Paper Titles

Effects of Truck Impacts on Bridge Piers
p.13

Innovative Applications of Textile-Based Composites in Strengthening and Seismic Retrofitting as Well as in the Prefabrication of New Structures
p.26

Performance Evaluation of Existing Bridges under Vehicle Dynamic Effects
p.42

Adaptive Negative Stiffness: A New Structural Modification Approach for Seismic Protection
p.54

Hybrid Simulations: Theory, Applications, and Future Directions
p.67

Engineered Wood in Cold Climate - Application to Monitoring of a New Swedish Suspension Bridge
p.96

Research on Mechanical Properties and Engineering Application of Modern Timber Structure
p.105

Selection of Ground Motions for Performance-Based Seismic Assessment of Structures
p.111

Parametric Identification of Nonlinear Devices for Seismic Protection Using Soft Computing Techniques
p.118

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 639-640Hybrid Simulations: Theory, Applications, and...

Hybrid Simulations: Theory, Applications, and Future Directions

Article Preview

Abstract:

Hybrid simulation is a testing method for examining the seismic response of structures using a hybrid model comprised of both physical and numerical substructures. Because of the unique feature of the method to combine physical testing with numerical simulations, it provides an opportunity to investigate the seismic response of structures in an efficient and economically feasible manner. It is this feature of the method which made it gain widespread use in recent years. This paper presents the theory of the method including an overview of the previous research related to various aspects of the method, an overview of two hybrid simulation applications, and the future directions for transforming the method to its next generation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Civil Infrastructure Engineering

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 639-640)

Pages:

67-95

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.639-640.67

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2013

Authors:

Khalid M. Mosalam, Selim Günay

Keywords:

Application, Hybrid Simulation, Integration Methods, Real-Time, Simulation Errors, Smart Shaking Table, Substructuring

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

[1] S.N. Dermitzakis and S.A. Mahin, Development of Substructuring Techniques for On-Line Computer Controlled Seismic Performance Testing, UBC/EERC-85/04, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, (1985).

[2] M. Nakashima, T. Kaminosono, M. Ishida, and K. Ando, Integration techniques for substructure pseudodynamic testing, Proc. 4th U.S. Natl. Conf. on Earthquake Eng., Palm Springs, Calif., II, 1990, pp.515-524.

[3] P.S. Schneider and W.C. Roeder, An inelastic substructure technique for the pseudodynamic test method, Earthquake Eng. Struc. Dyn. 23 (1994) 761–775.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290230706

[4] M. Nakashima and N. Masaoka, Real-time on-line test for MDOF systems, Earthquake Eng. and Struc. Dyn. 28 (1999) 393-420.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199904)28:4<393::aid-eqe823>3.0.co;2-c

[5] G. Mosqueda, M.D. Cortes-Delgado, T. Wang, and M. Nakashima, Substructuring techniques for hybrid simulation of complex structural systems, Proc. 9th U.S. Natl. /10th Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Eng., Toronto (2010).

[6] K. Takanashi, K. Udagawa, M. Seki, T. Okada, and H. Tanaka, Nonlinear earthquake response analysis of structures by computer-actuator on-line system, Bull. of Earthquake Resistant Struc. Res. Ctr. No. 8, Inst. of Indus. Science, University of Tokyo, Japan (1975).

[7] G. Magonette, Development and application of large-scale continuous pseudo-dynamic testing techniques. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 359 (2001) 1771-1799.

DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2001.0873

[8] S. A. Mahin and M. E. Williams, Computer controlled seismic performance testing. Dynamic Response of Structures: Experimentation, Observation, Prediction and Control, ASCE (1980).

[9] P. B. Shing and S. A. Mahin, Experimental Error Propagation In Pseudodynamic Testing, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, 175 pages, (1983).

[10] S. -Y. Chang, Explicit pseudodynamic algorithm with unconditional stability, ASCE J. Eng. Mechanics. 128(9) (2002) 935-947.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2002)128:9(935)

[11] S.N. Dermitzakis and S.A. Mahin, Development of Substructuring Techniques for On-Line Computer Controlled Seismic Performance Testing, UBC/EERC-85/04, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, (1985).

