Abstract
The ability of subjects to attend to vibrotactile patterns presented to two fingers was explored in several experiments. The patterns were generated by two 6 column × 24 row tactile arrays. In one set of measurements, the arrays were placed in contact with the subjects’ left index and middle fingers. Both discrimination and identification tasks suggested that there was an attentional deficit in processing patterns presented simultaneously to these two fingers. A pattern presented to either the middle or index finger was identified both more accurately and more rapidly than was the same pattern divided in half and presented to two fingers. Patterns were also presented to two fingers on opposite hands, and performance measures were taken on pattern-identification tasks, on discrimination tasks, and on tasks that required subjects to combine pattern information from two fingers. All three measures showed performance to improve when the patterns were presented to two fingers on opposite hands relative to when they were presented to two fingers on the same hand. The results are interpreted to suggest, first, that subjects can process patterns simultaneously presented to two fingers on the same hand, but with some deficit due to attentional mechanisms, and second, that information from patterns presented to two fingers is processed differently depending on whether the two fingers are on the same or on different hands. There is much less of an attentional deficit in processing patterns presented simultaneously to two fingers on opposite hands.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bliss, J. C., Katcher, M. H. Rogers, C. H., &Shepard, R. P., (1970). Optical-to-tactile image conversion for the blind.IEEE Transtions on Man-Machine Systems.MMS-11. 58–64.
Cholewiak, R. W., &Craig, J. C. (1984). Vibrotactile pattern recognition and dicrimination at several body sites.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 503–514.
Craig, J. C. (1968). Vibrotactile spatial summation.Perception & Psychophystcs,4, 351–354.
Craig, J. C. (1978). Vibrotactile pattern recognition and masking. In G. Gordon (Ed.),Active touch-the mechanism of recognition of objects by manipulation: A multi-disciplinary approach. Oxford Pergamon Press.
Craig, J. C. (1980). Modes of vibrotactile pattern generation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 151–166.
Craig, J. C. (1981). Tactile letter recognition: Pattern duration and modes of pattern generation.Perception & Psychophysics,30, 540–546.
Craig, J. C. (1983). The role of onset in perception of sequentially presented vlbrotactile patterns.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 421–432.
Craig, J. C. (1985). Tactile pattern perception and its perturbations.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,77, 238–246.
Craig, J. C., Green, B. G., &Rhodes, R. P. (1985). Ipsilateral vs. bilateral placement of a tactile vocoder display.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,77, 1266–1268.
Franzen, O., Markowitz, J., &Swets, J A. (1970). Spatially-limited attention to vibrotactile stimulation.Perception & Psychophysics,7, 193–196.
Geldard, F. A., &Sherrick, C. E. (1965). Multiple cutaneous stimulation. The discrimination of vibratory patterns.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,37, 797–801.
Gescheider, G. A., Herman, D. D., &Phillips, J. N. (1970). Criterion shifts in the measurement of tactile masking.Perception & Psychophysics,8, 433–436.
Gilson, R. D. (1968). Some factors affecting the spatial discrimination of vibrotactile patterns.Perception & Psychophysics,3, 131–136.
Gilson, R. D. (1974). Vibratory masking. In F. A. Geldard (Ed.),Cutaneous communication systems and devices. Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society.
Green, B. G., Craig, J. C., &Pisoni, D. B. (1983). Vibrotactile communication of information about consonants: Vowels mask consonants.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 507–515.
Green, B. G., Craig, J. C., Wilson, A. M., Pisoni, D. B., &Rhodes, R. P. (1983). Vibrotactile identification of vowel spectra.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,73, 1766–1778.
Hill, J. W. (1974). Limited field of view in reading lettershapes with the fingers. In F. A. Geldard (Ed.),Cutaneous communication systems and devices. Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society.
Kahneman, D. K. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lappin, J. S., &Foulke, E. (1973). Expanding the tactual field of view.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 237–241.
McFadden, D. (1970). Three computational versions of proportion correct for use in forced-choice experiments.Perception & Psychophysics,8, 336–342.
Reed, C. M., Durlach, N. I., &Braida, L. D. (1982).Research on tactile communication of speech: A review (ASHA Monograph No, 20). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
Sherrick, C. E. (1964). Effects of double simultaneous stimulation of the skin.American Journal of Psychology,77, 42–53.
Shiffrin, R. M., Craig, J. C., &Cohen, E. (1973). On the degree of attention and capacity limitation in tactile processing.Perception & Psychophysics,13, 328–336.
Snyder, R. (1977). Vibrotactile masking: A comparison of psychophysical procedures.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 471–475.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health, NS-09783.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Craig, J.C. Attending to two fingers: Two hands are better than one. Perception & Psychophysics 38, 496–511 (1985). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207059
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207059