Next Article in Journal
Control Strategy for Inverter Air Conditioners under Demand Response
Next Article in Special Issue
Innovative Effluent Capture and Evacuation Device that Increases COD Removal Efficiency in Subsurface Flow Wetlands
Previous Article in Journal
CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol by a Liquid-Phase Process with Alcoholic Solvents: A Techno-Economic Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Coffee Pulp: A Sustainable Alternative Removal of Cr (VI) in Wastewaters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Removal of Lead and Cadmium Ions from Aqueous Solution by Adsorption on a Low-Cost Phragmites Biomass

by
Abdulaziz N. Amro
1,*,
Mohammad K. Abhary
2,
Muhammad Mansoor Shaikh
1 and
Samah Ali
1,3
1
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al Munawwarah 30002, Saudi Arabia
2
Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al Munawwarah 30002, Saudi Arabia
3
The National Organization for Drug Control and Research, Al-Agouzah, Giza 12654, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2019, 7(7), 406; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7070406
Submission received: 19 May 2019 / Revised: 21 June 2019 / Accepted: 21 June 2019 / Published: 1 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wastewater Treatment Processes)

Abstract

:
In recent years, the interest in waste water treatment increased to preserve the environment. The objective of this study is the removal of lead and cadmium ions from aqueous solution by treated Phragmites biomass (TPB). TPB was characterized by using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDS) which indicates the presence of functional groups that may be responsible of metal adsorption such as hydroxyl, carbonyl, sulfonate and carboxylate. Characterization by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and surface area analysis using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method (BET) illustrated that TPB is nonporous with a small surface area. The influences of various experimental factors were investigated; the proposed method recommended the extraction of Pb+2 and Cd+2 metal ions by TPB at pH 5.0. A contact time of 60 and 45 min was required for the adsorption 50 mL (50 ppm) Pb+2 and Cd+2 respectively to reach equilibrium when 0.10 g TPB was used. The optimum TPB dosage was 0.20 g for adsorption both metal ions when adsorbate solution was 50 mL (50 ppm). Particle sizes of 0.125–0.212 mm showed the best metal ion removal of both metal ions. Thermodynamic study illustrated that both metal ions correlate more with Langmuir isotherm. Furthermore, chemisorption of Pb+2 and Cd+2 on TPB was more likely according to kinetic study data.

1. Introduction

The recent developments of industrial cities along the western coastline of Saudi Arabia have reshaped the socioeconomic environmental status of the area [1,2]. Common reed, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel, was recently reported as an invasive species in the area stretching from north [3] to south [4] of the Red Sea shoreline in Saudi Arabia. The reed has a cosmopolitan distribution, occurring in all continents except Antarctica [5] and it is considered a useful model for understanding when and how species become invasive, because of its ability to establish, survive, expand and modify the environment within which it persists [6].
Nowadays, ecosystem pollution with heavy metals is becoming a crucial environmental problem threatening the marine life in the western coastline of Saudi Arabia [2]. Live biomass cultures of Phragmites australis has been used in numerous studies for heavy metals water treatment [7,8], because of its ability to accumulate such ions within its tissues [9,10].
Ions of heavy metals are toxic and bio-accumulative, with further biomagnification. Therefore, purification of water from heavy metals is an important issue for human beings [11]. Toxicity of cadmium and lead are well known [12]. Cadmium (Cd) is not an essential metal for human beings, but it has a damaging impact on organs such as the kidneys, liver, and lungs [13]. Lead (Pb) has an unknown biological function and is considered a severe environmental pollutant with hazardous impacts on the human health [14]. Lead ingestion may damage the cardiovascular system and induce undesirable and potentially fatal changes in the body. Exposure to lead was also indicated to interfere with the bio-disposition of calcium in bones [15].
When growing in salt marshes, P. australis can alter its physiological responses to the surrounding environment and subsequently promote heavy metal uptake [9], on which occasions the presence of metal ions, such as Cd, was found to stimulate antioxidant activities along with increased levels of glutathione and pyridines [8]. Nevertheless, chemical functional groups such as sulfonate and carboxyl play a key role in binding to heavy metals found in the environment [16]. Therefore, it is expected that P. australis biomass that is collected from saline environments has a higher potential in heavy metal removal.
In this work, treated Phragmites biomass (TPB) is studied to be used for the first time in the removal of lead and cadmium ions from aqueous solution. After characterization of TPB using several techniques, the parameters impacting the removal of metal ions such as biomass, pH of metal ion solution, TPB dose, and particle size, are investigated. In addition to that thermodynamic isothermal models and kinetic studies have been applied.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