[12] T.J.R. Hughes, K.S. Pister and R.L. Taylor, Implicit-explicit finite elements in nonlineartransient analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 17/18 (Part 1) (1979) 159-182.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(79)90086-0

[13] K.M. Mosalam, R.N. White and G. Ayala, Response of infilled frames using pseudodynamic experimentation, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 27(6) (1998) 589-608.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199806)27:6<589::aid-eqe744>3.0.co;2-k

[14] Thewalt C.R. and Mahin S.A. Hybrid solution technique for generalized pseudodynamic testing. EERC-87/09, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, UC-Berkeley, (1987).

[15] H. Hilber, T. Hughes and R. Taylor, Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics, Earth. Eng. & Structural Dynamics. 5(3) (1977) 283-292.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290050306

[16] U. E. Dorka, Hybrid experimental - numerical simulation of vibrating structures. International Conference WAVE2002. Okayama, Japan (2002).

[17] V. Bayer, U.E. Dorka, U. Füllekrugc, and J. Gschwilmd, On real-time pseudo-dynamic sub-structure testing: algorithm, numerical and experimental results, Aerospace Science and Technology. 9(3) (2005) 223-232.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2005.01.009

[18] P.B. Shing, M.T. Vannan and E. Cater, Implicit time integration for pseudodynamic tests, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 20(6) (1991) 551-576.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290200605

[19] P.B. Shing, O.S. Bursi and M.T. Vannan, Pseudodynamic tests of a concentrically braced frame using substructuring techniques, J. Constr. Steel Research. 29(1-3) (1994) 121-148.

DOI: 10.1016/0143-974x(94)90059-0

[20] A. H. Schellenberg, S. A. Mahin and G. L. Fenves, Advanced Implementation of Hybrid Simulation, PEER Technical Report 2009/104, (2009).

[21] S. -Y. Chang, Improved numerical dissipation for explicit methods in pseudodynamic tests, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 26(9) (1997) 917-929.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199709)26:9<917::aid-eqe685>3.0.co;2-9

[22] A. Bonelli and O.S. Bursi, Generalized- α methods for seismic structural testing, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 33(10) (2004) 1067-1102.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.390

[23] J. Chung and G. M. Hulbert, A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: the generalized-alpha method, Journal of Applied Mechanics, ASME. 60(2) (1993) 371-375.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2900803

[24] S. Campbell and B. Stojadinovic, A system for simultaneous pseudodynamic testing of multiple substructures, Proceedings 6th U.S. Nat. Conf. on Earth. Eng., Seattle, WA (1998).

[25] E. Watanabe, K. Sugiura, K. Nagata and Y. Suzuka, Development of parallel pseudo-dynamic test system, Proceedings 10th Japan Earth. Eng. Symp., 2 (1998) 2205–2210 (in Japanese).

[26] E. Watanabe, C.B. Yun, K. Sugiura, D.U. Park, and K. Nagata, On-line interactive testing between KAIST and Kyoto University, Proceedings 14th KKNN Symposium on Civil Engineering, Kyoto, Japan, (2001) 369–374.

[27] K.C. Tsai, C.C. Yeh, Y.C. Yang, K.J. Wang, and P.C. Chen, Seismic hazard mitigation: internet-based hybrid testing framework and examples, International Colloquium on Natural Hazard Mitigation: Methods and Applications, France (2003).

[28] B. Spencer, T. Finholt, I. Foster, and C. Kesselman, Neesgrid: a distributed collaboratory for advanced earthquake engineering experimentation and simulation, Proceedings 13th World Conference on Earthquake Eng., Vancouver, Canada; (2004) 1674.

[29] G. Mosqueda, Continuous Hybrid Simulation with Geographically Distributed Substructures, University of California, Berkeley. PhD. Dissertation: 232 pages, (2003).

[30] A. Schellenberg, H. Kim, S.A. Mahin and G.L. Fenves, Environment independent implementation of a software framework for fast local and geographically distributed hybrid simulations, Proceedings 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China (2008).

[31] M. Nakashima, M. Kato and E. Takaoka, Development of real-time pseudo-dynamic testing, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 21(1) (1992) 79-92.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290210106

[32] T. Horiuchi, M. Inoue, T. Konno and Y. Namita, Real-time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 28(10) (1999).

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199910)28:10<1121::aid-eqe858>3.0.co;2-o

[33] A.P. Darby, A. Blakeborough and M.S. Williams, Real-time substructure test using hydraulic actuator, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE. 125(10) (1999) 1133-1139.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1999)125:10(1133)

[34] A.P. Darby, A. Blakeborough, and M.S. Williams, Improved control algorithm for real-time substructure testing, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 30(3) (2001)431-448.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.18

[35] M. Nakashima and N. Masaoka, Real-time on-line test for MDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 28(4) (1999) 393-420.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199904)28:4<393::aid-eqe823>3.0.co;2-c

[36] O. Mercan and J.M. Ricles, Stability and accuracy analysis of outer loop dynamics in real-time pseudodynamic testing of SDOF systems, Earth. Eng. & Structural Dynamics 36: 11 (2007) 1523-1543.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.701

[37] P.A. Bonnet, M.S. Williams, and A. Blakeborough, Evaluation of numerical time-integration schemes for real time hybrid testing. Earth. Eng. & Str. Dyn. 37: 13 (2008) 1467-1490.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.821

[38] O.S. Bursi, A. Gonzalez-Buelga, L. Vulcan, S.A. Neild and D.J. Wagg, Novel coupling Rosenbrock-based algorithms for real-time dynamic substructure testing. Earth. Eng. & Str. Dyn. 37: 3 (2008) 339-360.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.757

[39] A. Igarashi, H. Iemura, and T. Suwa, Development of substructured shaking table test method. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Auckland, New Zealand (2000).

[40] S. Neild, D. Stoten, D. Drury, and D. Wagg, Control issues relating to real-time substructuring experiments using a shaking table, Earth. Eng. & Str. Dyn. 34: 9 (2005) 1171–1192.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.473

[41] S. Lee, E. Parka, K. Mina and J. Park, Real-time substructuring technique for the shaking table test of upper substructures, Engineering Structures 29: 9 (2007) 2219–2232.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.11.013

[42] X. Ji, K. Kajiwara, T. Nagae, R. Enokida, and M. Nakashima, A substructure shaking table test for reproduction of earthquake responses of high-rise buildings, Earth. Eng. & Str. Dyn. 38: 12 (2009) 1381–1399.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.907

[43] X. Shao, A.M. Reinhorn, and M.V. Sivaselvan, Real-Time Hybrid Simulation using shake tables and dynamic actuators. ASCE J. Str. Eng. 137: 7 (2011) 748–760.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000314

[44] N. Nakata, and M. Stehman, Substructure shake table test method using a controlled mass: formulation and numerical simulation, Earth. Eng. & Str. Dyn., published online Feb. (2012).

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2169

[45] H. Krawinkler, F. Parisi, L. Ibarra, A. Ayoub, and R. Medina. Development of a Testing Protocol for Wood Frame Structures, CUREE Publication, No. W-02, California, (2000).

[46] IEEE Standard 693-2005. Recommended Practice for Seismic Design of Substations. (2006).

[47] N.M. Newmark, A method of computation for structural dynamics, ASCE J. Eng. Mec. 85: EM3 (1959) 67-94.

[48] N.V. Nguyen, and U. Dorka, Adaptive error compensation based on online system identification for real-time substructure testing, Proceedings 3rd International Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering, October 15-16, San Francisco, CA, (2009).

[49] T. Elkhoraibi, and K.M. Mosalam, Towards error-free hybrid simulation using mixed variables. Earth. Eng. & Str. Dyn. 36: 11 (2007) 1497-1522.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.691

[50] S. Takhirov, G. Fenves, E. Fujisaki, and D. Clyde, Ground Motions for Earthquake Simulator Qualification of Electrical Substation Equipment, PEER Report. PEER 2004/08, (2004).