Analysis of Bioretention Cell Design Elements Based on Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST)

Hong Wu Wang; Yun Feng Mao; Yuan Gao; Jin Hong Fan; Shan Fa Zhang; Lu Ming Ma

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.779-780.1369

Paper Titles

Hydraulic Loading on Test of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal from Rural Sewage by Subsurface Constructed Wetlands-Ponds Composite System
p.1347

Elman's Recurrent Neural Network Applied to Forecasting Algal Dynamic Variation in Gonghu Bay
p.1352

Research on Influence of Flow Velocity Regime and Sediment Deposit before Underground Hydroelectric Station,Three Gorges Project
p.1359

Effect on Marine Ecological Environment of COD Emission of Wastewater
p.1365

Analysis of Bioretention Cell Design Elements Based on Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST)
p.1369

The Storm Deposits Sedimentary Formation in Upper Ganchaigou Group of Youshashan Oilfield in Qaidam Basin
p.1376

A Comparison Study of Trace Elements along Two Transects in Tidal Mangrove Marsh at Dongzhaigang, Hainan, China
p.1379

Potassium Permanganate and Chlorine Reactions with Natural Organic Compounds in Algerian Surface Water
p.1383

Measuring Biomass Energy Flows of a Rural Energy Engineering
p.1388

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 779-780Analysis of Bioretention Cell Design Elements...

Analysis of Bioretention Cell Design Elements Based on Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST)

Abstract:

Sensitivity analysis of bioretention cell design elements can provide a theoretical basis for the design and construction of a bioretention cell. This study uses the storm management model (SWMM) and the bioretention infiltration RECARGA to generate runoff and outflow time series for calculation of hydrologic performance metrics. The hydrologic performance metrics include: the overflow ratio, groundwater recharge ratio, ponding time and underdrain flow ratio. The FAST method is chose to analyze sensitivity of design elements for two types of bioretention cell, one without underdrain and the other with underdrain. The results show that the surface area is the most sensitivity to most the hydrologic metrics for both types of bioretention, while the planting soil depth and the gravel depth are the two least sensitive elements. The saturated infiltration rates of planting soil and native soil are another two sensitive elements for bioretention cells without underdrain, but the saturated infiltration rate of planting soil and underdrain size are another two sensitive design elements for bioretention cells with underdrain.Keywords: Global sensitivity analysis; bioretention cell; design elements; FAST

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Materials, Transportation and Environmental Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 779-780)

Pages:

1369-1375

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.779-780.1369

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Hong Wu Wang, Yun Feng Mao, Yuan Gao, Jin Hong Fan, Shan Fa Zhang, Lu Ming Ma

Keywords:

Bioretention Cell, Design Element, FAST, Global Sensitivity Analysis

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

References

[1] Wang Jian-long, Che Wu, Yi Hong-xing. Stormwater Management in Green Buiding on the Base of Low Impact Development [J]. The Fifth International Conference Proceedings on Intelligent, Green and Energy-Efficient Building. 2009, (03). (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Mckay M.D., Beckman R.J., Conover W.J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code[J]. Technometrics, 2009, 2l：239-245.

DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1979.10489755

Google Scholar

[3] Cukier R.I., Schaibly J.H., Shuler K.E. 1975. III. Analysis of the approximations. Journal of Chemical Physics 63 (3), 1140-1149.

DOI: 10.1063/1.431440

Google Scholar

[4] Beven K.J. Prophecy，reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling[J]. Advances in Water Ressources, 1993, 16: 4l-51.

DOI: 10.1016/0309-1708(93)90028-e

Google Scholar

[5] Sun Y.W., Wei X.M., et al. Global analysis of sensitivity of bioretention cell design elements to hydrologic performance[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2011, 4(3): 246-257.

Google Scholar

[6] Michael E, Dietz, John C, Clausen. A field evaluation of rain garden flow and pollutant treatment[J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution(2005) 167: 123-138.

DOI: 10.1007/s11270-005-8266-8

Google Scholar

[7] Huber W.C., Heaney J.P., et al. Storm water management model User' manual (Version III)[M].U.S.: Environmental Protection Agency, (1987).

Google Scholar

[8] Asleson B.C., Nestingen R.S., Gulliver J.S., Hozalski R.M., and Nieber, J. L. 2009. Performance assessment of rain gardens. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 45(4): 1019-1031.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00344.x

Google Scholar

[9] Lu Y., Mohanty S. 2001. Sensitivity analysis of a complex, proposed geologic waste disposal system using the Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test method. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 72(2001): 275-291.

DOI: 10.1016/s0951-8320(01)00020-5

Google Scholar

[10] Chan K., Saltelli A., Tarantola S. 1997. Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output: Variance-based Methods Make the Difference., in Winter Simulation Conference, , pp.261-268.

DOI: 10.1145/268437.268489

Google Scholar

[11] Cukier R.I., Levine H.B., Shuler K.E., 1978. Nonlinear sensitivity analysis of multiparameter model systems: Review. Journal of Computational Physics 26: 1-42.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(78)90097-9

Google Scholar

[12] Steven F., Thornton, David N., Lerner, Steven A., Banwart, 2001. Assessing the natural attenuation of organic contaminants in aquifers using plume-scale electron and carbon balances: model development with analysis of uncertainty and parameter sensitivity[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 53(2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-7722(01)00167-x

Google Scholar