Paper Titles

Computational Micromechanics of Heterogeneous Materials
p.415

Crack Propagation Toughness of Rock for the Range of Low to Very High Crack Speeds
p.423

Damage and Microstructural Changes in Ice in Compression during Interaction with Structures
p.431

Modeling Cracking and Damage of Concrete during Cooling to Very Low Temperatures
p.437

An Investigation of Damage Initiation in Woven Graphite Fiber/Polyimide Composites Subjected to Shear
p.447

Vibration Diagnostics of a Gear Unit
p.457

Numerical Analysis of Cracked Functionally Graded Materials
p.463

Prediction of the Propagation of an Internal Crack under Rolling Contact Loads by a Weight Function Approach
p.473

Mixed-Mode Stress-Corrosion Cracking of High-Strength Steel: the Role of Cyclic Load History
p.485

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 251-252Numerical Analysis of Cracked Functionally Graded...

Numerical Analysis of Cracked Functionally Graded Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Fracture and Damage Mechanics III

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 251-252)

Pages:

463-472

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.251-252.463

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2003

Authors:

C. Zhang, Jan Sladek, Vladimir Sladek

Keywords:

Boundary Integral Equation Method, Functionally Graded Material (FGM), Stress Intensity Factor (SIF)

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

[1] F. Delale and F. Erdogan: ASME J. Appl. Mech., Vol. 50 (1983), p.609.

[2] N. Konda and F. Erdogan: Eng. Fract. Mech., Vol. 47 (1994), p.533. �'a KI, II K I KI KII KII.

0 0. 4 0. 8 1. 2 1. 6 2. 0.

0.

2.

4.

6.

8.

[1] 0.

[1] 2.

[1] 4.

[1] 6.

[1] 8 =45 o : BIEM : Konda & Erdogan Fig. 4: ¯K± I, II-factors versus β�a (φ=45◦) �'a KI, II K I KI.

0 0. 4 0. 8 1. 2 1. 6 2. 0.

0.

2.

4.

6.

8.

[1] 0.

[1] 2.

[1] 4 =90 o : BIEM : Konda & Erdogan KII KII 0 Fig. 5: ¯K± I, II-factors versus β�a (φ=90◦) KI, II K I KI KII KII 0 102030405060708090 -0. 2.

0.

2.

4.

6.

8.

[1] 0.

[1] 2 �'a =0. 5 : BIEM : Konda & Erdogan Fig. 6: ¯K± I, II versus φ (β�a=0. 5, φ in degrees) KI, II K I KI KII KII 0 102030405060708090 -0. 4 -0. 2.

0.

2.

4.

6.

8.

[1] 0.

[1] 2.

[1] 4 �'a =1. 0 : BIEM : Konda & Erdogan Fig. 7: ¯K± I, II versus φ (β�a=1. 0, φ in degrees).

[3] J.W. Eischen: Int. J. Fract., Vol. 34 (1987), p.3.

[4] P. Gu and R.J. Asaro: Int. J. Solids Struct., Vol. 34 (1997), p.1.

[5] P. Gu and R.J. Asaro: Int. J. Solids Struct., Vol. 34 (1997), p.3085.

[6] P. Gu, M. Dao and R.J. Asaro: ASME J. Appl. Mech., Vol. 66 (1999), p.101.

[7] G. Anlas, M.H. Santare and J. Lambros: Int. J. Fract., Vol. 104 (2000), p.131.

[8] P.R. Marur and H.V. Tippur: Int. J. Solids Struct., Vol. 37 (2000), p.5353. [9] Z.Z. Zou, S.X. Wu and C.Y. Li: Key Eng. Mater., Vol. 183-187 (2000), p.511.

[10] J.E. Dolbow and M. Gosz: Int. J. Solids Struct., Vol. 39 (2002), p.2557.

[11] M.H. Santare and J. Lambros: ASME J. Appl. Mech., Vol. 67 (2000), p.819.

[12] J. -H. Kim and G.H. Paulino: Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., Vol. 53 (2002), p. (1903).

[13] J. -H. Kim and G.H. Paulino: ASME J. Appl. Mech., Vol. 69 (2002), p.502.

[14] J. -H. Kim and G.H. Paulino: Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., Vol. 192 (2003), p.1463.

[15] J. Chen, L. Wu and S. Du: Key Eng. Mater., Vol. 183-187 (2000), p.487.

[16] B.N. Rao and S. Rahman: Eng. Fract. Mech., Vol. 70 (2003), p.1.

[17] M.I. Azis and D.L. Clements: Int. J. Solids Struct., Vol. 38 (2001), p.5747.

[18] Ch. Zhang, A. Savaidis, G. Savaidis and H. Zhu: Comput. Mater. Sci., Vol. 26 (2003), p.167.

[19] Ch. Zhang, J. Sladek and V. Sladek: Int. J. Solids Struct., 2003, in press.

[20] M. Amramowitz and I.A. Stegun: Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Dover Publications, New York 1972).

[21] I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik: Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (Acedemic Press, Inc., London 1980).

[22] F. Erdogan: Compos. Eng., Vol. 5 (1995), p.753.