[1]
Simulation modeling. Information on http: /www. anylogic. ru/use-of-simulation.
Google Scholar
[2]
Blocks in SimEvents, Documentation Center. Information on http: /www. mathworks. com/help/simevents/blocklist. html.
Google Scholar
[3]
X.N. Apachidi. Simulation of queuing systems with priority service discipline, Prospects for the development of information technology: The Proceedings of the Russian Youth Scientific and Practical Conference. (2014) 5-6.
Google Scholar
[4]
X.N. Apachidi. Analysis of queuing systems with priority disciplines and service expectations, Information systems and technologies in education, science and business. The works of the Russian Youth Scientific and Practical School. (2014) 109-110.
Google Scholar
[5]
J.J. Katsman, X.N. Apachidi. Algorithm Simulation of Resource Allocation of the Queueing Systems, Based on the Priorities, International Conference on Mechanical Engineering, Automation and Control Systems (MEACS). (2014) 1-6.
DOI: 10.1109/meacs.2014.6986896
Google Scholar
[6]
X.N. Apachidi. Comparison of characteristics of queuing systems with priority allocation of resources, Youth and Modern Information Technology. Proceedings of the VII International scientific and practical conference of students, graduate students and young scientists Youth and Modern Information Technology,. (2014).
Google Scholar
[7]
Choi, B. D., B. Kim, and J. Chung. M/M/1 queue with impatient customers of higher priority, Queueing Systems. 38 (2001) 49–66.
Google Scholar
[8]
Brandt, A. and M. Brandt. 2004. On the two-class M/M/1 system under preemptive resume and impatience of the prioritized customers, Queueing Systems. 47 (2004) 147–168.
DOI: 10.1023/b:ques.0000032805.73991.8e
Google Scholar
[9]
Iravani, F. and B. Balcioglu. On priority queues with impatient customers, Queueing Systems. 58 (2008) 239–260.
DOI: 10.1007/s11134-008-9069-6
Google Scholar
[10]
Che Soong Kim, A. Z. Melikov, and B. G. Ismailov, Optimal Assignment of Dynamic Priorities in Queuing Systems with Two Types of Customers, Automatic Control and Computer Sciences. 42 (2008) 320-326.
DOI: 10.3103/s0146411608060072
Google Scholar