The Properties of Wool Fibre, Yarn, Knitted Fabric, and Leather Obtained from Enzyme Depilation of Ovine Skins

Article Preview

Abstract:

The goal of reducing wool processing effluent is important due to increasing environmental restrictions on chemicals with potential to pollute the environment. Two enzyme-based depilation formulae were trialled on sheepskins alongside the more polluting lime sulphide currently used by the leather industry. Wool, yarn, fabric and leather properties were evaluated, showing no significant differences between the methods, except a beneficial increase in fabric pilling resistance where enzyme-depilated wool was used. The enzyme approach is therefore a viable alternative in sheepskin depilation, with a lower environmental impact than traditional methods.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

317-323

Citation:

Online since:

November 2015

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Shaw, T., Environmental Issues in the Wool Textile Industry, in Proc. 8th Int. Wool Text. Res. Conf.,. Christchurch, New Zealand, 1990. 4: pp.7-14.

Google Scholar

[2] Rankin, D.A., Factors affecting levels of calcium compounds in New Zealand woolgrease. New Zeal. J. Agr. Res., 1990. 33(1): pp.185-198.

DOI: 10.1080/00288233.1990.10430676

Google Scholar

[3] Ingham, P.E., et al., Meeting the challenge of healthy, green and colourful carpets. The Society of Dyers and Colourists of Australia and New Zealand 16th International Symposium, Melbourne, Australia. CD format, 2000. p.17–20.

Google Scholar

[4] Ingham, P.E., et al., Functional finishes for wool-Eco considerations. Adv. Mat. Res., 2012. 441: pp.33-43.

Google Scholar

[5] Ingham, P.E., et al., Novel eco-friendly wet processing of wool and end-of-life options. 12th Asian Textile Conference: New Prospects on Textiles, Shanghai, China, 2013. P. 24-26.

Google Scholar

[6] Necer, M., et al., Which yields with wastes? Study on pilot of the efficiency of water treatment plant-case of the sector of Algerian tanning. J. Water. Resource Prot., 2014. 6: pp.1457-1463.

DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2014.615134

Google Scholar

[7] Hosking, K.F., et al., Bandknife shearing of wool fibres. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Canterbury University, Christchurch, New Zealand, (1974).

Google Scholar

[8] Rawlings, D.E., et al., The effect of manganese and neutralisation on the removal of sulphide and oxygen demand in fellmongery effluent. Research Bulletin no. 700, Leather Industries Research Institute, Grahamstown, South Africa, (1975).

Google Scholar

[9] Rawlings, D.E., et al., An experimental study of the removal of sulphide in the aeration of fellmongery effluent. J. Soc. Leather Technol. Chem., 1975. 59: pp.143-148.

Google Scholar

[10] Stewart, R.G., Relative yields of slipe and shorn wools. Wool Research Organisation of New Zealand (Inc. ) Report No. 19 WRONZ, Christchurch, New Zealand., (1973).

Google Scholar

[11] Jamieson, R.G., et al., The effect of the sliping process on fibre diameter and subsequent wet processing. Wool Research Organisation of New Zealand (Inc. ) Report No. 152WRONZ, Christchurch, New Zealand, (1988).

Google Scholar