Abstract
Reading time for the second clause of a conjoined sentence was found to be faster when the clause was structurally similar to the first clause than when the clausal structures differed. This “parallel structure” effect was found for each of several types of structures, including active versus passive constructions, direct object versus sentential complement (minimal vs. nonminimal attachment), nonshifted versus shifted heavy noun phrase, agent versus theme, and animate versus inanimate noun phrase. The pervasiveness of the effect ruled out some hypotheses about its basis, including the hypothesis that it would occur only when a subject’s just having processed a structure would affect how temporary ambiguities are resolved. Detailed analysis of the data suggested the existence of several distinct sources of the effect and provided indirect evidence that people typically compute both a surface structure and an S-structure representation of a sentence.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anisfeld, M., &Klenbort, I. (1973). On the functions of structural paraphrase: The view from the passive voice.Psychological Bulletin,79, 117–126.
Chierchia, G. (1983, February).Outline of a semantic theory of (obligatory) control. Paper presented at the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, II, Los Angeles.
Chomsky, N. (1981).Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Dordrecht, Holland: Foils.
Chomsky, N., &Lasnik, H. (1977). Filters and control.Linguistic Inquiry,8, 425–504.
Comrie, B. (1979).Language universals and language typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Davison, A. (1984). On the function and definition of “sentence topic” in sentence processing. In D. Dowty, L. Kartunnen, & A. Zwicky (Eds.),Syntactic theory and how people parse sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davison, A., &Lutz, R. (1981).Measurement of syntactic complexity relative to context. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois (Champaign-Urbana).
Frazier, L. (1979).On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Frazier, L., &Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new parsing model.Cognition,6, 291–326.
Frazier, L., &Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences.Cognitive Psychology,14, 178–210.
Hakuta, K. (1982). Interaction between particles and word order in the comprehension and production of simple sentences in Japanese children.Developmental Psychology,18, 62–76.
Jackendoff, R. (1972).Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mehler, J., &Carey, P. (1968). The interaction of veracity and syntax in the processing of sentences.Perception & Psychophysics,3, 109–111.
Sheldon, A. (1974).The acquisition of relative clauses in English. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Solan, L. (1983).Pronominal reference: Child language and the theory of grammar. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH Grant MH-35347 to Lyn Frazier and Charles Clifton.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frazier, L., Taft, L., Roeper, T. et al. Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension. Memory & Cognition 12, 421–430 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198303
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198303