Abstract
Three rats were trained under a discrimination procedure in which responding was reinforced only following the repeated presentation of three bursts of white noise (S+). S− consisted of presentations of either two or four bursts of noise. All animals responded significantly more in the presence of S+ and, in two cases, showed lower response rates to both “2” and “4” stimuli. Responding by the third animal revealed differentiation between S+ and the stimulus “2,” but no reliable suppression to stimulus “4.” The present instances of discriminative control by the stimulus “3” replicate Fernandes and Church’s (1982) demonstration of control by sequential auditory stimuli in the rat. Moreover, because the present procedure involves adjacent S− values both greater as well as less than S+, these results extend our knowledge of the rat’s abilities with sequential auditory stimuli: Rats are capable of making intermediate numerical discriminations based upon something other than a simple many-versus-few dichotomy.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Church, R. M., &Meck, W. H. (1984). The numerical attribute of stimuli. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Davis, H. (1984). Discrimination of the number three by a raccoon (Procyon lotor).Animal Learning & Behavior,12, 409–413.
Davis, H., Albert, M., &Barron, R. W. (1985). Detection of number or numerousness by human infants.Science,228, 1222.
Davis, H., &Memmott, J. (1982). Counting behavior in animals: A critical evaluation.Psychological Bulletin,92, 547–571.
Davis, H., &Memmott, J. (1983). Autocontingencies: Rats count to three to predict safety from shock.Animal Learning & Behavior,11, 95–100.
Fernandes, D. M., &Church, R. (1982). Discrimination of the number of sequential events by rats.Animal Learning & Behavior,10, 171–176.
Gelman, R., &Gallistel, C. R. (1978).The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hicks, L. H. (1956). An analysis of number-concept formation in the rhesus monkey.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,49, 212–218.
Hulse, S. H., Fowler, H., &Honig, W. K. (1978).Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., &Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number.American Journal of Psychology,62, 498–525.
Koehler, O. (1950). The ability of birds to “count.”Bulletin of Animal Behaviour,9, 41–45.
Mandler, G., &Shebo, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,111, 1–22.
Piaget, J. (1952).The child’s conception of number. London: Rout-ledge & Kegan Paul.
Roitblat, H. L., Bever, T. G., &Terrace, H. S. (Eds.) (1984).Animal cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Seibt, U. (1982). Zahlbegriff und Zahlverhalten bei Tieren. Neue Versuche und Deutungen.Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie,60, 325–341.
Stevens, S. S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement, and psychophysics. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.),Handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley.
Thomas, R. K., Fowlkes, D., &Vickery, J. D. (1980). Conceptual numerousness judgments of squirrel monkeys.American Journal of Psychology,93, 247–257.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by Grant A06973 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, H., Albert, M. Numerical discrimination by rats using sequential auditory stimuli. Animal Learning & Behavior 14, 57–59 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200037
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200037