Abstract
In two experiments, we investigated the idea that attention moves through visual space in an analog fashion. The spatial distribution of attention was determined by presenting a spatially informative cue and comparing reaction times to targets at cued and uncued locations as a function of the interval from cue onset to target onset (SOA). Facilitation and inhibition were measured by reference to a neutral condition in which the cue provided no spatial information. In the first experiment, we used a central cue (an arrow), and in the second experiment, we used a peripheral cue (a 50-msec flash). With central cue, the facilitatory effects of the cuing were initially equal for all locations on the indicated side of the display, and then decreased for all locations except the one that had been specifically cued. These results are interpreted as being more consistent with “focusing” of an initially broad “beam” of attention than with “movement” of a narrow beam from fixation to the cued location. With peripheral cues, strong facilitation specific to the cued location was manifest as early as 50 msec after cue onset, but this effect decreased with increasing SOA. Inhibition for uncued locations increased with increasing SOA at a rate that generally reflected their distance from the cued location. Taken together, these results reveal important differences between peripheral and central cues in the generation of attentional selectivity, not just in the time-course of events, but also in the nature of the processes involved.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Some charactenstics of selective attention in visual perception determined by vocal reaction time.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 169–171.
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 155–160.
Eriksen, C. W., &Murphy, T. D. (1987). Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: A critical look at the evidence.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 299–305.
Eriksen, C. W., &Yeh, Y.-Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 583–597.
Findlay, J. M. (1974). A simple apparatus for recording microsaccades during fixation.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,26, 167–170.
Hughes, H. C., &Zimba, L. D. (1985). Spatial maps of directed visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 409–430.
Humphreys, G. W. (1981). On varying the span of visual attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 17–31.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance (Vol. 9, pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kirk, R. E. (1968).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Klein, R. (1980). Does oculomotor readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention? In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.),Attention and performance (Vol. 8, pp. 259–276). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kowler, E., &Steinman, R. M. (l979a). The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control: 1. Periodic target steps.Vision Research,19, 612–632.
Kowler, E., &Steinman, R. M. (l979b). The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control: 2. Single target displacements.Vision Research,19, 633–646.
Laberge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 371–379.
Maywr, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance (Vol. 11, pp. 189–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McLean, J. P., &Shulman, G. L. (1978). On the construction and maintenance of expectancies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,30, 441–454.
Müller, H. J., &Findlay, J. M. (1987). Sensitivity and criterion effects in the spatial cuing of visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 383–399.
Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (in press). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Murphy, T. D., &Eriksen, C. W. (1987). Temporal changes in the distribution of attention in the visual field in response to precues.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 576–586.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance (Vol. 10, pp. 531–555). Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Crippin, P. J., Cohen, A., & Rafal, R. (1986, November).Speed of covert orienting of attention and express saccades 1 Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
Posner, M. L, Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., &Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function.Cognuive Neuropsychology,2, 211–228.
Posner, M. L, Snyder, C. R. R., &Davidson, B. J. (1980) Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.
Remington, R., &Pierce, L. (1984). Moving attention: Evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 393–399.
Rizzolati, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, J., &Umiltà, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favour of a premotor theory of attention.Neuropsychologia,25, 31–40.
Rosenbaum, D. A., Inhoff, A. W., &Gordon, A. M. (1984). Choosing between movement sequences: A hierarchical editor model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 372–393.
Shepherd, M. (1984). EMDISP: A visual display system with digital and analogue sampling.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,16, 297–302.
Shepherd, M., Findlay, J. M., &Hockey, R. J. (1986). The relationship between eye movements and spatial attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,38, 475–491.
Shulman, G. L., Remington, R. W., &McLean, J. P. (1979). Moving attention through visual space.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 522–526.
Tsal, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field.Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 523–530.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The order of authors was decided by the toss of a coin: both authors contributed equally to this work, which was supported by Medical Research Council Grant G84/03193N and Postdoctoral Fellowship Mu773/1-1 from the Deutsche Forschtmgsgemeinschaft held by the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shepherd, M., Müller, H.J. Movement versus focusing of visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics 46, 146–154 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204974
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204974