Next Article in Journal
Electrical Measurements of Thermally Reduced Graphene Oxide Powders under Pressure
Next Article in Special Issue
Nanometer Ammonium Perchlorate and Ammonium Nitrate Prepared with 2D Network Structure via Rapid Freezing Technology
Previous Article in Journal
The Comet Assay as a Tool to Detect the Genotoxic Potential of Nanomaterials
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Electrospun Preparation of the NC/GAP/Nano-LLM-105 Nanofiber and Its Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Supercritical Antisolvent Processing of Nitrocellulose: Downscaling to Nanosize, Reducing Friction Sensitivity and Introducing Burning Rate Catalyst

by
Oleg S. Dobrynin
1,
Mikhail N. Zharkov
1,
Ilya V. Kuchurov
1,
Igor V. Fomenkov
1,
Sergey G. Zlotin
1,
Konstantin A. Monogarov
2,
Dmitry B. Meerov
2,
Alla N. Pivkina
2 and
Nikita V. Muravyev
2,*
1
N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow119991, Russia
2
N.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(10), 1386; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101386
Submission received: 28 August 2019 / Revised: 24 September 2019 / Accepted: 26 September 2019 / Published: 27 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanoenergetic Materials: Preparation, Properties, and Applications)

Abstract

:
A supercritical antisolvent process has been applied to obtain the nitrocellulose nanoparticles with an average size of 190 nm from the nitrocellulose fibers of 20 μm in diameter. Compared to the micron-sized powder, nano-nitrocellulose is characterized with a slightly lower decomposition onset, however, the friction sensitivity has been improved substantially along with the burning rate increasing from 3.8 to 4.7 mm·s−1 at 2 MPa. Also, the proposed approach allows the production of stable nitrocellulose composites. Thus, the addition of 1 wt.% carbon nanotubes further improves the sensitivity of the nano-nitrocellulose up to the friction-insensitive level. Moreover, the simultaneous introduction of carbon nanotubes and nanosized iron oxide catalyzes the combustion process evidenced by a high-speed filming and resulting in the 20% burning rate increasing at 12 MPa. The presented approach to the processing of energetic nanomaterials based on the supercritical fluid technology opens the way to the production of nitrocellulose-based nanopowders with improved performance.

