a recent report published by the united nations environment program (UNEP), less than 1% of end-of-life (EOL) gallium and indium bearing materials are being recycled [2,3]. Gallium is used in a wide variety of products that have microelectronic components containing either gallium arsenide (GaAs) or gallium nitride (GaN) [5]. Due to the low solubility of nitrogen in gallium and the high vapor pressure of nitrogen on GaN, the native substrate of GaN is not available in large quantities. The GaN is a crystal of high bond energy that is equal to 7.72 eV/molecule, which results in higher melting temperature and good thermal stability [8,9]. The value of sales for the GaN power device market was expected to reach $178 million by 2015 at an annual growth rate of nearly 29 percent [10]. In 2012, imports of gallium and GaAs wafers, which were valued at about $32 million, continued to satisfy almost all U.S. demand for gallium. GaAs and GaN electronic components represented about 99 percent of domestic gallium consumption [5]. The value of worldwide GaAs device consumption increased by about 7% to $7.5 billion in 2015 owing to a growing wireless telecommunications infrastructure in Asia; growth of feature-rich, application-intensive, third- and fourth-generation (3G, 4G) “smartphones”, which employ up to 10 times the amount of GaAs as standard cellular handsets; and robust use in military radar and communications applications. Cellular applications accounted for approximately 53% of total GaAs device revenue and wireless communications accounted for 27%. Various automotive, consumer, fiber-optic, and military applications accounted for the remaining revenue [11]. By yearend 2016, the GaN radio frequency device market was expected to reach $340 million, a 13% increase from that of 2015, and was forecast to increase at an average annual rate of 17% to reach $630 million in 2020 [11]. The gallium nitride semiconductor device market is expected to reach USD 22.47 Billion by 2023 from USD 16.50 Billion in 2016, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.6% during the forecast period between 2017 and 2023 [12,13]. The total GaN semiconductor (including both, power and opto semiconductors) market revenue is expected to reach $2.6 billion by 2022, which indicates massive production [14,15].
Recovery of gallium from metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) dust reported in the literature are very scarce, so it is an important problem needing to be addressed and the hydrometallurgy process can be a solution to the issue. High refractive index, mechanical stability, high heat capacity, and thermal conductivity make the GaN waste difficult to treat and recycle. Several authors have reported that etching GaN material is a challenge; hence, the chemical leaching of GaN is an essential and primary stage for recycling or treatment of the waste. Figure 1 adopted from Zhuang, D. and Edgar, J. [16] shows the leaching behavior of GaN with various mineral acids, organic acids, and alkalis at room temperature and higher temperature which indicated that it is impossible to leach the refractory GaN without any pretreatment [16].
GaN is employed principally in the manufacture of LEDs and laser diodes, power electronics, and radio-frequency (RF) electronics. Because GaN power transistors operate at higher voltages and with a higher power density than GaAs devices, the applications for advanced GaN-based products are expected to increase in the future [5]. The term urban mining-For gallium context means the recovery of valuables from waste electrical and electronic equipment, LED, and GaN waste from the semiconductor industry, which are known to contain appreciable amounts of this metal ingredient. Hence, the recycling of GaN-bearing EOL scrap is a sustainable, greener, and environment-friendly feasible option.
The research about recycling from gallium nitride around the world is very scarce. Especially, the literatures about recycling the valuable metals from the related waste are more rare, so it is important to develop and establish the recycling system from GaN waste. Recovery of gallium from secondary resources are well studied and are being used for industrial production [17,18,19]. Fang et al. studied recovery of gallium from coal fly ash by leaching followed by a precipitation & dissolution process [20]. Xu et al. has reported the recovery of gallium from phosphorus flue dust by leaching with spent sulfuric acid solution and precipitation [21]. Lee et al. has reported quantitative extraction of gallium from gallium arsenide scrap using HNO3 as lixiviant at a concentration of 2.5 M [22]. Reductive leaching of gallium from zinc residue has been reported by Wu et al. [23], where quantitative leaching of gallium using SO2 and H2SO4 as lixiviant has been reported. Furthermore, recovery of indium and (or) gallium through hydrometallurgical technique from thin-film solar panel [24], zinc sulfide concentrate [25], copper indium gallium diselenide [26], Indium Tin Oxide waste target [27] has also been reported.
Swain et al. [28] has reported using the acidic leaching method to recycle Ga rich metal-organic chemical vapor deposition residues, rich in GaN, InGaN and other Ga-compounds. They have found that other than GaN Ga phases were soluble in HCl, however solubility of GaN showed difficulties in leaching. Also, Swain and their research group [29] have reported processing GaN rich dust originated from the LED manufacturing. They have proposed two different methodologies.
The purpose of this study will focus on the leaching efficiency of the gallium from the GaN wastes. In this study, the GaN wastes were crushed by mortar grinding, ball milling for pre-treatment procedures. Material characteristic analysis accurately shows the proportion and composition of metal under investigation. Hydrometallurgy methods were being used for the acid leaching process. Different parameters that affect the leaching efficiency of gallium were discussed, such as the leaching agent, acidity, liquid-solid ratio, temperature, and reaction time. Based on the discussion of the results, the use of directly pressurized acid leaching will be effective. The leaching efficiency of gallium from the GaN waste was expected to be over 99%.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials, Reagents and Instruments

