Abstract
Many researchers have proposed that, for the purpose of recognition, human vision parses shapes into component parts. Precisely how is not yet known. The minima rule for silhouettes (Hoffman & Richards, 1984) defines boundary points at which to parse but does not tell how to use these points to cut silhouettes and, therefore, does not tell what the parts are. In this paper, we propose the short-cut rule, which states that, other things being equal, human vision prefers to use the shortest possible cuts to parse silhouettes. We motivate this rule, and the well-known Petter’s rule for modal completion, by the principle of transversality. We present five psychophysical experiments that test the short-cut rule, show that it successfully predicts part cuts that connect boundary points given by the minima rule, and show that it can also create new boundary points.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception.Psychological Review,61, 183–193.
Attneave, F. (1971, December). Multistability in perception.Scientific American,225, 63–71.
Baylis, G. C., &Driver, J. (1994). Parallel computation of symmetry but not repetition in single visual objects.Visual Cognition,1, 377–400.
Baylis, G. C., &Driver, J. (1995a). Obligatory edge assignment in vision: The role of figure and part segmentation in symmetry detection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 6, 1323–1342.
Baylis, G. C., &Driver, J. (1995b). One-sided edge assignment in vision: 1. Figure-ground segmentation and attention to objects.Current Directions in Psychological Science,4, 140–146.
Bennett, B. M., &Hoffman, D. D. (1987). Shape decompositions for visual shape recognition: The role of transversality. In W. A. Richards & S. Ullman (Eds.),Image understanding (pp. 215–256). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Beusmans, J., Hoffman, D. D., &Bennett, B. M. (1987). Description of solid shape and its inference from occluding contours.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,4, 1155–1167.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.Psychological Review,94, 115–147.
Biederman, I. (1990). Higher-level vision. In D. N. Osherson, S. M. Kosslyn, & J. M. Hollerbach (Eds.),Visual cognition and action: An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 2, pp. 41–72). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Biederman, I., &Cooper, E. E. (1991). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition.Cognitive Psychology,23, 393–419.
Biederman, I., Glass, A. L., &Stacy, E. W., Jr. (1973). Scanning for objects in real-world scenes.Journal of Experimental Psychology,97, 22–27.
Binford, T. O. (1971, December).Visual perception by computer. Paper presented at the IEEE Systems Science and Cybernetics Conference, Miami.
Blum, H., &Nagel, R. N. (1978). Shape description using weighted symmetric axis features.Pattern Recognition,10, 167–180.
Brady, M., &Asada, H. (1984). Smoothed local symmetries and their implementation.International Journal of Robotics Research,3,36–61.
Braunstein, M. L., Hoffman, D. D., &Saidpour, A. (1989). Parts of visual objects: An experimental test of the minima rule.Perception,18, 817–826.
Brooks, R. A. (1981). Symbolic reasoning among 3-D models and 2-D images.Artificial Intelligence,17, 205–244.
Bruce, V., &Humphreys, G. W. (1994). Recognizing objects and faces. In V Bruce & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Object and face recognition (pp. 141–180). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Dickinson, S. J., Pentland, A. P., &Rosenfeld, A. (1992). From volumes to views-an approach to 3-D object recognition.Computer Vision, Graphics, & Image Processing-Image Understanding,55, 130–154.
Driver, J., &Baylis, G. C. (1995). One-sided edge assignment in vision: 2. Part decomposition, shape description, and attention to objects.Current Directions in Psychological Science,4, 201–206.
Farah, M. J. (1996). Is face recognition ‘special’? Evidence from neuropsychology.Behavioral Brain Research,76, 181–189.
Freeman, W. T. (1994). The generic viewpoint assumption in a frame-work for visual perception.Nature,368, 542–545.
Guillemin, V., &Pollack, A. (1974).Differential topology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Guzman, A. (1971 ).Analysis of curved line drawings using context and global information (Machine Intelligence, 6). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Halmos, P. R. (1950).Measure theory. New York: Van Nostrand.
Hoffman, D. D. (1983a, December). The interpretation of visual illusions.Scientific American,249, 154–162.
Hoffman, D. D. (1983b).Representing shapes for visual recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Hoffman, D. D. (1998).Visual intelligence: How we create what we see. New York: Norton.
Hoffman, D. D., &Richards, W. A. (1984). Parts of recognition.Cognition,18, 65–96.
Hoffman, D. D., &Singh, M. (1997). Salience of visual parts.Cognition,63, 29–78.
Hulleman, J., te Winkel, W., & Boselie, F. (in press). Salience of concavities: Evidence from search asymmetries.Perception & Psychophysics.
Kanizsa, G. (1979).Organization in vision: Essays on gestaltperception. New York: Praeger.
Kellman, P. J., &Shipley, T. F. (1991) A theory of visual interpolation in object perception.Cognitive Psychology,23, 141–221.
Kendall, M. G., &Stuart, A. (1963).The advanced theory of statistics. New York: Hafner.
Kimia, B. B., Tannenbaum, A. R., &Zucker, S. W. (1991).Entropy scale-space. New York: Plenum.
Kimia, B. B., Tannenbaum, A. R., &Zucker, S. W. (1995). Shapes, shocks, and deformations: 1. The components of two-dimensional shape and the reaction-diffusion space.International Journal of Computer Vision,15, 189–224.