1. Introduction

Nitrocellulose (NC) is widely used as a base substance for conservation, adhesives, membranes and coatings [1,2,3,4,5] with an important application for solid rocket propellants and gunpowder production [6,7,8]. Long-term experience with nitrocellulose reveals some of its limitations, including certain thermal and mechanical hazards [9], inhomogeneity problems resulting from the organic nature of the cellulose precursor [10], and poor combustion performance. These challenges can be addressed by downscaling nitrocellulose to nanosized powder that should improve the burning rate, as was reported for another energetic substance, 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazinane (RDX), whose nanoparticles demonstrate a twofold burning rate increase [11]. Also, the available data for the nanosized energetic materials show that their mechanical sensitivity is often beneficially reduced [12,13,14]. To date, several examples of NC with nanosized morphology have been reported. Electrostatic spinning of NC solution results in the formation of fibers with diameters from 80 to 300 nm [15,16]. The samples demonstrate the slight lowering of the decomposition onset from 198 °C to 190 °C [16], while the heat of reaction was increased [15] for nanosized NC as compared to as-received material. A complementary use of the sol-gel approach and sc-CO2 drying allows obtaining the NC aerogel with 30–50 nm particles that also show a lower decomposition onset temperature compared to raw NC [17]. Besides, the thermolysis mechanism of this porous material is altered by its increased adsorption capacity. Zhang and Weeks explored the low temperature solvent evaporation technique to prepare nearly 500 nm-sized NC spheres (5 °C, dimethylformamide) and thin films of submicron NC (5–45 °C, MeOH or EtOH) [18]. Notably, the obtained films exhibited a more complete combustion with the rate 350% higher than that for films of ordinary nitrocellulose. From the chemical engineering prospective, there are definite complications related to the reported preparative techniques, i.e., physicochemical methods (e.g., anti-solvent [19,20], suspension dispersion [21], recrystallization [18]) are inevitably accompanied by the issues of wasted organic solvents utilization and removal of their traces trapped inside the product, whereas mechanical methods (e.g., milling [22]) are incompatible with the polymeric nature of NC. Thereby, the challenge to develop a ‘greener’ and more efficient approach for a NC morphology modification has not been addressed yet.
Tailoring the burning rate of the double-based propellants, i.e., nitrocellulose-based formulations, is usually performed by adding of 1–10 wt.% of catalysts or inhibitors [23,24]. The general conclusion drawn on the basis of the experience with catalysis of double-based propellants is that carbonaceous skeleton formed above the burning surface promotes the burning rate via the prolongated residence of catalyst particles and increase of heat flux to the condensed phase [24,25,26]. The desired carbonaceous layer can be formed either during combustion of some components, e.g., dinitrotoluene, dibutyl phthalate plasticizers, or by introduced prior to combustion additives (e.g., 0.5–3 wt.% of carbon black in [24]). Interestingly, the addition of carbon in the form of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) can increase the burning rate per se, by improving the thermal conductivity [27,28,29]. Thus, in the recent studies [30,31] the optimal level of multiwall carbon nanotubes additive was found to be about 1 wt.%, whereas at higher loadings the combustion is depressed. Nano-sized metal oxides render the catalytic action in diverse processes, including the decomposition and combustion of energetic materials [32,33,34]. Specifically, nano-Fe2O3 has been found to catalyze the decomposition of NC, with the governing effect of the contact surface between two components [35]. Therefore, improvement of the nitrocellulose combustion requires the composites designed to deliver the nano-sized additives to the reaction zone.
Recently, sub- and supercritical fluids media have proved valuable for modification and synthetic applications in chemical engineering [36,37]. Particularly, supercritical carbon dioxide (sc-CO2) is most attractive due to its low critical point (Pc = 7.38 MPa and Tc = 31.0 °C [38]), non-toxicity and environmental friendliness [39,40]. Supercritical Anti-Solvent (SAS) applications of CO2 are based on its very good miscibility with the majority of organic solvents and insolubility of the target substrate in resulting binary solvent systems (sc-CO2/solvent) that causes the precipitation (recrystallisation) of the final material [41,42]. The SAS technology has already been applied for micronization of nitramine explosives [43,44]. Herein, we report the first application of the supercritical antisolvent process to prepare the uniform nano-sized nitrocellulose powder. Furthermore, NC-based composites with carbon nanotubes and nano-Fe2O3 as the burning rate modifiers have been also fabricated via the SAS processing. Thermal behavior, mechanical sensitivity, and combustion performance were evaluated showing the enhanced burning rate and reduced sensitivity for prepared nano-nitrocellulose and its composites.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Commercial nitrocellulose was used as a precursor for synthesis and as a reference material. The powder is constituted by fibers with a characteristic diameter of about 20 μm, as shown in Figure 1b. The elemental composition of the raw NC was found to be 26.7 ± 0.2 wt.% C, 2.9 ± 0.1% H, and 11.5 ± 0.1% N. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (“Taunit-M” trademark by NanoTechCenter Ltd., Tambov, Russia) were used as-received. In line with the manufacturer specification [45] the inner diameter of CNTs was ca.10 nm, the outer diameter near 20 nm, and the length no less than 2 μm (Figure S1c,d, see Supporting information for details). The laboratory sample of nanosized α-iron oxide was produced by the plasma condensation technique and appeared as spherical particles 0.05–0.3 μm in diameter (Figure S1e,f, Supporting information). High purity carbon dioxide (Russian standard TU 2114-006-05015259-2014, Linde Gas Rus, Ltd., Balashikha, Russia) and acetone (Russian standard TU 2633-012-29483781-2009, Chimmed Ltd., Moscow, Russia) were used during the study.

2.2. Fabrication of Composites

Figure 1a illustrates the scheme of the experimental setup for the composite fabrication with the key units indicated. Cooled CO2 was transferred from the cylinder through the high-pressure pump into the 500 mL autoclave reactor with temperature-control. The pressure inside the autoclave was maintained with the automated back pressure regulator (ABPR). The NC acetone solution (2 wt.%) or suspension of selected fillers in this solution was fed with another pump to the filled with sc-CO2 autoclave through the capillary in the lid. The mutual diffusion of CO2 and acetone results in the precipitation of NC or its composite particles which were collected on the metallic filter at the bottom. The binary mixture CO2-acetone left the autoclave, went through ABPR and was divided inside the separator at the lower pressure controlled with the manual back pressure regulator (MBPR). The main units of the setup were connected with 1/8” steel pipes.
The general procedure implies filling with CO2 and pre-heating the system up to 40 °C. Once the desired temperature was achieved, the carbon dioxide feeding rate was set at 50 g·min−1. NC solution or suspension, prepared and maintained by ultrasonic vibrations, was fed at 1–2 mL·min−1 rate. After the solution/suspension was fully transferred to an autoclave, and CO2 flow pumped for an extra 30–40 min to flash off the residual acetone. Finally, the system was decompressed, and ~1 g of the target solid was taken out.