A sample of GaN waste from the LED industry was used for the experiment. A scanning electron microscope (SEM; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan, S-3000N) and an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS; Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA, XFlash6110) analyzed the surface characteristics of the GaN waste. The GaN waste powder was analyzed by a X-ray fluorescence analyzer (XRF; Spectro XEPOS, Kleve, Germany) as the semi-quantitation analysis and a X-ray diffraction (XRD; Dandong DX-2700, Dandong Fangyuan, China,) as the qualitative analysis. In order to understand the thermal property of the GaN waste, thermogravimetric analysis date-time group (TGA-DTG) was utilized. The GaN waste was ball milled for the pre-treatment of the leaching process. The GaN waste was ground with a mortar and milled in isopropanol by a planetary ball mill (Wisemix programmable ball mill). Zirconia-coated grinding bowls (200 mL) and Zirconia grinding balls (diameter = 3 mm) were used. The rotation speed was 150 r.p.m. and the milling time was 24 h. After ball milling the samples were dried in an oven at 80 °C for 4 h. The particle size distribution of the GaN waste after ball milling was tested by a laser particle size analyzer (LPSA; HORIBA, Kyoto, Japan, LA-350). In order to fully dissolve it, the GaN waste was put in aqua regia and hydrofluoric acid 5:1, at liquid-solid ratio 50 (mL/g) under 23 atm 220 °C for 4 h. The chemical composition of the GaN waste was analyzed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES; Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA, Vista-MPX) and mainly contained 89.91% Al, 3.39% Fe, and 3.38% Ga. Therefore, it is valuable and important to recycle the gallium from the GaN waste.

2.2. Leaching

Leaching procedures were carried out in standard laboratory leaching equipment. The GaN waste was leached by different kinds of acids like nitric acid, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, and hydrofluoric acid for the best acids selection. Three different kinds of alkaline salts LiBO2, NaOH, Na2CO3, were added to the GaN for alkali-roasting. Furthermore, the leaching parameters such as acidity, solid-liquid mass ratio, pressure, reaction temperature and reaction time were investigated. Acidity was set from 0.25 to 12 (mole/L) with liquid-solid ratio from 10 to 50 (g/mL). The effect of temperature was set from 25 °C to 220 °C and the reaction time was set from 60 min to 270 min to get better leaching efficiency of gallium. The concentration of gallium in the leach liquor was measured using ICP-OES (Varian, Vista-MPX). The leaching efficiency of gallium was calculated according to formula (1):
XB = (m1/m2)∙100%
where XB is leaching rate, m1 is the actual quantity of metal leaching, m2 is the metal quantity of raw material.

