Abstract
Acquisition of two-way avoidance by mice was slower with a light CS than with a buzzer CS, with punishment of intertrial responses than without punishment, and with a short CS-CS interval than with a long CS-CS interval (30 vs. 60 sec). Light-cued avoidance was little affected by shock level (.35–1.5 mA), whereas mice trained with the buzzer CS learned faster at 1.5 mA. Animals required to move away from light or toward light showed comparable rates of acquisition. Other CS, US, and apparatus variables (directionality of cue, maximal shock duration, and presence vs. absence of a central partition in the shuttlebox) interacted in a complex fashion with those already mentioned. This resulted in widely differing performances in what may superficially appear to be different versions of the same task. The differences in mouse and rat responses to some of the variables can contribute to an understanding of the interactions between organismic and test factors and the relative explanatory value of alternative avoidance models.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alleva, E., De Acetis, L., Amorico, L., &Bignami, G. (1983). Amphetamine, conditioned stimulus, and nondebilitating preshock effects on activity and avoidance: Further evidence for interactions between associative and nonassociative changes.Behavioral & Neural Biology,39, 78–104.
Aliison, J., Larson, D., &Jensen, D. D. (1967). Acquired fear, brightness preference, and one-way shuttlebox performance.Psychopharmacology,8, 269–270.
Anisman, H., &Waller, T. G. (1972). Facilitative and disruptive effects of prior exposure to shock on subsequent avoidance performance.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,78, 113–122.
Archer, T., Ogren, S.-O., &Johansson, G. (1984). Stimulus conditions affecting rate of acquisition in a computer-operated version of the two-way active avoidance procedure.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,25, 89–95.
Ashe, V. M., &McCain, G. (1972). Comparison of one-way and shuttle-avoidance performance of gerbils and rats.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,80, 293–296.
Baron, A., &Kish, G. B. (1962). Low-intensity auditory and visual stimuli as reinforcers for the mouse.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,55, 1011–1013.
Bauer, R. H. (1972). The effects of CS and US intensity on shuttle-box avoidance.Psychonomic Science,27, 266–268.
Biederman, G. B. (1967). Discriminated avoidance conditioning: Stimulus function in shaping and training.Psychonomie Science,9, 263–264.
Biederman, G. B., D’amato, M. R., &Keller, D. M. (1964). Facilitation of discriminated avoidance learning by dissociation of CS and manipulandum.Psychonomic Science,1, 229–230.
Bignami, G. (1965). Selection for high rates and low rates of avoidance conditioning in the rat.Animal Behaviour,13, 221–227.
Bignami, G., Amorico, L., Frontali, M., &Roste, N. (1971). Central cholinergic blockade and two-way avoidance acquisition: The role of response disinhibition.Physiology & Behavior,7, 461–470.
Bignami, G., &De Acetis, L. (1973). An investigation on the nature of continuous avoidance deficits: Differential response to chlordiazepoxide treatment.Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior,1, 277–283.
Bignami, G., &Roste, N. (1972). Acquisition and performance effects of scopolamine and of treatment withdrawal in avoidance situations.Physiology & Behavior,8, 1127–1134.
Bolles, R. C. (1970). Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning.Psychological Review,77, 32–48.
Bolles, R. C. (1978). The role of stimulus learning in defensive behavior. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bolles, R. C., &Grossen, N. E. (1970). Function of the CS in shuttle-box avoidance learning by rats.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,70, 165–169.
Bolles, R. C., Hargrave, G. E., &Grossen, N. E. (1970). Avoidance learning as a function of CS quality and CS termination on escape trials.Psychological Reports,26, 27–32.
Bovet, D., Bovet-Nitti, F., &Oliverio, A. (1968). Memory and consolidation mechanisms in avoidance learning of inbred mice.Brain Research,10, 168–182.
Brush, F. R. (1962). The effects of intertrial interval on avoidance learning in the rat.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,55, 888–892.
Bucci, L., &Bovet, D. (1974). The effect of iproniazid and tranyl-cypromine studied with a dark-avoidance conditioned schedule.Psychopharmacology,35, 179–188.
Carran, A. B., Yeudall, L. T., &Royce, J. R. (1964). Voltage level and skin resistance in avoidance conditioning of inbred strains of mice.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,58, 427–430.
Cicala, G. A., &Azorlosa, J. L. (1984). Light is an effective warning signal in avoidance learning.Bulletin of the Psychonomie Society,32, 70–72.
Cicala, G. A., Owen, J. W., &Hill, D. (1976). Successful shuttle avoidance learning with high-intensity USs is sustained if a feedback signal accompanies warning-signal termination.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,7, 533–535.
Crawford, M., &Masterson, F. A. (1982). Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning. An evaluative review.The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science,17, 204–214.
Dalby, D. A., &Shuttlesworth, D. E. (1978). Effect of septal lesions, required response, and shock on the acquisition of a two-way conditioned avoidance response in rats.Physiological Psychology,6, 11–14.
Denny, M. R., Zerbolio, D. J., Jr., &Weisman, R. G. (1969). Avoidance learning in heterogeneous and homogeneous shuttle boxes.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,68, 370–372.
Dieter, S. E. (1977). Preexposure to situational cues and shock intensity in two-way avoidance learning.Animal Learning & Behavior,5, 403–406.
Frontali, M., &Bignami, G. (1973) Go-no go avoidance discriminations in rats with simple “go” and compound “no go” signals: Stimulus modality and stimulus intensity.Animal Learning & Behavior,1, 21–24.
Frontali, M., &Bignami, G. (1974). Stimulus nonequivalences in go/no-go avoidance discirminations: Sensory, drive, and response factors.Animal Learning & Behavior,2, 153–160.
Galvani, P. F., Riddell, W. I., &Foster, K. M. (1975). Passive avoidance in rats and gerbils as a function of species-specific exploratory tendencies.Behavioral Biology,13, 277–290.
Giardini, V., Amorico, L., De Acetis, L., &Bignami, G. (1983). Scopolamine and acquisition of go-no go avoidance: A further analysis of the perseverative antimuscarinic deficit.Psychopharmacology,80, 131–137.
Henderson, N. D. (1970). Motivation-performance relationships using different shock-avoidance shuttlebox techniques.Psychonomic Science,21, 314–315.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1969). Method and theory in the study of avoidance.Psychological Review,76, 49–69.
Herrnstein, R. J., &Hineline, P. N. (1966). Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction.Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior,9, 421–430.
Hill, W. F. (1978). Effects of mere exposure on preferences in non-human mammals.Psychological Bulletin,85, 1177–1198.
Hurwttz, H. M. B., &Dillow, P. V. (1968). The effects of the warning signal on response characteristics in avoidance learning.Psychological Record,18, 351–360.
Izquierdo, I., &Cavalheiro, E. A. (1976). Three main factors in rat shuttle behavior: Their pharmacology and sequential entry in operation during a two-way avoidance session.Psychopharmacology,49, 145–157.
Jacobs, W. J., &Lolordo, V. M. (1977). The sensory basis of avoidance responding in the rat. Relative dominance of auditory or visual warning signals and safety signals.Learning & Motivation,8, 448–466.
Jacobs, W. J., &Lolordo, V. M. (1980). Constraints on Pavlovian aversive conditioning: Implications for avoidance learning in the rat.Learning & Motivation,11, 427–455.
Jennrich, R., &Sampson, P. (1979). Analysis of variance and covariance including repeated measures. In W. J. Dixon & M. B. Brown (Eds.),BMDP-79 biomedical computer programs. P series (pp. 540–580). Berkeley: University of Califomia Press.
Johnson, J. L., &Church, R. M. (1965). Effects of shock intensity on nondiscriminative learning of rats in a shuttlebox.Psychonomic Science,3, 497–498.
Katzev, R. D., &Mills, S. K. (1974). Classical conditioning of skeletal avoidance responses in two strains of rats.Psychological Reports,35, 355–360.
Kelsey, J. E., &Grossman, S. P. (1969). Cholinergic blockade and lesions in the ventro-medial septum of the rat.Physiology & Behavior,4, 837–845.
Konorski, J. (1967).Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kurtz, P. S., &Shafer, J. N. (1967). The interaction of UCS intensity and intertrial interval in avoidance learning.Psychonomie Science,8, 465–466.
Levine, S. (1966). UCS intensity and avoidance learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,71, 163–164.
Levine, S., &England, S. J. (1960). Temporal factors in avoidance learning.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,53, 282–283.
McAllister, W. R., McAllister, D. E., Dieter, S. E., &James, J. H. (1979). Preexposure to situational cues produces a direct relationship between two-way avoidance learning and shock intensity.Animal Learning & Behavior,7, 165–173.
McAllister, W. R., McAluster, D. E., &Douglass, W. K. (1971). The inverse relationship between shock intensity and shuttlebox avoidance learning in rats: A reinforcement explanation.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,74, 426–433.
Modaresi, H. A. (1975). One-way characteristic performance of rats under two-way signaled avoidance conditions.Learning & Motivation,6, 484–497.
Moot, S. A., Nelson, K., &Bolles, R. C. (1974). Avoidance learning in a black and white shuttlebox.Bulletin of the Psychonomie Society,4, 501–502.
Morris, R. G. M. (1974). Two independent effects of variation in intertrial interval upon leverpress avoidance learning by rats.Animal Learning & Behavior,2, 189–192.
Moyer, K. E., &Korn, J. H. (1964). Effect of UCS intensity on the acquisition and extinction of an avoidance response.Journal of Experimental Psychology,67, 352–359.
Murphy, J. V., &Miller, R. E. (1956). Spaced and massed practice with a methodological consideration of avoidance conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,52, 77–81.
Myers, A. K. (1960). Onset vs. termination of stimulus energy as the CS in avoidance conditioning and pseudoconditioning.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,53, 72–78.
Myers, A. K. (1964). Discriminated operant avoidance learning in Wistar and G-4 rats as a function of type of warning stimulus.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,58, 453–455.
Myers, A. K. (1965). Instrumental escape conditioning to a low-intensity noise by rats.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,60, 82–87.
Myers, A. K. (1977). Shock intensity and warning signal effects on several measures of operant avoidance acquisition.Animal Learning & Behavior,5, 51–56.
Oliverio, A. (1967). Effects of different conditioning schedules based on visual and acoustic conditioned stimulus on avoidance learning of two strains of mice.Journal of Psychology,65, 131–139.
Oliverio, A. (1968). Effects of scopolamine on avoidance conditioning and habituation of mice.Psychopharmacologia,12, 214–226.
Osborne, G. L., Caul, W. F., &Vanstrum, R. (1976). Avoidance differences between rats and gerbils.Animal Learning & Behavior,4, 151–159.
Rakover, S. S. (1980). Role of intertrial interval following an escape or avoidance response in bar-press avoidance.Learning & Motivation,11, 220–237.
Rosic, N., Frontali, M., &Bignami, G. (1969). Stimulus factors affecting go-no go avoidance discrimination learning by rats.Communications in Behavioral Biology,4, 151–156.
Royce, J. R. (1966). Optimal stimulus parameters in avoidance conditioning of inbred strains of mice.Multivariate Behavioral Research,1, 209–217.
Schindler, C. W., &Weiss, S. J. (1982). The influence of positive and negative reinforcement on selective attention in the rat.Learning & Motivation,13, 304–323.
Schwartzbaum, J. S., Greeen, R. H., Beatty, W. W., &Thompson, J. B. (1967). Acquisition of avoidance behavior following septal lesions in the rat.Journal of Comparative A Physiobgical Psychology,63, 95–104.
Seugman, M. E. P., &Hager, J. L. (1972).Biological boundaries of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Sigmundi, R. A., &Bolles, R. C. (1983). CS modality, context conditioning, and conditioned freezing.Animal Learning & Behavior,11, 205–212.
Soltysik, S., &Kowalska, M. (1960). Studies on the avoidance conditioning. I. Relations between cardiac (type I) and motor (type ff) effects in the avoidance reflex.Acta Biologiae Experimentalis,20, 157–170.
Theios, J., Lynch, A. D., &Lowe, W. F., Jr. (1966). Differential effects of shock intensity on one-way and shuttle avoidance conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,72, 294–299.
Walters, G. C., &Abel, E. L. (1971). Passive avoidance learning in rats, mice, gerbils, and hamsters.Psychonomic Science,22, 269–270.
Welker, R. L., &Wheatley, K. L. (1977). Differential acquisition of conditioned suppression in rats with increased and decreased luminance levels as CS+s.Leaming & Motivation,8, 247–262.
Whittleton, J. C., Kostanek, D. J., &Sawrey, J. M. (1965). CS directionality and intensity in avoidance learning and extinction.Psychonomic Science,3, 415–416.
Zieunski, K. (1965). The direction of change versus the absolute level of noise intensity as cue in the CER situation.Acta Biologiae Experimentalis,25, 337–357.
Zieunski, K. (1966). Retention of the avoidance reflex after prefrontal lobectomy in cats.Acta Biologiae Experimentalis,26, 167–181.
Zieunski, K. (1972). Effects of prefrontal lesions on avoidance and escape reflexes.Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis,32, 393–415.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported as part of the Subproject on Neurobehavioral Pathophysiology (main project: Noninfectious Pathology) of the Istituto Superiore di Sanita, Roma, Italy.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bignami, G., Alleva, E., Amorico, L. et al. Bidirectional avoidance by mice as a function of CS, US, and apparatus variables. Animal Learning & Behavior 13, 439–450 (1985). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208021
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208021