3. Results

3.1. Optimization of the Process Conditions

Preliminary runs resulted in the “herring-bone” structures instead of the desired uniform powder, as shown in Figure 1c. Several parameters of SAS process were tuned to improve the product morphology, i.e., the autoclave pressure, the ratio between the feeding rates of the solution and that of CO2 (f/F), NC concentration in the solution, and the additive material type (Section S3, Supporting information). Pressure variation within the 9–15 MPa range specifies the optimal value to be 10–12 MPa. At lower pressures the “herring-bone” was observed, whereas at higher pressures the uniform powder was obtained (cf. Figure 1c,d). The factor f/F controlled both the production time and CO2 consumption; however, its increase was shown to worsen the composite morphology. Thus, the solution flow rate appeared to be no higher than 2 mL·min−1 at the maximum CO2 feeding rate of 50 g·min−1 given by the experimental setup. The nitrocellulose concentration in the solution apparently determines the acetone and CO2 consumption and has to be maximized. On the other hand, its increase above 2 wt.% had adverse effects on the the NC dissolution time and the pump performance (due to an increase in the mixture viscosity). When the filler, i.e., and/or nano-Fe2O3, was introduced into the solution, the ultrasonic processing (30% of 70 W, 20 kHz) was applied continuously to prevent settling and to maintain the suspension shelf life.

3.2. Nano-Nitrocellulose and Composites

Once the SAS process parameters were optimized, four samples were obtained: NC(sc) pure nitrocellulose after SAS, NC/CNT(sc) nitrocellulose with 1 wt.% of carbon nanotubes, NC/Fe2O3(sc) nitrocellulose with 5 wt.% of nano-iron oxide, NC/CNT/Fe2O3(sc) nitrocellulose with 1 wt.% of CNTs and 5 wt.% of nano-Fe2O3. The elemental composition of NC(sc) was unaffected by the processing: 26.7 ± 0.1 wt.% C, 2.9 ± 0.4% H, and 11.6 ± 0.1% N. In contrast to the large fibers of initial NC (Figure 1b), the product after the SAS processing with no additives appeared as nanopowder. Electron microscopy revealed that the microstructure of the powder was formed by the nano-sized spheres of 50–450 nm in diameter that were located on thin polymeric fibers (Figure 2a,b). Numerical particle size distribution gave the average diameter of 190 nm (Figure 2c, Section S4, Supporting information). Note, that transmission electron microscope (TEM) images have captured a sole fraction that is below 100 nm. Apparently, the bigger fractions were lost during the sample preparation.
With the introduction of nanotubes the skeletal structure becomes more pronounced (Figure 3a). However, the further addition of nano-Fe2O3 resulted in the material with uniformly distributed nanoparticles and with no evidence of webbing (Figure 3b). These must have been the nanoparticles of iron oxide that promote the formation of NC nanospheres instead of fibers. Notably, the catalyst content within the fabricated composites was close to the target value, i.e., no material is lost during preparation (Section S5, Supporting information).

3.3. Thermal Behavior

The linear heating of all samples shows the general pattern consistent with the typical nitrocellulose behavior [46,47]: a single peak of the heat release started at about 190 °C with the corresponding mass loss of nearly 80 wt.%. The heat released during thermolysis was within the range of 1800–2000 J·g−1 and agreed closely for all analyzed species within the experimental error. A closer examination of the four obtained nano-NC-based samples showed a lower decomposition onset temperature (see Figure 4 and Table 1), previously observed for nitrocellulose with nano-sized features [16,17,18]. The isoconversional Friedman analysis showed that the activation energy remained the same as for micron-NC at low- and high-conversion degrees, while at the medium range the barrier was notably lower for nano-NC (Figure 4c). A similar conclusion is drawn from the formal kinetic fit with a single reaction model in flexible reduced Sestak–Berggren form [48,49]. Kinetic parameters for nano-NC, Ea = 186 ± 1 kJ·mol−1 and ln A = 43.0 ± 0.2 s−1 were lower than that for raw NC, Ea = 196 ± 1 kJ·mol−1 and ln A = 45.7 ± 0.3 s−1 (Section S6, Supporting Information). Both pairs of the kinetic parameters were consistent with the global autocatalytic reaction proposed by Brill and Gongwer [50]. The shift of the kinetic parameters for nano-NC was apparently caused by the higher surface area available for autocatalytic agents and its increased contribution to the overall decomposition process.

3.4. Friction Sensitivity

The full set of experiments according to standard STANAG 4487 [51] have been performed to derive the friction force corresponding to the 50% probability of explosion. The SAS processing decreased the pure nitrocellulose NC(sc) sensitivity, and the required initiation stimulus accordingly rose from 234 to 342 N. The effect must have been caused by the particle size reduction since the chemical composition of the sample was unaltered as shown above. The addition of the iron oxide sensitized the NC/Fe2O3(sc) sample down to the level of untreated raw compound. Introduction of carbon nanotubes ranked the composite NC/CNT(sc) as friction insensitive (10% of explosions at highest load of 360 N) and with the addition of both carbon nanotubes and iron oxide NC/CNT/Fe2O3(sc) the effect was still observed (40% of explosions at 360 N).