3. Results

3.1. Waste Characteristic Analysis

The GaN waste is mainly divided into two sides in Figure 2. One side is based on Al2O3 for matrix layer and the other side is the coating layer, which contains a GaN thickness of about 50 μm. Figure 3 shows the microstructure and the composition of GaN waste analyzed by the scanning electron microscope (SEM; Hitachi, S-3000N) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS; Bruker, XFlash6110). It is confirmed from Figure 3 that there are indeed two different layers in GaN waste. To ensure the waste contains GaN, X-ray diffraction (XRD; Dandong DX-2700) analysis was applied. Figure 4 shows the XRD diagram confirmed that the product contains Al2O3 and GaN. The composition of the GaN waste powder analyzed by X-ray fluorescence analyzer (XRF; Spectro XEPOS) is shown in Table 1. It could be found that the aluminum contained in the matrix layer is the main ingredient of the GaN waste and the waste also contains other metals such as iron, silicon chromium, nitrogen, and especially gallium.
During a typical hydrometallurgical leaching process, particle size distribution affects the reaction process. Generally, the smaller particles have greater average specific surface area, which can increase the contact area between reagents and leachable material and accelerate the reaction rate. Furthermore, extracted metals might be embedded in big particles and shredding or milling can liberate the small particles. Therefore, a good understanding of particle size properties is essential for deciding whether pre-treatments such as shredding or milling are needed. Particle size distribution was measured in triplicate using a laser particles size analyzer (LPSA; HORIBA, LA-350). Figure 5 gives the mass distribution at different particle sizes of as-obtained GaN waste after ball milling. The GaN waste is in the range of 1–100 μm (more than 90%) after ball milling, indicating that it can be used as feed when utilized in conventional leaching.
To explore the phase change behavior and understand thermal property of the GaN waste, TGA-DTG was analyzed under air atmosphere with the heating rate 10 °C/min. Figure 6 depicts the corresponding TGA curve. Oxidation of metals from the GaN waste can be distinguished. The oxidation of metals starts at a low temperature (500 °C) and the weight increases at a relatively constant rate because the GaN waste contains other elements such as Fe, Si and Cr. The weight increases slightly between around 1000–1200 °C. Under an air atmosphere, the weight of the raw GaN waste increases continuously until the end of the analysis process at 1000 °C. This is owing to the oxidation of the GaN waste and the degraded temperature being around 750 °C.

3.2. Leaching under Atmospheric-Pressure

In this section discusses the effects of nitric acid, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, and hydrofluoric acid on the leaching efficiency of gallium from GaN waste at atmospheric-pressure(<1 atm). The pre-treated GaN waste powders were reacted with four acid concentrations of 10 M at a liquid-solid ratio of 50 (mL/g) at 25 °C and 90 °C for 4 h respectively. Using ICP-OES analysis determines the leaching efficiency of gallium in different kinds of acid agents.
The results of Table 2 indicated that hydrochloric acid had the most effective leaching reaction for gallium under the same reaction conditions. With the increased temperature from 25 °C to 90 °C, the leaching efficiency of gallium in hydrochloric acid is much higher than that of other three acids. Therefore, hydrochloric acid was selected as a leaching agent. But the leaching efficiency of gallium is still very low (<10%) at atmospheric-pressure(<1 atm).

3.3. Alkaline-Roasting Leaching

From the method of alkali-roasting, three different kinds of alkaline salts, LiBO2, NaOH, and Na2CO3, were added to the GaN waste with the mass ratio of 10:1, respectively, at 1000 °C for 8 h. After the alkali-roasting, dissolving these samples in H2O, HNO3, H2SO4, HCl, and HF with concentrations of 10 M, respectively, at a liquid-solid ratio of 50 (mL/g) at 90 °C for 4 h.
From Table 3 it could be found that the alkaline-roasting leaching method with pre-alkali roasting is better than leaching at atmospheric-pressure. The leaching efficiency of gallium in HCl is higher than that of other acid agents. NaOH is the most effective alkaline flux, and LiBO2 is the least. This is because NaOH melts at a much lower temperature than LiBO2 or Na2CO3, so the NaOH has more opportunity to attack the material. However, the use of HCl after alkali-roasting could not dissolve the GaN waste completely at one time because the residues after filtration must be calcined with the alkaline salts and added to the HCl for several times in order to completely dissolve the GaN waste according to B. Swain [28].

