A Continuum Model with an Embedded Fracture Process Zone Modelled as a Cohesive Frictional Interface

Article Preview

Abstract:

Failure in quasi-brittle materials, such as concrete and rock, usually develops in a fracture process zone (FPZ), in which dissipative processes takes place. At the onset of bifurcation or upon formation of FPZ the homogeneity of kinematic fields is lost and the stress field is redistributed which gives rise to the so called deterministic size effect problem. The total strain energy stored within a specimen of quasi-brittle materials will scale with its size; however, the amount of dissipated energy does not depend on the specimen size but only on the width of the FPZ. This width is related to the microstructure of the material and is considered a characteristic of the material. In this paper, a cohesive frictional interface is used to model the dissipative behaviour of material inside FPZ. Fundamental micro-mechanisms of energy dissipation such as micro-crack opening in mode I and frictional sliding between micro-crack surfaces are formulated within the frame work of Thermodynamic with internal variables (TIV) to ensure the thermodynamics admissibility of the model. The link between the material behaviour inside and outside FPZ is given through the continuity of tractions along the boundaries of FPZ. It is shown that although the shape of the post-peak stress-strain varies, for specimens of different slenderness, the amount of dissipated energy remains the same in all cases.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

360-365

Citation:

Online since:

July 2016

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Z.P. Bažant, Size Effect on Structural Strength1, in: J. Lemaitre (Eds. ), Handbook of Materials Behavior Models, Academic Press, Burlington, 2001, p.30 – 68.

Google Scholar

[2] Z.P. Bažant, Y. Xiang, Size effect in compression fracture: splitting crack band propagation, J. Eng. Mech., 123. 2 (1997) 162-172.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1997)123:2(162)

Google Scholar

[3] Z.P. Bažant, Fracturing truss model: Size effect in shear failure of reinforced concrete, J. Eng. Mech., 123. 12 (1997) 1276-1288.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1997)123:12(1276)

Google Scholar

[4] B. J. Carter, Size and stress gradient effects on fracture around cavities, J. Rock Mech. and Rock Eng., 25. 3 (1992) 167-186.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01019710

Google Scholar

[5] B. J. Carter, E. Z. Lajtai, Y. Yuan, Tensile fracture from circular cavities loaded in compression, J. International Journal of Fracture, 57. 3 (1992) 221-236.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00035074

Google Scholar

[6] B.C. Haimson, C.G. Herrick, In-situ stress calculation from borehole breakout experimental studies, Proc. 26th US Symp. Rock Mech., (1989).

Google Scholar

[7] Z.P. Bažant, L. Cedolin, Damage and Localisation Instabilities, Stability of structures: elastic, inelastic, fracture and damage theories, World Scientific, 2010, pp.845-856.

DOI: 10.1142/7828

Google Scholar

[8] G.D. Nguyen, A.M. Korsunsky, I. Einav, A constitutive modelling framework featuring two scales of behaviour: fundamentals and applications to quasi-brittle failure, J. Eng. Frac. Mech. 115 (2014) 221-240.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.11.006

Google Scholar

[9] G.T. Houlsby, A.M. Puzrin, Principles of Hyperplasticity: an approach to plasticity theory based on thermodynamic principles, Springer Science & Business Media, (2007).

Google Scholar

[10] Z.P. Bažant, Analysis of work-of-fracture method for measuring fracture energy of concrete, J. Eng. Mech., 122. 2 (1996) 138-144.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1996)122:2(138)

Google Scholar

[11] M. Jirásek, Objective modeling of strain localization, J. Revue française de génie civil 6 (2002) 1119 – 1132.

DOI: 10.1080/12795119.2002.9692735

Google Scholar

[12] H. Ziegler, An Introduction to thermomechanics, second ed. North Holland, Amsterdam, (1983).

Google Scholar