Abstract
The allocation of human participants to resources was studied by observing the population dynamics of people interacting in real time within a common virtual world. Resources were distributed in two spatially separated pools with varying relative reinforcement rates (50–50, 65–35, or 80–20). We manipulated whether the participants could see each other and the distribution of the resources. When the participants could see each other but not the resources, the richer pool was underutilized. When the participants could see the resources but not each other, the richer pool was overutilized. In conjunction with prior experiments that correlated the visibility of agents and resources (Goldstone & Ashpole, 2004), these results indicate that participants’ foraging decisions are influenced by both forager and resource information. The results suggest that the presence of a crowd at a resource is a deterring, rather than an attractive, factor. Both fast and slow oscillations in the harvesting rates of the pools across time were revealed by Fourier analyses. The slow waves of crowd migration were most prevalent when the resources were invisible, whereas the fast cycles were most prevalent when the resources were visible and the participants were invisible.
Article PDF
References
Baum, W. M. (1974). On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,22, 231–242.
Baum, W. M., &Kraft, J. R. (1998). Group choice: Competition, travel, and the ideal free distribution.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,69, 227–245.
Boyd, R., &Richerson, P. J. (1985).Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bullnheimer, B., Dawid, H., &Zeller, R. (1998). Learning from own and foreign experience: Technological adaptation by imitating firms.Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory,4, 267–282.
Chwe, M. S.-Y. (1999). Structure and strategy in collective action.American Journal of Sociology,105, 128–156.
Dias, P. C. (1996). Sources and sinks in population biology.Trends in Ecology & Evolution,11, 326–330.
Fretwell, S. D., &Lucas, H. J. (1970). On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds: I. Theoretical development.Acta Biotheoretica,19, 16–36.
Goldstone, R. L., &Ashpole, B. C. (2004). Human foraging behavior in a virtual environment.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 508–514.
Kennedy, M., &Gray, R. D. (1993). Can ecological theory predict the distribution of foraging animals? A critical analysis of experiments on the ideal free distribution.Oikos,68, 158–166.
Kraft, J. R., &Baum, W. M. (2001). Group choice: The ideal free distribution of human social behavior.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,76, 21–42.
Madden, G. J., Peden, B. F., &Yamaguchi, T. (2002). Human group choice: Discrete-trial and free-operant tests of the ideal free distribution.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,78, 1–15.
Pöysä, H., Elmberg, J., Sjöberg, K., &Nummi, P. (1998). Habitat selection rules in breeding mallards (Anas platyrhynchos): A test of two competing hypotheses.Oecologia,114, 283–287.
Pulliam, H. R., &Danielson, B. J. (1991). Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: A landscape perspective on population dynamics.American Naturalist,137, S50-S66.
Sokolowski, M. B. C., Tonneau, F., &Freixa i Baqué, E. (1999). The ideal free distribution in humans: An experimental test.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 157–161.
Stamps, J. A. (1988). Conspecific attraction and aggregation in territorial species.American Naturalist,131, 329–347.
Templeton, J. J., &Giraldeau, L.-A. (1996). Vicarious sampling: The use of personal and public information by starlings foraging in a simple patchy environment.Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology,38, 105–114.
Valone, T. J., &Giraldeau, L.-A. (1993). Patch estimation by group foragers: What information is used?Animal Behavior,45, 721–728.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was funded by NIH Grant MH56871 and NSF Grant 0125287.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldstone, R.L., Ashpole, B.C. & Roberts, M.E. Knowledge of resources and competitors in human foraging. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 81–87 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196350
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196350