Abstract
People prefer a sure gain to a probable larger gain when the two choices are presented from a gain perspective, but a probable larger loss to a sure loss when the objectively identical choices are presented from a loss perspective. Such reversals of preference due to the context of the problem are known asframing effects. In the present study, schema activation and subjects’ interpretations of the problems were examined as sources of the framing effects. Results showed that such effects could be eliminated by introducing into a problem a causal schema that provided a rationale for the reciprocal relationship between the gains and the losses. Moreover, when subjects were freed from framing they were consistently risk seeking in decisions about human life, but risk averse in decisions about property. Irrationality in choice behaviors and the ecological implication of framing effects are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnoli, F., &Krantz, D. H. (1989). Suppressing natural heuristics by formal instruction: The case of the conjunction fallacy.Cognitive Psychology,21, 515–550.
Arkes, H. R., &Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,35, 124–140.
Berkeley, D., &Humphreys, P. (1982). Structuring decision problems and the “bias heuristic.”Acta Psychologica,50, 201–252.
Birnbaum, M. H., &Jou, J. (1990). A theory of comparative response times and “difference” judgments.Cognitive Psychology,22, 184–210.
Bradburn, N. M. (1982). Question-wording effects in surveys. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.),Question framing and response consistency (pp. 51–63). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bransford, J. D., &Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 717–721.
Cheng, P. W., &Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas.Cognitive Psychology,17, 391–416.
Cohen, L. J. (1981). Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?Behavioral & Brain Sciences,4, 317–370.
Corbin, R. M. (1980). Decisions that might not get made. In T. S. Wallsten (Ed.),Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior (pp. 47–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cox, J. R., &Griggs, R. A. (1982). The effects of experience on performance in Wason’s selection task.Memory & Cognition,10, 496–502.
Dawes, R. M. (1988).Rational choice in an uncertain world. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Ebbesen, E. B., &Konečni, V. J. (1980). On the external validity of decision-making research: What do we know about decisions in the real world? In T. S. Wallsten (Ed.),Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior (pp. 21–45). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Einhorn, H. J., &Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice.Annual Review of Psychology,32, 53–88.
Gigerenzer, G., Hell, W., &Blank, H. (1988). Presentation and content: The use of base rates as a continuous variable.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 513–525.
Goldstein, W. M., &Einhorn, H. J. (1987). Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena.Psychological Review,94, 236–254.
Graesser, A. C., &Bower, G. H. (Eds.) (1990).Inferences and text comprehension. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Graesser, A. C., &Nakamura, G. V. (1982). The impact of a schema on comprehension and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 16, pp. 59–109). New York: Academic Press.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., &Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.Psychological Review,101, 371–395.
Greenwald, A. G., Pratkanis, A. R., Leippe, M. R., &Baumgardner, M. H. (1986). Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress?Psychological Review,93, 216–229.
Harris, R. J. (1981). Inferences in information processing. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in reseach and theory (Vol. 15, pp. 81–128). New York: Academic Press.
Helson, H. (1948). Adaptation-level as a basis for a quantitative theory of frames of reference.Psychological Review,55, 297–313.
Hershey, J. C., &Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1980). Risk taking and problem context in the domain of losses: An expected utility analysis.Journal of Risk & Insurance,47, 111–132.
Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics.Psychological Bulletin,90, 197–217.
Hogarth, R. M. (1987).Judgment and choice: The psychology of decision (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., &Legrenzi, M. (1972). Reasoning and a sense of reality.British Journal of Psychology,63, 395–400.
Jou, J., &Shanteau, J. (1995). The gestalt and dynamic processes in decision making.Behavioural Processes,33, 305–318.
Jungermann, H. (1986). The two camps on rationality. In H. R. Arkes & K. R. Hammond (Eds.),Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 627–641). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D., &Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.Econometrica,47, 263–291.
Kahneman, D., &Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames.American Psychologist,39, 341–350.
Kahneman, D., &Tversky, A. (1986). Choice, values, and frames. In H. R. Arkes & K. R. Hammond (Eds.),Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 195–210). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Korchin, S. J. (1976).Modern clinical psychology. New York: Basic Books.
Levin, I. P., Gaeth, G. J., & Conlon, A. B. (1993, November).A review and synthesis of inconsistent findings in framing effects research. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.
Levin, I. P., Schnittjer, S. K., &Thee, S. L. (1988). Information framing effects in social and personal decisions.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,24, 520–529.
Lichtenstein, S., &Slovic, P. (1973). Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in Las Vegas.Journal of Experimental Psychology,101, 16–20.
McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., &Tversky, A. (1988). On the framing of medical decisions. In D. E. Bell, H. Raiffa, & A. Tversky (Eds.),Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions (pp. 562–568). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Redelmeier, D. A., &Tversky, A. (1992). On the framing of multiple prospects.Psychological Science,3, 191–193.
SAS Institute (1985).SAS user’s guide: Statistics (Version 5 edition). Cary, NC: Author.
Schank, R. C., &Abelson, R. (1977).Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schneider, S. L. (1992). Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1040–1057.
Schneider, S. L., &Lopes, L. L. (1986). Reflection in preferences under risk: Who and when may suggest why.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 535–548.
Shakow, D. (1977). Segmental set: The adaptive process in schizophrenia.American Psychologist,32, 129–139.
Shanteau, J., &Harrison, P. (1991). The perceived strength of an implied contract: Can it withstand financial temptation?Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,49, 1–21.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., &Lichtenstein, S. (1982). Response mode, framing, and information-processing effects in risk assessment. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.),Question framing and response consistency (pp. 21–36). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tulving, E., &Pearlstone, Z. (1966). Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,5, 381–391.
Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability.Cognitive Psychology,5, 207–232.
Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1981, January 30). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science,211, 453–458.
Wagenaar, W. A., Keren, G., &Lichtenstein, S. (1988). Islanders and hostages: Deep and surface structures of decision problems.Acta Psychologica,67, 175–189.
Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.),New horizons in psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 135–151). Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.
Wason, P. C., &Johnson-Laird, P. C. (1972).Psychology of reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Winkler, R. L., &Murphy, A. H. (1973). Experiments in the laboratory and the real world.Organizational Behavior & Human Performance,10, 252–270.
Wolford, G., Taylor, H. A., &Beck, J. R. (1990). The conjunction fallacy?Memory & Cognition, 18, 47–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jou, J., Shanteau, J. & Harris, R.J. An information processing view of framing effects: The role of causal schemas in decision making. Memory & Cognition 24, 1–15 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197268
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197268