Abstract
In five experiments, we investigated the primacy effect in memory for repetitions (DiGirolamo & Hintzman, 1997), the finding that when participants are shown a study list that contains two very similar versions of the same stimulus, memory is biased in the direction of the version that was presented first. In the experiments reported, the generality of the effect was examined by manipulating the orientation and features of the repeated stimuli. The results confirmed that the effect is reliable when stimulus changes affect the accidental properties of the stimulus (properties of the stimulus that give information about distance or angle but do little to aid in identification). However, the effect was not found when changes were made to other aspects of the stimulus. The results suggest that the primacy effect in memory for repetitions is not robust across all stimulus changes and converge with previous findings that have demonstrated that such properties of stimuli as orientation and size are represented differently in memory than are other stimulus characteristics.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Althoff, R. R., &Cohen, N. J. (1999). Eye-movement-based memory effect: A reprocessing effect in face perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 997–1010.
Bartlett, J. C., Gernsbacher, M. A., &Till, R. E. (1987). Remembering left-right orientation of pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 27–35.
Biederman, I., &Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depthrotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1162–1182.
Cooper, L. A., Schacter, D. L., Ballesteros, S., &Moore, C. (1992). Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of size and reflection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 43–57.
Crowder, R. G. (1976).Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
DiGirolamo, G. J., &Hintzman, D. L. (1997). First impressions are lasting impressions: A primacy effect in memory for repetitions.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 121–124.
Dunlosky, J., &Thiede, K. W. (1998). What makes people study more? An evaluation of the factors that affect self-paced study.Acta Psychologica,98, 37–56.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1964).Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1885)
Ellis, R., Allport, D. A., Humphreys, G. W., &Collis, J. (1989). Varieties of object constancy.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41A, 775–796.
Greene, R. L. (1992).Human memory: Paradigms and paradoxes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hintzman, D. L., &Curran, T. (1995). When encoding fails: Instructions, feedback, and registration without learning.Memory & Cognition, 23, 213–226.
Hintzman, D. L., Curran, T., &Oppy, B. (1992). Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: Registration without learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 667–680.
Kanwisher, N., Yin, C., &Wojciulik, E. (1999). Repetition blindness for pictures. In V. Coltheart (Ed.),Fleeting memories: The cognition of brief visual stimuli (pp. 119–150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Klein, R. (1982). Patterns of perceived similarity cannot be generalized from long to short exposure durations and vice versa.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 15–18.
Levin, D. T., Simons, D. J., Angelone, B. L., &Chabris, C. F. (2002). Memory for centrally attended changing objects in an incidental realworld change detection paradigm.British Journal of Psychology,93, 289–302.
Madigan, S., &Rouse, M. (1974). Picture memory and visual generation processes.American Journal of Psychology,87, 151–158.
Nickerson, R. S., &Adams, M. J. (1979). Long term memory for a common object.Cognitive Psychology,11, 287–307.
O’Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A., &Clark, J. J. (1999). Change blindness as a result of “mudsplashes.”Nature,398, 34.
Rao, K. V., &Proctor, R. W. (1984). Study-phase processing and the word frequency effect in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 386–394.
Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., &Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes.Psychological Science,8, 368–373.
Rock, I. (1974). The perception of disoriented figures.Scientific American,230, 78–85.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Srinivas, K. (1993). Specificity of operations in perceptual priming. In P. Graf & M. E. J. Masson (Eds.),Implicit memory: New directions in cognition, development, and neuropsychology (pp. 17–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rugg, M. D., Soardi, M., &Doyle, M. C. (1995). Modulation of event-related potentials by the repetition of drawings of novel objects.Cognitive Brain Research,3, 17–24.
Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., &Delaney, S. M. (1990). Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 5–24.
Shaughnessy, J. J., Zimmerman, J., &Underwood, B. J. (1972). Further evidence for the MD-DP effect in free recall learning.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 1–12.
Shore, D. I., &Klein, R. M. (2000). The effects of scene inversion on change blindness.Journal of General Psychology,127, 27–43.
Simons, D. J. (2000). Current approaches to change blindness.Visual Cognition,7, 1–15.
Simons, D. J., &Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 644–649.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.
Srinivas, K. (1995). Representation of rotated objects in explicit and implicit memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1019–1036.
Srinivas, K. (1996). Size and reflection effects in priming: A test of transfer-appropriate processing.Memory & Cognition,24, 441–452.
Tulving, E., Markowitsch, H. J., Kapur, S., Habib, R., &Houle, S. (1994). Novelty encoding networks in the human brain: Positron emission tomography data.NeuroReport,5, 2525–2528.
Zimmerman, J. (1975). Free recall after self-paced study: A test of the attention explanation of the spacing effect.American Journal of Psychology, 88, 277–291.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant 1-R03-MH66156-01 from NIMH.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, J.K., Westerman, D.L. & Lloyd, M.E. Are first impressions lasting impressions? An exploration of the generality of the primacy effect in memory for repetitions. Memory & Cognition 32, 1305–1315 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206321
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206321