Abstract
Previous studies of the perceptual processing and dynamics of emotional expression in faces have been limited by the lack of realistic yet controlled stimuli. The present work offers researchers a method for creating such stimuli for exploring these phenomena. We describe the creation of the stimuli and a series of experiments testing the validity of these stimuli with respect to emotional expressions in humans. Participants evaluated synthesized facial images and standardized photographs of six basic emotional expressions for intensity and accuracy of perceived emotion. Comparisons of these measures were qualitatively similar for synthesized and photographed faces. A manipulation of the magnitude of the synthesized expressions yielded a significant effect on the perceived intensity of expression. In a subsequent multidimensional scaling study, no systematic differences were uncovered in the derived configurations of the synthesized expressions and the photographs. These results are discussed in the context of possible future research applications.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Calder, A. J., Young, A. W., Perrett, D. I., &Etcoff, N. L. (1996). Categorical perception of morphed facial expressions.Visual Cognition,3, 81–117.
Ekman, P. (1971). Universality and cultural differences in facial expressions. In J. K. Cole (Ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 19, pp. 207–283). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Ekman, P., &Friesen, W. V. (1976a). Measuring facial movement.Environmental Psychology & Nonverbal Behavior,1, 56–75.
Ekman, P., & Friesen,W. V. (1976b).Pictures of facial affect. Unpublished manuscript.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., &Ellsworth, P. (1982). What are the relative contributions of facial behavior and contextual information to the judgment of emotion? In P. Ekman (Ed.),Emotion in the human face (2nd ed. pp. 111–127). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Guenter, B., Grimm, C., Malvar, H., &Wood, D. (1998). Making faces. InSIGGRAPH 98 conference proceedings. New York: ACM Press.
Hess, U., Blairy, S., &Kleck, R. E. (1997). The intensity of emotional facial expression and decoding accuracy.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,21, 241–257.
Kirouac, G., &Dore, F. Y. (1984). Judgment of facial expressions of emotion as a function of exposure time.Perceptual & Motor Skills,59, 147–150.
McAndrew, F. T. (1986). A cross-cultural study of recognition thresholds for facial expressions of emotion.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,17, 211–224.
Niedenthal, P. M., Halberstadt, J. B., Margolin, J., &Innes-Ker, A. H. (2000). Emotional state and the detection of change in facial expression of emotion.European Journal of Social Psychology,30, 211–222.
Parke, F. I., &Waters, K. (1996).Computer facial animation. Wellesley, MA: Peters.
Pighin, F., Szeliski, R., &Salesin, D. (1999). Resynthesizing facial animation through 3D model-based tracking.ICCV Vision & Graphics,1, 143–150.
Pittenger, J. B. (1991). On the difficulty of averagingfaces: Comments on Lhanglois and Roggman.Psychological Science,2, 351–353.
Russell, J. A. (1994). Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? A review of the cross-cultural studies.Psychological Bulletin,115, 102–141.
Spencer-Smith, J., Innes-Ker, A. H., & Townsend, J. T. (2000, November).Dynamics of expression. Paper presented at Object Perception and Memory 2000, New Orleans.
Wehrle, T., Kaiser, S., Schmidt, S., &Scherer, K. R. (2000). Studying the dynamics of emotional expression using synthesized facial muscle movements.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,78, 105–119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Funding for this project was provided by the Indiana University President’s Summer Undergraduate Research Initiative and by NIH-NIMH Grant R01MH57717.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spencer-Smith, J., Wild, H., Innes-Ker, Å.H. et al. Making faces: Creating three-dimensional parameterized models of facial expression. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 33, 115–123 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195356
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195356