Finite Element Model Updating of a Thin Wall Enclosure under Impact Excitation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Simulation result of a structural dynamics problem is dependent on the techniques used in the finite element model and the major task in model updating is determination of the changes to be made to the numerical model so that dynamic properties are comparable to the experimental result. In this paper, the dynamic analysis of a thin wall structure ( approx. 1.5±0.1 mm thick) was realized using the Lanczos tool to extract the modes between 0 and 200 Hz, but the interest was to achieve a good aggreement between the first ten natural frequencies. A shell element with mid size nodes was used to improve the finite element result and the model was tunned using the damping constant, material properties and discretization. The correlation of the results from the impact excitation response test and the finite element was significantly improved. A correlation coefficient of 0.99 was achieved after tunning the model.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

337-342

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Export:

[1] Ewins, D. J. Modal Testing : Theory and Practice Research Studies Press Ltd., (1984).

Google Scholar

[2] Mottershead J E and Friswell M I, Model Updating in Structural Dynamics: A Survey, Journal of Sound and Vibration (1993) 167(2), 347 - 375.

DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1993.1340

Google Scholar

[3] Zapico, J L, Gonzalez, M P, Friswell, M I, Taylor, C A and Crewe, A J, Finite Element Model Updating of a Small Scale Bridge, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 268 (2003) pp.993-1012.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-460x(03)00409-7

Google Scholar

[4] Mares C, Mottershead, J E and Friswell M I Results Obtained by Minimising Natural Frequency Errors and Using Physical Reasoning, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (2003) 17(1) 39 - 46.

DOI: 10.1006/mssp.2002.1537

Google Scholar

[5] Friswell, M I; Mottershead J E and Ahmadian, H; Finite-element Model Updating using Experimental Test Data: Parametrization and Regularization, Phil. Trans. Royal Society of London A (2001), pp.169-186.

DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2000.0719

Google Scholar

[6] Nalitolela, N; Penny, J E T and Friswell, M I; Updating Model Parameters by Adding an Imagined Stiffness to the Structure,; Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (1993) 7(2), pp.161-172.

DOI: 10.1006/mssp.1993.1005

Google Scholar

[7] Nalitolela, N G; Penny, J E T and Friswell M I; Mass or Stiffness addition Technique for Structural Parameter Updating', International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis, vol. 7 no 3, pp.157-168, Jul (1992).

Google Scholar

[8] Mares, C; Mottershead, J E and Friswell, M I; Stochastic Model Updating: Part 1: Theory and Simulated Example, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 20 (2006) pp.1674-1695.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.06.006

Google Scholar

[9] Mottershead J E, Mares C, James S and Friswell M I; Stochastic Model Updating: Part 2: Application to a Set of Physical Structures, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 20 (2006) pp.2171-2185.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.06.007

Google Scholar

[10] Stefan Reh, Jean-Daniel Beley, Siddhartha Mukherjee and Eng Hui Khor; Probabilistic Finite Element Analysis using ANSYS, Structural Safety 28 (2006) pp.17-43.

DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.03.010

Google Scholar

[11] B S 6897 Part 5, 1995, Experimental Determination of Mechanical Mobility.

Google Scholar

[12] Jimin He and Zhi-Fang Fu: Modal Analysis, 1 st ed: Butterworth-Heinemann (2001).

Google Scholar

[13] M I Friswell and J E Mottershead Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics' Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995. Acknowledgement: Thank to 'Technology Strategy Board' (project number, TP/8/ADM/6/I/Q2017G) and 'EPSRC, (project number DT/F006829/1) for funding this project.

Google Scholar