Studies on the Stability of the Foamy Oil in Developing Heavy Oil Reservoirs

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the process of natural energy depletion, foamy oil is characterized of low production Gas Oil Ratio, high oil viscosity, high daily production rate and high primary recovery factor. The stability of the foam turns out to be the prevailing factor that governs the life of the ‘foamy oil’. To enumerate the main factors affecting the stability of the foam, a high-temperature–high-pressure visualized experiment model for foamy oil stability test was developed. A serial of experiments was conducted to evaluate the performance of the foam stability. The effects of oil viscosity, height of the oil column, dissolved gas content and dispersed gas were investigated and recorded. These experiments were conducted using a Hele-Shaw, a high pressure cell. The volume of foamy oil produced, either by a step reduction in pressure or by a gradual (linear) reduction in pressure, and its subsequent decay was observed, visually. The experimental results show that foamy oil stability increases with higher oil viscosity, higher oil column, higher dissolved gas content and higher pressure decline rate. Asphaltene content was not observed to increase the foamy oil stability significantly. The results also show that the foam quality of foamy oils is much lower than aqueous foams.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

111-116

Citation:

Online since:

February 2017

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Loughead, D. and M. Saltuklaroglu. Lloydminster heavy oil production-why so unusual. in 9th Annual Heavy Oil and Oil Sands Technology Symposium, Calgary. (1992).

Google Scholar

[2] Maini, B.B., H.K. Sarma, and A.E. George, Significance of foamy-oil behaviour in primary production of heavy oils. Journal of Canadian petroleum technology, 1993. 32(09).

DOI: 10.2118/93-09-07

Google Scholar

[3] Maini, B.B. and B. Busahmin. Foamy oil flow and its role in heavy oil production. in Porous Media and Its Applications In Science, Engineering, and Industry: 3rd International Conference. 2010. AIP Publishing.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3453794

Google Scholar

[4] Bera, A. and T. Babadagli, Relative Permeability of Foamy Oil for Different Types of Dissolved Gases. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, (2016).

DOI: 10.2118/180913-pa

Google Scholar

[5] Karri, R.R., Evaluating and estimating the complex dynamic phenomena in nonlinear chemical systems. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 2011. 9(1).

DOI: 10.2202/1542-6580.2550

Google Scholar

[6] Sheng, J., et al., Experimental study of foamy oil stability. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 1997. 36(04).

Google Scholar

[7] Busahmin, B., et al., Application of Foamy Mineral Oil Flow under Solution Gas Drive to a Field Crude Oil. International Journal of Contemporary Energy, 2016. 2(1).

Google Scholar

[8] Kumar, R., M. Pooladi-Darvish, and T. Okazawa, Effect of depletion rate on gas mobility and solution gas drive in heavy oil. SPE Journal, 2002. 7(02): pp.213-220.

DOI: 10.2118/78438-pa

Google Scholar

[9] Zhou, X., et al., Foamy oil flow in heavy oil–solvent systems tested by pressure depletion in a sandpack. Fuel, 2016. 171: pp.210-223.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.12.070

Google Scholar

[10] Busahmin, B.S. and B.B. Maini. Effect of solution-gas-oil-ratio on performance of solution gas drive in foamy heavy oil systems. in Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference. 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

DOI: 10.2118/137866-ms

Google Scholar

[11] Karri, R.R. and V. Chimmiri, Nonlinear Model Based Control of Complex Dynamic Chemical Systems. Advanced Chemical Engineering Research, (2013).

Google Scholar

[12] Maini, B. and V. Ma. Relationship between foam stability measured in static tests and flow behavior of foams in porous media. in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 1984. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

DOI: 10.2118/13073-ms

Google Scholar

[13] Andrianov, A., et al., Immiscible foam for enhancing oil recovery: bulk and porous media experiments. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012. 51(5): pp.2214-2226.

DOI: 10.1021/ie201872v

Google Scholar

[14] Urgelli, D., et al. Investigation of foamy oil effect from laboratory experiments. in SPE international thermal operations and heavy oil symposium. (1999).

DOI: 10.2118/54083-ms

Google Scholar

[15] Firoozabadi, A., Mechanisms of solution gas drive in heavy oil reservoirs. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2001. 40(03): pp.15-20.

DOI: 10.2118/01-03-das

Google Scholar

[16] Sun, X., et al., Enhanced heavy oil recovery in thin reservoirs using foamy oil-assisted methane huff-n-puff method. Fuel, 2015. 159: pp.962-973.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.07.056

Google Scholar

[17] Rao, K.R., D. Rao, and C. Venkateswarlu, Soft sensor based nonlinear control of a chaotic reactor. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2009. 42(19): pp.537-543.

DOI: 10.3182/20090921-3-tr-3005.00093

Google Scholar

[18] Tang, G. -Q., C. Temizel, and A.R. Kovscek. The Role of Oil Chemistry on Cold Production of Heavy Oils. in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 2006. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Google Scholar