3.4. Pressurized Leaching

3.4.1. Effect of Concentration and Pressure

This section explored the effects of different concentrations of HCl on the leaching efficiency of gallium. Figure 7 shows that the leaching efficiency of gallium is very low at 1 atm (25 °C). But when the pressure is raised to 23 atm (220 °C), the leaching efficiency of gallium increased significantly at the same concentration of HCl, so the pressurization method can reduce the amount of HCl used in the leaching reaction and achieve a higher leaching efficiency. Therefore, this experiment will use the pressurized leaching method.
In order to examine the effect of the HCl concentration on the leaching efficiency of gallium in GaN waste, the concentration of HCl was varied from 0.05 M to 12.0 M at a liquid-solid ratio of 50 (mL/g) at 25 °C (1 atm) and 220 °C (23 atm) for 4 h, respectively. Figure 7 indicates that when the temperature is 25 °C (1 atm), the leaching rate is very low for all concentrations of HCl, even up to 10 M. However, when the temperature rises to 220 °C and the vapor pressure is at 23 atm, the leaching efficiency can be very high (>98%) until the concentration of HCl is diluted from 12 M to 0.25 M. Therefore, 0.25 M HCl was used as the best concentration parameter for the pressurized leaching method because all the gallium was leached at this condition.

3.4.2. Effect of Liquid-Solid Ratio

Figure 8 is the effect of liquid-solid ratio on leaching efficiency of gallium from the GaN waste using 0.25 M HCl at 220 °C for 4 h. The leaching efficiency of gallium was dramatically increased while the liquid-solid ratio increased from 10 (mL/g) to 30 (mL/g). The reason was that when the liquid-solid ratio was low, there was insufficient acid to react in the process. In other words, when the liquid-solid mass ratio was high, there was more acid ready to react and available to obtain a higher leaching efficiency. While the liquid-solid ratio was from 30 to 50 (mL/g), the leaching of gallium was complete. Hence, the liquid-solid ratio of 30 (mL/g) was chosen as optimum to save the amount of HCl used. Because at this condition all gallium could be leached, the addition of more acid could not leach more gallium.

3.4.3. Effect of Temperature

The effect of temperature on the leaching efficiency of Ga from the GaN waste using 0.25 M HCl with the liquid-solid ratio 30 (mL/g), for 4 h is shown in Figure 9. The leaching efficiency of gallium increases with the increasing temperature because the temperature has a great effect on the leaching process. The higher temperature could raise the speed of molecular motion and enlarge the energy of the particle collision. The vapor pressure also increased with temperature, which leads to the HCl reacting more thoroughly with gallium under the same reaction time. The result determined 200 °C for the best parameter to leach because it displayed no significant increase of leaching efficiency while the temperature increased above 200 °C (15 atm).

3.4.4. Effect of Reaction Time

Figure 10 shows the effect of leaching efficiency with reaction time utilizing 0.25 M HCl with a liquid-solid ratio of 30 (mL/g) at 200 °C. The leaching efficiency of gallium increased dramatically from 60 min to 150 min. The reason is that with the increase of leaching time, more and more surfaces of unreacted particle cores would react with the HCl. The leaching efficiency of gallium was complete and stopped increasing after 180 min. Consequently, the leaching time was carried out at 180 min.

