Education Quality Measured by the Classification of School Performance Using Quality Labels

Article Preview

Abstract:

Quality in education has been the subject of many debates, be it among managers in schools, in the media or in literature. However, the literature appears not to include methods or techniques for exploring databases to obtain classifications for this quality; nor is there a consensus as to the definition of “education quality”. To address these issues, this article proposes a methodology similar to the KDD (Knowledge Discovery in Databases) to classify Education Quality in schools comparatively, based on grades scored in school performance tests. For the purposes of this study, the test used was the Prova Brasil examination, which is part of the Basic Education Development Index (IDEB) used in Brazil. The methodology was applied to public municipal schools in the town of Araucária in the metropolitan district of Curitiba in Paraná State. Seventeen schools that offer elementary and junior high school education were included. All the grades of every student were considered from the early and later years at the schools. During the Data Mining stage, the main stage of the KDD process, three comparative methods were used for Pattern Recognition: Artificial Neural Networks, Support Vector Machines and Genetic Algorithms. These methods supplied satisfactory results in the classification of schools represented by way of a “Quality Label”, with Artificial Neural Networks having the best performance for the problem in question. With this quality label, educational managers can decide on which measures to adopt at all the schools to help them achieve their goals.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1675-1683

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A.A. Kardan; H. Sadeghi; S.S. Ghidary; M.R.F. Sani. Prediction of student course selection in online higher education institutes using neural network. Computers & Education. Vol 63, p.1–11, Jul. (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.015

Google Scholar

[2] S. Yeh; J. LO. Assessing metacognitive knowledge in web-based CALL: a neural network approach. Computers & Education. Vol. 44, no. 2, p.97–113, Feb. (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.019

Google Scholar

[3] S. Huang; N. Fang. Predicting student academic performance in an engineering dynamics course: A comparison of four types of predictive mathematical models. Computers & Education, vol. 61, pp.133-145, Feb (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.015

Google Scholar

[4] H. Wang; C. Chang; T. Li. Assessing creative problem-solving with automated text grading. Computers & Education. Vol. 51, no. 4, pp.1450-1466. Dez. (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.01.006

Google Scholar

[5] J. Moreno; D.A. Ovalle; R. M. Vicari. A genetic algorithm approach for group formation in collaborative learning considering multiple student characteristics. Computers & Education. Vol. 58, no. 1, pp.560-569, Jan. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.011

Google Scholar

[6] A. Meng; L. Ye; D. Roy; P. Padilha. Genetic algorithm based multi-agent system applied to test generation. Computers & Education. Vol. 49, no. 4, pp.1205-1223, Dez. (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.012

Google Scholar

[7] W.B. Elley. Evaluational studies - national assessment of the quality of Indonesian education. Studies in Education Evaluation, v. 2, no. 3, (1976).

Google Scholar

[8] P.J. Moss; B.J. Barfield; D.K. Blythe. Evaluation in Continuing Education: A Pilot Study. IEEE Transactions on Education, v. E-21, n. 2, maio, (1978).

DOI: 10.1109/te.1978.4321195

Google Scholar

[9] M. Benaim. A Model for the Evaluation of Instructional Methods. IEEE Transactions on Education, v. E-27, n. 2, mai, (1984).

Google Scholar

[10] W.B. Dockrell. National Quality Indicators in Scotland. Studies in Educational Evaluation. Vol. 14, pp.47-53, (1988).

DOI: 10.1016/0191-491x(88)90018-1

Google Scholar

[11] D. Carreira; J.M.R. Pinto. Custo aluno-qualidade inicial, rumo à educação pública de qualidade no Brasil. In: Campanha Nacional pelo Direito à Educação. Ed. Global, São Paulo/SP, (2007).

DOI: 10.5380/jpe.v2i3.15021

Google Scholar

[12] A. Parpala; S. Lindblom-Ylanne. University teachers' conceptions of good teaching in the units of high-quality education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, v. 33, p.355–370, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.07.009

Google Scholar

[13] E.D. Fowler; C.H.P. Mello; P.L. Costa Neto. Análise exploratória da utilização do programa de qualidade GESPÚBLICA nas instituições federais de ensino superior. Revista Gestão & Produção, v. 18, n. 4, pp.837-852,  (2011).

DOI: 10.1590/s0104-530x2011000400011

Google Scholar

[14] H. Tillema; M. Leenknecht; M. Segers. Assessing assessment quality: Criteria for quality assurance in design of (peer) assessment for learning – A review of research studies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, v. 37, p.25–34, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.004

Google Scholar

[15] L.F. Figueiredo Neto; L. Sauer; G.R.C. Borges; J.B. Belizario. Método servqual: um estudo de satisfação em uma escola de idiomas. In: XIII Simpósio de Engenharia de Produção, Bauru-SP, (2006).

DOI: 10.14488/enegep2019_tn_sto_293_1655_38436

Google Scholar

[16] S.S. Mahapatra. A neural network approach for assessing quality in technical education: an empirical study. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, v. 2, n. 3, pp.287-306, (2007).

DOI: 10.1504/ijpqm.2007.012451

Google Scholar

[17] INEP, Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira. Prova Brasil e Saeb. Disponivel em <http: /portal. inep. gov. br/web/prova-brasil-e-saeb/prova-brasil-e-saeb> Acesso em 16 de ago. de (2011).

DOI: 10.29388/978-65-86678-87-1-0.f.54-67

Google Scholar

[18] A.R.T. Góes; M.T.A. Steiner; P.J. Steiner Neto; O. Canciglieri. Power Quality Management in Distribution Systems. Advances Materials Research, vols. 945-949, pp.3060-3068, (2014).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.945-949.3060

Google Scholar

[19] J.F.L. Casteren; L.H.R. Enslin; W.T.J. Hulshorst; W.L. Kilng; M.D. Hamoen; L.F.G. Cobben. A customer oriented approach to the classification of voltage dips. In: The 18th International Conference and exhibition on Electricity Distribuion – CIRED, (2005).

DOI: 10.1049/cp:20051064

Google Scholar

[20] U. Fayyad; G. Piatetsky-Shapiro; P. Smyth; R. Uthurusamy. Advances in Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 1 ed. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, California, (1996).

Google Scholar