Abstract
Deontic reasoning is reasoning about what one may, ought, or ought not do in a given set of circumstances. Virtually all of our social institutions and child-rearing practices presume the capacity to reason about deontic concepts, such as what is permitted, obligated, or prohibited. Despite this, very little is known about the development of deontic reasoning. Two experiments were conducted that contrasted children’s reasoning performance on deontic and indicative reasoning tasks (i.e., the reduced array selection version of the Wason card selection task). Like adults, children as young as 3 years of age were found to adopt a violation-detecting strategy more often when reasoning about the deontic case than when reasoning about the indicative case. These results indicate that violation detection emerges as an effective deontic reasoning very early in human development.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baillargeon, R. (1987). Object permanence in 31/ 2- and 41/ 2-monthold infants.Developmental Psychology,23, 655–664.
Baillargeon, R. (1994). How do infants learn about the physical world?Current Directions in Psychological Science,3, 133–140.
Bertenthal, B. I. (1984). Infant sensitivity to figural coherence in biomechanical motions.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,37, 213–230.
Bertenthal, B. I. (1985). The development of sensitivity to biomechanical motions.Child Development,56, 531–543.
Campos, J. J., &Stenberg, C. (1981). Perception, appraisal, and emotion: The onset of social referencing. In M. Lewis & L. Rosenblum (Eds.),Infant social cognition: Empirical and theoretical considerations (pp. 273–314). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carey, S. (1985).Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cheney, D. L., &Seyfarth, R. M. (1990).How monkeys see the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cheng, P. W., &Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas.Cognitive Psychology,17, 391–416.
Cheng, P. W., &Holyoak, K. J. (1989). On the natural selection of reasoning theories.Cognition,33, 285–313.
Cheng, P. W., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., &Oliver, L. M. (1986). Pragmatic vs syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning.Cognitive Psychology,18, 293–328.
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., &Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices.Cognitive Science,6, 121–152.
Clutton-Brock, T. H., &Harvey, P. H. (1976). Evolutionary rules and primate societies. In P. P. G. Bateson & R. A. Hinde (Eds.),Growing points in ethology (pp. 195–238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task.Cognition,31, 187–276.
Cosmides, L., &Tooby, J. (1989). Evolutionary psychology and the generation culture: Part II. Case study: A computational theory of social exchange.Ethology & Sociobiology,10, 51–97.
Cosmides, L., &Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.),The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163–228). New York: Oxford University Press.
Cosmides, L., &Tooby, J. (1994). Beyond intuition and instinct blindness: Toward an evolutionarily rigorous cognitive science.Cognition,50, 41–77. or]Cummins, D. D. (in press). Evidence for the innateness of deontic reasoning.Mind & Language.
de Waal, F. B. M. (1982).Chimpanzee politics. New York: Harper & Row.
Dunn, J. (1988).The beginnings of social understanding. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Evans, J. St. B. (1989).Bias in human reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gigerenzer, G., &Hug, K. (1992). Domain-specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating, and perspective change.Cognition,43, 127–171.
Girotto, V., Light, P., &Colbourn, C. J. (1988). Pragmatic schemas and conditional reasoning in children.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 469–482.
Griggs, R. A., &Cox, J. R. (1983). The effects of problem content and negation on Wason’s selection task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35A, 519–533.
Hilpinen, R. (1971).Deontic logic: Introductory and systematic readings. Boston: Reidel/Kluwer.
Hilpinen, R. (1981).New studies in deontic logic: Norms, actions, and the foundations of ethics. Boston: Reidel/Kluwer.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Wason, P. C. (1970). Insight into a logical relation.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,22, 49–61.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., &Tversky, A. (1982).Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keil, F. C. (1986). The acquisition of natural kind and artifact terms. In W. Demopoulos & A. Marras (Eds.),Language learning and concept acquisition: Foundational issues (pp. 133–153). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Komatsu, L. K., &Galotti, K. M. (1986). Children’s reasoning about social, physical, and logical regularities: A look at two worlds.Child Development,57, 413–420.
Leekam, S. R. (1992). Believing and deceiving: Steps to becoming a good liar. In S. J. Ceci, M. DeSimone Leichtman, & M. E. Putnick (Eds.),Cognitive and social factors in early deception (pp. 47–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Leslie, A. M. (1984). Spatiotemporal continuity and the perception of causality in infants.Perception,13, 287–305.
Leslie, A. M. (1994). ToMM, ToBY, and agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In L. A. Hirshfel & S. A. Gelman (Eds.),Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leslie, A. M., &Keeble, S. (1987). Do six-month-old infants perceive causality?Cognition,25, 265–288.
Leslie, A. M., &Roth, D. (1993). What autism teaches us about misrepresentation. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.),Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism (pp. 83–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Light, P., Blaye, A., Gilly, M., &Girotto, V. (1989). Pragmatic schemas and logical relations in 6- to 8-year-old children.Cognitive Development,4, 49–64.
Light, P., Girotto, V., &Legrenzi, P. (1990). Children’s reasoning on conditional promises and permissions.Cognitive Development,5, 369–383.
Manktelow, K. I., &Over, D. E. (1990). Deontic thought and the selection task. In K. J. Gilhooly, M. T. Keane, R. H. Logie, and G. Erdos (Eds.),Lines of thinking (Vol. 1, pp. 153–164). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Manktelow, K. I., &Over, D. E. (1991). Social roles and utilities in reasoning with deontic conditionals.Cognition,39, 85–105.
Manktelow, K. I., &Over, D. E. (1995). Deontic reasoning. In S. E. Newstead & J. St. B. Evans (Eds.),Perspectives on thinking and reasoning (pp. 91–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Miller, J. (1986). Early cross-cultural commonalities in social explanation.Developmental Psychology,22, 514–520.
Miller, J., &Bersoff, D. M. (1988). When do American children and adults reason in social conventional terms?Developmental Psychology,24, 366–375.
Oaksford, M., &Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection.Psychological Review,101, 608–631.
Overton, W., Ward, S., Noveck, I., Black, J., &O’Brien, D. (1987). Form and content in the development of deductive reasoning.Developmental Psychology,23, 22–30.
Popper, K. (1959).The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Sodian, B., Zaitchik, D., &Carey, S. (1991). Young children’s differentiation of hypothetical beliefs from evidence.Child Development,62, 753–766.
Spelke, E. (1994). Initial knowledge: Six suggestions.Cognition,50, 431–445.
Starkey, P., Spelke, E. S., &Gelman, R. (1990). Numerical abstraction by human infants.Cognition,36, 97–127.
Turiel, E. (1983).The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turiel, E. (1989). Domain-specific social judgments and domain ambiguities.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,35, 89–114.
Vandell, L., &Wilson, K. S. (1987). Infant’s interactions with mother, sibling, and peer: Contrasts and relations between interaction systems.Child Development,58, 176–186.
Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,20, 273–281.
Wason, P. C., &Johnson-Laird, J. L. (1972).Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. London: Batsford.
Wellman, H. M., &Bartsch, K. (1988). Young children’s reasoning about beliefs.Cognition,30, 239–277.
Wynn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants.Nature,358, 749–750.
Zaitchik, D. (1991). Is only seeing really believing? Sources of true beliefs in the false belief task.Cognitive Development,6, 91–103.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cummins, D.D. Evidence of deontic reasoning in 3- and 4-year-old children. Mem Cogn 24, 823–829 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201105
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201105