The Effect of Tool Edge Geometry on Tool Performance and Surface Integrity in Turning Ti-6Al-4V Alloys

[1] Ezugwu, E. O., Bonney, J. and Yamane, Y. An overview of the machinability of aeroengine alloys. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2003, 134, 233–253.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)01042-7

Google Scholar

[2] Boyer, R. R. An overview on the use of titanium in the aerospace industry. Mater. Sci. Engng, 1996, A213, 103–114.

Google Scholar

[3] Smith, W. F. Structure and Properties of Engineering Alloys, 2nd edition, 1993 (McGraw-Hill, New York).

Google Scholar

[4] Boyer, R., Welsch, G. and Collings, E. W. Materials Proper- ties Handbook: Titanium Alloys, 1994 (American Society for Metals, Materials Park, Ohio).

Google Scholar

[5] Donachie, M. J. and Donachie, S. J. Superalloys: A Technical Guide, 2002 (American Society for Metals, Materials Park, Ohio).

Google Scholar

[6] Zlatin, N. and Field, M. Procedures and precautions in machining titanium alloys. Titanium Sci. Technol., 1973, 1, 489–501.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-1346-6_37

Google Scholar

[7] Narutaki, N. and Murakoshi, A. Study on machining of titanium alloys. Ann. CIRP, 1983, 32(1), 65–69.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)63362-9

Google Scholar

[8] Che-Haron, C. H. 2001. Tool life and surface integrity in turning titanium alloy. J. Mater. Processing Technol. 118: 231–237.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)00926-8

Google Scholar

[9] Hartung, P. D. 1981. Tool wears in titanium machining. Master Thesis, Massachuset Int. of Technology.

Google Scholar

[10] Nabhani, F. Machining of aerospace titanium alloys. Robotics Computer Integrated Mfg, 2001, 17, 99–106.

DOI: 10.1016/s0736-5845(00)00042-9

Google Scholar

[11] Nabhani, F. 2001. Wear mechanisms of ultra-hard cutting tool materials. J. Mater. Processing Technol. 17: 99–106.

Google Scholar

[12] Min, W. and Youzhen, Z. 1988. Diffusion wears in milling titanium alloys. Mater. Sci. Technol. 4: 548–553.

Google Scholar

[13] Kahles, J. F., Field, M., Eylon, D. and Froes, F. H. 1985. Machining of titanium alloys. J. Metals 37: 27–35.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03259441

Google Scholar

[14] Bhaumik, S. K., Divakar, C. and Singh, A. K. 1995. Machining Ti–6Al–4V alloy with a wBN–cBN composite tool. Mater. Des. 16(4): 221–226.

DOI: 10.1016/0261-3069(95)00044-5

Google Scholar

[15] Komanduri, R. and Reed Jr., W. R. Evaluation of carbide grades and a new cutting geometry for machining titanium alloys. Wear 92: 113–123.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(83)90011-x

Google Scholar

[16] Wang, Z. M. and Ezugwu, E. O. 1997. Performance of PVD- coated carbide tool when machining Ti–6Al–4V. Tribology Trans. 40: 81–86.

DOI: 10.1080/10402009708983632

Google Scholar

[17] Burhanuddin, Y., Che Haron, C.H., Ghani, J.A., Ariffin, A. K., Ibrahim, G.A., Yasir, A. & El-Maghribi, N.H. (2008).

Google Scholar

[18] Machado, A. R., Wallbank, J., Pashby, I. R. and Ezugwu, E. O. 1998. Tool performance and chip control when machining Ti6Al4V and Inconel 901 using high pressure coolant supply. Machining Sci. Technol. 2: 1–12.

DOI: 10.1080/10940349808945655

Google Scholar

[19] Komanduri, R. Some clarifications on the mechanics of chip formation when machining titanium alloys. Wear, 1982, 76, 15–34.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(82)90113-2

Google Scholar

[20] Hong, S.Y. & Zhao, Z. 1999. Thermal aspects, material considerations and cooling strategies in cryogenic machining. Clean Products and Processes 1: 107–116.

DOI: 10.1007/s100980050016

Google Scholar

[21] Machado, A. R. and Wallbank, J. 1990. Machining of titanium and its alloys—a review. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture. 204(B1): 53–60.

DOI: 10.1243/pime_proc_1990_204_047_02

Google Scholar

[22] Donachie, M. J. Titanium, A Technical Guide, 1988 (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio).

Google Scholar

[23] Yang, X. and Liu, C. R. 1999. Machining titanium and its alloys. Machining Sci. Technol. 3(1): 107–139.

Google Scholar

[24] ISO 3685 Specification for Tool Life with Single Point Turn- ing Tools, 1993 (International Standardization Organization, Geneva, Switzerland).

Google Scholar

[25] Ezugwu, E. O. and Wang, Z. M. 1997. Titanium alloys and their machinability—a review. J. Mater. Processing Technol. 68: 262–274.

Google Scholar

[26] Yeon Kim, K., Young Lee, W. and Chol Sin, H. A finite-element analysis of machining with the tool edge considered. J. Mater. Processing Technol. 86: 45–55.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(98)00230-1

Google Scholar

[27] Kalpakjian, S. 1995. Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, 3rd edition. Addison-Wesley: Reading, Massachusetts.

Google Scholar

[28] Kishawy, H. A. and Elbestawi, M. A. 1999. Effects of process parameters on material side flow during hard turning. Int. J. Mach. Tools Mfg 39: 1017–1030.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(98)00084-4

Google Scholar

[29] Thiele, J. D. and Melkote, S. N. 1999. Effect of edge geometry and workpiece hardness on surface generation in the finish hard turning of AISI 52100 steel. J. Mater. Processing Technol. 94: 216–226.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(99)00111-9

Google Scholar

[30] Zhou, J.M., Walter, H., Anderson, M. & Stahl, J.E. 2003. Effect chamfer angle on wear of PCBN cutting tool. Int. J. Mach. & Manufacture 43: 301-305.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(02)00214-6

Google Scholar

[31] Klocke, F., Konig, W. & Gerschwiller, K. 1996. Advanced machining of titanium and nickel-based alloys. in E. Kuljanic (Ed. ) Advanced Manufacturing Systems and Technology pp.7-21.

Google Scholar

[32] Wang, Z.G., Rahman, M. & Wong, Y.S. 2005. Tool wear characteristics of binderless CBN tools used in high-speed milling of titanium alloys Wear 258: 752–758 FIGURE 1 Tool wear progression curves FIGURE 2 Tool wear rate FIGURE 3 SEM micrograph of honed-edge PCBN cutting tools after machining at cutting speed of 280 m/min, feed of 0. 25 mm/rev and depth of cut of 0. 1 mm. FIGURE 4 EDAX analysis of honed-edge PCBN cutting tools after machining at cutting speed of 280 m/min, feed of 0. 25 mm/rev and depth of cut of 0. 1 mm. FIGURE 5 SEM micrograph of honed-edge PCBN cutting tools after machining at cutting speed of 280 m/min, feed of 0. 05 mm/rev and depth of cut of 0. 5 mm. FIGURE 6 SEM micrograph of honed-edge PCBN cutting tools after machining at cutting speed of 180 m/min, feed of 0. 25 mm/rev and depth of cut of 0. 5 mm. FIGURE 7 Machined surface roughness variation FIGURE 8 SEM micrograph of deformed grain boundary in the cutting direction when machining using honed edge PCBN tool.

Google Scholar