Next Article in Journal
A Dynamic Calibration Method of Installation Misalignment Angles between Two Inertial Navigation Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Adding Active Slot Joint Larger Broadcast Radius for Fast Code Dissemination in WSNs
Previous Article in Journal
A Residual Analysis-Based Improved Particle Filter in Mobile Localization for Wireless Sensor Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Practical Use of Robot Manipulators as Intelligent Manufacturing Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Performance Analysis of IoT-Based Sensor, Big Data Processing, and Machine Learning Model for Real-Time Monitoring System in Automotive Manufacturing

1
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul 100-715, Korea
2
u-SCM Research Center, Nano Information Technology Academy, Dongguk University, Seoul 100-715, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2018, 18(9), 2946; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092946
Submission received: 3 August 2018 / Revised: 30 August 2018 / Accepted: 3 September 2018 / Published: 4 September 2018

Abstract

:
With the increase in the amount of data captured during the manufacturing process, monitoring systems are becoming important factors in decision making for management. Current technologies such as Internet of Things (IoT)-based sensors can be considered a solution to provide efficient monitoring of the manufacturing process. In this study, a real-time monitoring system that utilizes IoT-based sensors, big data processing, and a hybrid prediction model is proposed. Firstly, an IoT-based sensor that collects temperature, humidity, accelerometer, and gyroscope data was developed. The characteristics of IoT-generated sensor data from the manufacturing process are: real-time, large amounts, and unstructured type. The proposed big data processing platform utilizes Apache Kafka as a message queue, Apache Storm as a real-time processing engine and MongoDB to store the sensor data from the manufacturing process. Secondly, for the proposed hybrid prediction model, Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN)-based outlier detection and Random Forest classification were used to remove outlier sensor data and provide fault detection during the manufacturing process, respectively. The proposed model was evaluated and tested at an automotive manufacturing assembly line in Korea. The results showed that IoT-based sensors and the proposed big data processing system are sufficiently efficient to monitor the manufacturing process. Furthermore, the proposed hybrid prediction model has better fault prediction accuracy than other models given the sensor data as input. The proposed system is expected to support management by improving decision-making and will help prevent unexpected losses caused by faults during the manufacturing process.

1. Introduction

Manufacturing plays an important role in economic development and is still considered crucial to economic growth in the globalization era [1,2]. It has a positive impact on the growth of both developed and developing countries [3,4]. Emerging technologies are utilized by the manufacturing industry to enhance the economic competitiveness of individual manufacturers and the sustainability of the entire industrial sector. The adoption of information and communication technology (ICT) in manufacturing enables a transition from traditional to advanced manufacturing processes [5]. Monitoring systems, as part of ICT application, play an important part in manufacturing process control and management. Recent developments in information technology enable the integration of various monitoring applications into one complex system for the whole supply chain [6]. In general cases, the application of a monitoring system plays an important role in predicting disease [7], improving production, reducing cost [8], and providing an early warning system [9,10]. Recent technologies such as Internet of Things (IoT)-based sensors can be utilized and integrated with monitoring systems. Studies have been conducted in the manufacturing industry and showed significant benefits from the use of IoT-based sensors for monitoring such as working condition improvements [11], error design prevention [12], fault diagnosis [13], quality prediction [14], and helping managers with better decision making [15].
With the increasing number of IoT sensing devices available, data generated from the manufacturing industry (i.e., process logs, events, images and sensor data) are expected to grow exponentially. This type of data is called “big data” [16]. Big data analysis has led to significant improvements in the manufacturing industry, such as reducing energy consumption [17], improving production scheduling and logistics planning [18], mitigating social risks [19], and facilitating better decision making [20]. Previous studies have shown significant benefits from several big data technologies in processing and storing large volumes of data quickly, such as with the application of Apache Kafka [21,22,23,24,25,26], Apache Storm [27,28,29,30,31], and NoSQL MongoDB [32,33,34,35,36,37]. Previous studies showed significant advantages from the integration of big data technologies such as reducing the processing time for home automation systems [38], providing effective and efficient solutions for processing IoT-generated data for smart cities [39], and handling large amounts of smart environmental data in real-time [40]. The aforementioned big data technologies have been integrated in data processing systems, resulting in significant advantages due to processing large amounts of streaming spatiotemporal data [41] as well as processing massive amounts of manufacturing sensor data efficiently [42]. Therefore, it is necessary to integrate Apache Kafka, Apache Storm, and MongoDB in big data processing systems for the manufacturing industry so that large amounts of streaming manufacturing sensor data can be promptly processed, stored, and presented in real-time.
Data (e.g., sensor data from the production line, environmental data, etc.) generated by the manufacturing industry needs to be analyzed to help managers with decision making. Machine learning methods can be considered advanced technology with great potential for data analysis and has been successfully applied in various areas such as fault detection [43], quality prediction [14,44], defect classification [45], and visual inspection [46]. In the case of fault prediction, machine learning algorithms such as Random Forest are highly effective in detecting abnormal events in a process and thus can help avoid productivity loss [47,48,49]. However, machine learning algorithms encounter problems with outlier data, which can reduce the accuracy of the classification model. Outlier detection can be applied to identify and remove outliers; thus, improving the performance of classification models [50,51]. One of the techniques used for outlier detection is Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) [52]. DBSCAN has been implemented in different fields and has been demonstrated to be effective at detecting true outliers [53,54]. The integration of DBSCAN-based outlier detection and Random Forest is necessary for more accurate detection of abnormal events during the manufacturing process.
The results of aforementioned studies have shown significant advantages of IoT-based sensor, big data technology, and machine learning models on improving decision-making for management. Nevertheless, there is no study on integration of the IoT-based sensor, big data technology, and machine learning models into a complete monitoring system specifically for automotive manufacturing. Thus, we propose a real-time monitoring system that utilizes IoT-based sensors, big data processing, and a hybrid prediction model for the automotive industry. The proposed IoT-based sensor collects temperature, humidity, accelerometer, and gyroscope data from the assembly line process while the big data processing platform handles and stores the large amounts of generated sensor data. Finally, the proposed hybrid prediction model, which consists of DBSCAN-based outlier detection and Random Forest classification, is used to remove outlier data and provide fault detection during the manufacturing process, respectively.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents a literature review. In Section 3, the methodology is explained, while in Section 4, the results and discussions are presented. In Section 5, concluding remarks are presented and several limitations and remaining challenges are discussed.

