Abstract
Five subjects were required in each trial to directly compare two pairs of tones and indicate which pair of tones had the greater loudness difference. Ten 1,200-Hz tones differing only in intensity were employed. Subjects made binary comparisons among the 45 tone pairs that can be formed from these 10 tones. The loudness difference comparisons of each subject were found to satisfy two properties (transitivity and monotonicity) that are required for an interval scale representation of loudness. Therefore, individual loudness scales were constructed using a nonmetric scaling technique designed for comparisons of sensory intervals. These loudness scales differed significantly from subject to subject. Since a nonnumerical scaling procedure was employed, these individual differences could not be attributed to biases in the way in which observers use numbers or numerical concepts to describe the loudness of tones. Hence, they suggest strong individual differences in the coding of sound intensity.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, N. H. Cross-task validation of functional measurement using judgments of total magnitude.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 226–233.
Anderson, N. H. Note on functional measurement and data analysis.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,21, 201–215.
Carterette, E. C., &Anderson, N. H. Bisection of loudness.Perception & Psychophysics, 1979,26, 265–280.
Curtis, D. W., Attneave, F., &Harrington, T. L. A test of a two-stage model of magnitude judgment.Perception & Psychophysics, 1968,3, 25–31.
Curtis, D. W., &Rule, S. J. Magnitude judgments of brightness and brightness difference as a function of background reflectance.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,95, 215–222.
Fagot, R. F., Stewart, M. R., &Kleinknecht, R. E. Representations for biased numerical judgments.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,17, 309–319.
Garner, W. R. A technique and a scale for loudness measurement.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1954,26, 73–88.
Garner, W. R. On the lambda loudness function, masking, and the loudness of multicomponent tones.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1959,31, 602–607.
Hays, W. L.Statistics for the social sciences. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.
Huaert, L. Seriation using asymmetric proximity measures.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1976,29, 32–52.
Kendall, M. G., &Babington Smith, B. On the method of paired comparisons.Biometrika, 1939,31, 324–345.
Krantz, D. H. A theory of magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1972,9, 168–199.
Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., &Tversky, A.Foundations of measurement (Vol. 1):Additive and polynomial representation. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Levelt, W. J. M., Riemersma, J. B., &Bunt, A. A. Binaural additivity of loudness.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1972,25, 51–68.
Luce, R. D. What sort of measurement is psychophysical measurement?American Psychologist, 1972,27, 96–106.
Marks, L. E. On scales of sensation: Prolegomena to any future psychophysics that will be able to come forth as science.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 358–376.
Marks, L. E., &Stevens, J. C. Individual brightness functions.Perception & Psychophysics, 1966,1, 17–24.
Morrison, D. Multivariate statistical methods. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.
Reynolds, G. S., &Stevens, S. S. Binaural summation of loudness.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1960,32, 1337–1344.
Rule, S. J., Curtis, D. W., &Markley, R. P. Input and output transformations from magnitude estimation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,86, 343–349.
Rule, S. J., Laye, R. C., &Curtis, D. W. Magnitude judgments and difference judgments of lightness and darkness: A two-stage analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,103, 1108–1114.
Rule, S., &Markely, R. P. Subject differences in cross-modality matching.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,9, 115–117.
Schneider, B. A technique for the nonmetric analysis of paired comparisons of psychological intervals.Psychometrika, 1980,45, 357–372.
Schneider, B., Parker, S., &Stein, D. The measurement of loudness using direct comparisons of sensory intervals.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1974,11, 259–273.
Schneider, B., Parker, S., Valenti, M., Farrell, G., &Kanow, G. Response bias in category and magnitude estimation of difference and similarity for loudness and pitch.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978,4, 483–496.
Shepard, R. N. Metric structures in ordinal data.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1966,3, 287–315.
Slater, P. Inconsistencies in a schedule of paired comparisons.Biometrika, 1961,48, 303–312.
Stevens, J. C., &Guirao, M. Individual loudness functions.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1964,36, 2210–2213.
Stevens, S. S. The measurement of loudness.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1955,27, 815–829.
Stevens, S. S. The direct estimation of sensory magnitude—loudness.American Journal of Psychology, 1956,69, 1–15.
Stevens, S. S. Issues in psychophysical measurement.Psychological Review, 1971,78, 426–450.
Walsh, J. K., &Browman, C. P. Intraindividual consistency on a cross-modality matching task.Perception & Psychophysics, 1978,23, 210–214.
Wanschura, R. G., &Dawson, W. E. Regression effect and individual power functions over sessions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 806–812.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schneider, B. Individual loudness functions determined from direct comparisons of loudness intervals. Perception & Psychophysics 28, 493–503 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198817
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198817