Menu Expand
  1. Journals
  2. Society & Social Sciences
  3. Sozialer Fortschritt
  4. Vol. 65, Issue 1–2
  5. pp. 37–45

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Schmitz, B. Zur Messung sozialer Innovationen. Sozialer Fortschritt, 65(1–2), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.65.1-2.37
Schmitz, Björn "Zur Messung sozialer Innovationen" Sozialer Fortschritt 65.1–2, 2016, 37-45. https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.65.1-2.37
Schmitz, Björn (2016): Zur Messung sozialer Innovationen, in: Sozialer Fortschritt, vol. 65, iss. 1–2, 37-45, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.65.1-2.37
Format
Download

Zur Messung sozialer Innovationen

Schmitz, Björn

Sozialer Fortschritt, Vol. 65 (2016), Iss. 1–2 : pp. 37–45

3 Citations (CrossRef)

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.65.1-2.37
Language
German
Pages
9

Pricing

Individual
€ 15.90 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Author Details

Schmitz, Björn, Phil!omondo, Bruchhäuser Weg 2.1, 69124 Heidelberg

Cited By

  1. Kooperationsmanagement in der Praxis

    Social Innovations – Innovationen aus der Kooperation von Wirtschaft und sozialem Sektor

    Leppert, Thomas | Posor, Hilke

    2021

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28112-0_8 [Citations: 0]

  2. CSR und Social Enterprise

    Direkte und indirekte Beeinflussungen von hybriden Organisationen auf traditionelle Wirtschaft und Gesetzgebung

    Schmitz, Björn

    2019

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55591-0_7 [Citations: 0]

  3. A digitalizáció és a társadalmi innovációk összefüggései

    Karajz, Sándor

    Társadalmi és gazdasági folyamatok elemzésének kérdései a XXI. században, (2020), P.188

    https://doi.org/10.14232/tgfek21sz.13 [Citations: 0]

