Abstract
Results from the classic dot pattern distortion paradigm have sometimes yielded prototype enhancement effects that could not be accounted for by exemplar models of categorization. However, in these experiments the status of the prototype was confounded with certain stimulus-specific properties as well as with the frequency of presentation of the prototype during testing. In two mock-subliminal experiments, participants made categorization judgments to patterns that were generated as prototypes, low-level distortions, or high-level distortions. The participants rated the prototypes as being more likely to be members of a category, although no patterns were presented during training, and there was no objective category structure. In two other experiments, greater prototype enhancement effects were observed when the prototype and low-level distortions were presented with greater frequency during transfer. These results suggest that classic prototype enhancement effects may not be due to the abstraction of a prototype at time of original learning, but rather to other factors not formalized in extant models.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ahn, W.-K., &Medin, D. L. (1992). A two-stage model of category construction.Cognitive Science,16, 81–121.
Busemeyer, J. R., Dewey, G. I., &Medin, D. L. (1984). Evaluation of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 638–648.
Clapper, J. P., &Bower, G. H. (1994). Category invention in unsupervised learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 443–460.
Garner, W. R. (1974).The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Gureckis, T. M., &Love, B. C. (2003). Towards a unified account of supervised and unsupervised category learning.Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence,15, 1–24.
Heit, E. (1994). Models of the effects of prior knowledge on category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1264–1282.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,93, 411–428.
Homa, D. (1984). On the nature of categories. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), Thepsychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 18, pp. 49–94). Oxford: Academic Press.
Homa, D., &Cultice, J. C. (1984). Role of feedback, category size, and stimulus distortion on the acquisition and utilization of illdefined categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 83–94.
Homa, D., &Vosburgh, R. (1976). Category breadth and the abstraction of prototypical information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,2, 322–330.
Knowlton, B. J., &Squire, L. R. (1993). The learning of categories: Parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge.Science,262, 1747–1749.
Medin, D. L., &Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning.Psychological Review,85, 207–238.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 39–57.
Nosofsky, R. M., &Zaki, S. R. (1998). Dissociations between categorization and recognition in amnesic and normal individuals: An exemplar-based interpretation.Psychological Science,9, 247–255.
Nosofsky, R. M., Zaki, S. R., & Palmeri, T. J. (2002).Exemplars, prototypes, and the categorization-recognition dissociation. Unpublished manuscript.
Palmeri, T. J., &Flanery, M. A. (1999). Learning about categories in the absence of training: Profound amnesia and the relationship between perceptual categorization and recognition memory.Psychological Science,10, 526–530.
Posner, M. I., Goldsmith, R., &Welton, K. E., Jr. (1967). Perceived distance and the classification of distorted patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology,73, 28–38.
Posner, M. I., &Keele, S.W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas.Journal of Experimental Psychology,77, 353–363.
Reber, P. J., &Squire, L. R. (1999). Intact learning of artificial grammars and intact category learning by patients with Parkinson’s disease.Behavioral Neuroscience,113, 235–242.
Reber, P. J., Stark, C. E. L., &Squire, L. R. (1998). Contrasting cortical activity associated with category memory and recognition memory.Learning & Memory,5, 420–428.
Reed, S. K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization.Cognitive Psychology,3, 382–407.
Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science.Science,237, 1317–1323.
Shin, H. J., &Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Similarity-scaling studies of dot-pattern classification and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 278–304.
Smith, J. D. (2002). Exemplar theory’s predicted typicality gradient can be tested and disconfirmed.Psychological Science,13, 437–442.
Smith, J. D., &Minda, J. P. (2001). Journey to the center of the category: The dissociation in amnesia between categorization and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 984–1002.
Smith, J. D., &Minda, J. P. (2002). Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 800–811.
Smith, J. D., Murray, M. J., Jr., &Minda, J. P. (1997). Straight talk about linear separability.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 659–680.
Wills, A. J., &McLaren, I. P. L. (1998). Perceptual learning and free classification.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative & Physiological Psychology,51B, 235–270.
Zaki, S. R., &Nosofsky, R. M. (2001). Exemplar accounts of blending and distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 1022–1041.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant R01 MH48494.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaki, S.R., Nosofsky, R.M. False prototype enhancement effects in dot pattern categorization. Memory & Cognition 32, 390–398 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195833
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195833