Abstract
Typically, “creativity” has been studied by identifying highly creative individuals and then comparing them with a suitable comparison group. The objective techniques employed in the identification phase have depended either on the judgment of experts or on scores obtained on psychometric tests of creativity. The argument made here is that dependence on these approaches has blinded researchers to the fact that both approaches are based, ultimately, on subjective criteria and that little is known about the subjective theories of creativity held by people. The reported research is an initial attempt at tapping these subjective criteria. People (N = 80) sorted adjectives descriptive of problem solvers under a standard (sort-for-meaning) context or a context that indicated the sorting should be guided by their concept of “creative” problem solving. Hierarchical clustering analyses indicated that the adjectives were sorted to different meaning structures in the two contexts. It appears that a consensually shared notion of creativity is that it is postively related to heightened sensitivity to one’s environment and a lessening of prejudicial thought.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bowers, P. Hypnosis and creativity: The search for the missing link. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1979, 88, 564–672.
Fillenbaum, S., & Rapoport, A. Structures in the subjective lexicon. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Gough, H., & Heilbrun, A. The adjective check list manual. Palo Alto, Calif: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1965.
Harrington, D. Effects of the explicit instructions to “be creative” on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 1975, 43, 434–454.
Ironson, G., & Davis, G. Faking high or low scores on the Adjective Check List. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1979, 13,139.
Katz, A. N., & Poag, J. Sex differences to “be creative” on divergent and nondivergent test scores. Journal of Personality, 1979, 47, 518–530.
Mackinnon, D. The personality correlates of creativity: A study of American architects. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity. New York: Penguin Books, 1970.
Mednick, S. The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 1962, 69, 220–232.
Miller, G. A psychological method to investigate verbal concepts. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1969, 6, 169–191.
Nicholls, J. Creativity in the person who will never produce anything original and useful. American Psychologist, 1972, 27.717-727.
Taylor, C., Smith, W., & Ghiselin, B. The creative and other contributions of one sample of research scientists. In C. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. New York: Wiley, 1963.
Torrence, P. Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms technical manual. Lexington, Mass: Personnel Press, 1974.
Welsh, G. Creativity and intelligence: A personality approach.Chapel Hill: Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina, 1975.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant 410-78-0487 to the senior author from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Katz, A.N., Giacommelli, L. The subjective nature of creativity judgments. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 20, 17–20 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334789
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334789