Collaborative Filtering Algorithm for Recommendation System of Improvement Based on Big Data Environment

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the rapid development of Internet and information technology, the exponential growth of information has attracted a lot of concern thesedays. Big data processing is particularly important. Recommendation system appears a good solution inadequacies of search engines, it is in addition based on keywords entered by the user to obtain information, but also with the user's social circle, as well as search history records, for users personalized recommendations services, and to establish a long and constant user interaction relations, not only improve customer loyalty, but also for the producers to create a good and reliable information platform for big data processing to achieve a win-win.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

189-195

Citation:

Online since:

March 2015

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Breese J Heckerman D, Kadie C. Empirical analysis of Predictive Algorithms for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty inartificial Intelligence, 1998, pp.43-52.

Google Scholar

[2] G. Adomavicius, A. Tuzhilin. Toward the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions, IEEE Trans, on Knowles and Data Eng, 2005: pp.734-749.

DOI: 10.1109/tkde.2005.99

Google Scholar

[3] Goldberg D, Nichols D, Oki B M, etal. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information Tapestry[J]. Communication of the ACM. 1992, Volume35(12): 61-70.

DOI: 10.1145/138859.138867

Google Scholar

[4] B M Sarwar, GKarypis, JKonstan, etal. Item-Based Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Algorithms, Process of the 10th Internet Conference on World Wide Web[C]: NewYork: ACMpress, 2001: 285-295.

DOI: 10.1145/371920.372071

Google Scholar

[5] B M Sarwar. Sparsity, scalability, distribution in recommender systems[D]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, (2001).

Google Scholar

[6] A M Rashid, S Lam, GKarypis, eta1. ClustKNN: a highly scalable hybrid model-&memory-based CF algorithm[C]. In: Proceedings of the WebKDD 2006: KDD Workshop on Web Mining and Web Usage Analysis, in conjunction with the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining(KDD 2006). 2006: 147-186.

DOI: 10.1145/1327942.1327948

Google Scholar

[7] SarwarB, KaryPlsG, KonstanJ, RiedlJ. Analysis of recommendation algorithms for E-comnmerce[A]. In: ACMConferenceonElectronieCornmerce[C], 2000(3): pp.158-167.

Google Scholar

[8] D.H. McKnight& N.L. Chervany. The Meaning of Trust. University of Minnesota. Management Information Systems Research Center. Technieal Report MISRC Working Paper Series 1996(04).

Google Scholar

[9] R. Baeza-Yates, B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., (1999).

Google Scholar

[10] Brusilovsky, P, AKobsa. The Adaptive Web: Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization [M], BerlinHeidelberg New York: Springer Verlag, (2007).

Google Scholar

[11] JohllO, BarryS. Eliciting Trust Values from Recommendation Errors. In Proceedings of the 18th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS05). Clearwater Beach, Florida, USA, May15-17, 2005. 289-294.

Google Scholar

[12] R. Burke. Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 12, iss. 4, pp.331-370, (2002).

DOI: 10.1023/a:1021240730564

Google Scholar

[13] AMENTO, B., TERVEEN, L., HIX, D., JU, P. 1999. An Empirical Evaluation of User Interfaces for Topic Management of Web Sites. In Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99), ACM Press, New York, NY. 552-559.

DOI: 10.1145/302979.303156

Google Scholar

[14] David Goldberg, David Nicols. Using Collaborative filtering to weave an information Tapsty[J], Communications of the ACM. vol(35)12, 1992: pp. 6I-70.

Google Scholar