3.5. Combustion Tests

The energetic performance of the samples was estimated by combustion in air with the high-speed filming of the burning surface (2000 fps) and directly measured as the burning rate–pressure dependency in a Crawford bomb at elevated pressures. For the raw nitrocellulose, the observation revealed active bubble formation on the surface during combustion (Videos S1,S2, Supporting information). In this foam zone, small black particles were formed that moved inside the liquid layer to aggregate (see Figure 5a,b for sequential frames with 0.075 s time difference). Thus, the formed framework remained above the surface until burning out in a flame of the final reactions between the semiproducts of NC decomposition or until blowing away by the gas flow. Similar observations were drawn for the NC(sc) sample with the only exception of higher carbonaceous framework formation that remained after tests as the solid residue (Figure 5c and Figure S6, Video S2, Supporting information). The finer structure of unreacted nano-nitrocellulose seemed to either result in a more distributed localization of the seeds or in the structural modification of the formed framework to keep it intact in gas flow. Considering the burning rate values, the nano-NC exhibited a higher velocity as compared to raw NC, e.g., 3.8 against 4.7 mm·s−1 at 2 MPa (Figure 5g). This enhancement was apparently linked with the lowering of the activation barrier for condensed-phase decomposition as revealed by thermal analysis. The introduction of carbon nanotubes gave more seeds for carbonaceous framework (Figure 5d), and in fact a considerable porous layer grew above the surface (Figure S7, Video S3, Supporting information). However, it easily broke down into fragments, which were blown away as the combustion proceeds. The burning rate for the NC/CNT(sc) composite was the same as for nano-NC monopropellant showing no significant effect of the increased heat conductivity on the combustion front propagation.
Figure 5e illustrates the burning process for the NC nanocomposite modified with nano-Fe2O3 addition. Seeds of the size bigger than that in previous samples stuck together on the surface and stayed in gas phase as a skeleton (Video S4, Supporting information). Recently, Shin et al. have proposed a facile method of nano-Fe2O3 transformation to Fe3O4 nanoparticles covered by a carbonaceous layer using a porous film made of nano-Fe2O3 particles filled with nitrocellulose [52]. After the burning of the NC matrix with the registered temperatures of 500–900 °C, the desired product was recovered. In line with these results, Denisyuk and Demidova [24] noticed the reduction of SnO2 to a mixture of SnO and Sn during the combustion of an NC-based propellant. Here, we could assume the reduction of nano-Fe2O3 in our experiments; however the necessary high-temperature flame was not registered. As for the burning rate, we noticed the acceleration of the combustion by iron oxide addition under 8 MPa pressure (blue curve, Figure 5g).
When carbon nanotubes and nano-iron oxide are introduced together to the composite, we observe a different picture of combustion (Video S5, Supporting information). Figure 5f shows a typical shot of the burning surface covered by a crumbly carbonaceous layer with luminous spots that appeared occasionally. These luminous regions give strong evidence of the catalyzed reactions and the increased heat flux seems to be the main driver for the combustion velocity increase. Figure 5g summarizes the burning rate-pressure data showing the highest catalytic effect at high pressures, achieving a maximum increase in 20% at 12 MPa (Table 1). The simplified combustion models [53,54] assumed the pressure exponent n of the burning rate dependency U = B·Pn to be an indicator of the importance of gas-phase reactions, and the observed increase in it is consistent with the action of the catalyst in gas-phase zone.
To estimate the value of the SAS process in the arrangement of nanocatalyst and CNTs, we prepare the sample of the same composition NC/CNT/Fe2O3 by means of conventional dry mixing. Testing for sensitivity and combustion reveal its inferior performance as compared to the composite produced via the SAS (Table 1).

