Abstract
Ratio scaling was used to obtain from 5 subjects estimates of the subjective dissimilarity between the members of all possible pairs of 17 tactile surfaces. The stimuli were a diverse array of everyday surfaces, such as corduroy, sandpaper, and synthetic fur. The results were analyzed using the multidimensional scaling (MDS) program ALSCAL. There was substantial, but not complete, agreement across subjects in the spatial arrangement of perceived textures. Scree plots and multivariate analysis suggested that, for some subjects, a two-dimensional space was the optimal MDS solution, whereas for other subjects, a three-dimensional space was indicated. Subsequent to their dissimilarity scaling, subjects rated each stimulus on each of five adjective scales. Consistent with earlier research, two of these (rough/smooth andsoft/hard) were robustly related to the space for all subjects. A third scale,sticky/slippery, was more variably related to the dissimilarity data: regressed into three-dimensional MDS space, it was angled steeply into the third dimension only for subjects whose scree plots favored a nonplanar solution. We conclude that thesticky/slippery dimension is perceptually weighted less than therough/smooth andsoft/hard dimensions, materially contributing to the structure of perceptual space only in some individuals.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Connor, C. E., Hsiao, S. S., Phillips, J. R., &Johnson, K. O. (1990). Tactile roughness: Neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates.Journal of Neuroscience,10, 3823–3836.
Connor, C. E., &Johnson, K. O. (1992). Neural coding of tactile texture: Comparison of spatial and temporal mechanisms for roughness perception.Journal of Neuroscience,12, 3414–3426.
Garner, W. R. (1974).The processing of information and structure. New York: Wiley.
Hollins, M., Faldowski, R., Rao, S., &Young, F. (1993).Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture: A multidimensional scaling analysis.Perception & Psychophysics,54, 697–705.
Katz, D. (1989).The world of touch (L. E. Krueger,Ed. and Trans.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (cmOriginal work published 1925)
Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J., &Reed, C. L. (1989). Haptic integration of object properties: Texture, hardness, and planar contour.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 45–57.
Lederman, S. J., &Klatzky, R. L. (1987). Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition.Cognitive Psychology,19, 342–368.
Lederman, S. J., Klatzky, R. L., &Reed, C. L. (1993). Constraints on haptic integration of spatially shared object dimensions.Perception,22, 723–743.
Lederman, S.J., &Taylor,M. M. (1972).Fingertip force, surface geometry, and the perception of roughness by active touch.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 401–408.
Reed, C. L. (1994). Perceptual dependence for shape and texture during haptic processing.Perception,23, 349–366.
Reed, C. L., Lederman, S. J., &Klatzky, R. L. (1990). Haptic integration of planar size with hardness, texture, and planar contour.Canadian Journal of Psychology,44,522–5455.
Shepard, R. N. (1991). Integrality versus separability of stimulus dimensions: From an early convergence of evidence to a proposed theoretical basis. In G. R. Lockhead & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),The perception of structure: Essays in honor of Wendell R. Garner (pp. 53–71). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Shiffman, S. S., Reynolds, M. L., &Young, F. W. (1981).Handbook of multidimensional scaling. New York: Academic Press.
Srinivasan, M. A., &Lamotte, R. H. (1996). Tactual discrimination of softness: Abilities and mechanisms. In O. Franzén, R. Johansson, & L. Terenius (Eds.), Somesthesis and the neurobiology of the somatosensory cortex (pp. 123–135). Basel: Birkhäuser.
Srinivasan, M. A., Whitehouse, J.M., &Lamotte, R. H. (1990). Tactile detection of slip: Surface microgeometry and peripheral neural codes.Journal of Neurophysiology,63, 1323–1332.
Stevens, J. (1996).Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stevens, S. S., &Harris, J. R. (1962). The scaling of subjective roughness and smoothness.Journal of Experimental Psychology,64, 489–494.
Taylor, M. M., &Lederman, S. J. (1975). Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: A model and the effect of friction.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 23–36.
Young, F. W, &Lewyckyj, R. (1979).ALSCAL user’s guide (3rd ed.). Chapel Hill, NC: Data Analysis and Theory Associates.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by NSF Grant SBR-9514432.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hollins, M., Bensmaïa, S., Karlof, K. et al. Individual differences in perceptual space for tactile textures: Evidence from multidimensional scaling. Perception & Psychophysics 62, 1534–1544 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212154
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212154