Experimental Characterization of Behavior Laws for Titanium Alloys: Application to Ti5553

Vincent Wagner; Maher Baili; Gilles Dessein; Daniel Lallement

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.446.147

Paper Titles

Influence of Process and Material Parameters on Impact Response in Composite Structure: Methodology Using Design of Experiments
p.83

Approximate Solution of the Structural Problems Using Probabilistic Transformation
p.91

Structural Shape Optimization Using an Adaptive Simulated Annealing
p.101

Graft Interpenetrating Continuous Epoxy-Polysiloxane Polymeric Network
p.111

Experimental and Numerical Modelling of LRI Process
p.121

BEM Simulation of 3D Updated Resin Front for LCM Processes
p.131

FEA of Dynamic Behavior of Top Hat Bonded Stiffened Composite Panel
p.137

Experimental Characterization of Behavior Laws for Titanium Alloys: Application to Ti5553
p.147

Effect of Ductile Damage Evolution in Sheet Metal Forming: Experimental and Numerical Investigations
p.157

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 446Experimental Characterization of Behavior Laws for...

Experimental Characterization of Behavior Laws for Titanium Alloys: Application to Ti5553

Abstract:

The aim of this paper is to study the machinability of a new titanium alloy: Ti-5AL-5Mo-5V-3CR used for the production of new landing gear. First, the physical and mechanical properties of this material will be presented. Second, we show the relationship between material properties and machinability. Third, the Ti5553 will be compared to Ti64. Unless Ti64 is α+β alloy group and Ti5553 is a metastable, we have chosen to compare these two materials. Ti64 is the most popular of titanium alloys and many works were been made on its machining. After, we have cited the Ti5553 properties and detailed the behavior laws. They are used in different ways: with or without thermal softening effect or without dynamic terms. The goal of the paper is to define the best cutting force model. So, different models are compared for two materials (steel and titanium alloy). To define the model, two methods exist that we have compared. The first is based on machining test; however the second is based on Hopkinson bar test. These methods allow us to obtain different ranges of strain rate, strain and temperature. This comparison will show the importance of a good range of strain rate, strain and temperature for behavior law, especially in titanium machining.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Structural Analysis of Advanced Materials

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 446)

Pages:

147-155

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.446.147

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2010

Authors:

Vincent Wagner, Maher Baili, Gilles Dessein, Daniel Lallement

Keywords:

Cutting Condition, Cutting Force, Cutting Temperature, Stress, Tensile Yield Stress (TYS), Thermal Effect, Ti5553, Tool Geometry, Ultimate Tensile Stress (UTS), Wear

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

References

[1] Ezugwu, E., & Wang, Z. (1997). Titanium alloys and their machinability - a review. Journal of Material Processinf Technology &o. 68 , 262-274.

Google Scholar

[2] Arrazola, P., Garay, A., Iriarte, L., Armendia, M., Marya, S., & Le Maître, F. (2008). Machinability of titanium alloys (Ti6Al4V and Ti5553). Journal of Material Processing Technology.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.06.020

Google Scholar

[3] Ozel, T., & Zeren, E. (2006). A metothodology to determine wprk material flow stress and toolchip interface friction properties by using analysis of machining. Journal of manufacturing science and Engineering, Vol. 128 , 119.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2118767

Google Scholar

[4] Changeux, B. (2001). Loi de comportement pour l'usinage. Localisation de la déformation et aspects microstructuraux. ENSAM Paris: PhD Thesis.

Google Scholar

[5] Poulachon, G., Moisan, A., & Dessoly, M. (2002). Contribution à l'étude des mécanismes de coupe en tournage dur. Mécanique et Industrie Vol. 3 , 291-299.

DOI: 10.1016/s1296-2139(02)01169-7

Google Scholar

[6] Tounsi, N., Vincenti, J., Otho, A., & Elbestawi, M. (2002). From the basic mechanic of orthogonal metal cutting toward the identification of the constitutive equation. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, Vol. 42 , 1373-1383.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(02)00046-9

Google Scholar

[7] Fanning, J. (n. d. ). Properties of TIMETAL 5553 (Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr). ASM International, Vol. 14 , 788-791.

DOI: 10.1361/105994905x75628

Google Scholar

[8] Oxley, P. (1989). Mechanics of machining an analyticale approach to assessing machinability. Ellis Horwood Limited.

Google Scholar

[9] Tricot, R. (1988). Thermo-mechanical treatments of titanium alloys. Proc. 6th World Conf. on Titanium.

Google Scholar

[10] Boothroyd, G. (1963). Temperatures in orthogonal metal cutting. Pro. Inst. Mech. Eng. , 189802.

Google Scholar

[11] Joyot, P. (1994). Modélisation numérique et expérimentale de l'enlèvement de matière. Université de Bordeaux : PhD Thesis.

Google Scholar

[12] Puigsegur, L. (2002). Caractérisation thermique d'un procèdè d'usinage par tournage approache analytique et par identification de système non entiers. ENSAM Bordeaux: PhD Thesis.

Google Scholar

[13] Nistor, I. (2005). Experimentale et simulation numérique de l'endommagement en dynamique rapide : application aux structures aéronautiques. Université de Toulouse/ENP/ENIT : PhD Thesis.

Google Scholar

[14] Johnson, G., & Cook, W. (n. d. ). A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strin rates and high temperatures.

Google Scholar