4. Conclusions

Supercritical CO2 has been applied for the first time as anti-solvent for obtaining nano-sized nitrocellulose powder and various nitrocellulose-based composites. Thus prepared materials exhibit a significantly lower sensitivity to friction and a higher burning rate than the raw fibrous nitrocellulose, while maintaining the chemical composition and thermal stability. For the benchmark dry mixture of NC/CNT/Fe2O3 the results are notably lower than those for the SAS-produced composite. Overall, the proposed approach for introducing the burning rate modifiers into the matrices of energetic materials allows increasing the performance, satisfies the high technological and ecological requirements and may be useful for modern energetic composites production.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/9/10/1386/s1: Section S1: Experimental Methods, Section S2: Starting Materials, Figure S1: Microstructure of (a, b) untreated micron-sized NC fibers, (c,d) carbon nanotubes, (e,f) nano-sized iron oxide, Section S3: Details of the SAS process, Table S1: SAS process parameters for NC modification, Section S4: Morphology of Nano-NC, Figure S2: Atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of nitrocellulose powder produced via SAS process, Table S2: Parameters of the particle-size distribution of nano-NC powder, Section S5: Determination of catalyst content in fabricated composites, Figure S3: Temperature and mass profiles during annealing of NC-based composites with Fe2O3 addition, Section S6: Thermokinetic analysis, Figure S4: Results of formal kinetic analysis for micron-(a) and nano-(b) sized nitrocellulose, Figure S5: Data from review and the results of the current study, Section S7: Combustion tests, Figure S6: Combustion of untreated (a–c) and processed (d–f) nitrocellulose: (a,d) view of pellet before test, (b,e) still image of the burning surface, (c,f) residue after experiment, Figure S7: Combustion nitrocellulose with additives of nano-iron oxide (a–c), carbon nanotubes (d–f) and both Fe2O3 and CNTs (g–i): (a,d,g) view of pellet before test, (b,e,h) still image of the burning surface, (c,f,i) residue after experiment, Table S3: Results of combustion experiments, Figure S8: Combustion velocity against pressure for all involved compositions, Videos S1–S6.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.V.K. and S.G.Z.; methodology, M.N.Z., I.V.K. and K.A.M.; software, N.V.M.; validation, M.N.Z. and N.V.M.; formal analysis, I.V.K.; investigation, O.S.D., K.A.M. and D.B.M., resources, I.V.F., S.G.Z. and A.N.P.; data curation, D.B.M.; writing – original draft, N.V.M.; writing – review and editing, M.N.Z., A.N.P. and N.V.M., visualization, D.B.M. and K.A.M., project administration, I.V.K. and N.V.M.; supervision, I.V.F., S.G.Z. and A.N.P.

Funding

The authors are grateful for financial support of synthetic part and combustion behavior studies by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grant No. 18-29-06023) K.A.M., A.N.P., and N.V.M. acknowledge the State research project #0082-2018-0002 (CITIS #AAAA-A18-118031490034-6) to Semenov Institute of Chemical Physics for a financial support of thermal analysis.

Acknowledgments

Authors thank Ekaterina K. Kosareva for performing the atomic force microscopy and Lyubov N. Mitireva for thorough English language editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

APre-exponential factor
ABPRAutomated back pressure regulator
BBurn rate coefficient
CNTsCarbon nanotubes
EaApparent activation energy
EtOHEthanol
fFeeding rate of NC-solution/suspension
FFeeding rate of CO2
MBPRManual back pressure regulator
MeOHMethanol
micron-NCNitrocellulose microfibers (raw nitrocellulose)
nPressure exponent
nano-NCNitrocellulose nanoparticles
NCNitrocellulose
NC(sc)Nitrocellulose particles obtained by SAS process
NC/CNT(sc)Nitrocellulose composite with CNTs obtained by SAS process
NC/Fe2O3(sc)Nitrocellulose with nano-Fe2O3 obtained by SAS process
NC/CNT/Fe2O3(sc)Nitrocellulose with CNTs and nano-Fe2O3 obtained by SAS process
PPressure
PcCritical pressure of CO2
RDX1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazinane
SASSupercritical Anti-Solvent process
sc-CO2Supercritical carbon dioxide
SEMScanning electron microscopy
TcCritical temperature of CO2
TEMTransmission electron microscopy
UBurning rate