All reagents used were of analytical grade. All solutions were prepared with fresh deionized water obtained from a Milli-Q water system. Glassware was washed throughout and repeatedly cleaned with Nitric acid then rinsed with Milli-Q water. Nitric acid was bought from Riedel-de’Haën (65%, Puriss, Germany), Cd and Pb elements standards was bought from Panreac (1000 µg mL−1) (Spain). 0.1 M HNO3 and 0.2 M NaOH are used to adapt the required pH.

2.2. Instrumentation

Metal ion determinations were done using atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) Agilent technology (200 series) (Santa Clara, CA, USA). A potentiometric digital pH meter was used to determine the pH of water samples. A digital analytical balance was used for all measurements of samples and chemicals. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were conducted at room temperature on a (IR Affinity-1) Shimadzu FTIR spectrometer (Shimadzu, Columbia, MD, USA). Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was performed using NOVA NANO SEM instrument (USA). Elemental analysis was measured using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) of Superscan Shimadzu SSX-550 diffractometer with CuKa (λ = 1.54056 Å) (Shimadzu, Columbia, MD, USA). Surface area was measured by BET (Micromeritics ASAP 2020) (Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA).

2.3. Sorption Experiment

The equilibrium sorption of the Pb2+ and Cd2+ ions by TPB was carried out by contacting 50–300 mg of the adsorbent with different concentrations of adsorbate ions. Each metal ion was studied separately. Each measurement was done in triplicate. The mixture was filtered, and the residual concentration of the filtrated metal ions was analyzed using atomic absorption spectroscopy (Agilent technology (200 series)). Adsorption isotherms of TPB were conducted according to batch experimental procedure: A certain volume of solution (V) and certain concentration (C) of the metal ion solution was shaken with a certain amount of adsorbent (W) for a certain time. After filtration of the adsorbent, the equilibrium concentration (Ce) of adsorbate in the solution was measured and the adsorbed quantity (Q) was calculated using Equation (1) [17].
Q = V × (Ci − Ce)/W
where Q = the quantity of metal ion adsorbed from the solution. V = adsorbate solution volume, Ci = initial concentration of metal ion solution, Cf = the concentration after adsorption and W = adsorbent mass (gram). Metal ion removal efficiency was determined by calculating the sorption percentage using this formula:
% Sorption = (Ci − Ce)/Ci × 100

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Biomass Characterization

3.1.1. Fourier Transfer Infrared (FTIR)

FTIR characterization of TPB showed the presence of several functional groups, such as hydroxyl, carbonyl, sulfonate and carboxylate groups (Figure 1). An FTIR spectrum discloses the existence of many components like polysaccharides, amino acids, fatty acids and others; such functional groups were reported earlier to have a role in adsorption of metal ions [8,18].
Aliphatic N–H and O–H stretching vibration bands show up at 3405 cm−1, which indicates the presence of amino acids and polysaccharides [19,20]. Aliphatic CH3 and CH2 symmetric stretching bands at 2924 and 2841 cm−1 assure the existence of Chlorophyll groups [20]. Stretching bands of carbonyl and N=O of pectin esters exhibited at 1724 and 1652 cm−1, and the C=C Stretching band at 1460 cm−1 indicate the presence of both pectin and lignin. 1378, 1247 and 1055 cm−1 peaks are stretching bands of S=O related to sulfonamides and lignin C–C–O. C–C band of cellulose ring appears at 1166 cm−1 [19]. The presence of 1114 cm−1 discloses C–O–C bond of glycosidic ether [19]. Absorption bands observed near 663 and 603 cm−1 reveal C–S and C=S stretching vibrations of sulfides [21].

