Fabrication and Characterisation of Nanofibres by Meltblowing and Melt Electrospinning

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fabrication of nanofibres has become a growing area of research because of their unique properties (i.e. smaller fibre diameter and higher surface area) and potential applications in various fields such as filtration, composites and biomedical applications. Although several processes exist for fabrication of nanofibres, electrospinning is considered to be the simplest. Most of the research in electrospinning is based on solution rather than melt. The feasibility of fabricating nanofibres of polypropylene (PP) by meltblowing and melt electrospinning has been investigated in this paper. In meltblowing different fluids such as air and water were fed at different inlets along the extrusion barrel for the fabrication of nanofibres whereas in melt electrospinning it was achieved by using different additives. The results obtained by using water in meltblowing were better with respect to the morphology and fibre uniformity compared to air. In melt electrospinning although all the additives (i.e. sodium oleate (SO), polyethylene glycol (PEG) and polydimethyl siloxane (PDMS)) helped in reducing the fibre diameter, only SO was effective to reduce the diameter down to nanoscale. It was concluded that both the solvent-free processes have the potential to substantially increase the production of nanofibres compared to solution electrospinning.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 472-475)

Pages:

1294-1299

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

[1] McCulloch, J.G., The history of the development of meltblowing technology. International Nonwovens Journal, 1999. 8: pp.139-149.

Google Scholar

[2] Dutton, K.C., Overview and analysis of the meltblown process and parameters. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 2008. 6(1): pp.1-24.

Google Scholar

[3] Lee, Y. and L. Wadsworth, Effects of melt-blowing process conditions on morphological and mechanical properties of polypropylene webs. Polymer, 1992. 33(6): pp.1200-1209.

DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(92)90764-n

Google Scholar

[4] Chen, T., X. Wang, and X. Huang, Effects of processing parameters on the fiber diameter of meltblown nonwoven fabrics. Textile Research Journal, 2005. 75(1): pp.76-80.

DOI: 10.1177/004051750507500114

Google Scholar

[5] Zhang, D., et al., Development and characterization of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) based bicomponent meltblown nonwovens. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2002. 83(6): pp.1280-1287.

DOI: 10.1002/app.2295

Google Scholar

[6] Malkan, S.R., An overview of spunbonding and meltblowing technologies. Tappi Journal, 1995. 78: pp.185-185.

Google Scholar

[7] Deitzel, J., et al., The effect of processing variables on the morphology of electrospun nanofibers and textiles. Polymer, 2001. 42(1): pp.261-272.

DOI: 10.1016/s0032-3861(00)00250-0

Google Scholar

[8] Nayak, R., et al., Recent advances in nanofibre fabrication techniques. Textile Research Journal, 2011.

Google Scholar

[9] Lyons, J., C. Pastore, and F. Ko, Developments in melt-electrospinning of thermoplastic polymers. Polymer Preprints, 2003. 44(2): pp.122-123.

Google Scholar

[10] Nayak, R., et al., Production of novel surfaces by electrospinning. Acta Universitatis Cibiniensis, 2011. 58: pp.128-138.

Google Scholar

[11] Lee, K.H., et al., Electrospinning of syndiotactic polypropylene from a polymer solution at ambient temperatures. Macromolecules, 2009. 42(14): pp.5215-5218.

DOI: 10.1021/ma9006472

Google Scholar

[12] Luu, Y., et al., Development of a nanostructured DNA delivery scaffold via electrospinning of PLGA and PLA-PEG block copolymers. Journal of Controlled Release, 2003. 89(2): pp.341-353.

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-3659(03)00097-x

Google Scholar

[13] Kim, K., et al., Control of degradation rate and hydrophilicity in electrospun nonwoven poly (lactide) nanofiber scaffolds for biomedical applications. Biomaterials, 2003. 24(27): pp.4977-4985.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00407-1

Google Scholar

[14] Shambaugh, R.L., A macroscopic view of the meltblowing process for producing microfibers. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 1988. 27(12): pp.2363-2372.

DOI: 10.1021/ie00084a021

Google Scholar

[15] Lyons, J., C. Li, and F. Ko, Melt-electrospinning part I: processing parameters and geometric properties. Polymer, 2004. 45(22): pp.7597-7603.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.08.071

Google Scholar

[16] Machado, A., et al., Evolution of peroxide induced thermomechanical degradation of polypropylene along the extruder. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2004. 91(4): pp.2711-2720.

DOI: 10.1002/app.13476

Google Scholar

[17] Zhang, W., S. Deodhar, and D. Yao, Processing properties of polypropylene with a minor addition of silicone oil. Polymer Engineering and Science, 2010. 50(7): pp.1340-1349.

DOI: 10.1002/pen.21665

Google Scholar

[18] Tsebrenko, M., et al., Effect of sodium oleate addition on the morphology of polypropylene-co-polyamide blends. Polymer Engineering and Science, 1999. 39(6): pp.1014-1021.

DOI: 10.1002/pen.11490

Google Scholar

[19] Xie, M., X. Liu, and H. Li, Influence of poly(ethylene glycol) containing additives on extrusion of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene/polypropylene blend. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2006. 100(2): pp.1282-1288.

DOI: 10.1002/app.23510

Google Scholar

[20] Ryan, K.J., et al., Ultra high molecular weight functional siloxane additives in polymers: effects on processing and properties. Journal of Vinyl and Additive Technology, 2000. 6(1): pp.7-19.

DOI: 10.1002/vnl.10217

Google Scholar