Abstract
Treatments that attenuate latent inhibition (LI) were examined using conditioned suppression in rats. In Experiment 1, retarded conditioned responding was produced by nonreinforced exposure to the CS prior to the CS-US pairings used to assess retardation (i.e., conventional LI). In Experiment la, retarded conditioned responding was induced by preexposure to pairings of the CS and a weak US prior to retardation-test pairings of the CS with a strong US (i.e., Hall-Pearce [1979] LI). Both types of LI were attenuated by extensive exposure to the training context (i.e., context extinction) following the CS-US pairings of the retardation test. Experiment 2 examined the specificity of the attenuated LI effect observed in Experiment 1. After preexposure to two different CSs in two different contexts, each CS was paired with a US in its respective preexposure context. One of the two contexts was then extinguished. This attenuated LI to a greater degree for the CS that had been trained in the extinguished context. Experiment 3 differentiated the roles in LI of CS-context associations and context-US associations. Following preexposure to the CS in the training context, LI was reduced by further exposure to the CS outside the training context. This observation was interpreted as implicating the CS-context association as a factor in LI. Thus, the results of these experiments suggest that LI is a performance deficit mediated by unusually strong CS-context associations. Implications for Wagner’s (1981) SOP model and Miller and Matzel’s (1988) comparator hypothesis are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baker, A. G., &Mercier, P. (1982). Extinction of the context and latent inhibition.Learning & Motivation,13, 391–416.
Balsam, P. D. (1985). The functions of context in learning and performance. In P. D. Balsam & A. Tomie (Eds.), Context and learning (pp. 1–21). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bouton, M. E., &King, D. A. (1983). Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear: Tests for associative value of the context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,9, 248–265.
Channell, S., &Hall, G. (1983). Contextual effects in latent inhibition with an appetitive conditioning procedure.Animal Learning & Behavior,11, 67–74.
Hall, G., &Honey, R. C. (1989). Contextual effects in conditioning, latent inhibition, and habituation: Associative and retrieval functions of contextual cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,15, 232–241.
Hall, G., &Minor, H. (1984). A search for context-stimulus associations in latent inhibition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36B, 145–169.
Hall, G., &Pearce, J. M. (1979). Latent inhibition of a CS during CS-US pairings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,5, 31–42.
Hallam, S. C, Matzel, L. D., Sloat, J. S., &Miller, R. R. (1990). Excitation and inhibition as a function of posttraining extinction of the excitatory cue used in Pavlovian inhibition training.Learning & Motivation,21, 59–84.
Kasprow, W. J., Catterson, D., Schachtman, T. R., &Miller, R. R. (1984). Attenuation of latent inhibition by postacquisition reminder.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36B, 53–63.
Kasprow, W. J., Schachtman, T. R., &Miller, R. R. (1985). Associability of a previously conditioned stimulus as a function of qualitative changes in the US.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37B, 33–48.
Kasprow, W. J., Schachtman, T. R., &Miller, R. R. (1987). The comparator hypothesis of conditioned response generation: Manifest conditioned excitation and inhibition as a function of relative excitatory associative strengths of CS and conditioning context at the time of testing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,13, 395–406.
Kraemer, P. J., Randall, C. K., &Carbary, T. J. (1991). Release from latent inhibition with delayed testing.Animal Learning & Behavior, 19, 139–145.
Lubow, R. E. (1973). Latent inhibition.Psychological Review,79, 398–407.
Lubow, R. E., Schnur, P., &Rifkin, B. (1976). Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,2, 163–174.
Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement.Psychological Review,82, 276–298.
Matzel, L. D., Brown, A. M., &Miller, R. R. (1987). Associative effects of US preexposure: Modulation of conditioned responding by an excitatory training context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,13, 65–72.
Matzel, L. D., Schachtman, T. R., &Miller, R. R. (1985). Recovery of an overshadowed association achieved by extinction of the overshadowing stimulus.Learning & Motivation,16, 398–412.
Miller, R. R., Barnet, R. C, &Grahame, N. J. (1992). Responding to a conditioned stimulus depends on the current associative status of other cues that were present during training of that specific stimulus.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,18, 251–264.
Miller, R. R., &Matzel, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 51–92). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Miller, R. R., &Schachtman, T. R. (1985). Conditioning context as an associative baseline: Implications for response generation and the nature of conditioned inhibition. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 51–88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pearce, J. M., &Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not unconditioned stimuli.Psychological Review,87, 332–352.
Rescorla, R. A. (1983). Effect of separate presentation of the elements on within-compound learning in autoshaping.Animal Learning & Behavior, 11, 439–446.
Rescorla, R. A., &Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Robbins, S. J. (1988). The role of context in performance on a random schedule in autoshaping.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 413–424.
Szakmary, G. A. (1977). A note regarding conditioned attention theory.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,9, 142–144.
Wagner, A. R. (1979). Habituation and memory. In A. Dickinson & R. A. Boakes (Eds.), Mechanisms of learning and motivation (pp. 53–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5–47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Young, S. L., &Fanselow, M. S. (1992). Associative regulation of Pavlovian fear conditioning: Unconditional intensity, incentive shifts, and latent inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,18, 400–413.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was made possible by funds from National Institute of Mental Health Grant 33881 and the SUNY-Binghamton Center for Cognitive and Psycholinguistic Studies. Experiments 1, 1a, and 3 were executed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD for N.J.G., who was supported by a SUNY-Binghamton Dissertation Year Fellowship. Thanks are due Patricia DiLorenzo, Wesley J. Kasprow, Norman E. Spear, David S. Wilson, and Hua Yin for their comments on a preliminary version of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grahame, N.J., Barnet, R.C., Gunther, L.M. et al. Latent inhibition as a performance deficit resulting from CS—context associations. Animal Learning & Behavior 22, 395–408 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209159
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209159