3.1.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis (EDS) and BET (Surface Area)

Measurements using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were carried out to determine the morphology of the Phragmites. Figure 2 displays SEM images of Biomass of Phragmites, where all the morphological characteristics were taken at 2000× magnification. Results have showed that the biomass of P. australis has a rough surface due to the presence of fibrous layers. EDS analysis of the biomass is shown in Figure 3, illustrating that the biomass is composed mainly of organic matter, where high concentrations of carbon (37%), oxygen (55%) and nitrogen were found (Table 1). On the other hand, inorganic elements, such as phosphorus, sulfur and fluorine, were also detected. Results showed that P. australis biomass had no pores on its surface and the surface area is small (0.5 m2/g), indicating that the adsorption process occurred preferentially on the external surface without any penetration to the bulk.

3.2. Factors Affecting Metal Ion Removal Study

3.2.1. Effect of Contact Time

The effect of contact time on the adsorption of metals was investigated here. Figure 4 shows the percentage of the metal ions’ removal with respect to time. The effect of shaking time on the extraction of the metal ions was investigated by adding 0.1 g of the TPB to 50 mL (50 ppm) metals ion solution at pH 4. Samples were automatically shaken at different time intervals (0, 5, 10, 25, 45, 60, 90 min). The TPB was separated and the amount of metal ions remaining in the aqueous solution was measured by AAS. The plot in Figure 4 reveals that the rate of metal ions’ removal as percentages was higher at the beginning, presumably due to larger surface area of the TPB available at beginning for adsorption. Most metal ion removal was attained after about 60 min of shaking time for both metal ions.

3.2.2. Effect of pH

The pH effect on the TPB sorption was studied using 50 ppm metal ion solutions in pH ranging between 2.0 and 5.0. The results presented in Figure 5 show that the removal efficiency increased with the increasing of pH from 2 to 5, with a maximum extraction at pH 4.0 and 5.0 for both metal ions, since there is no significant difference between pH 4.0 and 5.0. Low efficiency of metal ion removal at low pH may come from high hydronium ion concentration that competes with metal ion on the adsorbent surface.

3.2.3. Effect of TPB Dosage

The influence of TPB amount was tested by shaking 50 mL solution containing 50 ppm of Pb and Cd ions with variable amount of TPB in the range of 50–300 mg for 1 h. The sorption increased with increasing the amount of TPB, and reached to a maximum value of 51%, and 41% for Cd (II), and Pb (II) ions, respectively. Results in Figure 6 show no significant difference in the removal of both metal ions between a 200 and 300 mg TPB dose; these results demonstrate that 200 mg is the optimum dose for every 50 mL of 50 ppm metal ion solution.

3.2.4. Effect of Phragmites Biomass Particle Size

Different particle sizes of TPB were used as absorbent material to investigate the best size for removal efficiency. Results in Figure 7 show the effect of TPB particle size, which represents the relationship between removal efficiency and particle size of TPB. It is observed that the decrease of particle size increases the removal efficiency of lead and cadmium ions, which indicates the highest removal efficiency would occur when particle size of 0.125–0.212 mm is used. That demonstrates that larger surface area confers higher metal ion removal ability.

3.2.5. Adsorption Isotherm

The Langmuir model was applied to interpret adsorption of Cd+2 and Pb+2 on TPB. The adsorption capacities of TPB for Cd+2 and Pb+2 obtained from the experiment fit to Langmuir adsorption isotherm model (Figure 8). The curve could be illustrated by the equation below [22]:
C e Q e = 1 XmK + 1 Xm C e
where Qe is the quantity of metal ions adsorbed per gram of sorbent and Ce is the amount of metal ions persist in the solution at equilibrium (mg L−1). The Xm is the maximum sorption capacity (mg g−1) and K is the Langmuir constant. Values of Xm and K were determined from the figure and were found to be 5.46 mg/g and 0.1625 L/mg for Pb+2 ions, while Cd+2 ions values of Xm and K were found to be 6.40 mg/g and 0.0395 L/mg, respectively (Table 2). It was found that the isotherm data fits the Langmuir equation well with good correlation coefficients: R2 = 0.936 and 0.918 for Pb+2 and Cd+2 ions, respectively, showing that the sorption data correlates more to Langmuir Isotherm model. In order to confirm the adsorption efficiency, the dimensionless separation factor (RL) could be calculated according to the following equation [23]:
RL = 1/(1 + bCo)
where b is the Langmuir constant (L mg−1) and C0 is the initial concentration of metal ions (mg L−1). While 0 < RL < 1 denotes favourable adsorption, RL > 1 is an indication of unfavourable adsorption. Values for RL were calculated at metal ions initial concentration 50 mg L−1. The value of RL was found to be 0.110 and 0.336 for Pb (II) and Cd (II) ions, respectively, which is in the favourable range 0–1, indicating a tendency for the metal ions’ adsorption by treated biomass. Freundlich proposed an isothermal model characteristic of heterogeneous surfaces. The quantity of metal ions adsorbed, Qe, is related to the concentration of metal ions persisting in the solution Ce, as mentioned in the equation below [24]:
Log Qe =log KF + (1/n) log Ce
where KF and n are Freundlich constants which can be calculated from the plot of log Qe vs. log Ce.
A linear relation with correlation coefficient was observed (R2 = 0.724 for Cd+2 and 0.743 for Pb+2). By comparing the correlation coefficients (R2) for both isothermal models, it’s clear that adsorption is better correlated to the Langmuir model than the Freundlich model, meaning that adsorbates form a homogenous monolayer is on the adsorbent surface.