Leyton, M. (1992).Symmetry, causality, and mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lowe, D. G. (1985).Perceptual organization and visual recognition. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Mach, E. (1959).The analysis of sensation. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1885)
Marr, D. (1977). Analysis of occluding contour.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,197, 441–475.
Marr, D. (1982).Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
Marr, D., &Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of three-dimensional shapes.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,200, 269–294.
Palmer, S. E. (1977). Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation.Cognitive Psychology,9, 441–474.
Parent, P., &Zucker, S. W. (1989). Trace inference, curvature consistency and curve detection.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence,11, 823–839.
Pentland, A. P. (1986). Perceptual organization and the representation of natural form.Artificial Intelligence,28, 293–331.
Petter, G. (1956). Nuove ricerche sperimentali sulla totalizzazione percettiva.Rivista di Psicologia,50, 213–217.
Pinker, S. (1985). Visual cognition: An introduction. In S. Pinker (Ed.),Visual cognition (pp. 1–63). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Richards, W.A., Dawson, B., &Whittington, D. (1986). Encoding contour shape by curvature extrema.Journal of the Optical Society of America,4, 1168–1175.
Richards, W. A., &Hoffman, D. D. (1985). Codon constraints on closed 2D shapes.Computer Vision, Graphics, & Image Processing,31, 156–177.
Richards, W. A., Koenderink, J. J., &Hoffman, D. D. (1987). Inferring three-dimensional shapes from two-dimensional silhouettes.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,4, 1168–1175.
Roberts, L. G. (1965). Machine perception of three-dimensional solids. In J. T. Tippett et al. (Eds.),Optical and electrooptical information processing (pp. 211–277). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rom, H., &Medioni, G. (1993). Hierarchical decomposition and axial shape description.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence,11, 823–839.
Saidpour, A. (1996).The salience of part boundaries in object decomposition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
Saiki, J., &Hummel, J. E. (1998). Connectedness and the integration of parts with relations in shape perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 227–251.
Schyns, P. G., Goldstone, R. L., &Thibaut, J. P. (1998). The development of features in object concepts.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,21, 1–54.
Schyns, P. G., &Murphy, G. L. (1994). The ontogeny of part representation in object concepts. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 31, pp. 305–349). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Schyns, P. G., &Rodet, L. (1997). Categorization creates functional features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, & Cognition,23, 681–696.
Shipley, T. F., &Kellman, P. J. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects and illusory figures: Evidence for an identity hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 106–120.
Siddiqi, K., &Kimia, B. B. (1995). Parts of visual form: Computational aspects.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence,17, 239–251.
Siddiqi, K., Tresness, K. J., &Kimia, B. B. (1996). Parts of visual Form—Psychophysical aspects.Perception,25, 399–424.
Singh, M., &Hoffman, D. D. (1997). Constructing and representing visual objects.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,1, 98–102.
Singh, M., &Hoffman, D. D. (1998). Part boundaries alter the perception of transparency.Psychological Science,9, 370–378.
Singh, M., & Hoffman, D. D. (in press). Completing visual contours: The relationship between relatability and minimizing inflections.Psychological Science.
Singh, M., Hoffman, D. D., & Albert, M. (in press). Contour completion and relative depth: Petter’s rule and support ratio.Psychological Science.
Singh, M., &Landau, B. (1998). Parts of visual shape as primitives for categorization.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,21, 36–37.
Stevens, K. A., &Brookes, A. (1988). The concave cusp as a determiner of figure-ground.Perception,17, 35–42.
Stoner, G. R., &Albright, T. D. (1993). Image segmentation cues in motion processing: Implications for modularity in vision.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,5, 129–149.
Tanaka, J. W., &Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,46, 225–245.
Terzopoulos, D., Witkin, A., &Kass, M. (1987). Symmetry-seeking models and 3-D object reconstruction.International Journal of Computer Vision,1, 211–221.
Todd, J. T., Koenderink, J. J., Van Doorn, A. J., &Kappers, A. M. L. (1996). Effects of changing viewing conditions on the perceived structure of smoothly curving surfaces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 695–706.
Tommasi, L., Bressan, P., &Vallortigara, G. (1995). Solving occlusion indeterminacy in chromatically homogeneous patterns.Perception,24, 391–403.
Turk, M., &Pentland, A. (1991). Eigenfaces for recognition.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,3, 71–86.
Tversky, B., &Hemenway, K. (1984). Objects, parts, and categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 169–193.
Waltz, D. (1975). Generating semantic descriptions from drawings of scenes with shadows. In P. Winston (Ed.),The psychology of computer vision (pp. 19–91). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Winston, P. A. (1975). Learning structural descriptions from examples. In P. H. Winston (Ed.),The psychology of computer vision (pp. 157–209). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Witkin, A. P., &Tenenbaum, J. M. (1983). On the rule of structure in vision. In J. Beck, B. Hope, & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.),Human and machine vision (pp. 481–543). New York: Academic Press.
Wolfe, J. M., &Bennett, S. C. (1997). Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of basic features.Vision Research,37, 25–43.
Yuille, A. L. (1991). Deformable templates for face recognition.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,3, 59–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant DIR-9014278.
—Accepted by previous editor, Myron L. Braunstein
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, M., Seyranian, G.D. & Hoffman, D.D. Parsing silhouettes: The short-cut rule. Perception & Psychophysics 61, 636–660 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205536
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205536