Abstract
Researchers have proposed that graphical efficacy may be determined, in part, by the nature of the perceptual interactions that exist between attributes used to create graphical displays. One extreme type of interaction isintegrality, in which two or more physical dimensions are represented as a single psychological dimension in the observer. An alternative type of interaction isconfigurality, in which a global emergent dimension is availableto the observer in addition to the component attributes. Thirteen stimulus sets, each composed of attributes commonly used in the design of graphs, were submitted to the performance-based diagnostics of integrality and configurality. Analyses suggest a continuum of configurality among the present stimulus sets, with little evidence for integral graphical attributes. The configural pattern of results was more common when two identical dimensions were paired (homogeneous stimuli) than when two different dimensions were paired (heterogeneous stimuli). However, there was no evidence that pairs of dimensions belonging to a single object (object integration) were any more configural than dimensions belonging to different objects. Object integration was, however, consistently related to inefficient performance in tasks requiring the filtering of one of two component dimensions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnett, B. J., &Wickens, C. D. (1988). Display proximity in multi-cue information integration: The benefit of boxes.Human Factors,30, 15–24.
Biederman, I., &Checkosky, S. F. (1970). Processing redundant information.Journal of Experimental Psychology,83, 486–490.
Carswell, C. M. (1988).Graphical information processing: The effect of proximity compatibility. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Carswell, C. M., &Wickens, C. D. (1987). Information integration and the object display: An interaction of task demands and display superiority.Ergonomics,30, 511–528.
Carswell, C. M., &Wickens, C. D. (1988). Comparative graphics: History and applications of perceptual integrality theory and the proximity comparability hypothesis (Technical Report ARL-88-2/AHEL-88-1). Savoy, IL: Aviation Research Lab, Institute of Aviation, University of Illinois.
Casey, E. J., &Wickens, C. D. (1986).Visual display representation of multidimensional systems (Tech. Rep. CPL-86-2/MDA9O3-83-K-0255). Champaign: Cognitive Psychophysiology Laboratory, University of Illinois.
Chambers, J. M., Cleveland, W. S., Kleiner, B., &Tukey, P. A. (1983).Graphical methods for data analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Cheng, P. W., &Pachella, R. G. (1984). A psychophysical approach to dimensional separability.Cognitive Psychology,16, 279–304.
Cleveland, W. S. (1985).The elements of graphing data. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth.
Cole, W. G. (1986). Medical cognitive graphics.Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery, SIGCHI ′86.
Coury, B. G., &Purcell, J. (1988). The bargraph as a configural and separable display.Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd annual meeting (pp. 1361–1365). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
Desanctis, G. (1984). Computer graphics as decision aids: Directions for research.Decision Sciences,15, 463–487.
Felfoldy, G. L. (1974). Repetition effects in choice reaction time to multidimensional stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 453–459.
Garner, W. R. (1970). The stimulus in information processing.American Psychologist,25, 350–358.
Garner, W. R. (1974).The processing of information and structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Garner, W. R. (1976). Interaction of stimulus dimensions in concept and choice processes.Cognitive Psychology,8, 98–123.
Garner, W. R. (1978). Selective attention to attributes and to stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,107, 287–308.
Garner, W. R. (1981). The analysis of unanalyzed perceptions. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 119–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Garner, W. R., &Felfoldy, G. L. (1970). Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing.Cognitive Psychology,1, 225–241.
Goettl, B. P., Kramer, A. F., &Wickens, C. D. (1986). Display format and the perception of numerical data.Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting (pp. 450–454). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
Goldsmith, T., &Schvaneveldt, R. (1984). Facilitating multi-cue judgments with integral information displays. In J. Thomas & M. Schneider (Eds.),Human factors in computer systems (pp. 243–270). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Hutchingson, R. D. (1981).New horizons for human factors in design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Jacob, R. J. K., Egeth, H. E., &Bevan, W. (1976). The face as a data display.Human Factors,18, 189–200.
Jones, P., &Wickens, C. D. (1986).The display of multivariate information: The effects of auto- and cross-correlation, display formal, and reliability (Tech. Rep. CPL-86-5). Champaign: Cognitive Psychophysiology Lab, University of Illinois.
Lockhead, G. R., &King, M. C. (1977). Classifying integral stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 436–443.
Mccormick, E. J., &Sanders, M. S. (1982).Human factors in engineering and design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Miller, J., &Lopes, A. (1988). Testing race models by estimating the smaller of two true mean or true median reaction times: An analysis of estimation bias.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 513–524.
Munsell book of color (1976). Baltimore: Koll Morgan.
Pachella, R. G., Somers, P., &Hardzinski, M. (1981). A psychophysical approach to dimensional integrality. In D. Getty & J. Howard (Eds.),Visual and auditory pattern recognition (pp. 107–126). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Petersen, R. J., Banks, W. W., &Gertman, D. I. (1981). Performance-based evaluation of graphic displays for nuclear power plant control rooms.Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 182–189). Gaithersburg, MD: Association for Computing Machinery.
Pomerantz, J. R. (1981). Perceptual organization in information processing. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 141–180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pomerantz, J. R., &Garner, W. R. (1973). Stimulus configuration in selective attention tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 565–569.
Pomerantz, J. R., &Pristach, E. A. (1989). Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 635–649.
Pomerantz, J. R., Pristach, E. A., &Carson, C. E. (1989). Attention and object perception. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.),Object perception: Structure and process (pp. 53–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pomerantz, J. R., Sager, L. C., &Stoever, R. J. (1977). Perception of wholes and of their component parts: Some configural superiority effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 422–435.
Pomerantz, J. R., &Schwaitzberg, S. D. (1975). Grouping by proximity: Selective attention measures.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 355–361.
Sanderson, P. M., Flach, J. M., Buttigieg, M. A., &Casey, E. J. (1989). Object displays do not always support better integrated task performance.Human Factors,31, 183–198.
Siegel, J. H., Goldwyn, R. M., &Friedman, H. P. (1971). Pattern and process in the evolution of human septic shock.Surgery,70, 232–243.
Smith, L. B., &Kilroy, M. C. (1979). A continuum of dimensional separability.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 285–291.
Stokes, A. E., &Wickens, C. D. (1988). Aviation displays. In E. L. Wiener & D. C. Nagel (Eds.),Human factors in aviation (pp. 387–430). New York: Academic Press.
Treisman, A., &Paterson, R. (1984). Emergent features, attention, and object perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 12–31.
Tufte, E. R. (1983).The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
Wainer, H., &Thissen, D. (1981). Graphical data analysis.Annual Review of Psychology,32, 191–241.
Weintraub, D. J. (1971). Rectangle discriminability: Perceptual relativity and the law of pragnanz.Journal of Experimental Psychology,88, 1–11.
Wickens, C. D. (1986).The object display: Principles and a review of experimental findings (Tech. Rep. CPL-86-6). Champaign: Cognitive Psychophysiology Lab, University of Illinois.
Wickens, C. D., &Andre, A. D. (1988). Proximity compatibility and the object display.Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 1335–1339). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
Woods, D., Wise, J., &Hanes, L. (1981). An evaluation of nuclear power plant safety parameter display systems.Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (pp. 110–114). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
For their programming and technical assistance, we thank Kellie Keifer and Roger Marsh.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carswell, C.M., Wickens, C.D. The perceptual interaction of graphical attributes: Configurality, stimulus homogeneity, and object integration. Perception & Psychophysics 47, 157–168 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205980
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205980