References

  1. Selwitz, C. Cellulose Nitrate in Conservation; Research in Conservation; Getty Conservation Institute: Marina del Rey, CA, USA, 1988; ISBN 978-0-89236-098-7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cretich, M.; Sedini, V.; Damin, F.; Pelliccia, M.; Sola, L.; Chiari, M. Coating of nitrocellulose for colorimetric DNA microarrays. Anal. Biochem. 2010, 397, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mujawar, L.H.; Moers, A.; Norde, W.; van Amerongen, A. Rapid mastitis detection assay on porous nitrocellulose membrane slides. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 7469–7476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Holstein, C.A.; Chevalier, A.; Bennett, S.; Anderson, C.E.; Keniston, K.; Olsen, C.; Li, B.; Bales, B.; Moore, D.R.; Fu, E.; et al. Immobilizing affinity proteins to nitrocellulose: A toolbox for paper-based assay developers. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 1335–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhong, Y.; McConnell, G.C.; Ross, J.D.; DeWeerth, S.P.; Bellamkonda, R.V. A Novel Dexamethasone-releasing, Anti-inflammatory Coating for Neural Implants. In Proceedings of the 2nd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, Arlington, VA, USA, 16–19 March 2005; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 522–525. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kubota, N. Propellants and Explosives; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006; ISBN 978-3-527-61010-5. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lengelle, G.; Duterque, J.; Trubert, J.-F. Physico-Chemical Mechanisms of Solid Propellant Combustion. In Solid Propellant Chemistry, Combustion, and Motor Interior Ballistics; Yang, V., Brill, T.B., Ren, W.Z., Eds.; Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.: Reston, VI, USA, 2000; pp. 287–334. ISBN 978-1-56347-442-2. [Google Scholar]
  8. de la Ossa, M.Á.F.; Torre, M.; García-Ruiz, C. Chapter 4. Nitrocellulose in propellants: Characteristics and thermal properties. In Advances in Materials Science Research; Wythers, M.C., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers, cop.: New York, NY, USA, 2012; Volume 7, pp. 201–220. ISBN 978-1-62100-045-7. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fu, G.; Wang, J.; Yan, M. Anatomy of Tianjin Port fire and explosion: Process and causes. Process Saf. Prog. 2016, 35, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Saunders, C.W.; Taylor, L.T. A review of the synthesis, chemistry and analysis of nitrocellulose. J. Energy Mater. 1990, 8, 149–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Frolov, Y.V.; Pivkina, A.N.; Zav’yalov, S.A.; Murav’ev, N.V.; Skryleva, E.A.; Monogarov, K.A. Physicochemical characteristics of the components of energetic condensed systems. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 4, 916–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, G.; Nie, F.; Li, J.; Guo, Q.; Qiao, Z. Preparation and Characterization of Nano-NTO Explosive. J. Energy Mater. 2007, 25, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bayat, Y.; Zeynali, V. Preparation and Characterization of Nano-CL-20 Explosive. J. Energy Mater. 2011, 29, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, K.-Y.; Moore, D.S.; Asay, B.W.; Llobet, A. Submicron-Sized Gamma-HMX: 1. Preparation and Initial Characterization. J. Energy Mater. 2007, 25, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xia, M.; Yunjun, L.; Hua, Y.-L. Preparation and characterization of nitrocellulose nano-fibers. Chin. J. Energetic Mater. 2012, 20, 167–171. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sovizi, M.R.; Hajimirsadeghi, S.S.; Naderizadeh, B. Effect of particle size on thermal decomposition of nitrocellulose. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 168, 1134–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jin, M.; Luo, N.; Li, G.; Luo, Y. The thermal decomposition mechanism of nitrocellulose aerogel. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2015, 121, 901–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, X.; Weeks, B.L. Preparation of sub-micron nitrocellulose particles for improved combustion behavior. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 268, 224–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Steinitz, M.; Tamir, S. An improved method to create nitrocellulose particles suitable for the immobilization of antigen and antibody. J. Immunol. Methods 1995, 187, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cox, C.D.; Liggett, T. Spherical Production of Small Particle Nitrocellulose. U.S. Patent 3671515A 1972. [Google Scholar]
  21. O’Neill, J.J., Jr. Nitrocellulose Particles. U.S. Patent 2885736A 1959. [Google Scholar]
  22. Plunguian, M. Process for Making Fine Particles of Nitrocellulose. U.S. Patent 3275250A 1966. [Google Scholar]