References

  1. Anderson, N./De Dreu, C. K./Nijstad, B. A. (2004): The routinization of innovation research. A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science, in: Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25 (2), S. 147 – 173.  Google Scholar
  2. Benford, J./Birnbaum, J./Dombrowski, K. (2014): Wirkungsorientiertes Investieren. Neue Finanzierungsquellen zur Lösung gesellschaftlicher Herausforderungen. Abschlussbericht des National Advisory Boards (NAB) Deutschland, Berlin, online verfügbar unter: http://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin//user_upload/Studie_Wirkungsorientiertes_Investieren.pdf.  Google Scholar
  3. BEPA (Bureau of European Advisers) (2011). Empowering people, driving change. Social innovation in the European Union, Luxembourg: European Communities.  Google Scholar
  4. Bertelsmann Stiftung (2010): Corporate Citizenship planen und messen mit der iooi-Methode. Ein Leitfaden für das gesellschaftliche Engagement von Unternehmen, Gütersloh.  Google Scholar
  5. Blasy, C./Gruber, F. (2011): Zur Messbarkeit sozialer Innovationen, in: Zentrum für soziale Innovation (Hrsg.), Pendeln zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis. ZSI Beiträge zu sozialen Innovationen, LIT, S. 165 – 172.  Google Scholar
  6. Bluszcz, O. (2008): Kooperation und Innovation. Zivilgesellschaftliche und organisationstheoretische Grundlagen, online verfügbar unter: http://www2.hs-esslingen.de/~langeman/heutige%20Recherche/Hochschulen/StratAll_AP_1_3_Grundlagen2_2009.pdf.  Google Scholar
  7. Borzaga, C./Bodini, R. (2012). What to make of social innovation? Towards a framework for policy development. Euricse Working Paper, N.036,12, online verfügbar unter: http://euricse.eu/sites/euricse.eu/files/db_uploads/documents/1338304696_n2082.pdf.  Google Scholar
  8. Buchanan, J./Stubblebine, W. C. (1962): „Externality“, in: Economica, 29, S. 371 – 384.  Google Scholar
  9. Cliffton, J./Badal, S. B. (2014): Entrepreneurial StrengthFinder, New York.  Google Scholar
  10. Damanpour, F. (1991): Organizational innovation. A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators, in: Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), S. 555 – 590.  Google Scholar
  11. Davies, A./Caulier-Grice, J./Norman, W. (2012): Introduction to Innovation. A literature review of the methods and policies for innovation, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research, online verfügbar unter: http://www.tepsie.eu/images/documents/tepsie.d1.3anintroductiontoinnovationstudiesforsocialinnovators.pdf.  Google Scholar
  12. Dougherty, D./Hardy, C. (1996): Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations. Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems, in: Academy of management Journal, 39(5), S. 1120 – 1153.  Google Scholar
  13. Ebrahim, A./Rangan, V. K. (2010): The Limits of Nonprofit Impact. A Contingency Framework for Measuring Social Performance, Working Paper No. 10-099. Cambridge.  Google Scholar
  14. European Commission (2014): Innovation Union Scoreboard 2014, online verfügbar unter: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ius/ius-2014_en.pdf.  Google Scholar
  15. Fischer, K. (2005): Interpreneurship. Nachhaltigkeitsinnovationen in interaktiven Perspektiven eines vernetzenden Unternehmertums, Marburg.  Google Scholar
  16. George, J. M./Zhou, J. (2001): When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior. An international approach, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3), S. 513 – 524.  Google Scholar
  17. Gibson, C. B./Gibbs, J. L. (2006): Unpacking the concept of virtuality. The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 51 (3), S. 451 – 495.  Google Scholar
  18. Greenhalgh, T./Glen, R./Macfarlane, F./Bate, P./Kyriakidou, O. (2004): Diffusion of innovations in service organizations. Systematic review and recommendations, in: The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), S. 581 – 629.  Google Scholar
  19. Greiling, D. (2009): Performance Measurement in Nonprofit-Organisationen, Wiesbaden.  Google Scholar
  20. Harris, M./Albury, D. (2009): The innovation imperative. Why radical innovation is needed to reinvent public services for the recession and beyond, London: NESTA Discussion Paper, online verfügbar unter: http://socialwelfare.bl.uk/subject-areas/government-issues/social-policy/nesta/1516692009_innovation_imperative.pdf.  Google Scholar
  21. Helm, S. T./Andersson, F. O. (2010): Beyond Taxonomy. An Empirical Validation of Social Entrepreneurship in the Nonprofit Sector, in: Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 20(3), S. 259 – 276.  Google Scholar
  22. Hobbes, M. (2014): Stop Trying to Save the World. Big Ideas are destroying international development, NewRepublic, online verfügbar unter: http://www.newrepublic.com/article/120178/problem-international-development-and-plan-fix-it.  Google Scholar
  23. Howaldt, J./Schwarz, M. (2010). Social innovation. Concepts, research fields and international trends. Dortmund: Sozialforschungsstelle Dortmund, online verfügbar unter: http://www.sfs-dortmund.de/odb/Repository/Publication/Doc %5C1289 %5CIMO_Trendstudie_Howaldt_Schwarz_englische_Version.pdf.  Google Scholar
  24. John, R. (2005): Innovationen als irritierende Neuheiten. Evolutionstheoretische Perspektiven, in: Aderhold, J./John, R. (Hrsg.), Innovation. Sozialwissenschaftliche Perspektiven, UVK, Konstanz, S. 49 – 64.  Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, S. (2010). Where good ideas come from. The seven patterns of innovation. London.  Google Scholar
  26. Kania, J./Kramer, M. (2011): Collective Impact, in: Stanford Social Innovation Review, 11(1): S. 36 – 41.  Google Scholar
  27. Kasper, G./Clohesy, S. (2008): Intentional Innovation. How getting more systematic about innovation could improve philanthropy and increase social impact, in: W. K. K. Foundation (Ed.): Kellogg Foundation.  Google Scholar
  28. Kauffeld, S./Jonas, E./Grote, S./Frey, D./Frieling E. (2004): Innovationsklima. onstruktion und erste psychometrische Überprüfung eines Messinstruments, in: Diagnostica, 50(3), S. 153 – 164.  Google Scholar
  29. Kesselring, A./Leitner, M. (2008): Soziale Innovationen in Unternehmen. Wien: Unruhe Stiftung, online verfügbar unter: https://www.zsi.at/attach/1Soziale_Innovation_in_Unternehmen_ENDBERICHT.pdf.  Google Scholar
  30. KPMG (2014): A New Vision of Value. Connecting Corporate and Societal Value Creation, ohne Ort.  Google Scholar
  31. Krlev, G./Bund, E./Mildenberger, G. (2014): Measuring What Matters-Indicators of Social Innovativeness on the National Level, in: Information Systems Management, 31 (3), S. 200 – 224.  Google Scholar
  32. Kuratko, D. F./Hornsby, J. S./Bishop, J. W. (2005): Managers’ Corporate Entrepreneurial Actions and Job Satisfaction, in: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal (1) (3), S. 275 – 291.  Google Scholar
  33. Kurz, B./Kubek, D. (2014): Kursbuch Wirkung. Das Praxishandbuch für alle, die Gutes noch besser tun wollen, Berlin.  Google Scholar
  34. Liebeherr, J. (2009): Innovationsförderliche Organisationskultur. Eine konzeptionelle und empirische Untersuchung radikaler Innovationsprojekte, Dissertation TU Berlin, online verfügbar unter: http://www.opus4.kobv.de/opus4-tuberlin/files/2168/liebeherr_jeanette.pdf.  Google Scholar
  35. Lumley, T. (2013): Impact, Power and Social Change, NPC, online verfügbar unter: www.thinknpc.org/publications/impactpower-and-social-change-2/tris-lumley-impact-power-and-social-change-australia/?post-parent=9410.  Google Scholar
  36. Lumpkin, G. T./Dess, G. G. (1996): Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance, in: Academy of Management Review, 21(1), S. 135 – 172.  Google Scholar
  37. MacMillan, I. C./Thompson, J. D. (2013): The Social Entrepreneur’s Playbook. Pressure Test, Plan, Launch and Scale Your Enterprise, Philadelphia.  Google Scholar
  38. Merton, R. K. (1936): The unanticipated consequences of purposeful action, in: American Sociological Review, 1(6), S. 894 – 904.  Google Scholar
  39. Milbergs, E./Vonortas, N. (2004): Innovation Metrics: Measurement to Insight, Center for Accelerating Innovation and George Washington University, National Innovation Initiative 21st Century Working Group.  Google Scholar
  40. Mildenberger, G./Münscher, R./Schmitz, B. (2012): Dimensionen der Bewertung gemeinnütziger Organisationen und Aktivitäten, in: Anheier, H./Schröer, A./Then, V. (Hrsg.), Soziale Investitionen. Interdiszipliäre Perspektiven, Wiesbaden, S. 279 – 312.  Google Scholar
  41. Miron, E./Erez, M./Naveh, E. (2004): Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other?, in: Journal of Organizational Behavior (25) (2), S. 175 – 199.  Google Scholar
  42. Mort, G. S./Weerawardena, J./Carnegie, K. (2003). Social entrepreneurship. Towards conceptualization, in: International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1), S. 76 – 88.  Google Scholar
  43. Mulgan, G. (2006). The Process of Social Innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), S. 145 – 162.  Google Scholar
  44. Mulgan, G. (2012). The theoretical foundations of social innovation, in: Nicholls, S./Murdoch, A. (Hrsg.), Social innovation. Blurring boundaries to reconfigure markets, New York, S. 33 – 65.  Google Scholar
  45. Murray, R./Caulier-Grice, J./Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation, online verfügbar unter: http://ebookbrowse.com/murray-caulier-grice-mulgan-2010-the-book-ofsocial-innovation-pdf-d382057825.  Google Scholar
  46. Naveh, E./Erez, M. (2004): Innovation and attention to detail in the quality improvement paradigm, in: Management Science, 50 (11), S. 1576 – 1586.  Google Scholar
  47. Nicholls, A./Murdoch, A. (2012). The nature of social innovation, in: Nicholls, S./Murdoch, A. (Hrsg.), Social innovation. Blurring boundaries to reconfigure markets, New York, S. 1 – 30  Google Scholar
  48. Nock, L./Krlev, G./Mildenberger, G. (2013): Soziale Innovationen in den Spitzenverbänden der Freien Wohlfahrtspflege. Strukturen, Prozesse und Zukunftsperspektiven, Berlin, online verfügbar unter: www.bagfw.de/veröffentlichungen.OECD (2005): The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Oslo Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition, OECD Publishing.  Google Scholar
  49. Phills Jr., J. A./Deiglmeier, K./Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation, in: Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(3), S. 34 – 43.  Google Scholar
  50. Phineo (2012): Engagement mit Wirkung, Berlin.  Google Scholar
  51. Pinchot, G. (1985): Intrapreneuring. Why You Don’t Have to Leave the Corporation to Become an Entrepreneur, New York.  Google Scholar
  52. Porter, M. E./Kramer, M. R. (2011): Creating Shared Value, in: Harvard Business Review, 89(1), S. 62 – 77.  Google Scholar
  53. Reeder, N./O’Sullivan, C./Tucker, S./Ramsden, P./Mulgan G. (2012): Strengthening social innovation in Europe: Journey to effective Assessment and metrics. Brüssel.  Google Scholar
  54. Repp, L. (2013): Soziale Wirkungsmessung im Social Entrepreneurship. Herausforderungen und Probleme, Wiesbaden.  Google Scholar
  55. Schmitz, B. (2015a): Social Entrepreneurship, Social Innovation and Social Mission Organizations: Towards a Conceptualization, in: Cnaan, R. A./Vinokur-Kaplan, D. (Hrsg.), Cases in Innovative Nonprofits, Sage, S. 17 – 42.  Google Scholar
  56. Schmitz, B. (2015b): Social Innovations in Mature, Faith-Based, Social Service Nonprofit Organizations –Two German Case Studies, in: Cnaan, R. A./Vinokur-Kaplan, D. (Hrsg.), Cases in Innovative Nonprofits, Sage, S. 257 – 268.  Google Scholar
  57. Schmitz, B./Krlev, G./Mildenberger, G./Bund, E./Hubrich, D. (2013): Paving the Way to Measurement. A Blueprint for social Innovation Metrics, online verfügbar unter: http://www.tepsie.eu/images/documents/tepsie25.pdf.  Google Scholar
  58. Seelos C./Mair, J. (2012a). Innovation is not the holy grail, in: Stanford Social Innovation Review, 12(4), S. 45 – 49.  Google Scholar
  59. Seelos C./Mair, J. (2012b): What Determines the Capacity for Continuous Innovation in Social Sector Organizations? Rockefeller Foundation Report, online verfügbar unter: http://pacscenter.stanford.edu/files/images/capacity-for-continuous-innovation_PACS_31Jan2012-4.pdf.  Google Scholar
  60. Stopford, J. M./Baden-Fuller, CW. F. (1994): Creating corporate entrepreneurship, in: Strategic Management Journal, 15(7), S. 521 – 536.  Google Scholar
  61. Sundbo, J. (1999): Empowerment of employees in small and medium-sized service firms, in: Employee Relations, 21(2), S. 105 – 127.  Google Scholar
  62. Umweltbundesamt (2014): Sozialen Innovationen im Aufwind. Ein Leitfaden zur Förderung sozialer Innovationen für nachhaltigen Konsum, Troisdorf.  Google Scholar
  63. Van Dyck, C./Frese, M./Baer, M./Sonnentag, S. (2005): Organizational error Management culture and its impact on performance. A two-study replication, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (6), S. 1228 – 1240.  Google Scholar
  64. Veenhoven, R. (2002): Why Social Policy Needs Subjective Indicators, in: Social Indicators Research, 58(1/3), S. 33 – 45.  Google Scholar
  65. Vernis, A./Iglesias, M./Sanz, B./Saz-Carranza, A. 2006. Nonprofit organizations. Challenges and collaboration, New York, N.Y.  Google Scholar

Abstract

On Measuring Social Innovation

Due to the increased attention given to the field of social innovations, questions about measurement arise. While there is a variety of measurement approaches, these approaches show a low degree of integration with each other. This paper presents an integrative framework for the measurement of social innovation. Several dimensions will be distinguished, i. e. innovation genesis, intended innovation effects, (unintended) consequences on other stakeholders and environment, and conducive environmental conditions. This allows us to sketch a space of relevant measurement reference values that allows for locating both measurement approaches and the actor"s reference and contribution to social innovation.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Björn Schmitz: Zur Messung sozialer Innovationen 1

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.