3.2.6. Sorption Kinetics

In order to analyze the adsorption kinetics of Pb2+ and Cd2+ on TPB surface, correlations between adsorbed amounts and time were studied by testing different mathematical expressions corresponding to various models. Pseudo first and second order kinetic models were applied to study the adsorption of metal ions on the surface of Phragmites biomass.
Pseudo first order kinetic models have often been applied on experimental adsorption kinetic results to study whether the adsorption of metal ions dominated by a physical or chemical sorption mechanism. The Kinetics of the studied Phragmites were subjected to the linearized forms of the Pseudo first order equation [25,26] and a linear fit of log (Qe − Qt) versus time (t) is observed in Figure 9b:
Log   ( Qe Qt ) = log   Qe k 1 t 2.303
where Qe, Qt is the sorbed amount of Phragmites (mg g−1) at equilibrium and at any time (t), respectively, and k1 is the first order rate constant of sorption.
The second order kinetic equation:
t/Qt = 1/(K2Qe2) + (t/Qe)
K2 is the second order rate constant of adsorption (g mg−1 min−1). The plot t/Qt versus time (t) should give a straight line if pseudo second order kinetics is applicable and both Qe, K2 is simply determined from the slope and intercept of the above equation plot in Figure 9c.
Kinetic models are tested to fit the experimental data for sorption of Cd+2 and Pb+2. (Figure 9) and Table 3 shows a significantly higher correlation coefficient R2 value of pseudo second order kinetic model compared with first one for both metal ions. Furthermore, Table 3 shows a lower difference between Qe calc and Qe Exp for pseudo second order model compared to first one. The fitness of the data to the pseudo second-order kinetic model could be interpreted by chemisorption of Pb and Cd ions by Phragmites biomass.
Table 4 shows a comparison between Phragmites biomass and other bio-adsorbent ability for removal Pb and Cd ions from aqueous solution. It can be concluded that Phragmites biomass has a comparable adsorption capacity for both metal ions.

4. Conclusions

In this study low coast is locally available; Phragmites australis has been collected from salt marshes and treated to be used as alternative biomass adsorbent to remove metal ions from aqueous solution. Even though TPB has a low surface area, it is considered a good adsorbent of metal ions from aqueous solution, when considering the abundance of low-cost raw materials used for its preparation.
Several techniques have been applied to characterize TPB in this study. Optimization of adsorption parameters for metal ions on TPB have been illustrated in this study. It can be concluded from thermodynamic and kinetic investigations that adsorption of metal ions on TPB fit Langmuir homogenous monolayer chemisorption. Further studies are recommended on TPB for the removal of other metals and organic pollutants.