  23. Androsov, A.S.; Denisyuk, A.P.; Tokarev, N.P. Laws governing the effect of lead-copper catalysts on the combustion rate of a ballistic powder. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 1976, 12, 698–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Denisyuk, A.P.; Demidova, L.A. Effect of Some Catalysts on Combustion of Double-Base Propellants. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 2004, 40, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Denisyuk, A.P.; Demidova, L.A.; Shepelev, Y.G.; Baloyan, B.M.; Telepchenkov, V.E. Highly efficient low-toxicity catalysts of combustion of double-base powders. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 1997, 33, 688–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zenin, A.A.; Finjakov, S.V.; Ibragimov, N.G.; Afiatullov, E.K. Mechanism of catalysis in combustion waves of modern ballistite propellants. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 1999, 35, 532–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Merzhanov, A.G.; Dubovitskii, F.I. On the Theory of Steady State Monopropellant. Proc. USSR Acad. Sci. 1959, 129, 153–156. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kirchdoerfer, T.; Ortiz, M.; Stewart, D.S. Topology Optimization of Solid Rocket Fuel. AIAA J. 2019, 57, 1684–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. He, G.; Li, X.; Dai, Y.; Yang, Z.; Zeng, C.; Lin, C.; He, S. Constructing bioinspired hierarchical structure in polymer based energetic composites with superior thermal conductivity. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 162, 678–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, S.; Tang, Y.; Yu, H.; Guan, X.; DeLuca, L.T.; Zhang, W.; Shen, R.; Ye, Y. Combustion enhancement of hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene by doping multiwall carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2019, 144, 472–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, J.H.; Cho, M.H.; Kim, K.J.; Kim, S.H. Laser ignition and controlled explosion of nanoenergetic materials: The role of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2017, 118, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yan, Q.-L.; Zhao, F.-Q.; Kuo, K.K.; Zhang, X.-H.; Zeman, S.; DeLuca, L.T. Catalytic effects of nano additives on decomposition and combustion of RDX-, HMX-, and AP-based energetic compositions. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2016, 57, 75–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pivkina, A.N.; Muravyev, N.V.; Monogarov, K.A.; Fomenkov, I.V.; Schoonman, J. Catalysis of HMX Decomposition and Combustion: Defect Chemistry Approach. In Energetic Nanomaterials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 193–230. ISBN 978-0-12-802710-3. [Google Scholar]
  34. Muravyev, N.V.; Pivkina, A.N.; Schoonman, J.; Monogarov, K.A. Catalytic influence of nanosized titanium dioxide on the thermal decomposition and combustion of HMX. Int. J. Energy Mater. Chem. Propuls. 2014, 13, 211–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, T.; Zhao, N.; Li, J.; Gong, H.; An, T.; Zhao, F.; Ma, H. Thermal behavior of nitrocellulose-based superthermites: Effects of nano-Fe2O3 with three morphologies. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 23583–23590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Corr, S. 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane; from refrigerant and propellant to solvent. J. Fluor. Chem. 2002, 118, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Carbon Dioxide Recovery and Utilization; Aresta, M. (Ed.) Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; ISBN 978-90-481-6335-9. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lemmon, E.W.; McLinden, M.O.; Friend, D.G. Thermophysical Properties of Fluid Systems. In NIST Chemistry WebBook; NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  39. Darr, J.A.; Poliakoff, M. New Directions in Inorganic and Metal-Organic Coordination Chemistry in Supercritical Fluids. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 495–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sihvonen, M. Advances in supercritical carbon dioxide technologies. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1999, 10, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jung, J.; Perrut, M. Particle design using supercritical fluids: Literature and patent survey. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2001, 20, 179–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pourmortazavi, S.M.; Hajimirsadeghi, S.S. Application of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide in Energetic Materials Processes: A Review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 6523–6533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Seo, B.; Kim, T.; Park, H.J.; Kim, J.-Y.; Lee, K.D.; Lee, J.M.; Lee, Y.-W. Extension of the Hansen solubility parameter concept to the micronization of cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine crystals by supercritical anti-solvent process. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2016, 111, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lee, B.-M.; Jeong, J.-S.; Lee, Y.-H.; Lee, B.-C.; Kim, H.-S.; Kim, H.; Lee, Y.-W. Supercritical Antisolvent Micronization of Cyclotrimethylenetrinitramin: Influence of the Organic Solvent. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 11162–11167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. CNTs “Taunit” and Synthesis Thereof; NanoTechCenter Ltd.: Tambov, Russia, 2019.
  46. Eisenreich, N.; Pfeil, A. Non-linear least-squares fit of non-isothermal thermoanalytical curves. reinvestigation of the kinetics of the autocatalytic decomposition of nitrated cellulose. Thermochim. Acta 1983, 61, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Binke, N.; Rong, L.; Xianqi, C.; Yuan, W.; Rongzu, H.; Qingsen, Y. Study on the Melting Process of Nitrocellulose by Thermal Analysis Method. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 1999, 58, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Šesták, J.; Berggren, G. Study of the kinetics of the mechanism of solid-state reactions at increasing temperatures. Thermochim. Acta 1971, 3, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Burnham, A.K. Application of the Šesták-Berggren Equation to Organic and Inorganic Materials of Practical Interest. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2000, 60, 895–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Brill, T.B.; Gongwer, P.E. Thermal Decomposition of Energetic Materials 69. Analysis of the kinetics of nitrocellulose at 50–500 °C. Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 1997, 22, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. STANAG 4487. Explosives, Friction Sensitivity Tests; NATO: Brussels, Belgium, 2002; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  52. Shin, J.; Lee, K.Y.; Yeo, T.; Choi, W. Facile One-pot Transformation of Iron Oxides from Fe2O3 Nanoparticles to Nanostructured Fe3O4@C Core-Shell Composites via Combustion Waves. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zeldovich, Y.B. Theory of combustion of propellants and explosives Zh. Eksperimentalnoy i Teor. Fiz. 1942, 12, 498–524. [Google Scholar]
  54. Sinditskii, V.P.; Egorshev, V.Y.; Berezin, M.V.; Serushkin, V.V. Mechanism of HMX combustion in a wide range of pressures. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 2009, 45, 461–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Supercritical anti-solvent (SAS) fabrication of nitrocellulose (NC)-based composites: (a) scheme of the experimental setup, (b) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of raw NC fibers, (c) product obtained under non-optimized conditions, (d) pure NC after SAS treatment in optimized conditions.
Figure 1. Supercritical anti-solvent (SAS) fabrication of nitrocellulose (NC)-based composites: (a) scheme of the experimental setup, (b) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of raw NC fibers, (c) product obtained under non-optimized conditions, (d) pure NC after SAS treatment in optimized conditions.
Nanomaterials 09 01386 g001
Figure 2. Morphology of NC (sc): scanning (a), transmission (b) electron microscopy, and numerical particle size distribution (c). Note that image (b) shows the nanoparticles localized on transmission electron microscope (TEM) grid.
Figure 2. Morphology of NC (sc): scanning (a), transmission (b) electron microscopy, and numerical particle size distribution (c). Note that image (b) shows the nanoparticles localized on transmission electron microscope (TEM) grid.
Nanomaterials 09 01386 g002
Figure 3. Electron microscopy of (a) NC/carbon nanotube (CNT)(sc) and (b) NC/CNT/Fe2O3(sc).
Figure 3. Electron microscopy of (a) NC/carbon nanotube (CNT)(sc) and (b) NC/CNT/Fe2O3(sc).
Nanomaterials 09 01386 g003
Figure 4. Thermal analysis under linear heating: mass loss (a), heat flow (b) data, and isoconversional kinetic analysis results (c).
Figure 4. Thermal analysis under linear heating: mass loss (a), heat flow (b) data, and isoconversional kinetic analysis results (c).
Nanomaterials 09 01386 g004
Figure 5. Combustion of the composites: still images from the high-speed filming (a–f) and the burning rate-pressure dependencies (g). Images shows the typical shots of NC (a,b), NC(sc) (c), NC/CNT(sc) (d), NC/Fe2O3(sc) (e), and NC/CNT/Fe2O3(sc) (f) burning. Frame width is 1.22 mm.
Figure 5. Combustion of the composites: still images from the high-speed filming (a–f) and the burning rate-pressure dependencies (g). Images shows the typical shots of NC (a,b), NC(sc) (c), NC/CNT(sc) (d), NC/Fe2O3(sc) (e), and NC/CNT/Fe2O3(sc) (f) burning. Frame width is 1.22 mm.
Nanomaterials 09 01386 g005
Table 1. Summary of properties for raw NC and SAS-obtained composites.
Table 1. Summary of properties for raw NC and SAS-obtained composites.
SampleDecomposition onset 1, °CHeat Effect 1, J·g−1Friction Sensitivity, NBurning Rate 2, mm·s−1
NC1931880 ± 90234 ± 2113.8 ± 0.5
NC(sc)1891970 ± 30342 ± 1813.1 ± 0.5
NC/CNT(sc)1881920 ± 150>360 (10%)13.2 ± 0.5
NC/Fe2O3(sc)1861790 ± 150229 ± 1813.1 ± 0.5
NC/CNT/Fe2O3(sc)1891890 ± 150>360 (40%)15.8 ± 0.6
NC/CNT/Fe2O31931590 ± 150222 ± 3114.6 ± 0.5
1 Measured at 5 K·min−1 rate. 2 For pressed pellets burned at 12 MPa.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dobrynin, O.S.; Zharkov, M.N.; Kuchurov, I.V.; Fomenkov, I.V.; Zlotin, S.G.; Monogarov, K.A.; Meerov, D.B.; Pivkina, A.N.; Muravyev, N.V. Supercritical Antisolvent Processing of Nitrocellulose: Downscaling to Nanosize, Reducing Friction Sensitivity and Introducing Burning Rate Catalyst. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1386. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101386

AMA Style

Dobrynin OS, Zharkov MN, Kuchurov IV, Fomenkov IV, Zlotin SG, Monogarov KA, Meerov DB, Pivkina AN, Muravyev NV. Supercritical Antisolvent Processing of Nitrocellulose: Downscaling to Nanosize, Reducing Friction Sensitivity and Introducing Burning Rate Catalyst. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(10):1386. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101386

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dobrynin, Oleg S., Mikhail N. Zharkov, Ilya V. Kuchurov, Igor V. Fomenkov, Sergey G. Zlotin, Konstantin A. Monogarov, Dmitry B. Meerov, Alla N. Pivkina, and Nikita V. Muravyev. 2019. "Supercritical Antisolvent Processing of Nitrocellulose: Downscaling to Nanosize, Reducing Friction Sensitivity and Introducing Burning Rate Catalyst" Nanomaterials 9, no. 10: 1386. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101386

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop