Venation-Inspired Growth Technique for Stiffener Layout Design of Plate and Shell Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

A novel design method for stiffener layout of plate and shell structures is proposed in this paper. The method is inspired by the morphogenesis mechanism of dicotyledonous venation which is featured by hierarchy and functional adaptivity. It is expected that a optimal stiffener layout can be gradually achieved if the stiffeners extend by obeying a similar growth rule as the venation. Starting from the so called “seeds”, the stiffeners grow and branch off towards the direction that optimizes the structural performance. And the stiffeners with the minimum effectiveness to the structural performance are degenerated simultaneously. During the design process, the relative density of each element is treated as the design variable. The growth and degeneration of the stiffeners are determined by the nodal and elemental sensitivity numbers respectively. The design algorithm is programmed in Python and integrated with Abaqus software which is used as the FEA preprocessor and solver. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, it is applied to design the stiffener layouts of some typical structures with the objective of maximizing the overall stiffness with a volume constraint.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

1-12

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Lam Y C, Santhikumar S. Automated rib location and optimization for plate structures. Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 2003, 25(1), : 35-45.

DOI: 10.1007/s00158-002-0270-7

Google Scholar

[2] Ansola R, Canales J, Tarrago J A, et al. Combined shape and reinforcement layout optimization of shell structures. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2004, 27(4),: 219-227.

DOI: 10.1007/s00158-004-0399-7

Google Scholar

[3] ZHANG Shengdong, YANG Jungang, ZHANG Weihong. Evolutionary structural optimization for stiffener layout problem of plate structures (in Chinese). Modern Manufacturing Engineering. 2009, 4: 5-9.

Google Scholar

[4] Fatemi J, Trompette P. Optimal design of stiffened plate structures. Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA/ASM E/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Denver, CO, USA, AIAA Paper. 2002, 1672.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-1672

Google Scholar

[5] Bojczuk D, Szteleblak W. Optimization of layout and shape of stiffeners in 2D structures. Computers & Structures, 2008, 86(13): 1436-1446.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.05.005

Google Scholar

[6] Mulani S B, Slemp W C H, Kapania R K. EBF3PanelOpt: An optimization framework for curvilinear blade-stiffened panels. Thin-Walled Structures, 2013, 63: 13-26.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2012.09.008

Google Scholar

[7] Ding X, Yamazaki K. Adaptive growth technique of stiffener layout pattern for plate and shell structures to achieve minimum compliance. Engineering Optimization, 2005, 37(3): 259-276.

DOI: 10.1080/0305215512331328231

Google Scholar

[8] Kobayashi M H. On a biologically inspired topology optimization method. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 2010, 15(3): 787-802.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.04.014

Google Scholar

[9] Ma Jianfeng, Chen Wuyi, Zhao Ling, Zhao Dahai. Bionic Design of Aircraf t Reinforced Frame Based on Structure of Dragonfly Wing (in Chinese). Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2009, 30(3): 562-569.

Google Scholar

[10] Xue K, Li Y X. Mechanics in leaf venation morphogenesis and their biomimetic inspiration to construct a 2-Dimensional reinforcement layout model. Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials, and Tissue Engineering, 2011, 10: 81-93.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/jbbte.10.81

Google Scholar

[11] Sachs T. Cell polarity and tissue patterning in plants. Development, 1991, 113(Supplement 1): 83-93.

DOI: 10.1242/dev.113.supplement_1.83

Google Scholar

[12] Couder Y, Pauchard L, Allain C, et al. The leaf venation as formed in a tensorial field. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 2002, 28(2): 135-138.

DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2002-00211-1

Google Scholar

[13] Li Q, Steven G P, Xie Y M. On equivalence between stress criterion and stiffness criterion in evolutionary structural optimization. Structural optimization, 1999, 18(1): 67-73.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01210693

Google Scholar

[14] Durand M. Architecture of optimal transport networks. Physical Review E, 2006, 73(1): 016116.

Google Scholar

[15] Xue K, Li Y X, Wang W Y. Venation-Like Rib Layout Design in Plate under Bending Loads. Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials, and Tissue Engineering, 2012, 13: 31-40.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/jbbte.13.31

Google Scholar