Abstract
Monkeys and pigeons learned a same/different task with pairs that were selected from a training set of eight picture stimuli. They showed no novel-stimulus transfer and hence no abstract-concept learning. They were also tested with novel pairs of the eight training pictures (i.e., combinations that had not been used in training) and with inverted pictures of the training pairs. If the subjects had learned the task item-specifically (e.g., if—then or configural learning), they should have failed these tests, but they performed well with novel combinations of training pictures and inverted pictures, suggesting that they learned the task relationally (i.e., on the basis of the relationship between the two pictures that were presented in each trial). This somewhat paradoxical conclusion of relational learning in the absence of abstract-concept learning is contrary to most theories of abstract-concept learning. The implications of this conclusion are discussed in the context of restricted-domain relational learning.
Article PDF
References
Carter, D. E., & Werner, T. J. (1978). Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: A critical analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 565–601.
Chen, Z., & Mo, L. (2004). Schema induction in problem solving: A multidimensional analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 583–600.
Doumas, L. A. A., Hummel, J. E., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2008). A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts. Psychological Review, 115, 1–43.
Elmore, L. C., Wright, A. A., Rivera, J. J., & Katz, J. S. (2009). Individual differences: Either relational learning or item-specific learning in a same/different task. Learning & Behavior, 37, 204–213. doi:10.3758/LB.37.2.204
Gentner, D. (1988). Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift. Child Development, 59, 47–59.
Gentner, D. (2003). Why we’re so smart. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 195–235). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gentner, D., & Rattermann, M. J. (1991). Language and the career of similarity. In S. A. Gelman & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought: Interrelations in development (pp. 225–277). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Katz, J. S., & Wright, A. A. (2006). Same/different abstract-concept learning by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 80–86. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.32.1.80
Katz, J. S., Wright, A. A., & Bachevalier, J. (2002). Mechanisms of same/different abstract-concept learning by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 358–368. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.28.4.358
Lashley, K. S. (1938). Conditional reactions in the rat. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary & Applied, 6, 311–324.
Premack, D. (1978). On the abstractness of human concepts: Why it would be difficult to talk to a pigeon. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.), Cognitive processes in animal behavior (pp. 423–451). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Premack, D. (1983a). Animal cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 351–362.
Premack, D. (1983b). The codes of man and beasts. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 6, 125–167.
Rattermann, M. J., & Gentner, D. (1998). More evidence for a relational shift in the development of analogy: Children’s performance on a causal-mapping task. Cognitive Development, 13, 453–478.
Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2004). Children’s thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Skinner, B. F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review, 57, 193–216.
Smith, L. B. (1984). Young children’s understanding of attributes and dimensions: A comparison of conceptual and linguistic measures. Child Development, 55, 363–380.
Smith, L. B. (1989). From global similarities to kinds of similarities: The construction of dimensions in development. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 146–178). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, R. K. (1980). Evolution of intelligence: An approach to its assessment. Brain, Behavior & Evolution, 17, 454–472.
Wright, A. A. (1997). Concept learning and learning strategies. Psychological Science, 8, 119–123. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00693.x
Wright, A. A., & Katz, J. S. (2006). Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians. Behavioural Processes, 72, 234–254. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.009
Wright, A. A., & Katz, J. S. (2007). Generalization hypothesis of abstract-concept learning: Learning strategies and related issues in Macaca mulatta, Cebus apella, and Columba livia. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121, 387–397. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.121.4.387
Wright, A. A., Rivera, J. J., Katz, J. S., & Bachevalier, J. (2003). Abstract-concept learning and list-memory processing by capuchin and rhesus monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 184–198. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.29.3.184
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH Grant MH-072616 and NSF Grant IBN-0316113.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wright, A.A., Katz, J.S. A case for restricted-domain relational learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16, 907–913 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.907
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.907