Abstract
Odors were identified by 141 persons before and after a nonolfactory cue was presented. The context cue was a color concept, either relevant or irrelevant to the odor identity. The color concept was presented as a word or as the color itself. The familiarity of each odor was judged prior to each identification. The relevant color concepts facilitated identification to a slight, but reliable, degree. Irrelevant color concepts evoked an increase in wrong identifications. Relevant cues increased correct second identifications and increased them to an even greater degree if the odors were judged to be highly familiar.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cain, W. S. To know with the nose: Keys to odor identification.Science, 1979,203, 467–470.
Davis, R. G. Acquisition of verbal associations to olfactory stimuli of varying familiarity and to abstract visual stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975,104, 134–142.
Davis, R. G. Acquisition and retention of verbal associations to olfactory and abstract visual stimuli of varying similarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 37–51.
Davis, R. G. The microencapsulation of odorants as a method of stimulus control and delivery in studies of odor quality per-ception.Chemical Senses and Flavour, 1979,4, 191–206.
Desor, J. A., &Beauchamp, G. K. The human capacity to transmit olfactory information.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 551–556.
Eich, J. E. Fragrances as cues for remembering words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978,17, 103–111.
Engen, T., &Pfaffman, C. Absolute judgments of odor quality.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960,59, 214–219.
Engen, T., &Ross, B. Long-term memory of odors with and without verbal descriptions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,100, 221–227.
Friedman, M. A comparison of alternative tests of significance for the problem of in rankings.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1940,11, 86–92.
Lawless, H., &Engen, T. Associations to odors: Interference, mnemonics, and verbal labeling.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 52–59.
Matson, G. W. Microcapsules and process of making (U.S. Patent #3 516 941). Washington, D.C: U.S. Patent Office, 1970.
Mcnemar, Q.Psychological statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1955.
Mozell, M..Smith, B., Smith, P., Sullivan, R., &Swender, P. Nasal chemoreception in flavor identification.Archives of Otolaryngology, 1969,90, 367–373.
Tanyolac, N.Theories of odor and odor measurement. Istanbul: Robert College, 1968.
Wire, E. L. &Church, J. D. Monte Carlo studies of Levy’s “Nonparametric large sample pairwise comparisons”.Psychological Bulletin, 1980,88, 607–613.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by the Veterans Administration. Reprint requests should be sent to Richard G. Davis
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, R.G. The role of nonolfactory context cues in odor identification. Perception & Psychophysics 30, 83–89 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206139
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206139