Influence of the Honeycomb Geometry on the Sandwich Composite Plate Behavior

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper the influence cell honeycomb geometry on the mechanical behaviour of a composite sandwich plate is analyzed. Three cell geometries (circular, hexagonal and square) are static analysed so that to select the best type of honeycomb that will be used in the manufacturing the sandwich plate core. The main aim is to develop approach models of equivalent orthotropic materials to replace the real model of honeycomb core with their properties so that to quickly calculate the sandwich plate made out of composite when is used a finite element analysis code. Geometry and material properties of the honeycomb are delivered by the material provider. Comparative analysis, by using Finite element analysis is performed for all geometries, in the same boundary conditions. Since in the impact loading of the composite sandwich plate the core is mainly loaded to compression, comparative study of the three cell geometries honeycomb was performed for this type of compressive loading. Since the cell is the basic element of the honeycomb core, the calculus is performed for one unit volume of sandwich, concerning also the part of skins.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

139-144

Citation:

Online since:

February 2017

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] I. Aydincak, Thesis: Investigation of design and analyses principles of honeycomb structures, nov. 2007, pages 177.

Google Scholar

[2] L. J. Gibson, M. F. Ashby, Cellular Solids Structure and Properties Paperback ISBN: 9780521499118, Cambridge University Press, (January 1997).

Google Scholar

[3] W. Becker, Closed Form Analysis of the Thickness Effect of Regular Honeycomb Core Material, Composite Structures, Vol. 48, 2000, p.67 – 70.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(99)00074-4

Google Scholar

[4] ANSYS Mechanical APDL Element Reference, ANSYS, Inc. is certified to ISO 9001: 2008 November (2013).

Google Scholar

[5] ANSYS Online Help Documentation, ANSYS Inc.

Google Scholar

[6] Hexcel Corp, Honeycomb Attributes and Properties Handbook (1999).

Google Scholar

[7] http: /inside. mines. edu/~apetrell/ENME442/Documents/SOLID186. pdf, SOLID186 Element Description.

Google Scholar

[8] S. J. Amith Kumar , K Sabeel Ahmed K, Santosh M B, Parametric Analysis on the Vibration Characteristics of Sandwich composites Structure , International Journal on Mechanical Engineering and Robotics (IJMER) , Vol. 1, No. 1, pp.2321-5747, (2013).

Google Scholar

[9] K Kantha Rao, K. Jayathirtha Rao, A.G. Sarwade, M. Sarath Chandra, Strength Analysis on Honeycomb Sandwich Panels of different Materials, International Journal of Engineering, Research and Applications, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp.365-374, (2012).

Google Scholar

[10] P. Noury, B. Hayman, D. McGeorge and J. Weitzenböck, Lightweight construction for advanced shipbuilding Recent development, DET NORSKE VERITAS, Veritasveien 1, N-1322 Høvik, Norway.

DOI: 10.3940/rina.ft.2001.73

Google Scholar

[11] A. Szekrenyes, Analysis of classical and first-order shear deformable cracked orthotropic plates, Journal of Composite Materials 48, 12, p.1441, (2014).

DOI: 10.1177/0021998313487756

Google Scholar

[12] A. Szekrenyes, Interlaminar fracture analysis in the GI–GII–GIII space using prestressed transparent composite beams, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 30, 19, p.1655, (2011).

DOI: 10.1177/0731684411418549

Google Scholar