Economical and Ecological Benefits of Process-Integrated Surface Structuring

M. Thome; Gerhard Hirt

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.344.939

Paper Titles

Management of Complexity in Automotive Companies in the West Midlands UK
p.889

Assessment of Best Scheduling Practice in Continuous Casting and Hot Rolling of Stainless Steel Strip by System Dynamics Simulation
p.897

Laser Forming Oriented CAD/CAM for Developable Surfaces
p.905

Modeling Sheet Metal Integrated Production Planning for Laser Cutting and Air Bending
p.913

A More Efficient Method for Clustering Sheet Metal Shapes
p.921

Economical and Ecological Aspects of Single Point Incremental Forming Versus Deep Drawing Technology
p.931

Economical and Ecological Benefits of Process-Integrated Surface Structuring
p.939

Boss Forming, An Environment-Friendly Rotary Forming
p.947

Towards the Mastering of the Free Surface Position in Roll Coating
p.955

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 344Economical and Ecological Benefits of...

Economical and Ecological Benefits of Process-Integrated Surface Structuring

Abstract:

Properties and functional behavior of modern products are strongly influenced by their surface characteristics - like their appearance and haptics as well as their optical, tribological and fluidic performance [1]. In present production processes these functional features are mostly generated by surface treatment processes (e. g. grinding, etching, coating). In contrast to these costintensive and complex off-line sequences rolling provides an opportunity to apply functional structures on sheet metal products using non-pollutive synergy-potentials of the process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 344)

Pages:

939-946

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.344.939

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2007

Authors:

M. Thome, Gerhard Hirt

Keywords:

Rolling , Riblets, Surface Structuring

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

References

[1] L. De Chiffre, H. Kunzmann, G. N. Peggs, D. A. Lucca: Surfaces in Precision Engineering, Microengineering and Nanotechnology. In: Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 52/2/2003, pp.561-577, (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60204-2

Google Scholar

[2] W. Sterzl, M. Franzke.: Simulation des Bandwalzprozesses zur Herstellung profilierter Spezialoberflächen aus hochreinen Aluminium-Werkstoffen. In: 19. Aachener Stahlkolloquium 2004, pp.77-87, (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] D. W. Bechert, M. Bruse, W. Hage, J. G. T. van der Hoeven, G. Hoppe: Experiments on dragreducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry. In: Journal of Fluid Mechanics (1997), Vol. 338, pp.59-87, (1997).

DOI: 10.1017/s0022112096004673

Google Scholar

[4] J. Hesselbach, H. Weule, J. Fleischer, F. Klocke, M. Weck et al.: International state of the art of micro production technology. In: Production Engineering Vol. XI/I, pp.29-36, (2004).

Google Scholar

[5] C. Brecher, R. Schmitt, S. Lange, F. Koerfer, F. Niehaus, R. Widemann: Großflächige Mikrosturkturierung. In: wt Werkstattstechnik, pp.276-280, (2006).

DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2006-5-276

Google Scholar

[6] L. Alting, F. Kimura, H. N. Hansen, G. Bissacco: Micro Engineering. In: Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 52/2/2003, pp.635-657, (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60208-x

Google Scholar

[7] G. Hirt, K. van Putten, M. Thome: Besser simulieren. In: Mikroproduktion 1/2006, pp.38-39, (2006).

Google Scholar