The Effects of Spot Weld Pitch to the Axial Crushing Characteristics of Top-Hat Crash Box

Article Preview

Abstract:

Numerical study of the effect of spot weld pitch with respect to top-hat crash box crushing characteristics are presented in this paper. Belytschko-Lin-Tsay shell element was used for modeled columns wall with Piecewise Linear Plasticity material model. The impactor was modeled using hexahedral solid elements and assumed as a rigid body. Spot weld joints used to connect mild steel St37 plates of the columns were modeled using beam element and solid element. Impact characteristics related to the spot weld pitch and models were evaluated from simulation results in the form of crushing force vs axial deformation of the column. The results show that spot weld pitch does not significantly affect the crushing characteristics for top-hat crash box with beam element spot weld model, while solid element spot weld model show otherwise. The difference between beam element spot weld model and solid element spot weld model is larger at spot weld pitch 0.50HH, and tend to close at higher spot weld pitch. Top-hat crash box model becomes stiffer with solid element applied as spot weld model.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

578-582

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] I.S. Putra, T. Dirgantara, L.H. Anh, H. Homma, and K. Kishimoto, Behaviour of Thin Walled Square Tube and Tubular Hat Sections Subjected to Low Velocity Impact Loading, Advanced Material Research, 33-37: 387-394, (2008).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.33-37.387

Google Scholar

[2] A. Jusuf, F.S. Allam, T. Dirgantara, L. Gunawan, and I.S. Putra, Low Velocity Impact Analyses of Primatic Columns using Finite Element Method, Key Engineering Materials, 462-463: 1308-1313, (2011).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.462-463.1308

Google Scholar

[3] L. Gunawan, A. Jusuf, T. Dirgantara, and I.S. Putra, Experimental Study on Axial Impact Loading of Foam Filled Aluminum Columns, Journal of KONES Power Train and Transport, 20(2): 150-157, (2013).

Google Scholar

[4] M.D. White and Norman Jones, Experimental Quasi-static Axial Crushing of Top-hat and Double-hat Thin-walled Sections, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 41: 179-208, (1999).

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(98)00047-2

Google Scholar

[5] M. D. White and Norman Jones, A Theoretical Analysis for the Dynamic Axial Cruhing of Top-hat and Double-hat Thin-walled Sections, Proceeding of the Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 213(4): 307-325, (1999).

DOI: 10.1243/0954407991526883

Google Scholar

[6] O. Fyllingen, O.S. Hopperstad, and M. Langseth, Simulations of a Top-hat Section Subjected to Axial Crushing Taking Into Account Material and Geometry Variations. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 45: 6205-6219, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.07.011

Google Scholar

[7] J. D. Campbell and R.H. Cooper, Yield and Flow of Low-carbon Steel at Medium Strain Rates, Proceedings of the Conference on the Physical Basis of Yield and Fracture, 77-87, (1984).

Google Scholar