Author Contributions

Methodology: M.M.S., A.N.A., M.K.A.; Software: A.N.A., S.A.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation: S.A.; Writing-Review & Editing: A.N.A., M.K.A.; Project Administration: A.N.A.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Paimpillil, J.; Se, J.; Dahalawi, M. Impact of Treated Industrial Effluents on Yanbu (Red Sea) Coral Reefs and the Efficiency of Coastal Ecosystems Conservation. The Changing Coast; Ed. EUROCOAST—Portugal. 2002, pp. 311–316. Available online: https://repositoriocientifico.uatlantica.pt/bitstream/10884/351/1/2002_Eurocoast_porto.pdf (accessed on 5 May 2019).
  2. Erftemeijer, P. Seawater Intake and Outfall Channel and Thermal Pollution Study in Northern and Southern Sector at MYAS (Yanbu), Saudi Arabia; Report Prepared for the Saudi Consulting Services; SAUDCONSULT Saudi Consulting Services: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Moawed, M.; Ansari, A. Wild plants diversity of Red Sea coastal region, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2015, 7, 220–227. [Google Scholar]
  4. Remesh, M.; Masrahi, Y.S.; Sayed, O.H. Phragmites australis (Poaceae): New addition to flora of southwestern Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2018, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tucker, G.C. The genera of Arundinoideae (Gramineae) in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 1990, 71, 145–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Meyerson, L.A.; Cronin, J.T.; Pyšek, P. Phragmites australis as a model organism for studying plant invasions. Biol. Environ. 2016, 18, 2421–2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vymazal, J.; Kröpfelová, L.; Švehla, J.; Chrastný, V.; Štíchová, J. Trace elements in Phragmites australis growing in constructed wetlands for treatment of municipal wastewater. Ecol. Eng. 2009, 35, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pietrini, F.; Iannelli, M.; Pasqualini, S.; Massacci, A. Interaction of Cadmium with Glutathione and Photosynthesis in Developing Leaves and Chloroplasts of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 829–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Du Laing, G.; Van de Moortel, A.; Moors, W.; De Grauwe, P.; Meers, E.; Tack, F.; Veloo, M. Factors affecting metal concentrations in reed plants (Phragmites australis) of intertidal marshes in the Scheldt estuary. Ecol. Eng. 2009, 35, 310–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Deghles, A.; Abu−Obaid, A.; Alkowni, R.; Salman, M. Adsorption of Heavy Metals by Reed (Phragmites australis) as a Potential Clean Water Technology. J. Environ. Earth Sci. 2018, 8, 159–171. [Google Scholar]
  11. Plotnikov, E.; Martemianova, I.; Martemianov, D.; Zhuravkov, S.; Voronova, O.; Korotkova, E.; Vladimir, S. Water Purification with Natural Sorbents: Effect of Surface Modification with Nano−Structured Particles. Proc. Chem. 2015, 15, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dessuy, M.B.; Vale, M.G.R.; Welz, B.; Borges, A.R.; Silva, M.M.; Martelli, P.B. Determination of cadmium and lead in beverages after leaching from pewter cups using graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Talanta 2011, 85, 681–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Rezende, H.C.; Nascentes, C.C.; Coelho, N.M. Cloud point extraction for determination of cadmium in soft drinks by thermospray flame furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Microchem. J. 2011, 97, 118–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abou-Arab, A.; Donia, M.; Sharaf, N.; Mohamed, S. Lead levels in human blood as biological test in different Egyptian environments. World J. Med. Sci. 2014, 10, 392–399. [Google Scholar]
  15. Shayesteh, T.H.; Khajavi, F.; Khosroshahi, A.G.; Mahjub, R. Development and validation of a novel, simple, and accurate spectrophotometric method for the determination of lead in human serum. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fourest, E.; Volesky, B. Contribution of Sulfonate Groups and Alginate to Heavy Metal Biosorption by the Dry Biomass of Sargassum fluitans. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vanderborght, B.M.; Van Grieken, R.E. Enrichment of trace metals in water by adsorption on activated carbon. Anal. chem. 1977, 49, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Antonielli, M.; Pasqualini, S.; Batini, P.; Ederli, L.; Massacci, A.; Loreto, F. Physiological and anatomical characterisation of Phragmitis australis leaves. Aquat. Bot. 2001, 72, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dokken, K.M.; Davis, L.C. Infrared Imaging of Sunflower and Maize Root Anatomy. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 10517–10530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kannan, S. FT-IR and EDS analysis of the seaweeds Sargassum wightii (brown algae) and Gracilaria corticata (red algae). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2014, 3, 341–351. [Google Scholar]
  21. Son, E.B.; Poo, K.M.; Chang, J.S.; Chae, K.J. Heavy metal removal from aqueous solutions using engineered magnetic biochars derived from waste marine macro−algal biomass. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Langmuir, I. The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. Part I. Solids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1916, 38, 2221–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Weber, T.W.; Chakravorti, R.K. Pore and solid diffusion models for fixed bed adsorbers. AIChE J. 1974, 20, 228–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Freundlich, H. Über die adsorption in lösungen. Z. Phys. Chem. 1907, 57, 385–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Al Hamouz, O.C.S.; Akintola, O.S. Chemistry Removal of lead and arsenic ions by a new series of aniline based polyamines. Proc. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2017, 106, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shen, S.; Guishen, L.; Pan, T.; He, J.; Guo, Z. Selective adsorption of Pt ions from chloride solutions obtained by leaching chlorinated spent automotive catalysts on ion exchange resin Diaion WA21J. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 346, 482–489. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cimá-Mukul, C.A.; Abdellaoui, Y.; Abatal, M.; Vargas, J.; Santiago, A.; Barrón-Zambrano, J.A. Eco-Efficient Biosorbent Based on Leucaena leucocephala Residues for the Simultaneous Removal of Pb(II) and Cd(II) Ions from Water System: Sorption and Mechanism. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2019, 2019, 2814047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ammaria, T.G.; Al-Atiyata, M.; Abu-Nameh, E.S.; Ghrairc, A.; Jaradat, D.; Abu-Romman, S. Bioremediation of cadmium-contaminated water systems using intact and alkaline-treated alga (Hydrodictyon reticulatum) naturally grown in an ecosystem. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2017, 19, 453–462. [Google Scholar]
  29. Xu, S.; Gong, X.F.; Zou, H.L.; Liu, C.Y.; Chen, C.L.; Zeng, X.X. Recycling agriculture wastes of ramie stalk as bioadsorbents for Cd2+ removal: A kinetic and thermodynamic study. Water Sci. Technol. 2016, 73, 396–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Amro, A.N.; Abhary, M.K. Removal of Lead and Cadmium Ions from Water Using Cladophora Biomass. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2019, 28, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Farah, A.; Farah, N.T.; Aamna, B.; Hassa, N.; Imran, A. Eco-efficient Fungal Biomass for the Removal of Pb(II) Ions from Water System: A Sorption Process and Mechanism. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2017, 11, 315–325. [Google Scholar]
  32. Cechinel, M.A.P.; Ulson De Souza, S.M.A.G.; Ulson De Souza, A.A. Study of lead (II) adsorption onto activated carbon originating from cow bone. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 65, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of treated phragmites biomass.
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of treated phragmites biomass.
Processes 07 00406 g001
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscope image of the sieved biomass powder of Phragmites; scale bar, 10 µm.
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscope image of the sieved biomass powder of Phragmites; scale bar, 10 µm.
Processes 07 00406 g002
Figure 3. EDS spectra of phragmites biomass powder.
Figure 3. EDS spectra of phragmites biomass powder.
Processes 07 00406 g003
Figure 4. Effect of contact time on metal ion removal (mean ± RSD) (50 mL, 50 ppm) using phragmites powdered biomass (0.1 g, 0.212–0.5 mm) (120 rpm, pH 4, 25 °C). Each measurement has been done in triplicate.
Figure 4. Effect of contact time on metal ion removal (mean ± RSD) (50 mL, 50 ppm) using phragmites powdered biomass (0.1 g, 0.212–0.5 mm) (120 rpm, pH 4, 25 °C). Each measurement has been done in triplicate.
Processes 07 00406 g004
Figure 5. Effect of solution pH on metal ion removal (mean ± RSD) (50 mL, 50 ppm) using powdered biomass (0.1 g, 0.212–0.5 mm) (120 rpm, 60 min, 25 °C). Each measurement was done in triplicate.
Figure 5. Effect of solution pH on metal ion removal (mean ± RSD) (50 mL, 50 ppm) using powdered biomass (0.1 g, 0.212–0.5 mm) (120 rpm, 60 min, 25 °C). Each measurement was done in triplicate.
Processes 07 00406 g005
Figure 6. Effect of powdered biomass dose (0.212–0.50 mm) on metal ion removal (mean ± RSD) (50 mL, 50 ppm, pH 4) (120 rpm, 60 min, 25 °C). Each measurement has been done in triplicate.
Figure 6. Effect of powdered biomass dose (0.212–0.50 mm) on metal ion removal (mean ± RSD) (50 mL, 50 ppm, pH 4) (120 rpm, 60 min, 25 °C). Each measurement has been done in triplicate.
Processes 07 00406 g006
Figure 7. Effect of particle size (0.10 g) on metal ion removal (mean ± RSD) (50 mL, 50 ppm, pH 4) (120 rpm, 60 min, 25 °C). Each measurement has been done in triplicate.
Figure 7. Effect of particle size (0.10 g) on metal ion removal (mean ± RSD) (50 mL, 50 ppm, pH 4) (120 rpm, 60 min, 25 °C). Each measurement has been done in triplicate.
Processes 07 00406 g007
Figure 8. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms of Pb and Cd ions, 0.10 g Phragmites powdered biomass, and 20–120 mg L−1 initial concentrations (50 mL, pH 4, 120 rpm, 60 min, 25 °C).
Figure 8. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms of Pb and Cd ions, 0.10 g Phragmites powdered biomass, and 20–120 mg L−1 initial concentrations (50 mL, pH 4, 120 rpm, 60 min, 25 °C).
Processes 07 00406 g008
Figure 9. (a) Effect of time on the adsorption capacity of Cd and Pb ions on powdered biomass, (b) Pseudo first-order kinetic model, (c) Pseudo second-order kinetic model.
Figure 9. (a) Effect of time on the adsorption capacity of Cd and Pb ions on powdered biomass, (b) Pseudo first-order kinetic model, (c) Pseudo second-order kinetic model.
Processes 07 00406 g009aProcesses 07 00406 g009b
Table 1. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy results of Phragmites biomass.
Table 1. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy results of Phragmites biomass.
ElementWeight%Atom%
C36.9643.70
N6.766.85
O55.0348.84
F0.150.11
P0.310.14
S0.800.36
Total100.00100.00
Table 2. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm model constants for the adsorption of Pb (II) and Cd (II) ions.
Table 2. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm model constants for the adsorption of Pb (II) and Cd (II) ions.
Langmuir IsothermFreundlich Isotherm
Xm (mg/g)K (L/mg)R2KF1/nR2
Pb5.460.16250.9361.6890.2870.743
Cd6.400.03950.9180.8050.4180.724
Table 3. Pseudo first-order and pseudo second-order kinetic models for the adsorption of Pb and Cd ions on powdered biomass.
Table 3. Pseudo first-order and pseudo second-order kinetic models for the adsorption of Pb and Cd ions on powdered biomass.
Metal IonPseudo First Order Kinetic Model
Qe, exp (mg g−1)Qe, calc (mg g−1)k1 (h−1)R2
Pb0.3350.1011.0480.9505
Cd0.7650.1531.1040.7404
Metal IonPseudo Second Order Kinetic Model
Qe, exp (mg g−1)Qe, calc (mg g−1)k2 (g mg−1 h−1)R2
Pb0.3350.3937.4520.9718
Cd0.7650.82114.960.9966
Table 4. A comparison of various bio-adsorbents used to adsorb lead and cadmium ions from aqueous solutions.
Table 4. A comparison of various bio-adsorbents used to adsorb lead and cadmium ions from aqueous solutions.
Bio-AdsorbentPb Maximum Capacity mg/gCd Maximum Capacity mg/gReference
Leucaena leucocephala Residues25.5114.79[27]
Hydrodictyon reticulatum-7.03[28]
agriculture wastes of ramie stalk-10.33 [29]
Cladophora biomass20.6512.07[30]
activated carbon originating from cow bone50.10-[31]
Fungal Biomass2.971-[32]
Phragmites biomass5.466.40Present study

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amro, A.N.; Abhary, M.K.; Shaikh, M.M.; Ali, S. Removal of Lead and Cadmium Ions from Aqueous Solution by Adsorption on a Low-Cost Phragmites Biomass. Processes 2019, 7, 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7070406

AMA Style

Amro AN, Abhary MK, Shaikh MM, Ali S. Removal of Lead and Cadmium Ions from Aqueous Solution by Adsorption on a Low-Cost Phragmites Biomass. Processes. 2019; 7(7):406. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7070406

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amro, Abdulaziz N., Mohammad K. Abhary, Muhammad Mansoor Shaikh, and Samah Ali. 2019. "Removal of Lead and Cadmium Ions from Aqueous Solution by Adsorption on a Low-Cost Phragmites Biomass" Processes 7, no. 7: 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7070406

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop