Abstract
An influential study by Rips (1989) provides the strongest evidence available that categorization cannot be reduced to similarity. In Rips’s study, subjects were presented asparse description of an object that mentioned only a value on a single dimension (e.g., “an object 3 inches in diameter”), followed by two categories (e.g., PIZZA and QUARTER), where one allowed more variability on the relevant dimension than did the other (the diameter of pizzas is more variable than that of quarters). Subjects judged the described object to be more likely to be a member of the variable category (PIZZA), but more similar to the nonvariable category (QUARTER). This dissociation between categorization and similarity strongly implies that categorization was not based on similarity. In our first experiment, we used sparse descriptions like Rips’s, as well asrich descriptions that contained features characteristic of the nonvariable category. We found that categorization trackedsimilarity with both kinds of descriptions. In a second experiment, we modified our procedure to be more like that of Rips’s by requiring subjects to think aloud while making their decisions. Now, like Rips, we found a dissociation between similarity and categorization with sparse items; with rich descriptions, categorization again tracked similarity. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that categorization can be done in two ways, by similarity and byrule. An exclusive reliance on rule-based categorization seems to occur only when the description of the to-be-categorized object does not contain any features characteristic of any relevant category.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References Allen, S. W., & Brooks, L. R. (1991). Specializing the operation of an explicit rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 3-19.
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., &Austin, G. A. (1956).A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.
Carey, S. (1985).Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Estes, W. K. (1986). Array models for category learning.Cognitive Psychology,18, 500–549.
Keil, F. C. (1986). The acquisition of natural kind and artifact forms. In W. Demopoulos & A. Marras (Eds.),Language learning and concept acquisition (pp. 135–153). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Keil, F. C. (1989).Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Malt, B. C. (in press). Water is not H2O.Cognitive Psychology.
Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure.American Psychologist,44, 1469–1481.
Murphy, G. L., &Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence.Psychological Review,92, 289–316.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 39–57.
Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language.Science,253, 530–535.
Rips, L. J. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.),Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 21–59). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, E. E., Langston, C., &Nisbett, R. E. (1992). The case for rules in reasoning.Cognitive Science,16, 1–40.
Smith, E. E., &Medin, D. L. (1981).Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., &Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions.Psychological Review,81, 214–241.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Air Force Contract No. AFOSR-92-0265 to E.E.S., and by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada postdoctoral fellowship to S.A.S.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, E.E., Sloman, S.A. Similarity- versus rule-based categorization. Mem Cogn 22, 377–386 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200864
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200864