Abstract
The visible kinematic pattern that occurs when objects collide contains information about the relative mass of the objects. Recently, Gilden and Proffitt (1989) have claimed that perceivers are limited to the use of simultaneous elemental cues and that therefore mass discrimination judgments are independent of whether the precollision epoch is visible or not. The present paper argues that their experimental results are irrelevant because crucial parameters were held constant, and that false conclusions were drawn because their data were not treated for what they are: threshold measurements obtained with the method of constant stimuli. Three experiments are reported, showingthat a high level of performance is attainable only when the whole event is visible, and thus that the effective information is extended over time. In addition, modified PROBIT analysis was used to determine what information observers use when the precollision epoch is occluded. Analytically complex invariants, based on vector components in the abstract collision-axis system, proved to have the best fit to the data. Thus the elementaristic premises in Gilden and Proffitt’s cue-heuristic model for relative mass perception are defeated.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amemiya, T. (1981). Qualitative response models: A survey.Journal of Economic Literature,19, 1483–1536.
Bingham, G. P. (1987). Kinematic form and scaling: Further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 155–177.
Bingham, G. P. (1993). Scaling judgments of lifted weight: Lifter size and the role of the standard.Ecological Psychology,5, 31–64.
Burton, G., &Turvey, M. T. (1990). Perceiving the lengths of rods that are held but not wielded.Ecological Psychology,2, 295–324.
Finney, D. J. (1971).Probit analysis (3rd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilden, D. L. (1991). On the origin of dynamical awareness.Psychological Review,98, 554–568.
Gilden, D. L., &Proffitt, D. R. (1989). Understanding collision dynamics.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 372–383.
Goilford, J. P. (1954).Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Johansson, G. (1950).Configurations in event perception. Uppsala, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Johansson, G. (1964). Perception of motion and changing form.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,5, 181–208.
Johansson, G., Von Hofsten, C., &Jansson, G. (1980). Event perception.Annual Review of Psychology,31, 27–63.
Kaiser, M. K., &Proffitt, D. R. (1987). Observers’ sensitivity to dynamic anomalies in collisions.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 275–280.
McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.),Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). New York: Academic Press.
Meriam, J. L. (1975),Dynamics (2nd ed). New York: Wiley.
Michotte, A. (1963).The perception of causality (T. R. Miles, Trans.). London: Methuen. (Original work published 1946)
Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., &Vetterling, W. T. (1986).Numerical recipes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Proffitt, D. R., &Gilden, D. L. (1989). Understanding natural dynamics.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 384–393.
Rosen, R. (1978).Fundamentals of measurement and representation of natural systems. New York: North-Holland.
Runeson, S. (1974). Constant velocity—Not perceived as such.Psychological Research,37, 3–23.
Runeson, S. (1975). Visual prediction of collision with natural and nonnatural motion functions.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 261–266.
Runeson, S. (1977). On the possibility of ‘smart’ perceptual mechanisms.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,18, 172–179.
Runeson, S. (1983).On visual perception of dynamic events. (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Studia Psychologica Upsaliensia, Serial No. 9). (Original work published 1977)
Runeson, S. (1989a, July).An invariant-basedmodel for the acquisition of perceptual skills. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Event Perception and Action, Miami University, Oxford, OH.
Runeson, S. (1989b). A note on the utility of ecologically incomplete invariants.International Society for Ecological Psychology Newsletter,4(1), 6–9.
Runeson, S. (1992).Psychophysics: The failure of an elementaristic dream. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Runeson, S. (in press). Perception of biological motion: The KSD-principle and the implications of a distal versus proximal approach. In G. Jansson & S. S. Bergström (Eds.), Perceiving events and objects:A review ofGunnar Johansson’s researchwith commentaries.
Runeson, S., & Costall, A. P. (1991).The ecological concept of information versus the traditional notion of cue. Unpublished manuscript.
Runeson, S., &Frykholm, G. (1981). Visual perception of lifted weight.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 733–740.
Runeson, S., &Frykholm, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 585–615.
Thinès, G., Costall, A. P., & Butterworth, G. (Eds.) (1991).Michotte’s experimental phenomenology of perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tipler, P. A. (1976).Physics. New York: Worth.
Todd, J. T., &Warren, W. H. (1982). Visual perception of relative mass in dynamic events.Perception,11, 325–335.
Warren, W. H., Kim, E. E., &Husney, R. (1987). The way the ball bounces: Visual and auditory perception of elasticity and control of the bounce pass.Perception,16, 309–336.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation (RJ) and The Swedish Council for Research in theHumanities and Social Sciences (HSFR). Parts of the present work were presented at the Sixth International Conference on Event Perception and Action, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, August 1991.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Runeson, S., Vedeler, D. The indispensability of precollision kinematics in the visual perception of relative mass. Perception & Psychophysics 53, 617–632 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211738
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211738