4. Conclusions

The leaching method of gallium from the GaN waste has proven in this work to be successful and effective. The experimental flowchart of the best leaching method is shown in Figure 11. In this study, several leaching methods were used to discover the most efficient leaching rate of gallium in GaN waste. The GaN waste, generated from industrial GaN manufacturing, is a refractory material, but it can also be considered an important secondary resource of gallium. The particle size of the pre-treatment GaN waste is concentrated in the range of 1–100 μm (>90%), indicating that it can conduct in the leaching experiments. Although alkali-roasting leaching can leach the GaN waste, it takes a lot of complicated procedures and time to completely leach gallium. Comparing various leaching methods, the recovery of gallium from GaN waste under high pressure has proven to be the most effective leaching method in this study. Table 4 shows the optimal conditions of the leaching procedure is 0.25 mol/L of HCl with a liquid-solid mass ratio of 30 mL/g at 200 °C (15 atm) for 180 min and about 98.46% gallium was leached. This study indicated that those parameters were significant to analyze the leaching behavior. Overall, the recovery of gallium from GaN waste by acid leaching under high pressure was effective.

Author Contributions

W.-S.C. and L.-L.H. conceived and designed the experiments; L.-L.H. performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper; L.-P.W. revised the paper.

Funding

This research was funded by NCKU Research and Development Foundation (106S281).

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge the support of the Laboratory of Resources Circulation (LRC) at National Cheng Kung University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kinoshita, T.; Ishigaki, Y.; Shibata, N.; Yamaguchi, K.; Akita, S.; Kitagawa, S.; Kondou, H.; Nii, S. Selective recovery of gallium with continuous counter-current foam separation and its application to leaching solution of zinc refinery residues. Separ. Purif. Technol. 2011, 78, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Graedel, T.; Allwood, J.; Birat, J.; Buchert, M.; Hagelüken, C.; Reck, B.K.; Sibley, S.F.; Sonnemann, G. What Do We Know About Metal Recycling Rates? J. Ind. Ecol. 2011, 15, 355–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Elshkaki, A.; Graedel, T.; Ciacci, L.; Reck, B.K. Resource Demand Scenarios for the Major Metals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 2491–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Facts about Gallium. Live Science. Available online: https://www.livescience.com/29476-gallium.html (accessed on 8 April 2017).
  5. Pubs.usgs.gov. 2012. Available online: https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1802/h/pp1802h.pdf (accessed on 12 September 2018).
  6. Minerals.usgs.gov. Available online: https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/mcs/2017/mcs2017.pdf (accessed on 12 September 2018).
  7. Alonso, E.; Sherman, A.; Wallington, T.J.; Everson, M.P.; Field, F.R.; Roth, R.; Kirchain, R.E. Correction to Evaluating Rare Earth Element Availability: A Case with Revolutionary Demand from Clean Technologies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 4684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pearton, S.; Kuo, C. GaN and Related Materials for Device Applications. MRS Bull. 1997, 22, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Morkoc, H. Nitride Semiconductors and Devices; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  10. Minerals.usgs.gov. 2013. Available online: https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/country/2013/myb3-2013-hu.xls (accessed on 12 May 2018).
  11. Minerals.usgs.gov. 2017. Available online: https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/gallium/mcs-2017-galli.pdf (accessed on 14 April 2018).
  12. Marketsandmarkets.com. Gallium Nitride Semiconductor Device Market by Device Type & Application—Global Forecast to 2023 | MarketsandMarkets. Available online: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/gallium-nitride-gan-semiconductor-materials-devices-market-698.html (accessed on 8 May 2017).
  13. Marketsandmarkets.com. Gallium Nitride Semiconductor Device Market worth 22.47 Billion USD by 2023. Available online: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/PressReleases/gallium-nitride-semiconductor.asp (accessed on 13 September 2017).
  14. Semiconductortoday.com. The Lighthouse Worldwide Solutions Blog. Available online: http://www.semiconductortoday.com/news_items/2012/JULY/MANDM_110712.html (accessed on 8 June 2017).
  15. Chiou, Y.; Chen, C.; Chang, S.J.; Chen, C.H. GaN metal–semiconductor interface and its applications in GaN and InGaN metal–semiconductor–metal photodetectors. IEE Proc. Optoelectron. 2003, 150, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhuang, D.; Edgar, J. Wet etching of GaN, AlN, and SiC: A review. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2005, 48, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Moskalyk, R. Gallium: The backbone of the electronics industry. Miner. Eng. 2003, 16, 921–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Qiu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, X.; Li, W.; Wei, Z.; Xiao, J.; Leung, S.F.; Lin, Q.; Wu, H.; Zhang, Y. Three-dimensional metal/oxide nanocone arrays for high-performance electrochemical pseudocapacitors. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 3626–3631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mihaylov, I.; Distin, P. Solvent Extraction of Gallium with D2EHPA from Acidic Sulphate Solutions—Equilibria and Complexation. Can. Metall. Q. 1993, 32, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fang, Z.; Gesser, H. Recovery of gallium from coal fly ash. Hydrometallurgy 1996, 41, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, K.; Deng, T.; Liu, J.; Peng, W. Study on the recovery of gallium from phosphorus flue dust by leaching with spent sulfuric acid solution and precipitation. Hydrometallurgy 2007, 86, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lee, H.; Nam, C. A study on the extraction of gallium from gallium arsenide scrap. Hydrometallurgy 1998, 49, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wu, X.; Wu, S.; Qin, W.; Ma, X.; Niu, Y.; Lai, S.; Yang, C.; Jiao, F.; Ren, L. Reductive leaching of gallium from zinc residue. Hydrometallurgy 2012, 113–114, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, Q.; Zhu, L. Recovery Method of Copper Indium Gallium Selenide Thin-Film Solar Panel. Patent CN103184338A, 29 December 2011. [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, Y.; Liu, Z. Properties of Gallium Phosphide Thick Films Prepared on Zinc Sulfide Substrates by Radio-Frequency Magnetron Sputtering. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2010, 26, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tanaka, A.; Hirata, M.; Koga, K.; Nakano, M.; Omae, K.; Kiyohara, Y. Pulmonary Toxicity of Indium Tin Oxide and Copper Indium Gallium Diselenide. MRS Proc. 2012, 1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Koo, S.; Ju, C. Preparation of indium oxide from waste indium tin oxide targets by oxalic acid. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 35, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Swain, B.; Mishra, C.; Kang, L.; Park, K.-S.; Lee, C.G.; Hong, H.S.; Park, J.J. Recycling of metal-organic chemical vapor deposition waste of GaN based power device and LED industry by acidic leaching: Process optimization and kinetics study. J. Power Sources 2015, 281, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Swain, B.; Mishra, C.; Kang, L.; Park, K.-S.; Lee, C.G.; Hong, H.S. Recycling process for recovery of gallium from GaN an e-waste of LED industry through ball milling, annealing and leaching. Environ. Res. 2015, 138, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Leaching GaN with Various Chemical Reagents.
