Comparative Study of Drill Pipe Erosion Wear in Gas Drilling and Mud Drilling

Article Preview

Abstract:

Failure of drill pipe is very severe in gas drilling. Based on the erosion theory and field condition, the erosion of drill pipe is investigated by using numerical simulation. The agreement between the simulation result and experimental data is very good, this agreement indicates that the numerical model is realistic in this paper. The erosion wear of drill pipe is investigated in gas drilling and mud drilling by using this model. According to study result of drill pipe erosion between gas drilling and mud drilling, the erosion rate of drill pipe in gas drilling is greater than that of in mud drilling. The result shows that the local erosion rate of joint is more severe than that of the drill pipe body in gas drilling, and also the local erosion of drill pipe body is severe. There are many eroded pits on drill pipe body in gas drilling. This study will reveal the failure mechanism of drill pipe in gas drilling, and also have some guiding significance to reduce the failure of drill pipe.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1708-1712

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

[1] C. Santus. Fretting fatigue of aluminum alloy in contact with steel in oil drill pipe connections, modeling to interpret test results, International Journal of Fatigue, 30 (2008) 677-688.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.05.006

Google Scholar

[2] G.F. Miscow, P.E.V. de Miranda, T.A. Netto and J.C.R. Placido. Techniques to characterize fatigue behaviour of full size drill pipes and small scale samples. International Journal of Fatigue, 26 (2004) 575-584.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.10.014

Google Scholar

[3] A.R. Shahani and S.M.H. Sharifi. Contact stress analysis and calculation of stress concentration factors at the tool joint of a drill pipe. Materials and Design, 30 (2009) 3615-3621.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.02.022

Google Scholar

[4] Shuanlu Lu, Yaorong Feng, Faqian Luo, Changyi Qin and Xinhu Wang. Failure analysis of IEU drill pipe wash out. International Journal of Fatigue, 27 (2005) 1360-1365.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.07.012

Google Scholar

[5] I. Finnie. Erosion of Surfaces by Solid Particles. Wear, 3(1960) 87-103.

Google Scholar

[6] W. Tabakoff. Shanov. Erosion rate testing at high temperature for turbomachinery use. Surface and Coatings Technology, 76-77 (1995) 75-80.

DOI: 10.1016/0257-8972(95)02507-3

Google Scholar

[7] M. Atkinson, E.V. Stepanova, D.P. Goulet, S.V. Sherikar and J. Hunter. High pressure testing sand erosion in 3D flow channels and correlation with CFD. Wear, 263 (2007) 270-77.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2007.01.100

Google Scholar

[8] Guo Jianhua, She Chaoyi, Li Qian, et al. Quantitative analysis and controlling method for pipe string erosion in gas drilling. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 28 (2007) 129-132.

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Zhang, E.P. Reuterfors, B.S. McLaury, S.A. Shirazi and E.F. Rybicki. Comparison of computed and measured particle velocities and erosion in water and gas flows. Wear, 263 (2007) 330-338.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.12.048

Google Scholar

[10] Huang Xiaobing. Study of erosion mechanism of drilling tool for gas drillng. Chengdu: Southwest Petrolem University Doctoral Dissertation, (2009).

Google Scholar

[11] Zhu Xiaohua, Liu Shaohu and Tong Hua. Study on drill pipe erosion law in gas drilling. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, in press.

Google Scholar

[12] ZHU Hongjun, LIN Yuanhua, MENG Yingfeng, et al. Influence of Relevant Parameters on Hole Cleaning and Pipe String Erosion in Gas Drilling. SPE 126515, (2010).

DOI: 10.2118/126515-ms

Google Scholar

[13] Company A. ANSYS CFX-Solver, Release 11. 0: Theory. Waterloo, Ontario: ANSYS Canada Ltd, 2005: 26-29.

Google Scholar