Abstract
The role of individual differences in bridging-inference processing was studied. Students (n=135) read passages of short to moderate length. After each one, they answered corresponding questions about inferences that bridged causally related ideas that were either near or far apart in the text. The main hypothesis was that local bridging-inference processing is facilitated by the reader’s predisposition to access pertinent knowledge during comprehension Regression analyses provided support for this proposal and indicated that greater working-memory capacity and vocabulary knowledge promote inference processing. The following relationships between the predictors and inference processing were proposed: Knowledge access promotes the co-occurrence in working memory of the text ideas and knowledge needed to compute the bridge. Working-memory capacity enhances the likelihood that needed antecedent ideas will be available to the bridging processes. Vocabulary knowledge may promote inference processing because-unfamiliar word meanings place more demands on working-memory resources than do familiar meanings.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., &Goetz, E. T. (1976, July).Frameworks for comprehending discourse (Tech. Rep. No. 12). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Laboratory for Cognitive Studies in Education.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory (Oxford Psychology Series Vol. 11). Oxford: Clarendon.
Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.
Baddeley, A. D., Logie, R., Nimmo-Smith, I., &Brereton, N. (1985). Components of fluent reading.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 119–131.
Black, J. B., &Bern, H. (1981). Causal inference and memory for events in narratives.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 267–275.
Black, J. B., &Bower, G. H. (1980). Story understanding as problem solving.Poetics,9, 223–250.
Bloom, C. P., Fletcher, C. R., van den Broek, P., Reitz, L., &Shapiro, B. P. (1990). An on-line assessment of causal reasoning during comprehension.Memory & Cognition,18, 65–71.
Brooks, L. R. (1968). Spatial and verbal components of the act of recall.Canadian Journal of Psychology,22, 349–367.
Brown, J. I., Bennett, J. M., &Hanna, G. (1981).Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Chicago: Riverside.
Carpenter, P. A., &Just, M. A. (1989). The role of working memory in language comprehension. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.),Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 31–68). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 450–466.
Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 561–583.
Daneman, M., &Tardif, T. (1987). Working memory and reading skill re-examined. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and Performance XII. London: Erlbaum.
Dixon, P., LeFevre, J., &Twilley, L. C. (1988). Word knowledge and working memory as predictors of reading skill.Journal of Educational Psychology,80, 465–472.
Fletcher, C. R., &Bloom, C. P. (1988). Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narratives.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 235–244.
Fletcher, C. R., Hummel, J. E., &Marsolek, C. J. (1990). Causality and the allocation of attention during comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 233–240.
Haviland, S. E., &Clark, H. H. (1974). What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 512–521.
Hayes-Roth, B., &Thorndyke, P. W. (1979). Integration of knowledge from text.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 91–108.
Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1978). Inference processes during reading: Reflections from eye fixations. In J. Senders & R. Monty (Eds.),Eye movements and the higher psychological functions (pp. 195–207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory.Psychological Review,99, 122–149.
Keenan, J. M., Baillet, S. D., &Brown, P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 115–126.
Kintsch, W., &Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychological Review,85, 363–394.
Lesgold, A. M., Roth, S. F., &Curtis, M. E. (1979). Foregrounding effects in discourse comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 291–308.
Mandler, J. M., & Murachver, T. (1985, November).Script activation and lexical processing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston.
Masson, M. E. J., &Miller, J. A. (1983). Working memory and individual differences in comprehension and memory of text.Journal of Educational Psychology,75, 314–318.
Palmer, J., MacLeod, C. M., Hunt, E., &Davidson, J. E. (1985). Information processing correlates of reading.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 59–88.
Perfetti, C. A., &Lesgold, A. M. (1977). Discourse comprehension and sources of individual differences. In M. Just & P. Carpenter (Eds.),Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 141–183). New York: Wiley.
Post, T. A., Greene, T., & Bruder, G. (1982, November).“On-line” text processing in high- and low-knowledge individuals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis.
Potts, G. R., Keenan, J. M., &Golding, J. M. (1988). Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 399–415.
Potts, G. R., Keller, R. A., &Rooley, C. J. (1981). Factors affecting the use of world knowledge to complete a linear ordering.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,7, 254–268.
Potts, G. R., &Peterson, S. B. (1985). Incorporation versus compartmentalization in memory for discourse.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 107–118.
Reder, L. M. (1982). Plausibility judgments versus fact retrieval: Alternative strategies for sentence verification.Psychological Review,89, 250–280.
Reder, L. M. (1987). Strategy-selection in question answering.Cognitive Psychology,19, 90–134.
Singer, M. (1979). Processes of inference in sentence encoding.Memory & Cognition,7, 192–200.
Singer, M. (1980). The role of case-filling inferences in the coherence of brief passages.Discourse Processes,3, 185–201.
Singer, M., &Ferreira, F. (1983). Inferring consequences in story comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 437–448.
Singer, M., Halldorson, M., Lear, J. C., & Andrusiak, P. (in press). Validation of causal bridging inferences.Journal of Memory & Language.
Singer, M., Revlin, R., &Halldorson, M. (1990). Bridging-inference and enthymeme. In A. Graesser & G. Bower Eds.,The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 25, pp. 35–51). New York: Academic Press.
Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., &Voss, J. F. (1979). Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 275–290.
Trabasso, T., &Sperry, L. L. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events.Journal of Memory& Language,24, 595–611.
Turner, M. L., &Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory & Language,28, 127–154.
Vipond, D. (1980). Micro- and macroprocesses in text comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 276–296.
Whitney, P., &Waring, D. A. (1991). The role of knowledge in comprehension: A cognitive control perspective. In G. Simpson (Ed.),Understanding word and sentence (pp. 199–216). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singer, M., Andruslak, P., Reisdorf, P. et al. Individual differences in bridging inference processes. Memory & Cognition 20, 539–548 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199586
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199586