Figure 1. Leaching GaN with Various Chemical Reagents.
Metals 08 00861 g001
Figure 2. (a) The matrix layer of the GaN waste (b) The coating layer of the GaN waste.
Figure 2. (a) The matrix layer of the GaN waste (b) The coating layer of the GaN waste.
Metals 08 00861 g002
Figure 3. (a) Microstructure of matrix layer by scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis; (b) The composition of matrix layer by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis; (c) Microstructure of coating layer by scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis; (d) The composition of GaN coating layer by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis.
Figure 3. (a) Microstructure of matrix layer by scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis; (b) The composition of matrix layer by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis; (c) Microstructure of coating layer by scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis; (d) The composition of GaN coating layer by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis.
Metals 08 00861 g003
Figure 4. (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the GaN waste with Al2O3 peak; (b) X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the GaN waste with GaN peak.
Figure 4. (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the GaN waste with Al2O3 peak; (b) X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the GaN waste with GaN peak.
Metals 08 00861 g004
Figure 5. Particle size of the GaN waste by particle size distribution analyzer after ball milling.
Figure 5. Particle size of the GaN waste by particle size distribution analyzer after ball milling.
Metals 08 00861 g005
Figure 6. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) analysis of GaN waste with the heating rate 10 °C/min.
Figure 6. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) analysis of GaN waste with the heating rate 10 °C/min.
Metals 08 00861 g006
Figure 7. Effect of HCl concentration on the leaching efficiency of gallium at liquid-solid ratio 50 (mL/g) at 25 °C (1 atm) and 220 °C (23 atm) for 4 h respectively.
Figure 7. Effect of HCl concentration on the leaching efficiency of gallium at liquid-solid ratio 50 (mL/g) at 25 °C (1 atm) and 220 °C (23 atm) for 4 h respectively.
Metals 08 00861 g007
Figure 8. Effect of liquid/solid ratio on the leaching efficiency of gallium in 0.25 M HCl at 220 °C for 4 h.
Figure 8. Effect of liquid/solid ratio on the leaching efficiency of gallium in 0.25 M HCl at 220 °C for 4 h.
Metals 08 00861 g008
Figure 9. Effect of temperature on the leaching efficiency of gallium in 0.25 M HCl with the liquid-solid ratio 30 (mL/g), for 4 h.
Figure 9. Effect of temperature on the leaching efficiency of gallium in 0.25 M HCl with the liquid-solid ratio 30 (mL/g), for 4 h.
Metals 08 00861 g009
Figure 10. Effect of reaction time on the leaching efficiency of gallium in 0.25 M HCl with liquid-solid ratio 30 (mL/g) at 200 °C.
Figure 10. Effect of reaction time on the leaching efficiency of gallium in 0.25 M HCl with liquid-solid ratio 30 (mL/g) at 200 °C.
Metals 08 00861 g010
Figure 11. The flowchart of the best leaching method.
Figure 11. The flowchart of the best leaching method.
Metals 08 00861 g011
Table 1. The composition of the GaN waste analyzed by X-ray fluorescence analyzer (XRF).
Table 1. The composition of the GaN waste analyzed by X-ray fluorescence analyzer (XRF).
ElementAl2O3Fe2O3GaSiO2CrO3N
Content (%)89.93.393.381.910.960.45
Table 2. The leaching efficiency of gallium (%) with four acid with concentrations 10 M at liquid-solid ratio of 50 (mL/g) at 25 °C and 90 °C for 4 h respectively.
Table 2. The leaching efficiency of gallium (%) with four acid with concentrations 10 M at liquid-solid ratio of 50 (mL/g) at 25 °C and 90 °C for 4 h respectively.
TemperatureHNO3H2SO4HClHF
25 °C0.171.043.161.13
90 °C1.363.288.92.73
Table 3. The leaching efficiency of gallium (%) with acid concentrations 10 M at liquid-solid ratio 50 (mL/g) at 90 °C for 4 h after alkali roasting.
Table 3. The leaching efficiency of gallium (%) with acid concentrations 10 M at liquid-solid ratio 50 (mL/g) at 90 °C for 4 h after alkali roasting.
Acid Agent/Alkali AgentLiBO2NaOHNa2CO3
H2O17.324.521.6
HNO336.645.241.7
H2SO437.847.543.7
HCl52.973.362.4
HF34.452.543.1
Table 4. The optimal parameters of the leaching process.
Table 4. The optimal parameters of the leaching process.
Material[HCl]Liquid-Solid RatioTemperatureLeaching Time
GaN waste0.25 M30 mL/g200 °C (15 atm)180 min

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, W.-S.; Hsu, L.-L.; Wang, L.-P. Recycling the GaN Waste from LED Industry by Pressurized Leaching Method. Metals 2018, 8, 861. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8100861

AMA Style

Chen W-S, Hsu L-L, Wang L-P. Recycling the GaN Waste from LED Industry by Pressurized Leaching Method. Metals. 2018; 8(10):861. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8100861

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Wei-Sheng, Li-Lin Hsu, and Li-Pang Wang. 2018. "Recycling the GaN Waste from LED Industry by Pressurized Leaching Method" Metals 8, no. 10: 861. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8100861

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop