Dynamic Response of FDM Made ABS Parts in Different Part Orientations

Hesamodin Jami; Syed H. Masood; W.Q. Song

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.748.291

Paper Titles

CO₂ Laser Cladding of Mild Steel Using Iron Based Powder and Silicon Carbide Particles
p.269

Optimization of Process Parameters of Rotary Ultrasonic Machining Based on Taguchis Method
p.273

Acoustic Study Based on Sustainable Green Polymer Treated with H₂O
p.281

In Situ Transesterification of Vegetable Oil for Biodiesel Production via Ultrasound Clamp on Tubular Reactor as an Environment Sustainable Manufacturing Process
p.286

Dynamic Response of FDM Made ABS Parts in Different Part Orientations
p.291

Research on Kinetics of Hydrolysis Preparation of Micro-Molecular Dextran
p.295

Scaling up Process Output of Monomer Reactor
p.299

Characterization of Rice Straw Ash and Utilization in Glass Production
p.304

Investigation on Carbon Fiber Composites as Architectural EMI Shielding Material
p.309

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 748Dynamic Response of FDM Made ABS Parts in...

Dynamic Response of FDM Made ABS Parts in Different Part Orientations

Abstract:

The mechanical properties of a product made in Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) rapid prototyping are strongly dependant on process parameters selected during part fabrication. Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) is a common material used in FDM systems. The advantages of ABS include high strength and rigidity with toughness and these properties make it one of the most common thermoplastics used in engineering applications. This paper describes an experimental investigation of dynamic stressstrain response of ABS parts made by fused deposition modelling for three different part build orientations. Currently there is limited research available for this aspect of ABS material processed by FDM systems. The high strain rate compression tests were performed using a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar apparatus to determine the dynamic stress-strain response and results were compared with quasi-static behaviour of the same specimens.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Material and Manufacturing Technology IV

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 748)

Pages:

291-294

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.748.291

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2013

Authors:

Hesamodin Jami, Syed H. Masood, W.Q. Song

Keywords:

Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), Dynamic Response, Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), Part Orientation

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

References

[1] S.H. Masood, Intelligent rapid prototyping with fused deposition modeling, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 2, (1996), pp.34-40.

DOI: 10.1108/13552549610109054

Google Scholar

[2] O.S. Es-Said, R. Noorani, M. Mendelson, R. Marloth, B.A. Pregger, Effect of Layer Orientation on Mechanical Properties of Rapid Prototyped Samples, Materials and Manufacturing Processes (USA), Vol. 15, No. 1, Jan. (2000), pp.107-122.

DOI: 10.1080/10426910008912976

Google Scholar

[3] C. Lee, S. Kim, H. Kim, S. Ahn, Measurement of anisotropic compressive strength of rapid prototyping parts, J Mater Process Technol., Vol 187–188, (2007), p.627–630.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.095

Google Scholar

[4] K. Thrimurthulu, P. Pandey, N.V. Reddy, Optimum part deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, Vol 44, (2004) p.585–594.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.12.004

Google Scholar

[5] Y . Zhang, K . Chou, A parametric study of part distortions in fused deposition modeling using three-dimensional finite element analyses. Proc Inst Mech Eng B, J Eng Manuf. Vol 222, (2008) p.959–967.

Google Scholar

[6] M. A. Meyers, Dynamic behaviour of materials. Berlin: Spring (1994), p.296–302.

Google Scholar