2. Literature Review

2.1. IoT-Based Sensor for Monitoring System

Recent technologies such as IoT, sensors, big data, and machine learning can be utilized for monitoring and can play important roles in predicting disease, improving production, reducing cost, providing an early warning system, and facilitating better decision making for management. Several studies have been conducted on IoT-based monitoring systems and showed significant advantages. Mora et al. proposed an IoT-based framework for monitoring human vital signs [7]. A case study on monitoring footballers’ heart rates during a football match was conducted. The proposed system was able to monitor the players’ vital signs and predict, not only the worst situation (i.e., sudden death), but also possible injuries. Zhang et al. proposed a monitoring system based on IoT for the agricultural field [8]. The developed system was used to monitor citrus soil moisture and nutrients for fertilization and irrigation decision making. Case study-based results showed that the proposed system helped farmers make better decisions, improve citrus production, and reduce labor costs as well as the pollution caused by chemical fertilizers. Manes et al. proposed a distributed monitoring system for leakage detection and gas levels in hazardous environments [9]. A wireless sensor network was utilized to gather the sensor data. The collected environmental sensor data were transmitted to a remote server and presented to the manager via a user interface. The proposed system was effective for monitoring the environment and triggered a warning when critical events were detected. Finally, Cheung et al. proposed real-time monitoring based on information modeling and a wireless sensor network to monitor the safety of construction sites [10]. Hazardous gas levels and environmental conditions (i.e., temperature and humidity) were collected by wireless sensor nodes and sent to a remote server. The proposed system triggered a warning/alarm once an abnormal situation was detected. Case-study based results showed that the proposed system improved the safety of the construction site and helped the management with better decision making in real-time.
Current studies utilize IoT-based sensors to determine the environmental conditions at a real site, thus the sensor data can be presented in real-time. IoT-based sensors provide an important solution for many research areas, including smart building and healthcare. Several studies have been conducted and showed significant results for IoT based sensors on improving system performance. Plageras et al. proposed a monitoring system using IoT-based sensors for smart buildings [55]. The proposed system was implemented in a simulation environment. The results showed that a better monitoring system in a smart building can be achieved by using several IoT-based sensors. The proposed system is expected to improve energy efficiency as well as facilitate green smart buildings. Blanco-Novoa et al. proposed an IoT-based sensor for monitoring the radon gas level inside a building [56]. The proposed system could notify/warn users when a specific level of radon gas is reached to prevent dangerous situations. The proposed system was able to monitor the radon gas level, trigger the programmed actions, and notify the users once a specific level of gas radon was reached. Benammar et al. proposed a modular indoor air quality monitoring system that collects several types of sensor data such as CO2, CO, SO2, NO2, O3, Cl2, temperature, and humidity [57]. A single-board computer (Raspberry Pi) was utilized as a gateway to process the sensor data. The experimental results showed that the proposed system effectively monitored the indoor air quality for six kinds of gases in addition to temperature and humidity. Sood and Mahajan proposed a healthcare system based on wearable IoT-based sensors for detecting and preventing the outbreak of chikungunya virus [58]. The collected health, environmental, medical, location, and meteorological data were used to classify individuals as possibly infected or uninfected. The results showed that the proposed system could be used to detect infected individuals as well as to send a warning alert to the nearest governments and healthcare clinics to prevent further outbreaks. Finally, Bayo-Monton et al. developed an IoT-based sensor utilizing Arduino and Raspberry Pi to enhance eHealth care [59]. The performance of the proposed sensor was compared with that of a personal computer. The results confirmed that the proposed IoT-based sensor was suitable for scalable eHealth systems.
Several studies have been conducted in the manufacturing industry and showed significant advantages from IoT based sensors in improving working conditions, preventing erroneous designs, providing fault diagnosis and quality prediction, and helping managers with better decision making. Moon et al. developed an IoT-based sensor to measure the air quality inside a factory [11]. Temperature, humidity, CO2 level, dust, and odor sensor data were collected and transmitted via wireless communication. Based on the experimental results, the proposed system is robust enough, able to accurately measure the environmental condition in the factory in real-time, and is expected to help managers maintain an optimum working environment for the workers inside the factory. Salamone et al. proposed an environmental monitoring system based on low-cost IoT sensors for preventing errors during the design phase in additive manufacturing [12]. The sensors were used to gather temperature and humidity data. The study revealed that knowledge of environmental conditions could help prevent errors during the design phase in additive manufacturing. Li et al. utilized IoT sensors to collect data for the fault diagnosis of mine hoisting equipment [13]. The study revealed that IoT sensors can help provide complete diagnosis data as well as improve diagnosis results. Lee et al. proposed a framework by utilizing IoT and machine learning to predict the quality of a product and optimize operation control [14]. Metal casting was used as a real-case implementation of the proposed system. The proposed system was able to effectively predict the quality of the metal casting and efficiently improve the operation control. Finally, Calderón Godoy et al. proposed the integration of sensors and the SCADA system for implementation of the fourth industrial revolution framework [15]. Experimental results confirmed the feasibility of the proposed system, which is expected to help managers during the migration of legacy systems to the Industry 4.0 framework.
The number of IoT-based sensors and other related components is increasing significantly. The adoption of IoT in manufacturing enables the transition from traditional to modern digitalized manufacturing. As the number of devices collecting sensor data in manufacturing increases, the potential for new types of applications that can handle the input of large amounts of sensor data such as big data technology also increases. Ge et al. developed a conceptual framework by integrating big data technology in IoT, which is expected to support critical decision making [60]. By utilizing big data processing, the enormous amount of data collected by many heterogeneous sources (sensor devices) can be handled and presented in an efficient manner, thus they can assist managers with better decision making.

2.2. Big Data Processing

With the increasing number of IoT and sensing devices, data generated from manufacturing systems are expected to grow exponentially, producing so called “big data” [16]. Big data is often described in terms of 4 V’s. The first V is volume in reference to the size of the data, the second V is variety in reference to the different types/formats of the data, the third V is velocity in reference to the speed of data generation, and the last V is veracity in reference to the reliability of the data [61]. The data generated during manufacturing is increasing daily with different types and formats (i.e., process logs, events, images, and sensor data), hence, the processing and storage of these data is becoming a challenging issue that needs to be addressed. There are several applications of big data analytics in the manufacturing industry. Zhang et al. proposed a big data framework for reducing energy consumption and emission in an energy-intensive manufacturing industry [17]. The proposed system consists of two components, data acquisition for gathering the energy data and data analytics for analyzing the energy usage. Based on a real-case implementation, the results showed that the proposed system was capable of eliminating three percent of the energy consumption and four percent of energy costs. Zhong et al. proposed a big data system for logistics discovery from RFID-enabled production data for mining knowledge [18]. An experiment was used to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed system and the results showed that the knowledge gained from big data could be used for production scheduling and logistics planning. Mani et al. studied the application of big data analytics for mitigating supply chain social risk [19]. A case study was used to elaborate the application of big data analytics in the supply chain. The results of the study revealed that big data analytics can help management predict various social problems and mitigate social risks. Finally, Li et al. proposed a big data framework for active sensing and processing of complex events in manufacturing processes [20]. To effectively process complex event big data, a relation model and unified XML-based manufacturing processes were developed. The Apriori frequent item mining algorithm was used to find a frequent pattern from the complex events data. The feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed system was confirmed with implementation in a local chili sauce manufacturing company. The proposed model is expected to provide practical guidance for management decision-making.
Several big data technologies can be utilized in the manufacturing industry to process and store large volumes of data quickly, such as Apache Kafka, Apache Storm, and NoSQL MongoDB. Apache Kafka is a scalable messaging queue system used for building real-time applications [62]. It is fault-tolerant, high-throughput, and scalable. Several studies have shown significant benefits from using Kafka for healthcare, transportation, manufacturing, and IoT-generated sensor data. Alfian et al. proposed real-time data processing for monitoring diabetic patients [21]. Apache Kafka and MongoDB were utilized to handle and store sensor data from the patients. The proposed system was sufficiently efficient at monitoring diabetic patients. Ji et al. proposed a cloud-based car parking system consisting of several technologies, including Apache Kafka [63]. The proposed system was capable of efficiently handling massive amounts of sensor data when the amount of data and the number of clients increased. D’silva et al. proposed a framework for handling real-time IoT event data [22]. The proposed framework utilized Apache Kafka as a message queue system and was efficient enough to process real-time IoT events data. Canizo et al. proposed a framework based on big data technologies and machine learning for online fault prediction for wind turbines [23]. Apache Kafka was used to handle incoming data in real-time and send the data to a streaming system for further analysis. The proposed system could be used to monitor the status of wind turbines and is expected to help reduce operation and management costs. Du et al. proposed a framework for handling huge amounts of incoming unstructured connected vehicle (CV) data [24]. The proposed framework utilized Apache Kafka as a distributed message broker. Experimental results showed the proposed system is efficient enough in handling huge amounts of incoming CV data and achieved the minimal recommended latency value defined by the U.S. Department of Transportation for CV applications. Park and Chi proposed an architecture for an ingestion system based on Apache Kafka for machine logs in the manufacturing industry [25]. The proposed system collects machine logs from a set of milling machines, handles them in a Kafka messaging queue, and delivers them to an external systems for further analysis. Finally, Ferry et al. proposed a data management system based on big data technologies for machine generated data in a manufacturing shop-floor [26]. The proposed system utilizes Apache Kafka as a message queue and Apache Storm as a real-time processing system. Implementation of the proposed system is expected to reduce infrastructure and deployment costs.
Apache Storm is a real-time distributed parallel system for processing high-velocity stream data [64]. It is fault-tolerant and scalable, with guaranteed data processing. Previous studies have utilized Apache Storm for real-time data processing. Ma et al. proposed a stream-based framework for providing real-time information services on public transit [27]. The proposed framework utilized Apache Storm as a real-time distributed processing engine. The results showed that the proposed framework was capable of handling large amounts of real-time data with lower latency. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed framework increased when the number of nodes/servers utilized increased. Manzoor and Morgan proposed a real-time intrusion detection system based on Apache Storm [28]. The proposed system was evaluated using the KDD 99 network intrusion dataset and the results showed that the proposed system was feasible for processing network traffic data and detecting network intrusion with high accuracy. Chen et al. proposed a real-time geographic information system for managing environmental big data using Apache Storm [29]. The proposed system was tested with two use-cases (i.e., real-time air quality monitoring and soil moisture monitoring). The results showed that the proposed system was effective enough for managing real-time environmental big data. In addition, several studies have been conducted regarding the performance of Apache Storm as a real-time data processing system. Qian et al. performed a performance comparison between Apache Storm and Spark [30]. The latency and throughput of the system was considered and the results showed that Apache Storm has shorter latency while Spark has higher throughput. Finally, Chatterjee and Morin performed comparative performance analysis between several data streaming platforms (i.e., Flink, Storm, and Heron) [31]. Various performance metrics were considered such as fault tolerance and resource usage. The results showed that Storm has better fault tolerance and less memory usage than the other systems.
The increasing amount of IoT-generated sensor data has led to increased demand for sensor-friendly data storage platforms. NoSQL databases have become popular in the last couple of years because of their growing flexibility, scalability and availability. The term ‘NoSQL’ collectively refers to data storage platforms that do not follow a strict data model for relational databases. MongoDB is a document-oriented NoSQL database that offers flexible data-schema, high performance, scalability, and availability [65]. A previous study compared the performance of MongoDB and Oracle with insert, update, and delete tests [32]. MongoDB outperforms oracle in all tests. In addition, MongoDB has been proven to be effective for storing data from the supply chain, geographic information systems and manufacturing. Alfian et al. utilized MongoDB to store IoT-generated sensor data for monitoring a perishable food supply chain [33]. In the study, MongoDB was capable of processing a huge amount of input/output sensor data efficiently when the number of sensors and clients increased. In addition, MongoDB outperformed MySQL in read and write tests. Hu et al. conducted a comparative study among six popular databases (i.e., Rasdaman, SciDB, Spark, ClimateSpark, Hive, and MongoDB) for handling a variety of geospatial data [34]. The results showed that MongoDB was adequate in terms of parallel query and resource consumption (i.e., CPU, memory, network). Chen et al. proposed MongoSOS, a sensor observation service based on MongoDB, for handling spatiotemporal data [35]. The proposed system was capable of handling read and write access for navigation and positioning data in a millisecond and the performance improved by around two percent compared with the traditional model. Putri et al. proposed a big data processing system based on Apache Spark and MongoDB to identify profitable areas from large amounts of taxi trip data [36]. The experimental results showed that the proposed system was scalable and efficient enough in processing profitable-area queries from huge amounts of big taxi trip data. Finally, Angrish et al. proposed a flexible data schema based on NoSQL MongoDB for the virtualization of manufacturing machines [37]. The proposed system was evaluated against several query statements. The results showed that MongoDB can accommodate any type of machine data and could easily be implemented across a variety of machines on the factory floor.
Previous studies have shown a significant impact from the integration of several big data technologies. Lohokare et al. proposed a scalable framework for home automation in smart cities [38]. The proposed framework utilized Apache Kafka as a message broker to handle incoming IoT data and MongoDB to store the sensor data. The proposed system was able to reduce the processing time when the amount of data and nodes increased. Jung et al. proposed a smart city system using Apache Kafka and Apache Storm to handle and process IoT-generated data in real-time [39]. Experimental results showed that the proposed system was capable of effectively and efficiently processing the IoT-generated data in real-time. Villari et al. proposed a management system for smart environments using big data technologies [40]. The proposed system utilized Apache Storm to process the data in real-time and MongoDB to store huge amounts of sensor data. A case study on smart homes was performed, and the results showed that the proposed system was able to manage large amounts of smart environmental data in real-time. Zhou et al. proposed an integration of Apache Kafka, Apache Storm, and MongoDB for processing streaming spatiotemporal data [41]. The proposed system was tested using the Taiyuan BeiDou bus location data. The proposed system was capable of processing large amounts of sensor data per second and was around three times faster than the traditional model. Finally, Syafrudin et al. proposed an open source-based real-time data processing system consisting of Apache Kafka, Apache Storm, and MongoDB [42]. The proposed system was implemented to monitor the injection molding process in real-time. The proposed system was capable of processing a massive amount of sensor data efficiently when the amount of data and the number of devices increased.
Integration of Apache Kafka, Apache Storm, and MongoDB can be used for big data processing to handle manufacturing sensor data. Previous studies have shown that these three technologies can be used for big data processing so that large amounts of streaming sensor data can be promptly processed, stored, and presented in real-time [41,42]. Thus, in our study, Apache Kafka, Apache Storm, and MongoDB were utilized for big data processing to monitor the manufacturing process in real-time. In addition, the integration of big data processing with a machine-learning model is expected to help managers with decision-making and to prevent unexpected losses caused by faults during the manufacturing process.

2.3. Machine Learning Methods in Manufacturing

The manufacturing industry is experiencing an increase in data generation, e.g., sensor data from the production line, environmental data, etc. New developments in technology such as machine learning offer great potential to analyze data repositories, and thus can provide support for management in decision-making or can be used to improve system performance. Machine learning techniques are utilized to detect certain patterns or regularities and have been successfully implemented in various areas such as fault detection, quality prediction, defect classification, and visual inspection. Several studies have utilized machine learning and showed significant results in the manufacturing industry. Kim et al. employed seven different machine learning-based novelty detection methods to detect faulty wafers [43]. The models were trained with Fault Detection and Classification (FDC) data to detect faulty wafers. The experimental results showed that machine learning-based models had a high possibility of detecting faulty wafers. Lee et al. performed an evaluation analysis on four machine learning algorithms (i.e., decision tree, random forest, artificial neural network, and support vector machine) for predicting the quality of metal castings product [14]. The result showed that all of four machine learning algorithms can effectively be used to predict the quality of product. Chen et al. utilized support vector machine algorithm to predict the quality of welding in a high-power disk layer [44]. The results showed that the proposed quality prediction model can be used for real-time monitoring system. An intelligent system was developed by Chen et al. to minimize the incorrect warning in detecting the quality of product in manufacturing [45]. They utilized three methods (i.e., visual inspection, support vector machine, and similarity matching). Through real-case implementation in manufacturing company in Taiwan, the proposed system can effectively be used to minimize the incorrectly classified and improve the performance of quality prediction. Finally, two machine learning algorithms (i.e., decision tree and Naïve Bayes) was also used by Ravikumar et al. for automating the process of inspecting the quality of machine components [46]. Three types of machine component quality (i.e., good, minor scratch, and deep scratch) were measured. The results showed that the proposed method can effectively be used in automating the quality inspection of the product in real practical case.
Fault detection and diagnosis is an important problem in process engineering and is utilized to detect abnormal events in a process. Early detection of process faults can help avoid productivity loss. Machine learning algorithms such as Random Forest showed significant efficacy in detecting process faults in manufacturing. Random Forest is an ensemble prediction method that aggregates the results of individual decision trees [66]. Generally, Random Forest works by utilizing the bagging method to generate subsets of training data. For each training dataset, a decision tree algorithm is utilized. In the end, the final prediction result is selected based on majority vote (the most voted class) over all the trees in the forest. Recently, Random Forest was used by Quiroz et al. for detecting the failure of rotor bar. They performed the performance analysis between Random Forest and other models (i.e., decision tree, Naïve Bayes, logistic regression, linear ridge, and support vector machine). The experimental results showed that Random Forest outperformed the other models and has around 98.8% of accuracy. The proposed model can be used for real-time fault monitoring system as well as the preventive maintenance system in factory. Random Forest also was utilized by Patel and Giri for detecting the failure of bearing [48]. The results were compared with those obtained from an existing artificial intelligence technique, neural network. The results showed that Random Forest had better performance and higher accuracy than the neural network algorithm. The results of this study are expected be used for bearing fault detection and diagnosis. Finally, Cerrada et al. proposed fault diagnosis in spur gears based on genetic algorithm and Random Forest [49]. The proposed system consisted of two parts, namely genetic algorithm for attribute selection and Random Forest for classification. The proposed system was tested on real vibration signals and Random Forest had better performance for fault diagnosis.
Machine learning algorithms encounter problems with outlier data, which can reduce the accuracy of the classification model. Outlier detection can be utilized in the preprocessing step to identify inconsistencies in data/outliers; thus, a good classifier can be generated for better decision making. Previous studies showed that removing the outlier can improve the classification accuracy. Tallón-Ballesteros and Riquelme utilized outlier detection for a classification model [50]. The authors proposed a statistical outlier detection method based on the interquartile range (lQR) with classes. The results showed that by removing the outliers from the training set, the classification performance of C4.5 was improved. Podgorelec et al. utilized an outlier prediction method to improve classification model performance in medical datasets [51]. The results showed that by removing the identified outliers from the training set, the classification accuracy was improved, especially for the Naïve Bayes classifier.
One of the techniques used for outlier detection is DBSCAN [52]. The algorithm works by identifying dense regions, which are determined based on the number of objects close to a given point. Finally, the algorithm identifies points that do not belong to any cluster, which are treated as outliers. DBSCAN has been implemented in different areas and showed significant accuracy by detecting true outliers. Tian et al. proposed an outlier detection method involving soft sensor modeling of time series [53]. They utilized DBSCAN for outlier detection and the proposed outlier detection method demonstrated good performance. Abid et al. proposed outlier detection based on DBSCAN for sensor data in wireless sensor networks [54]. The proposed model successfully separated outliers from normal sensor data. Based on experiments with synthetic datasets, the proposed model showed significant accuracy in detecting outliers, with an accuracy rate of 99%.
Existing studies showed that Random Forest can be utilized for fault prediction with high classification accuracy. Furthermore, several studies showed significant results for DBSCAN-based outlier detection with regard to improving the classification accuracy. We propose a hybrid prediction model that consists of DBSCAN-based outlier detection to remove the outlier data, and Random Forest to detect whether the manufacturing process is functioning normally or abnormally. The hybrid prediction model is integrated with a real-time big data processing system, enabling processing of the sensor data from IoT-based sensor device (e.g., temperature, humidity, accelerometer, and gyroscope) and fault prediction in real-time.

3. Methodology

3.1. System Design

The real-time monitoring system proposed here was developed to help managers to better monitor the assembly line process in an automotive manufacturing as well as provide early warning when a fault is detected. The proposed system utilizes IoT-based sensors, big data processing, and a hybrid prediction model. The hybrid prediction model consists of clustering-based outlier detection and a machine learning-based classification model. As can be seen in Figure 1a, IoT-based sensors are attached to the desk of a workstation in the assembly line. The IoT-based sensors consist of temperature, humidity, accelerometer, and gyroscope sensors. The IoT-generated sensor data is transmitted wirelessly to a cloud server where the big data processing system is installed. The system allows the system to process large amounts of sensor data quickly before they are stored in the MongoDB database. A clustering-based outlier detection method is utilized to filter out outliers from the sensor data. In addition, a data analytics machine learning-based classification model is applied to predict faults given by the current sensor data during the assembly line process. Finally, the complete history of the sensor data such as the temperature, humidity, accelerometer, and gyroscope data are presented to the manager in real-time via a web-based monitoring system in addition to the fault prediction results.
The proposed big data processing system utilizes Apache Kafka, Apache Storm, and MongoDB. Apache Kafka is a message queue system with low-latency, high-throughput, and fault tolerance, capable of publishing streams of data. Apache Storm is a real-time parallel data processing system with horizontal scalability, fault tolerance, and guaranteed data processing and can process large volumes of high-velocity streams of data. Figure 1b shows the system design for the big data processing system proposed for real-time monitoring. The sensor data from the IoT-based sensor device is wirelessly transmitted using a python-based program developed to serve as the “producer” for the Kafka server. The “producer” client publishes streams of data to Kafka “topics” distributed across one or more cluster nodes/servers called “brokers”. The published streams of data from Kafka are then processed by Storm in parallel and real-time. Outlier detection and classification are implemented inside Storm. The sensor data and the classification results are stored in MongoDB and presented in a web-based monitoring system in real-time.
The characteristics of IoT-generated sensor data are as follows: large amount, unstructured format, and continuous generation. Figure 2a shows an example of the data generated by IoT-based sensors in JSON format before being sent to the Kafka server. The sensor data is delivered to Storm where the hybrid prediction model (i.e., outlier detection and fault classification) is implemented. The sensor data and the prediction results are then stored in NoSQL MongoDB. An embedding scheme-based sensor data repository is commonly utilized in NoSQL MongoDB databases to improve performance [67]. We found that the embedding scheme is appropriate for a large sensor data repository, which requires fast read and write performance [33]. Thus, in our study, we utilized an embedding scheme-based sensor data repository. As can be seen in Figure 2b, the sensor document consists of the ID of the IoT device, the recorded time, processed time, sensor data, and prediction results. The sensor data such as temperature, humidity, gyroscope, and accelerometer data are embedded as a subdocument.

3.2. System Implementation

In this study, the monitoring system was applied to monitor the assembly line process for producing door-trim at an automotive manufacturing in Korea, as shown in Figure 3. The developed IoT-based sensor consists of a Raspberry Pi [68] as the single main board and Sense-HAT [69] as an add-on sensor board. Raspberry Pi is a small single-board computer with the dimensions of 85.60 mm × 53.98 mm × 17 mm, weighing only 45 g, and is affordable at approximately $25–35 USD. It has USB, LAN, HDMI, audio, and video ports for various input and output operations. In addition, general-purpose input-output (GPIO) connectors enable additional devices, or add-on boards such as sensors, to be connected to the main board [70]. The detailed specifications of the Raspberry Pi board can be seen in Table 1. The Sense-HAT board is an add-on sensor board that measures temperature, humidity, accelerometer, and gyroscope data and is designed as an official add-on board for the Raspberry Pi. The detailed specifications of the Sense-HAT board can be seen in Table 2. The Sense-HAT board is attached to a Raspberry Pi via GPIO 40 pins. The assembled and real-case implementation versions of the IoT-based sensor device can be seen in Figure 3.
In this study, we developed a python-based program as a client using the supplied official application programming interface (API) to gather sensor data from IoT-based sensors [71]. The IoT-based sensors continuously collect temperature, humidity, gyroscope, and accelerometer data, which are transmitted to a cloud server wirelessly. As can be seen in Figure 3, an IoT-based sensor device is attached to the desk of a workstation panel along the assembly line process. The IoT-based sensor senses the environmental conditions and sends the sensor data to a cloud server every 5 s. The sensor data are processed by the big data processing system and analyzed further in real-time. Finally, the historical sensor data are saved in MongoDB and presented on a web-based monitoring system in real-time.

3.3. Hybrid Prediction Model for Fault Detection

In this study, the hybrid prediction model is utilized to predict whether the process is functioning normally or abnormally. Figure 4 shows the process of detecting normal or abnormal events during the manufacturing process. The hybrid prediction model utilizes an outlier detection based on DBSCAN to detect and remove outliers from the sensor data and a Random Forest-based classification model to predict normal and abnormal events. Finally, the performance is evaluated by comparing the hybrid prediction model with other classification models.
For the performance evaluation of various prediction models, the dataset was collected from experiments in a lab in which the IoT-based sensor was installed. The collected dataset consisted of 342 instances, which were classified as normal or abnormal events during the manufacturing process. The dataset contained eight features: (1) temperature (°C), (2) humidity (% relative humidity/rh), (3) the X value of the accelerometer, (4) the Y value of the accelerometer, (5) the Z value of the accelerometer, (6) the X value of the gyroscope, (7) the Y value of the gyroscope, and (8) the Z value of the gyroscope. The dataset consisted of 102 data points labeled as “yes” and 240 labeled as “no”. A “yes” class indicates an abnormal event occurred while a “no” class means an abnormal event did not occur during the manufacturing process (normal). In addition, the collected training dataset (342 instances) was labeled based on the possible combination of fault events during assembly line process in automotive manufacturing. The machine learning methods are expected to learn and generate the robust model/classifier from collected dataset. Once the model/classifier is generated and installed into monitoring system, the prediction result from real-time IoT-based sensor data can be presented.
Once the dataset was collected, data preprocessing was performed by removing inappropriate, inconsistent, and missing-value data. Table 3 shows the dataset distribution for the mean and standard deviation of each class. Furthermore, in order to analyze the significance of the features, the Information Gain (IG) technique was applied [72]. Weka version 3.6.15 software was utilized to evaluate the significance of the features with IG [73]. The dataset attributes and their IG scores are presented in Table 4. The results show that temperature is the greatest factor that affects abnormal events during the manufacturing process.
DBSCAN-based outlier detection was utilized in our study to filter out outlier data from the dataset [52]. Dense regions were created by finding the objects close to a given point. Outliers were defined as the points located outside dense regions. Epsilon (eps) and minimum points (MinPts) are two important parameters considered in DBSCAN. eps defines the radius distance of the neighborhood around a point x (ϵ-neighborhood of x ) and MinPts defines the minimum number of neighbor points within the defined radius distance of eps. For dataset D, which is marked as unvisited, DBSCAN works as follows:
  • For each unvisited point x i in D, find the ϵ-neighborhood of x i that includes at least MinPts points. Then x i is labeled as visited.
  • For point x i , which is not assigned to a specific cluster, create a new cluster C. Add the points in the ϵ-neighborhood of x i to a candidate set N. Add any points in N (that do not belong to any cluster) to C.
  • For each point p in N, find the ϵ-neighborhood of p that includes at least MinPts points. Those points in the ϵ-neighborhood of p are then included in the candidate set N and assigned to cluster C. Finally, p is labeled as visited.
  • Iterate the process for the remaining points in N and the unvisited points in the dataset D.
  • The points that do not belong to any cluster are labeled as outliers.
Due to the imperfect sensing device and network connection problems, some of the data collected by the sensor may be noise caused by outlier data. Outlier detection based on DBSCAN was applied to our dataset. The optimal value of MinPts and eps should be defined first in order to perform DBSCAN-based outlier detection. If the value of eps is too small, more clusters will be created, and normal data could be classified as outliers. However, if it is too big, less clusters will be generated, and true outliers could be classified as normal data. Through the different setup of the experiments, the optimal parameters for MinPts and eps were discovered, they are 5 and 7. Figure 5 shows the results of DBSCAN implementation for the dataset in two-dimensional graphs. DBSCAN performed clustering by grouping the data into three clusters, presented as clusters 1, 2, and 3. The outliers were unclustered data and were presented as cluster 0. The description of dataset, optimal parameters, and outlier data are presented in Table 5. Finally, the outlier data were removed from the dataset, and the remaining data were used for further analysis.
Random Forest is a popular classification method for solving real-world classification problems [66,74,75,76]. The Random Forest algorithm is constructed by combining multiple decision trees for more accurate and stable prediction [77]. Every tree inside a Random Forest is independently constructed by selecting a random subset of features and bootstrap sampling of the dataset. Next, the tree is grown to the largest possible level. Each decision tree model inside the Random Forest will generate a prediction output and a majority vote is applied to obtain the final prediction output. Majority vote is a well-known method to obtain a better final prediction output [77]. Previous studies have utilized Random Forest because of its robustness when dealing with numerical data and solving real-world problems [74,75,76]. Recently, Random Forest was utilized for predicting the crash of stopping maneuvering [76]. The results showed that Random Forest successfully detected the crash of stopping maneuvering and forecast the safety properties of the ship before production. In our study, DBSCAN-based outlier detection was utilized to remove outlier data from the dataset and Random Forest was utilized to learn from the training set. Finally, the results of prediction were compared with the testing set to determine the model accuracy.
Based on a confusion matrix [78], the prediction output can have four possible outcomes, as can be seen in Table 6. True positive (TP) and true negative (TN) results are defined as the number of correctly classified points. False positive (FP) and false negative (FN) results are defined as the number of points incorrectly classified as “yes” (positive) when they are actually “no” (negative) and incorrectly classified as no (negative) when they are actually yes (positive), respectively. In our dataset, abnormal events during the manufacturing process were defined as “Yes” and normal events were defined as “No”. For training and testing the dataset, 10-fold cross-validation was applied for all classification models. The final performance measure was obtained by averaging the test performance for all folds. Weka Software 3.6.15 was utilized to run the classification models for the dataset [73]. Table 7 shows the measured performance metrics for the classification model based on precision, recall/sensitivity, and accuracy.

4. Results and Discussions

4.1. Real-Time Monitoring System

Data visualization was developed by utilizing JavaScript framework as a monitoring system to present sensor data in real-time. The manager could monitor the status of assembly line process as well as receive the early warning once the abnormal event (fault) is detected in real-time through the proposed system. The IoT-based sensor devices sent the sensor data to Apache Kafka, then Apache Storm will process the data as well as sent the sensor data and its fault prediction results directly to the monitoring system in real-time, and finally the sensor data and its prediction result are stored into MongoDB. As can be seen in Figure 6, the real-time monitoring system can be easily accessed via a web-browser on a personal computer. The proposed system presents the sensor data such as temperature, humidity, accelerometer, and gyroscope data in real-time. The device ID (IoT-based sensor device) and recorded time was collected and presented for every record. In addition, the hybrid prediction model was used to predict the fault and present the result into real-time monitoring system. The proposed system has been implemented and tested in one of automotive manufacturing in Korea from 1 August 2017 to 31 March 2018. Four IoT-based sensor devices were installed in the manufacturing assembly line and transmitted the sensor data to the remote server every 5 s. During this testing period, around 19 million records (with approximate size is 3 gigabytes) has been collected. Our proposed real-time monitoring system consists of three parts: the IoT-based sensor, the big data processing platform and hybrid prediction model. The performance evaluation are presented for each part in Section 4.2, Section 4.3 and Section 4.4, respectively.

4.2. Performance of the IoT-Based Sensor

An IoT-based sensor consists of a sensor device and a client program to retrieve sensor data and send them to a cloud server. It is important to analyze the IoT-based sensor performance under various conditions. Performance metrics such as network delay and CPU and memory usage were utilized in this study. Alazzawi and Elkateeb proposed network delay as a metric to evaluate the sensor device performance [79], while Morón et al. utilized CPU usage as a metric to evaluate IoT device capabilities in different scenarios [80]. In our study, network delay was defined as the average time between sending sensor data from by the source (sensor device) and successfully receiving the data at the destination (MongoDB). The second performance metric was the average CPU and memory usage of the client program under various scenarios.
In this study, the client program was a python-based program running on an IoT-based sensor device that collected sensor data such as temperature, humidity, gyroscope, and accelerometer data. An IoT-based sensor with Linux Raspbian OS Jessie; 1 GB RAM was used for the experiment. Communication between the IoT-based sensor and cloud server was implemented via Wi-Fi. Figure 7a shows the network delay for different amounts of sensor data. The results show that the network delay increases as the amount of sensor data sent by the sensor device increases. It takes approximately 50 s for the IoT-based sensor to send 1000 sensor data points at the same time. However, in a real-case implementation, it takes less than 0.02 s to send the sensor data, as we only set one sensor data point (temperature, humidity, gyroscope, and accelerometer data) to be sent every 5 s. In addition, Figure 7b shows the CPU and memory usage of the client program. Four different reading period scenarios were evaluated, in which the client program was reading and sending sensor data to the cloud server every 5, 10, 30, and 60 s. The results showed that the reading period has a very small effect on CPU or memory usage. Regarding the computational cost of the client program, it should be noted that the program used less than 3% CPU and 18 MB for all reading periods.

4.3. The Performance of Big Data Processing

It is important to analyze the performance of big data processing under various conditions. Performance metrics such as system latency, throughput, and concurrency were utilized in this study. Pereira et al. utilized system latency and throughput to evaluate the performance of big data technology under different operations [81], while Van der Veen et al. used concurrency to evaluate big data technology under multiple clients [82]. In our study, system latency is defined as the time needed by the proposed system to handle, process, and store the sensor data into database. Throughput is defined as total number of sensors data processed per second. The last metric is concurrency which is defined as the number of clients accessed simultaneously to the system. The experiments was conducted with different numbers of servers and the response time was collected for analysis. The Java program was developed as a simulator to generate sensor data and send the data to the big data processing servers. The server was installed with Apache Kafka, Apache Storm, and MongoDB. The threads was used by Java program to simulate multiple clients. The detailed specifications of client and server computer can be seen in Table 8. In addition, the approximate size of each simulated data is around 211 bytes which consists of the device ID, the date and time when the data is generated and the value of sensor data (temperature, humidity, accelerometer, and gyroscope).
Figure 8a shows that as the amount of sensor data sent to the cloud server increased, the response time also increased. The number of clients also affected the response time, since more time was required for the proposed system to process and store sensor data sent by a larger number of clients simultaneously. However, taking advantage of scalability support by adding more servers can help achieve lower response time compared to a single server as shown in Figure 8b. Figure 8c,d show the system throughput with different numbers of clients. Better performance could be achieved by increasing the number of servers. Furthermore, Figure 8e,f compare the system latency and database size of MongoDB and CouchDB. In this test, we used a single client and sent different amounts of sensor data to the cloud server at the same time. The Java Program was implemented on the client-side to send the sensor data to the cloud server. MongoDB performed better than CouchDB when the amount of sensor data increased. In addition, MongoDB occupied a lower database size than CouchDB did.

4.4. Hybrid Prediction Model for Fault Detection

During dataset generation, the big data processing system receives the sensor data from the IoT-based sensor device and stores the data in NoSQL MongoDB. The IoT-based sensor collects data from different types of operation, including normal and abnormal events. The dataset is then labeled by expert users based on the process status (either normal or abnormal) during the period when the sensor data were collected. Next, the dataset is analyzed using the hybrid prediction model to predict the fault status. The performance comparison results for several classification models are presented in Table 9. Several conventional classification models such as Naïve Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Random Forest (RF) were compared with the hybrid prediction model to identify and predict abnormal events. The proposed model achieved the highest accuracy (100%) compared to other classification models. There was slight improvement in model accuracy after the implementation of DBSCAN-based outlier detection. Integrating DBSCAN-based outlier detection with the Random Forest model increased the accuracy by as much as 1.462% compared to conventional Random Forest. Furthermore, the accuracy improvement has been found in other conventional classification models after applying DBSCAN for outlier detection as much as 3.173%, 0.567%, and 2.026% for Naïve Bayes, Logistic Regression, and Multilayer Perceptron, respectively.
The proposed model was implemented in Apache Storm where the streams of data from Kafka can be processed and predicted in parallel and real-time. Figure 6 shows the results of implementation where real-time prediction is performed by Apache Storm to identify whether the process is functioning normally or abnormally given the input data from the IoT-based sensor (e.g., temperature, humidity, accelerometer, and gyroscope). The results of the study are expected to help management prevent unexpected losses caused by faults at an early stage and improve decision-making during the manufacturing process.

4.5. Managerial Implications

In this study, the proposed system consists of three parts: the IoT-based sensor, big data processing, and machine learning model. First, the IoT-based sensor device developed in this study is based on Raspberry Pi which is small-size, low-cost, and powerful single-board computer device. Previous studies have shown significant advantages of utilizing Raspberry Pi such as for controlling and monitoring IoT system [83], estimating the roll angle of a vehicle using embedded neural network in real-time [84], hosting and serving the user interface of eHealth care system [59], and monitoring the temperature of lava lake using near infrared thermal camera [85]. Therefore, the proposed IoT-based sensor device developed in this study could be applied to monitor the manufacturing process in real-time. Second, since the number of IoT devices increased, it is necessary to develop new big data processing to effectively handle, process, and store the data without experiencing detectable performance loss. Previous studies revealed that by implementing open source software (OSS), the organizations can achieve some economic gains in terms of software development productivity, product quality, as well as lower cost (i.e., license costs) and availability of external support [86,87]. In our study, the developed big data processing platform is based on the OSS that is cost-effective for implementation and integration. Third, machine learning has been used in various processes for monitoring systems in manufacturing and predictive maintenance in different industries [88,89,90,91,92]. Machine learning has powerful tools for continuous quality improvement in a large and complex process such as semiconductor manufacturing [89,90,92]. In our study, the machine learning model is used to detect the fault (abnormal event) during assembly line process in real-time. Thus, it is expected to support the management in improving the decision-making and preventing the unexpected loss caused by faults at an early stage during manufacturing process. Finally, the overall results of the study can be used as a guideline for the industrial practitioner in adopting the IoT, big data, and machine learning for their manufacturing process.
Previous scholars and practitioners have considered several aspects of big data. Big data is often described in terms of 4 V’s, they are volume (the size of data), variety (different type of data), velocity (speed of data generation), and veracity (reliability of data) [61]. However, some scholars are more focused on one or more aspects of the big data concept. Davenport et al. focused more on the variety aspect of data sources [93], while some other authors emphasized the storage (volume) and analysis parts when it comes to dealing with big data [94,95]. The big data processing that efficiently can handle the fast incoming (velocity) and huge amount (volume) of sensor data has been developed in our study. Finally, the integration of an IoT-based sensor, big data processing, and machine learning model can be utilized to effectively monitor the manufacturing process as well as obtain early warning notification when an abnormal event is detected in real-time.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we developed a real-time monitoring system that utilizes IoT-based sensors, big data processing, and a hybrid prediction model. The proposed model is expected to help managers monitor the status of the assembly line process and to identify faults in the process, thus unexpected losses caused by faults can be prevented. Through this study, we showed that integrating IoT-based sensors with a big data processing system is effective for processing and analyzing large amounts of sensor data in real-time. The big data processing system developed in this study utilizes Apache Kafka, Apache Storm, and NoSQL MongoDB. The experimental results showed that the system is scalable and can process a large amount of continuous sensor data more efficiently than traditional models. Furthermore, the performance of the IoT-based sensor was analyzed with various metrics such as the network delay, CPU, and memory usage. For all experimental scenarios, the IoT-based sensor provided an efficient solution as it successfully collected and transmitted the data within an acceptable time with low computational cost.
Fault detection is an important issue in the manufacturing process as it can identify whether the process is functioning normally or abnormally. We propose a hybrid prediction model that consists of DBSCAN-based outlier detection and Random Forest classification. DBSCAN was used to separate outliers from normal sensor data, while Random Forest was utilized to predict faults—given the sensor data as input. The results showed that the proposed hybrid prediction model is effective with high accuracy compared to the other models tested. The results of the study are expected to support management and improve decision-making during manufacturing, helping prevent unexpected losses caused by faults.
Security is a big issue when more IoT devices are adopted, implemented, and connected. Therefore, the security of IoT devices and platforms should be considered in a future study. Furthermore, a variety of abnormal conditions during the manufacturing process should be further identified and collected so the proposed hybrid prediction model can be utilized to learn from a complex dataset in the near future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S. and J.R.; Methodology, M.S. and G.A.; Software, M.S.; Formal Analysis, N.L.F.; Data Curation, N.L.F.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, M.S.; Writing-Review & Editing, M.S. and G.A.; Visualization, N.L.F.; Supervision, J.R.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the IT R&D program of MOTIE/KEIT [10052972, Development of the Reconfigurable Manufacturing Core Technology based on the Flexible Assembly and ICT Converged Smart Systems].

Acknowledgments

This paper is a tribute made out of deep respect of a wonderful person, friend, advisor, and supervisor, Yong-Han Lee (1965–2017).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Cantore, N.; Clara, M.; Lavopa, A.; Soare, C. Manufacturing as an engine of growth: Which is the best fuel? Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn. 2017, 42, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Haraguchi, N.; Cheng, C.F.C.; Smeets, E. The importance of manufacturing in economic development: Has this changed? World Dev. 2017, 93, 293–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Szirmai, A.; Verspagen, B. Manufacturing and economic growth in developing countries, 1950–2005. Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn. 2015, 34, 46–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Marconi, N.; de Borja Reis, C.F.; de Araújo, E.C. Manufacturing and economic development: The actuality of Kaldor’s first and second laws. Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn. 2016, 37, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhong, R.Y.; Xu, X.; Klotz, E.; Newman, S.T. Intelligent manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0: A review. Engineering 2017, 3, 616–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Oborski, P. Developments in integration of advanced monitoring systems. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2014, 75, 1613–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Mora, H.; Gil, D.; Terol, R.M.; Azorín, J.; Szymanski, J. An IoT-Based Computational Framework for Healthcare Monitoring in Mobile Environments. Sensors 2017, 17, 2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, G. Monitoring Citrus Soil Moisture and Nutrients Using an IoT Based System. Sensors 2017, 17, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Manes, G.; Collodi, G.; Gelpi, L.; Fusco, R.; Ricci, G.; Manes, A.; Passafiume, M. Realtime Gas Emission Monitoring at Hazardous Sites Using a Distributed Point-Source Sensing Infrastructure. Sensors 2016, 16, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Cheung, W.-F.; Lin, T.-H.; Lin, Y.-C. A Real-Time Construction Safety Monitoring System for Hazardous Gas Integrating Wireless Sensor Network and Building Information Modeling Technologies. Sensors 2018, 18, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Moon, Y.S.; Choi, H.R.; Kim, J.J.; Kim, D.W.; Cho, J.H.; Kim, J.W.; Jeong, J.W. Development of IoT-Based Sensor Tag for Smart Factory. Int. Res. J. Electron. Comput. Eng. 2017, 3, 28–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Salamone, F.; Danza, L.; Meroni, I.; Pollastro, M.C. A Low-Cost Environmental Monitoring System: How to Prevent Systematic Errors in the Design Phase through the Combined Use of Additive Manufacturing and Thermographic Techniques. Sensors 2017, 17, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, J.; Xie, J.; Yang, Z.; Li, J. Fault Diagnosis Method for a Mine Hoist in the Internet of Things Environment. Sensors 2018, 18, 1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lee, J.; Noh, S.D.; Kim, H.-J.; Kang, Y.-S. Implementation of Cyber-Physical Production Systems for Quality Prediction and Operation Control in Metal Casting. Sensors 2018, 18, 1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Calderón Godoy, A.J.; González Pérez, I. Integration of Sensor and Actuator Networks and the SCADA System to Promote the Migration of the Legacy Flexible Manufacturing System towards the Industry 4.0 Concept. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2018, 7, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Qin, S.J. Process data analytics in the era of big data. AIChE J. 2014, 60, 3092–3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Y.; Ma, S.; Yang, H.; Lv, J.; Liu, Y. A big data driven analytical framework for energy-intensive manufacturing industries. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 197, 57–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhong, R.Y.; Huang, G.Q.; Lan, S.; Dai, Q.Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, T. A big data approach for logistics trajectory discovery from RFID-enabled production data. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 165, 260–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mani, V.; Delgado, C.; Hazen, B.T.; Patel, P. Mitigating Supply Chain Risk via Sustainability Using Big Data Analytics: Evidence from the Manufacturing Supply Chain. Sustainability 2017, 9, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, S.; Chen, W.; Hu, J.; Hu, J. ASPIE: A Framework for Active Sensing and Processing of Complex Events in the Internet of Manufacturing Things. Sustainability 2018, 10, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alfian, G.; Syafrudin, M.; Ijaz, M.F.; Syaekhoni, M.A.; Fitriyani, N.L.; Rhee, J. A Personalized Healthcare Monitoring System for Diabetic Patients by Utilizing BLE-Based Sensors and Real-Time Data Processing. Sensors 2018, 18, 2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. D’silva, G.M.; Khan, A.; Gaurav; Bari, S. Real-time processing of IoT events with historic data using Apache Kafka and Apache Spark with dashing framework. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information & Communication Technology (RTEICT), Bangalore, India, 19–20 May 2017; pp. 1804–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Canizo, M.; Onieva, E.; Conde, A.; Charramendieta, S.; Trujillo, S. Real-time predictive maintenance for wind turbines using Big Data frameworks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM), Dallas, TX, USA, 19–21 June 2017; pp. 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Du, Y.; Chowdhury, M.; Rahman, M.; Dey, K.; Apon, A.; Luckow, A.; Ngo, L.B. A Distributed Message Delivery Infrastructure for Connected Vehicle Technology Applications. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2018, 19, 787–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Park, J.; Chi, S. An implementation of a high throughput data ingestion system for machine logs in manufacturing industry. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), Vienna, Austria, 5–8 July 2016; pp. 117–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ferry, N.; Terrazas, G.; Kalweit, P.; Solberg, A.; Ratchev, S.; Weinelt, D. Towards a big data platform for managing machine generated data in the cloud. In Proceedings of the IEEE 15th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Emden, Germany, 24–26 July 2017; pp. 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, T.; Motta, G.; Liu, K. Delivering Real-Time Information Services on Public Transit: A Framework. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2017, 18, 2642–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Manzoor, M.A.; Morgan, Y. Real-time Support Vector Machine based Network Intrusion Detection system using Apache Storm. In Proceedings of the IEEE 7th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 13–15 October 2016; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, Z.; Chen, N.; Gong, J. Design and implementation of the real-time GIS data model and Sensor Web service platform for environmental big data management with the Apache Storm. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics (Agro-Geoinformatics), Istanbul, Turkey, 20–24 July 2015; p. 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qian, S.; Wu, G.; Huang, J.; Das, T. Benchmarking modern distributed streaming platforms. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), Taipei, Taiwan, 14–17 March 2016; pp. 592–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chatterjee, S.; Morin, C. Experimental Study on the Performance and Resource Utilization of Data Streaming Frameworks. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGRID), Washington, DC, USA, 1–4 May 2018; pp. 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Boicea, A.; Radulescu, F.; Agapin, L.I. MongoDB vs. Oracle—Database Comparison. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Emerging Intelligent Data and Web Technologies, Bucharest, Romania, 19–21 September 2012; pp. 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alfian, G.; Syafrudin, M.; Rhee, J. Real-Time Monitoring System Using Smartphone-Based Sensors and NoSQL Database for Perishable Supply Chain. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hu, F.; Xu, M.; Yang, J.; Liang, Y.; Cui, K.; Little, M.M.; Lynnes, C.S.; Duffy, D.Q.; Yang, C. Evaluating the Open Source Data Containers for Handling Big Geospatial Raster Data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2018, 7, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, N.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, Z. A Spatio-Temporal Enhanced Metadata Model for Interdisciplinary Instant Point Observations in Smart Cities. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2017, 6, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Putri, F.K.; Song, G.; Kwon, J.; Rao, P. DISPAQ: Distributed Profitable-Area Query from Big Taxi Trip Data. Sensors 2017, 17, 2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Angrish, A.; Starly, B.; Lee, Y.-S.; Cohen, P.H. A flexible data schema and system architecture for the virtualization of manufacturing machines (VMM). J. Manuf. Syst. 2017, 45, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lohokare, J.; Dani, R.; Rajurkar, A.; Apte, A. An IoT ecosystem for the implementation of scalable wireless home automation systems at smart city level. In Proceedings of the IEEE Region 10 Conference, Penang, Malaysia, 5–8 November 2017; pp. 1503–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jung, H.S.; Yoon, C.S.; Lee, Y.W.; Park, J.W.; Yun, C.H. Cloud computing platform based real-time processing for stream reasoning. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Future Generation Communication Technologies (FGCT), Dublin, Ireland, 21–23 August 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Villari, M.; Celesti, A.; Fazio, M.; Puliafito, A. AllJoyn Lambda: An architecture for the management of smart environments in IoT. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Computing Workshops, Hong Kong, China, 5 November 2014; pp. 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhou, L.; Chen, N.; Chen, Z. Efficient Streaming Mass Spatio-Temporal Vehicle Data Access in Urban Sensor Networks Based on Apache Storm. Sensors 2017, 17, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Syafrudin, M.; Fitriyani, N.L.; Li, D.; Alfian, G.; Rhee, J.; Kang, Y.S. An Open Source-Based Real-Time Data Processing Architecture Framework for Manufacturing Sustainability. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kim, D.; Kang, P.; Cho, S.; Lee, H.J.; Doh, S. Machine learning-based novelty detection for faulty wafer detection in semiconductor manufacturing. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39, 4075–4083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, J.; Wang, T.; Gao, X.; Wei, L. Real-time monitoring of high-power disk laser welding based on support vector machine. Comput. Ind. 2018, 94, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, Y.J.; Fan, C.Y.; Chang, K.H. Manufacturing intelligence for reducing false alarm of defect classification by integrating similarity matching approach in CMOS image sensor manufacturing. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2016, 99, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ravikumar, S.; Ramachandran, K.I.; Sugumaran, V. Machine learning approach for automated visual inspection of machine components. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38, 3260–3266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Quiroz, J.C.; Mariun, N.; Mehrjou, M.R.; Izadi, M.; Misron, N.; Radzi, M.A.M. Fault detection of broken rotor bar in LS-PMSM using random forests. Measurement 2018, 116, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Patel, R.K.; Giri, V.K. Feature selection and classification of mechanical fault of an induction motor using random forest classifier. Perspect. Sci. 2016, 8, 334–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cerrada, M.; Zurita, G.; Cabrera, D.; Sánchez, R.V.; Artés, M.; Li, C. Fault diagnosis in spur gears based on genetic algorithm and random forest. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2016, 70, 87–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tallón-Ballesteros, A.J.; Riquelme, J.C. Deleting or keeping outliers for classifier training? In Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC 2014), Porto, Portugal, 30 July–1 August 2014; pp. 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Podgorelec, V.; Hericko, M.; Rozman, I. Improving mining of medical data by outliers prediction. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS’05), Dublin, Ireland, 23–24 June 2005; pp. 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ester, M.; Kriegel, H.; Sander, J.; Xu, X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’96), Portland, OR, USA, 2–4 August 1996. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tian, H.X.; Liu, X.J.; Han, M. An outliers detection method of time series data for soft sensor modeling. In Proceedings of the Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Yinchuan, China, 28–30 May 2016; pp. 3918–3922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Abid, A.; Kachouri, A.; Mahfoudhi, A. Outlier detection for wireless sensor networks using density-based clustering approach. IET Wirel. Sens. Syst. 2017, 7, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Plageras, A.P.; Psannis, K.E.; Stergiou, C.; Wang, H.; Gupta, B.B. Efficient IoT-based sensor BIG Data collection–processing and analysis in smart buildings. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2018, 82, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Blanco-Novoa, O.; Fernández-Caramés, T.M.; Fraga-Lamas, P.; Castedo, L. A Cost-Effective IoT System for Monitoring Indoor Radon Gas Concentration. Sensors 2018, 18, 2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Benammar, M.; Abdaoui, A.; Ahmad, S.H.; Touati, F.; Kadri, A. A Modular IoT Platform for Real-Time Indoor Air Quality Monitoring. Sensors 2018, 18, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Sood, S.K.; Mahajan, I. Wearable IoT sensor based healthcare system for identifying and controlling chikungunya virus. Comput. Ind. 2017, 91, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bayo-Monton, J.-L.; Martinez-Millana, A.; Han, W.; Fernandez-Llatas, C.; Sun, Y.; Traver, V. Wearable Sensors Integrated with Internet of Things for Advancing eHealth Care. Sensors 2018, 18, 1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ge, M.; Bangui, H.; Buhnova, B. Big Data for Internet of Things: A Survey. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2018, 87, 601–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zikopoulos, P.; Eaton, C. Understanding Big Data: Analytics for Enterprise Class Hadoop and Streaming Data; McGraw-Hill Osborne Media: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  62. Apache Kafka. Available online: https://kafka.apache.org (accessed on 17 July 2018).
  63. Ji, Z.; Ganchev, I.; O’Droma, M.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, X. A Cloud-Based Car Parking Middleware for IoT-Based Smart Cities: Design and Implementation. Sensors 2014, 14, 22372–22393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Jain, A.; Nalya, A. Learning Storm; Packt Publishing: Birmingham, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  65. Chodorow, K. MongoDB: The Definitive Guide; O’Reilly Media, Inc.: Newton, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  66. Breiman, L. Random Forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Kang, Y.S.; Park, I.H.; Rhee, J.; Lee, Y.H. MongoDB-based repository design for IoT-generated RFID/sensor big data. IEEE Sens. J. 2015, 16, 485–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Raspberry Pi 3 Model B. Available online: https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-3-model-B (accessed on 3 July 2018).
  69. Sense HAT. Available online: https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/sense-hat/ (accessed on 3 July 2018).
  70. Ansari, A.N.; Sedky, M.; Sharma, N.; Tyagi, A. An internet of things approach for motion detection using raspberry Pi. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Internet of Things (ICIT), Harbin, China, 17–18 January 2015; pp. 131–134. [Google Scholar]
  71. Python Module to Control the Raspberry Pi Sense HAT. Available online: https://pythonhosted.org/sense-hat/ (accessed on 2 July 2018).
  72. Han, J.; Kamber, M.; Pei, J. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, 3rd ed.; Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: Burlington, MA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  73. Weka Tools. Available online: https://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/ (accessed on 3 July 2018).
  74. Fernández-Delgado, M.; Cernadas, E.; Barro, S.; Amorim, D. Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems? J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014, 15, 3133–3181. [Google Scholar]
  75. Wainberg, M.; Alipanahi, B.; Frey, B.J. Are random forests truly the best classifiers? J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016, 17, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  76. Oneto, L.; Coraddu, A.; Sanetti, P.; Karpenko, O.; Cipollini, F.; Cleophas, T.; Anguita, D. Marine Safety and Data Analytics: Vessel Crash Stop Maneuvering Performance Prediction. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN 2017), Alghero, Italy, 11–14 September 2017; Volume 10614, pp. 385–393. [Google Scholar]
  77. Germain, P.; Lacasse, A.; Laviolette, F.; Marchand, M.; Roy, J.-F. Risk bounds for the majority vote: From a PAC-Bayesian analysis to a learning algorithm. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2015, 16, 787–860. [Google Scholar]
  78. Liu, B. Web Data Mining: Exploring Hyperlinks, Contents, and Usage Data; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  79. Alazzawi, L.; Elkateeb, A. Performance evaluation of the WSN routing protocols scalability. J. Comput. Syst. Netw. Commun. 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Morón, M.J.; Luque, R.; Casilari, E. On the capability of smartphones to perform as communication gateways in medical wireless personal area networks. Sensors 2014, 14, 575–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Pereira, D.A.; Ourique de Morais, W.; Pignaton de Freitas, E. NoSQL real-time database performance comparison. Int. J. Parallel Emerg. Distrib. Syst. 2017, 33, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Van der Veen, J.S.; Van der Waaij, B.; Meijer, R.J. Sensor data storage performance: SQL or NoSQL, physical or virtual. In Proceedings of the IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), Honolulu, HI, USA, 24–29 June 2012; pp. 431–438. [Google Scholar]
  83. Lima, Z.; García-Vázquez, H.; Rodríguez, R.; Khemchandani, S.L.; Dualibe, F.; del Pino, J. A System for Controlling and Monitoring IoT Applications. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2018, 1, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. García Guzmán, J.; Prieto González, L.; Pajares Redondo, J.; Montalvo Martínez, M.M.L.; Boada, M.J. Real-Time Vehicle Roll Angle Estimation Based on Neural Networks in IoT Low-Cost Devices. Sensors 2018, 18, 2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wilkes, T.C.; Stanger, L.R.; Willmott, J.R.; Pering, T.D.; McGonigle, A.J.S.; England, R.A. The Development of a Low-Cost, Near Infrared, High-Temperature Thermal Imaging System and Its Application to the Retrieval of Accurate Lava Lake Temperatures at Masaya Volcano, Nicaragua. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ajila, S.A.; Wu, D. Empirical study of the effects of open source adoption on software development economics. J. Syst. Softw. 2007, 80, 1517–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ven, K.; Verelst, J. The Organizational Adoption of Open Source Server Software by Belgian Organizations. In Proceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Open Source Systems, Como, Italy, 8–10 June 2006; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2006; pp. 111–122. [Google Scholar]
  88. Gardner, R.; Bicker, J. Using machine learning to solve tough manufacturing problems. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Theory Appl. Pract. 2000, 7, 359–364. [Google Scholar]
  89. Kwak, D.-S.; Kim, K.-J. A data mining approach considering missing values for the optimization of semiconductor-manufacturing processes. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39, 2590–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Pham, D.T.; Afify, A.A. Machine-learning techniques and their applications in manufacturing. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2005, 219, 395–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Susto, G.A.; Schirru, A.; Pampuri, S.; McLoone, S.; Beghi, A. Machine learning for predictive maintenance: A multiple classifier approach. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 2015, 11, 812–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Monostori, L.; Prohaszka, J. A step towards intelligent manufacturing: Modelling and monitoring of manufacturing processes through artificial neural networks. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 1993, 42, 485–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Davenport, T.H.; Barth, P.; Bean, R. How big data is different. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2012, 54, 43–46. [Google Scholar]
  94. Havens, T.C.; Bezdek, J.C.; Leckie, C.; Hall, L.O.; Palaniswami, M. Fuzzy c-means algorithms for very large data. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 2012, 20, 1130–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Jacobs, A. The pathologies of big data. Assoc. Comput. Mach. Commun. 2009, 52, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Architecture of the real-time monitoring system in an assembly line process (a) and system design for big data processing (b).
Figure 1. Architecture of the real-time monitoring system in an assembly line process (a) and system design for big data processing (b).
Sensors 18 02946 g001
Figure 2. An example of sensor data generated by the IoT-based sensor presented in JSON format (a); and when stored in NoSQL MongoDB (b).
Figure 2. An example of sensor data generated by the IoT-based sensor presented in JSON format (a); and when stored in NoSQL MongoDB (b).
Sensors 18 02946 g002
Figure 3. The real-case implementation of the proposed IoT-based sensor in an assembly line.
Figure 3. The real-case implementation of the proposed IoT-based sensor in an assembly line.
Sensors 18 02946 g003
Figure 4. Hybrid Prediction Model using Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN)-based outlier detection and Random Forest (RF)-based classifier.
Figure 4. Hybrid Prediction Model using Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN)-based outlier detection and Random Forest (RF)-based classifier.
Sensors 18 02946 g004
Figure 5. The result of DBSCAN-based outlier detection.
Figure 5. The result of DBSCAN-based outlier detection.
Sensors 18 02946 g005
Figure 6. The web-based real-time monitoring system.
Figure 6. The web-based real-time monitoring system.
Sensors 18 02946 g006
Figure 7. The IoT-based sensor system’s (a) network delay, and (b) CPU and memory usage.
Figure 7. The IoT-based sensor system’s (a) network delay, and (b) CPU and memory usage.
Sensors 18 02946 g007
Figure 8. Performance evaluation in terms of latency with different numbers of clients (a) and servers (b); throughput with different numbers of clients (c) and servers (d); comparison between MongoDB and CouchDB databases in terms of latency (e); and database size (f).
Figure 8. Performance evaluation in terms of latency with different numbers of clients (a) and servers (b); throughput with different numbers of clients (c) and servers (d); comparison between MongoDB and CouchDB databases in terms of latency (e); and database size (f).
Sensors 18 02946 g008
Table 1. Detailed specifications of Raspberry Pi 3 model B.
Table 1. Detailed specifications of Raspberry Pi 3 model B.
SpecificationInformation
RAM1 GB
CPUQuad Cortex A53 @ 1.2 GHz
GPU400 MHz VideoCore IV
GPIO40 pins
StorageMicro-SD
Ethernet10/100 Mbps
WirelessWireless LAN 802.11n/Bluetooth 4.0 Low Energy
USB4 ports
Power consumption5 V
Dimensions85.60 × 56.5 mm
Table 2. Detailed specifications of Sense-HAT.
Table 2. Detailed specifications of Sense-HAT.
SpecificationInformation
GyroscopeGyroscope sensor (accurate to ±245/500/2000 degrees per second)
AccelerometerAccelerometer sensor (accurate to ±2/4/8/16 G-forces)
MagnetometerMagnetic Sensor (accurate to ±4/8/12/16 gauss)
Barometric pressurePressure sensor (accurate to ±0.1 hectopascal)
TemperatureTemperature sensor (accurate to ±2 °C)
HumidityRelative humidity sensor (accurate to ±4.5%)
Display8 × 8 LED display matrix
InputSmall 5 joystick button
Table 3. Distribution of dataset.
Table 3. Distribution of dataset.
FeatureDescriptionNormal ClassAbnormal Class
MeanSTDMeanSTD
tempTemperature22.095833330.29497771924.049019611.26159926
humHumidity19.904166670.29497771919.9901960811.70638744
axThe x value of accelerometer1.5578558333.568198363−1.9911264714.533231608
ayThe y value of accelerometer2.18342751.3624061344.0903686278.006935948
azThe x value of accelerometer15.72753171.491313548.21502549153.998157
gxThe x value of the gyroscope−0.0138504170.000748499−0.0120519610.052695636
gyThe y value of the gyroscope−0.1057829170.000897929−0.016525490.02378498
gzThe z value of the gyroscope0.9993291670.0039340670.9960215690.053289554
Table 4. The significance of features presented by Information Gain (IG) Score.
Table 4. The significance of features presented by Information Gain (IG) Score.
FeatureIG Score
temp1.0504
ay0.97
gy0.9249
hum0.8719
gz0.8471
gx0.6324
az0.4899
ax0.4663
Table 5. The result of DBSCAN-based outlier detection.
Table 5. The result of DBSCAN-based outlier detection.
# Instance (Original)MinPtseps# Outlier Data# Normal Data
342574338
Table 6. Confusion matrix of a classifier.
Table 6. Confusion matrix of a classifier.
Classified as “Yes”Classified as “No”
Actual “Yes”TPFN
Actual “No”FPTN
Table 7. Performance metrics for the classification model.
Table 7. Performance metrics for the classification model.
Performance MetricFormula
Precision TP / ( TP + FP )
Recall/Sensitivity TP / ( TP + FN )
Accuracy ( TP + TN ) / ( TP + TN + FP + FN )
Table 8. The detailed specifications of server and client computer.
Table 8. The detailed specifications of server and client computer.
ServerClient
HardwareProcessorCore i7-4790Core i7-4790
CPU3.60 GHz × 8 cores3.60 GHz × 8 cores
RAM16 GB16 GB
HDDSSD 128 GBSSD 128 GB
SoftwareOSUbuntu Server 14.04Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Node.js8.4.0-
Express4.15.4-
Socket.IO1.7.4-
Apache Kafka0.8.2-
Apache Storm0.9.3-
MongoDB3.6.2-
JDK-1.8.0_121
Eclipse-4.6.3
HttpClient-4.5.3
Table 9. Performance comparison of several classification models for fault prediction.
Table 9. Performance comparison of several classification models for fault prediction.
ModelPrecision (%)Recall (%)Accuracy (%)
Naïve Bayes (NB)94.193.693.567
Logistics Regression (LR)989897.953
Multilayer Perceptron (MLP)96.896.896.784
Random Forest (RF)98.598.598.538
DBSCAN + NB96.896.796.74
DBSCAN + LR98.698.598.52
DBSCAN + MLP98.898.898.81
Hybrid Prediction Model (DBSCAN + RF)100100100

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Syafrudin, M.; Alfian, G.; Fitriyani, N.L.; Rhee, J. Performance Analysis of IoT-Based Sensor, Big Data Processing, and Machine Learning Model for Real-Time Monitoring System in Automotive Manufacturing. Sensors 2018, 18, 2946. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092946

AMA Style

Syafrudin M, Alfian G, Fitriyani NL, Rhee J. Performance Analysis of IoT-Based Sensor, Big Data Processing, and Machine Learning Model for Real-Time Monitoring System in Automotive Manufacturing. Sensors. 2018; 18(9):2946. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092946

Chicago/Turabian Style

Syafrudin, Muhammad, Ganjar Alfian, Norma Latif Fitriyani, and Jongtae Rhee. 2018. "Performance Analysis of IoT-Based Sensor, Big Data Processing, and Machine Learning Model for Real-Time Monitoring System in Automotive Manufacturing" Sensors 18, no. 9: 2946. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092946

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop