Paper Titles

Modeling and Simulation of Closed-Loop Counterbalancing Hydraulic Units for Heavy-Duty Machine-Tools
p.417

Automatic Manipulation of Parts Made from Yielding Material
p.423

Optimisation of Single Edge Tools Exploitation Process
p.431

Raw Material Stock Analysis in a Supply Chain
p.437

Improving the Accuracy of Parts Manufactured by Single Point Incremental Forming
p.443

Dimensional Compensation in Stern Tube Bushes Machining
p.449

Contribution to Mathematical Modelling of Oil Field Data
p.455

Research on the Influence of Progressive Plantar Supporters on the Stability in Biped Position
p.465

Adaptronics - an Intelligent Science Adaptive to Advanced Systemes/Micro-Nanosystems
p.471

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 332Improving the Accuracy of Parts Manufactured by...

Improving the Accuracy of Parts Manufactured by Single Point Incremental Forming

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of this paper is to enrich the knowledge related to the single point incremental forming (SPIF) process by evaluating the efficiency of two optimization methods - the response surface method and the neural network method - to improve the accuracy of manufactured parts by prescribing a proper combination of the process parameters. The analysis is performed for a double frustum of pyramid made by stainless steel. It was found a good ability of prediction of both methods, demonstrating their suitability for physical implementation in solving problems associated to the SPIF process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

OPTIROB 2013

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 332)

Pages:

443-448

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.332.443

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2013

Authors:

Maria Crina Radu, Ion Cristea, Eugen Herghelegiu, Stefan Tabacu

Keywords:

Optimization Method, Part Accuracy, SPIF

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

[1] G. Ambrogio, L. De Napoli, L. Filice, F. Gagliardi, and M. Muzzupappa: J. Mater. Process. Tech. Vol. 162-163 (2005), p.156

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.148

[2] K. Hamilton and J. Jeswiet: CIRP – Ann. Manuf. Tech. Vol. 59 (2010), p.311

[3] J. Jeswiet, F. Micari, G. Hirt, A. Bramley, J.R. Duflou, J.M. Allwood: CIRP – Ann. Manuf. Tech. Vol. 54 (2005) p.88

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60021-3

[4] K. Essa and P. Harley: Int. J. Mater. Form. Vol. 4 (2011), p.401

[5] J.M. Allwood, O. Music, A. Raithathna, S.R. Duncan: CIRP – Ann. Manuf. Tech. Vol. 58 (2009), p.287

[6] M. Rauch, J.Y. Hascoet, J.C. Hamann, Y. Plenel: Comp. Aided Design Vol. 41 (2009), p.877

DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2009.06.006

[7] J.R. Duflou, B. Callebaut, J. Verbert, H. Baerdemaeker: CIRP – Ann. Manuf. Tech. Vol. 56 (2007), p.273

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.063

[8] G. Ambrogio, V. Cozza, L. Filice, F. Micari: J. Mater. Process. Tech. Vol. 191 (2007), p.92

[9] G. Hussain, G. Lin, N. Hayat: J. Mech. Sci. Tech. Vol. 25 (2011), p.177

[10] R.H. Myers, D.C. Montgomery, C.M. Anderson-Cook: Response Surface Methodology. Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments (John Wiley & Sons Inc. Publication, New Jersey 2009)

[11] C. Radu and I. Cristea: submitted to Materials and Manufacturing Processes (2012)

[12] S. Mandal, P.V. Sivaprasad, S. Venugopal, K.P.N. Murthy, B. Raj: Mater. Sci. Eng. Vol. 485 (2008), p.571

[13] K. Hornik, M. Stinchcombe, H. White: Neural Networks Vol. 2 (1989), p.359

[14] G. Ambrogio, L. Filice, F. Guerriero, R. Guido, D. Umbrello: Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. Vol. 54 (2011), p.921

[15] Information on http://www.nd.com